政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/50050
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51759088      線上人數 : 592
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50050


    題名: 為台灣主權奮戰:民主進步黨在憲政改革的角色與影響
    The struggle for a Taiwan sovereignty - the role and impact of the Democratic Progressive Party in constitutional reforms
    作者: 班高仁
    Ben,Goren
    貢獻者: 陳陸輝
    Chen,Lu huei
    班高仁
    Ben,Goren
    關鍵詞: 主權
    民進黨
    台灣
    憲法
    中華民國
    Sovereignty
    Democratic Progressive Party
    Taiwan
    Constitution
    Republic of China
    日期: 2009
    上傳時間: 2010-12-09 16:58:13 (UTC+8)
    摘要: This thesis examines the role and impact of Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party upon the constitutional reforms of 1991 to 2005 with a view to asking to what extent these reforms either strengthened or weakened the Taiwanese sovereignty the party aspired to establish and consolidate within a wholly Taiwanese national polity. The party’s ability to influence the course of reforms are placed in the broader context of ROC constitutional history and foreign influence upon the status of Taiwan. The research focuses on the party’s linking of the ROC constitution and question of Taiwanese sovereignty, and the negotiated choices it made both during the period of democratisation in Taiwan and when it was in power. This thesis will argue that the need to enact significant institutional change and meet electoral goals whilst lacking a clear legislative majority largely constrained the DPP`s ability to achieve substantive rather than symbolic reform. The ROC constitution remains in force and, though amended, it signifies to the world that Taiwan is officially a Chinese nation whose sovereignty belongs to the ROC state. Yet, in practice, Taiwanese also exercise a popular and practical national democratic sovereignty and a clear de facto independence of national self-determination. That the KMT and DPP both used the reform of the apparatus of the ROC state to advance the building of their respective visions of what nation Taiwan would be, has led to the question of Taiwan’s sovereignty ultimately remaining unresolved and her independence insecure. The DPP`s role in the constitutional reform process was a major contributor to this outcome.
    This thesis examines the role and impact of Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party upon the constitutional reforms of 1991 to 2005 with a view to asking to what extent these reforms either strengthened or weakened the Taiwanese sovereignty the party aspired to establish and consolidate within a wholly Taiwanese national polity. The party’s ability to influence the course of reforms are placed in the broader context of ROC constitutional history and foreign influence upon the status of Taiwan. The research focuses on the party’s linking of the ROC constitution and question of Taiwanese sovereignty, and the negotiated choices it made both during the period of democratisation in Taiwan and when it was in power. This thesis will argue that the need to enact significant institutional change and meet electoral goals whilst lacking a clear legislative majority largely constrained the DPP`s ability to achieve substantive rather than symbolic reform. The ROC constitution remains in force and, though amended, it signifies to the world that Taiwan is officially a Chinese nation whose sovereignty belongs to the ROC state. Yet, in practice, Taiwanese also exercise a popular and practical national democratic sovereignty and a clear de facto independence of national self-determination. That the KMT and DPP both used the reform of the apparatus of the ROC state to advance the building of their respective visions of what nation Taiwan would be, has led to the question of Taiwan’s sovereignty ultimately remaining unresolved and her independence insecure. The DPP`s role in the constitutional reform process was a major contributor to this outcome.
    參考文獻: China Post. 2008. Taiwan and China is ‘special relations’: Ma. China Post, 4th September 2008. <http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/china-taiwan%20relations/ 2008/09/04/173082/Taiwan-and.htm>. Accessed: 18th December 2009.
    Chu, Yun-han, and Jih-wen Lin. 2001. "Political Development in 20th-Century Taiwan: State-Building, Regime Transformation and the Construction of National Identity." The China Quarterly (165):102 - 29.
    Chung, Oscar. 2000. Island of Uncertainties. Taiwan Review, 1st May 2000. <http:// taiwanreview.nat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=504&CtNode=1348>. Accessed: 28th November 2009.
    Cole, Michael J. 2010a. Analysis: Ma ‘error’ throws Taiwan back two decades. Taipei Times, 26th February 2010. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/ 2010/02/26/2003466691>. Accessed: 24th March 2010.
    Cole, Michael J. 2010b. China Times Group slams criticism of CCP official’s visit. Taipei Times, 29th April 2010. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/ 2010/04/29/2003471757>. Accessed: 3rd May 2010.
    Copper, John F. 2003. Taiwan, Nation-State or Province? 4th ed. Colorado: Westview Press.
    Corcuff, Stephane, ed. 2002. Memories of The Future: National Identity Issues and the Search for a New Taiwan. New York: East Gate.
    Cornford, James. 1991. "On Writing a Constitution." Parliamentary Affairs 44:558 - 71.
    Corwin, Edward S. 1925. "Constitution V. Constitutional Theory." The American Political Science Review 19 (2):290 - 304.
    Davidson, James. W. 1903. The Island of Formosa: Past and Present. Taipei: SMC Publishing Inc.
    Davis, Michael C. 1998. "The Price of Rights: Constitutionalism and East Asian Economic Development." Human Rights Quarterly 20 (2):303-37.
    Diamond, Larry, Marc F. Plattner, Yun-han Chu, and Hung-mao Tien, eds.1997. Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.
    138
    DPP. 2008. “Mr. Ma:” A Threat to Taiwan’s Sovereignty?. Democracy & Progress, September 2008. <http://www.dpp.org.tw/index_en/upload/news_letter/ 20081008153009_data_1.pdf>. Accessed: 17th May 2010.
    DPP. 2008. The return of Chinese Taipei, a long term threat to Taiwan’s sovereignty. Democracy & Progress, June 2008. <http://www.dpp.org.tw/index_en/upload/ news_letter/20080701175624_data_1.pdf>. Accessed: 17th May 2010.
    DPP. 2008. DPP 2009 Action Plan. Democracy & Progress, February 2009. <http:// www.dpp.org.tw/index_en/upload/news_letter/20090323151218_data_1.pdf>. Accessed: 17th May 2010.
    Duara, Prasenjit. 1995. rescuing History from the Nation: Questioning Narratives of Modern China. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
    DPP Web site. 2003. Statement by DPP Chairman Chen Shui-bian on September 30th. DPP Speeches Section, 30th September 2003. <http://www.dpp.org.tw/index_en/>. Accessed: 17th August 2009.
    Eyton, Lawrence. 2003. The real significance of Taiwan’s referendum law. Asia Times Online, 2nd December 2003. <http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/ EL02Ad01.html>. Accessed: 18th November 2009.
    Eyton, Lawrence. 2008. National identity formation in settler societies: a comparative study with specific reference to Taiwan, International Masters of Taiwan Studies, College of Social Sciences, National Cheng-chi University, Taipei.
    Fa, Jyhn-pin. 1991. "Constitutional Developments in Taiwan: The Role of the Council of Grand Justices." The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 40 (1):198 - 209.
    Fallon, Richard H. 2005. Legitimacy and the Constitution. Harvard Law Review. 118, (6): 1787-1853.
    Fan, Cheng-hsiang. 2010. Show set to spark debate on sovereignty. Taipei Times, 25th January 2010. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/ 2010/01/25/2003464352>. Accessed: 28th February 2010.
    Fowler, Michael, and Julie Marie Bunck. 1996. Law, power, and the sovereign state : the evolution and application of the concept of sovereignty. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    139
    Gallup, Inc. 2006. Multi-nation Survey: China and Taiwan Separate, Sovereign Nations. 19th January 2006. <http://www.gallup.com/poll/20704/multination-survey- china-taiwan-separate-sovereign-nations.aspx>. Accessed: 15th November 2009.
    Gao, Pat. 2007. The revitalized vote. Taiwan Review. 4th January 2007. <http:// taiwanreview.nat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=24034&CtNode=1348>. Accessed: 18th February 2010.
    Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
    Ginsburg, Tom. 2002. "Confucian Constitutionalism? The Emergence of Constitutional Review in Korea and Taiwan." Law & Social Inquiry 27 (4):763-99.
    Gmelch, George, ed. 2006. Baseball Without Borders: The International Pastime. Nebraska: Board of Regents, University of Nebraska.
    Goren, Ben. 2009. Health and Sustainability of Democracy on Taiwan: Is there cause for concern?. Unpublished. <http://public.me.com/bengoren> Presentation paper for Arizona State University Second Annual Asian Studies Graduate Student Conference. “Sustainability and Asia”. Saturday October the 17th, 2009.
    Government Information Office, Republic of China. 2002. The Republic of China Yearboook -- Taiwan 2002: The History of the ROC before 1949. <http:// www.gio.gov.tw/taiwan-website/5-gp/yearbook/2002/appendix2.htm>. Accessed: 13th July 2009.
    Government Information Office, Republic of China. 2004. President Chen’s Address to the National Day Rally. GIO. 10th October 2004. <http://www.gio.gov.tw/taiwan- website/4-oa/20041010/2004101002.html>. Accessed: 19th April 2010.
    Griffin, Stephen M. 1991. "Bringing the State into Constitutional Theory: Public Authority and the Constitution." Law & Social Inquiry 16 (4):659 - 710.
    Haass, Richard. 2003. The Changing Nature of Sovereignty. Information Warfare Web site, 15th January 2003. <http://www.iwar.org.uk/news-archive/2003/01-15.htm>. Accessed: on June 23rd 2009.
    Hechter, Michael. 2002. Containing Nationalism. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
    140
    Held, David, and Anthony G. Mcgrew. 2003. The Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate: Wiley-Blackwell.
    Herschensohn, Bruce. 2006. Taiwan: The Threatened Democracy. Los Angeles: World Ahead Publishing.
    Hobsbawm, Eric J. 1990. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Hsiau, A-Chin. 2000. Contemporary Taiwanese Cultural Nationalism. London & New York: Routledge.
    Hsueh, Hua-yuan, Pao-tsun Tai, and Mei-li Chow. 2005. Is Taiwan Chinese?: A History of Taiwanese Nationality. Tamsui: Taiwan Advocates.
    Hsueh, Hua-yuen. 2001. Constitution Day and Constitutional Government. Taiwan History website. <http://www.twhistory.org.tw/20011224.htm>. Accessed: 20th November 2009.
    Huang, Anita. 1997. Incomplete Reforms. Taiwan Review, 1st October 1997. <http:// taiwanreview.nat.gov.tw/fp.asp?xItem=411&CtNode=119>. Accessed: 16th November 2009.
    Hung, Chen-ling and Chad Liu. 2009. Cross-media mergers hurt sovereignty, trick public. Taipei Times, 12th May 2009. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/ archives/2009/05/12/2003443408>. Accessed: 23rd November 2009.
    Hwang, Jim. 2001. Minority Government, Majority Rule. Taiwan Review, 1st August 2001. <http://taiwanreview.nat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xitem=644&ctnode=1372&mp=1>. Accessed: 16th November 2009.
    Hwang, Jim and Francis Li. 1997. Politics in Transition. Taiwan Review, 1st October 1997. <http://taiwanreview.nat.gov.tw/fp.asp?xItem=414&CtNode=119>. Accessed: 16th November 2009.
    Jackson, John H. 2003. "Sovereignty Modern: A New Approach to an Outdated Concept." American Journal of International Law 97:782 - 802.
    Kan, Shirley A. 2007. "China/Taiwan: Evolution of the “One China” Policy — Key Statements from Washington, Beijing, and Taipei." Congressional Research Service. Kao, Mily Ming-Tzu. 2004. "The Referendum Phenomenon in Taiwan: Solidification of Taiwan Consciousness?" Asian Survey 44 (4):591-613.
    141
    Kerr George H. 1965. Formosa Betrayed. Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
    Ko, Shu-ling and Flora Wang. 2005. Chen vows to persist on UN bid. Taipei Times, 25th July 2005. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/ 2007/07/25/2003371140>. Accessed: 9th July 2009.
    Ko, Shu-ling. 2008. Presidential website removes ‘Taiwan’ from its Website. Taipei Times, 23rd May 2008. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/ 2008/10/08/2003425320>. Accessed: 7th July 2009.
    Ko, Shu-ling. 2008. Ma refers to China as ROC territory in magazine interview. Taipei Times, 8th October 2008. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/ 2008/10/08/2003425320>. Accessed: 7th July 2009.
    Ko, Shu-ling. 2009. Taiwan needs a new constitution: academic. Taipei Times, 28th June 2009. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/ 2009/06/28/2003447290>. Accessed: on November 18th 2009.
    Ko, Shu-ling. 2009. Treaty confirmed sovereignty: Ma. Taipei Times, 29th April 2009. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2009/04/29/2003442293>. Accessed: 8th July 2009.
    Ko, Shu-ling and Rich Chang. 2009. Ma defends his administration. Taipei Times, 20th May 2009. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/ 2009/05/20/2003444068>. Accessed: 8th July 2009.
    Ko, Shu-ling. 2010. Talks to reveal Wen’s nature: Ma. Taipei Times, 24th March 2010. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2010/03/24/2003468828>. Accessed: 10th May 2010.
    Ko, Shu-ling. 2010. Ma lauds use of Chinese script. Taipei Times, 9th June 2010. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2010/06/09/2003475027>. Accessed: 10th June 2010.
    Krasner, Stephen D. 1984. "Review: Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamic." Comparative Politics 16 (2):223 - 46.
    Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty : organized hypocrisy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    Lansing, Robert. 1914. "A Definition of Sovereignty." The American Political Science Review 8 (1):61 - 75.
    142
    Liao, Da-chi and Hui-chih Chang. 2010. The Choice of Constitutional Amendments in a Young Democracy - From Indirect to Direct Election of the President of Taiwan. Journal of current chinese affairs. 39. no. 1: 111-131
    Liberty Times. 2010. Editorial: Ma is whittling sovereignty away. Taipei Times, 7th May 2010. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/ 2010/05/07/2003472352>. Accessed: 10th May 2010.
    Liberty Times. 2010. Editorial: The illogical fear of referendums. Taipei Times, 30th May 2010. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/ 2010/05/30/2003474236>. Accessed: 10th June 2010.
    Limbach, Jutta. 2001. "The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution." The Modern Law Review 64 (1):1 - 10.
    Lin, Jih-wen. 2002. "Transition through Transaction: Taiwan`s Constitutional Reforms in the Lee Teng-hui Era." American Asian Review XX (2).
    Lin, Jih-wen. 2003. "Institutionalized Uncertainty and Governance Crisis in Post- Hegemonic Taiwan." Journal of East Asian Studies 3 (3):433 - 60.
    Liu, Lawrence Shao-liang. 1991. "Judicial Review and Emerging Constitutionalism: The Uneasy Case for the Republic of China on Taiwan." The American Journal of Comparative Law 39 (3):509 - 58.
    Loa, Iok-sin. 2008. Ma repeats ‘region-to-region’ comment. Taipei Times, 22nd December 2008. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/ 2008/12/22/2003431770>. Accessed: 7th July 2009.
    Loa, Iok-sin. 2009. Ma Ying-jeou’s First year: feature: Aborigines wait for action on Ma’s promises. Taipei Times, 21st May 2009. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/ taiwan/archives/2009/05/21/2003444128>. Accessed: 10th July 2009.
    Lowther, William. 2009. Group monitoring Taiwan press. Taipei Times, 6th May 2009. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2009/05/06/2003442863>. Accessed: 23rd November 2009.
    Lutz, Donald S. 2000. "Thinking about Constitutionalism at the Start of the Twenty- First Century." Publius 30 (4, Essays in Memory of Daniel J. Elazar):115 - 35.
    Lynch, Daniel C. 2004. "Taiwan`s Self-Conscious Nation-Building Project." Asian Survey 44 (4):513 - 33.
    143
    Maddox, Graham. 1982. "A Note on the Meaning of "Constitution`." The American Political Science Review 76 (4):805 - 9.
    Manthorpe, Jonathan. 2005. Forbidden Nation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Maritain, Jacques. 1950. "The Concept of Sovereignty." The American Political Science Review 44 (2):343 - 57.
    Marneffe, Peter De. 2004. "Popular Sovereignty, Original Meaning, and Common Law Constitutionalism." Law and Philosophy 23 (3):223 - 60.
    McIIwain, C. H. 1941. "Constitutional History and the Present Crisis of Constitutionalism." The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science / Revue canadienne d`Economique et de Science politique 7 (2):147 - 53.
    Mendel, Douglas. 1970. The Politics of Formosan Nationalism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    Ministry of Justice, Republic of China. 2009. Act Governing Relations Between The People Of The Taiwan Area And The Mainland Area. Laws and Regulations Database of the Republic of China. 1st July 2009. <http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/ LawAll.aspx?PCode=Q0010001>. Accessed: 13th April 2010.
    Mo, Yan-chih. 2010. Cross-strait talks not transparent:panel. Taipei Times. 16th May 2010. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2010/05/16/2003473106>. Accessed: 17th May 2010
    Morris, Andrew D. 2006. Taiwan: Baseball, Colonialism and Nationalism. Selected Works of Andrew D. Morris. <http://works.bepress.com/admorris/13/>. Accessed: 23rd November 2009.
    Muyard, Frank. 2005. "From a Two-Chinas situation to a Taiwanese nation in the making. Democracy, nationalism and the US factor in the transformation of Taiwan’s “national” identity." In 2nd Conference of the European Association of Taiwan Studies. Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum, Germany.
    Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1994. "The Puzzle and Demands of Modern Constitutionalism." Ethics 104 (3):500 - 15.
    Noble, Gregory W. 1999. "Opportunity Lost: Partisan Incentives and the 1997 Constitutional Revisions in Taiwan." The China Journal 41 (Jan 1999):89-114. Office of the President, Republic of China (Taiwan). 2008. President Ma’s Inaugural Address. Office of the President, Republic of China (Taiwan) Web site. 20th May 2008. <http://www.president.gov.tw/en/prog/news_release/document_content.php?
    144
    id=1105499687&pre_id=1105499687&g_category_number=145&category_number_ 2=145>. Accessed: 19th June 2009.
    Osiander, Andreas. 2001. "Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth." International Organisation 55 (2):251 - 87.
    People’s Daily. [no date]. The One-China Principle and the Taiwan Issue. People’s Daily Newspaper Online. <http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/features/taiwanpaper/ taiwan.html>. Accessed: 19th March 2010.
    Phillips, Steven E. 2003. Between Assimilation and Independence: The Taiwanese Encounter Nationalist China 1945-1950. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
    Philpott, Daniel. 2001. "Review: Usurping the Sovereignty of Sovereignty?" World Politics 53 (2):297 - 324.
    Philpott, Daniel. 2009. Sovereignty. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. <http:// plato.stanford.edu/entries/sovereignty/>. Accessed: 11th October 2009.
    Quigley, Harold Scott. 1924. "The Constitution of China." The American Political Science Review 18 (2):346-50.
    Reid, David Charles. 2010. Indigenous Rights in Taiwan and the Smangus Case. Final Dissertation, International Program of Taiwan Studies (Asia-Pacific Studies), National Chengchi University, Taipei.
    Reinsch, Paul. 1911. Intellectual and Political Currents in the Far East. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Rigger, Shelley. 1999. "The Evolution of the DPP and KMT`s Policies of the National Identity Issue." In Conference in War and Peace in the Taiwan Strait. Duke University.
    Rigger, Shelley. 2001. From Opposition to Power - Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner
    Riker, William.1980. Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions. American Political Science Review. 74: 432-446 reprinted in Ordesbook, Peter and Kenneth Shepsle, eds. 1982. Political Equilibrium. Boston,Mass: Kluwer-Nijhoff: 3-24.
    Roy, Denny. 2003. Taiwan: a political history. New York: Cornell University Press. 145
    Rubinstein, Murray A., ed. 2007. Taiwan: A New History. Armonk and London: East Gate.
    Sartori, Giovanni. 1962. "Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion." The American Political Science Review 56 (4):853 - 64.
    Schofield, Norman. 2002. "Evolution of the Constitution." British Journal of Political Science 32 (1):1 - 20.
    Schram, Glenn N. 1979. "A Critique of Contemporary Constitutionalism." Comparative Politics 11 (4):483 - 7.
    Schubert, Gunter. 1999. "A New Rising Nation? The Discourse on National Identity in Contemporary Taiwan." China Perspectives 23:54 - 64.
    - - -. 2004. "Taiwan`s Political Parties and National Identity: The Rise of an Overarching Consensus." Asian Survey 44 (4):534 - 54.
    Schuman, David. 1992. "A Failed Critique of State Constitutionalism." Michigan Law Review 91 (2):274 - 80.
    Shih, Chih-yu. 2007. "Constituting Taiwanese Statehood: the world timing of un- Chinese consciousness." Journal of Contemporary China 16 (53):699 - 716.
    Shan, Shelley. 2009a. Analysts wary of China Times Group’s agenda. Taipei Times, 9th May 2009. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/ 2009/05/09/2003443161>. Accessed: 23rd November 2009.
    Shan, Shelley. 2009b. NCC head faces more criticism in the legislature. Taipei Times, 5th June 2009. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/ 2009/06/05/2003445387>. Accessed: 23rd November 2009.
    Shan, Shelley. 2009c. Media Scholars slam Want Want’s series of lawsuits. Taipei Times, 17th June 2009. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/ 2009/06/17/2003446396>. Accessed: 23rd November 2009.
    Sicherman, Harvey. 2003. "A Conversation with Chen Shui-bian." Orbis. Spring 47 (2): Foreign Policy Institute: 329 - 35.
    Simon, Scott. 2007. “Paths to Autonomy: Aboriginally and the Nation in Taiwan” In The Margins of Becoming: Identity and Culture in Taiwan, eds. Cartsen Storm and Carsten and Mark Harrison. Weisbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. Pp. 221-240.
    146
    Su, Yung-yao. 2007. UN RERENDUM: ‘Taiwan is the ROC,’ Ma statement says. Taipei Times, 17th September 2007. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/ archives/2007/09/17/2003379144>. Accessed: 9th July 2009.
    Taiwan Documents Project. Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States. <http://www.taiwandocuments.org/montevideo01.htm>. Accessed: 7th July 2009.
    Taiwan Documents Project. Joint Communiqué on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations. <http://www.taiwandocuments.org/communique02.htm>. Accessed: 7th July 2009.
    Taiwan News. 2010. Editorial: Ma’s racialism risks Taiwan’s free choice. Taiwan News, 21st May 2010. <http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_content.php? id=1262601〈=eng_news&cate_img=46.jpg&cate_rss=news_Editorial>. Accessed: 22nd May 2010.
    Tien, Hung-mao. ed. 1996. Taiwan’s Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition: Riding the Third Wave. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
    Tierney, Stephen. 2007. "Giving with one hand: Scottish devolution within a unitary state." International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (4):730 - 53.
    Time Magazine. 1923. China: An Inauguration. <http://www.time.com/time/ magazine/article/0,9171,750947,00.html>. Accessed: 13th July 2009.
    Time Magazine. 2004. Strait Talk (Chen Shui-bian interview by Michael Elliot). <http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,750947,00.html>. Accessed: 13th July 2009.
    Tkacik, John. 2008. "WebMemo No. 1865: Taiwan`s Elections: Sea Change in the Strait." Washington: Heritage Foundation.
    Tkacik, John. 2007. John Tkacik on Taiwan: Taiwan’s status remains ‘unsettled’. Taipei Times, 30th September 2007. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/ archives/2007/09/30/2003381074>. Accessed: 10th May 2010.
    Tkacik, John. 2008. Taiwan’s elections: Sea Change in the Strait. heritage Foundation Web site, 24th March 2008. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/ 2007/09/30/2003381074>. Accessed: 10th May 2010.
    147
    Tsai, June. 2008. The long and winding road to direct presidential election. Taiwan Today, 14th March 2008. <http://www.taiwantoday.tw/ct.asp? xItem=30624&CtNode=430>. Accessed: 18th May 2009.
    Turton, Michael. 2009. The Culture of Taiwan: President Ma Ying-jeou’s symbolic gestures matter. Wall Street Journal, 9th April 2009. <http://online.wsj.com/article/ SB123921826967102121.html>. Accessed: 10th May 2009.
    UN Web Services Section. History of the Charter of the United Nations. United Nations Website. <http://www.un.org/en/aboutun/charter/history/declaration.shtml>. Accessed: 23rd November 2009.
    Wachman, Alan M. 2007. Why Taiwan?: Geostrategic Rationales for China`s Territorial Integrity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Wang, James W.Y. 2006. "Building the National: Historical Perspective of Taiwanese Nationalism." In 20th International Political Science Association World Congress. Fukuoka: University of Northern Iowa.
    Wang, Tu-fa. 1999. Post-Assembly damage control. Taipei Times, 12th September 1999. <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/archives/1999/09/12/0000002292>. Accessed: 18th July 2009.
    Wikipedia. 2010. Republic of China National Assembly election, 2005. Wikipedia. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Republic_of_China_National_Assembly_election,_2005>. Accessed: 13th February 2010.
    Wong, Joseph. 2003. "Deepening Democracy in Taiwan." Pacific Affairs 76 (2):235 - 56.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
    96924019
    98
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096924019
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS)] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    401901.pdf803KbAdobe PDF21756檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋