Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49934
|
Title: | 清潔發展機制之國際政治經濟學分析:以歐盟與中國為例 An international political economy analysis of the clean development mechanism: A comparative study of the EU and China |
Authors: | 陳俊仰 Chen, Chun Yang |
Contributors: | 李河清 Lee, Ho Ching 陳俊仰 Chen, Chun Yang |
Keywords: | 清潔發展機制 國際政治經濟學 比較政治 京都議定書 中國 歐盟 Clean Development Mechanism international political economy comparative politics Kyoto Protocol China EU |
Date: | 2009 |
Issue Date: | 2010-12-09 14:04:56 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 清潔發展機制作為京都議定書中的一種彈性機制,普遍被認為將為溫室氣體排放減量所引起的「環境保護─經濟發展」與「北─南」衝突帶來雙贏的結果。支持者認為,其為附件一締約方提供達成溫室氣體減排經濟成本較低的方法,也同時為非附件一締約方引進資金與技術。然而,本研究運用國際政治經濟學的分析,提出因為各自要素禀賦的不同,清潔發展機制實行後的利弊損益將不會公平的分配於清潔發展機制項目的投資方與東道方間,因而導致某些負面的效果:其將阻礙投資方境內減排措施的推動,與導致東道方在技術上的依賴。而透過對投資方與東道方內部排放權提供者與技術研發者間互動的分析,再輔以中國與EU-15的實證資料,可以證實本研究的假設並較為清楚地說明其背後之原因。最後,本研究將討論中國政府與EU-15各自如何以政治力介入市場機制的運作,以試圖處理這樣市場機制運作所導致的弊病。 Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) as a Kyoto flexible mechanism was believed to provide a win-win solution to the conflicts, which result from cutting down greenhouse gas emissions, between wheather ecology & economy or North & South. The proponents believe the implementation of CDM is cost-efficient for the Annex I Parties to achieve their Kyoto commitments and can also introduce capital & technology into the non-Annex I Parties. However, by international political economic analysis, the difference in factors endowments between CDM invest parties and host parties will result in unequal distribution of gains & pays between them. This causes some negative effects: CDM will deter the implementation of domestic emissions reduction in the invest parties, and it will also make technological dependence in the host parties. Through analyzing the interactions between emission allowance providers & technology innovators in the invest & host parties and with empirical data from China & EU-15, the assumptions of this study is proved and the causation is clarified. At last, the governmental interventions, which are trying to modify the negative effects result from the operation of market mechanism, by China and EU-15 are brought into discuss perspectively. |
Reference: | 書籍 中國21世紀議程管理中心&清華大學,(2005)。清潔發展機制。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。 中國21世紀議程管理中心&清華大學,(2008)。中國清潔發展機制項目開發與實踐。北京:科學出版社 白永秀主編,(2008)。中國經濟改革30年/資源環境卷。重慶:重慶大學出版社。 佟新華,(2009)。基於清潔發展機制的東北亞環境合作研究。吉林長春:長春出版社。 科學技術部、國家發展改革委、外交部、教育部、財政部、水利部、農業部、國家環保總局、國家林業局、國家海洋局、中國氣象局、中國科學院、國家自然科學基金委、中國科學技術協會,(2007)。中國應對氣候變化科技專項行動。北京:作者共同發佈。 蕭全政,(1994)。政治與經濟的整合。臺北:桂冠。 國家發展改革委員會,(2007)。中國應對氣候變化國家方案。北京:國家發展改革委員會。 Baumert, K. A., Kete, N., & Figueres, C. (2000). Designing the Clean Development Mechanism to Meet the Needs of a Broad Range of Interests. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Boyce, J. K. (2002). The political economy of the environment. Glos: Edward Elgar. Braga, A. S., & Miranda, L. C. (2002). Comércio & meio ambiente—Uma agenda positiva para o desenvolvimento sustentável. Brasilia: Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. and Reisinger, A. (Eds.). (2008). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Drori, G., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O. & Schofer, E. (2003). Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press. EEA. (2002). Greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe: Are the EU and the candidate countries on track to achieve the Kyoto Protocol targets? Copenhagen: EEA. EEA. (2004a). Greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe 2003: Tracking progress by the EU and acceding and candidate countries towards achievingtheir Kyoto Protocol targets. Copenhagen: EEA. EEA. (2004b). Greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe 2004: Progress by the EU and its Member States towards achievingtheir Kyoto Protocol targets. Copenhagen: EEA. EEA. (2005). Greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe 2005. Copenhagen: EEA. EEA. (2006). Greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe 2006. Copenhagen: EEA. EEA. (2007). Greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe 2007: Tracking progress towards Kyoto targets. Copenhagen: EEA. EEA. (2008). Greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe 2008: Tracking progress towards Kyoto targets. Copenhagen: EEA. EEA. (2009). Greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe 2009: Tracking progress towards Kyoto targets. Copenhagen: EEA. Elliott, L. (2004). The Global Politics of the Environment. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. European Communities. (2007). EU action against climate change: Working with developing countries to tackle climate change. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Gilpin, R., & Gilpin, J. M. (2001). Global political economy: understanding the international economic order. Princeton (N.J.): Princeton University Press. Haveman, R., & Knopf, K. A. (1970). The Market System. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Heckscher, E., Ohlin, G., Heckscher, G., & Gerschenkron, A. (1963). An economic history of Sweden. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University. IGES. (2005). Sustainable Asia 2005 and Beyond: In the pursuit of innovative policies. Tokyo: Urban Connections Jahn, M., Michalowa, A., Raubenheimer, S. & Liptow, H. (2004). Measuring the Potential of Unilateral CDM: A Pilot Study. Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA): Hamburg. Judd, C. M., Smith, E. R., & Kidder, L. H. (1991). Research Methods in Social Relations. Texas: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers. Kemp, R. (1997). Environmental Policy and Technical Change. Glos: Edward Elgar. Morgenthau, H. J. (1946). Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Morgenthau, H. J. (1954). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Mosley, L. (2003). Global Capital and National Governments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ragin, C, (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press. Chap. 3. Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London : John Murray. Rogowski, R. (1989). Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Rothschild, K. W. (Ed.). (1971). Power in Economics. England: Penguin Books. Tietenberg, T. H. (1985). Emissions Trading: an Exercise in Reforming Pollution Policy. Washington, D.C.: Johns Hopkins University Press. WCED. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wiarda, H. (2002). New Directions in Comparative Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Working Group on Environmental Technology Transfer. (1991). Technology cooperation—New approaches. Rotterdam: II World Industry Conference on Environmental Management. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2000). Clean Development Mechanism. Geneva, Switzerland: World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 期刊文章 刁海燕,(2006)。全球減排市場交易時代到來。國際化工資訊,2006(11),1-3。 宣能嘯,(2004)。“新”經濟-我國能源效率問題分析。煤炭經濟研究,2004(9),4-7。 劉蘭翠、吳剛,(2007)。我國CDM項目的現狀與思考。能源與環境,2(3),34-40。 李河清,(2001)。環境外交與氣候議題談判-以京都議定書為例。國家政策論壇,1(9),14-27。 李河清,(2003)。永續發展的國際關係面向:全球環境治理。全球變遷通訊雜誌,38,21-25。 李河清,(2004)。知識社群與全球氣候談判。問題與研究,43(6),73-102。 Blok, K. & Phylipsen, D. (1998). Common and coordinated policies and measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 10(3/4), 393-402. Duan, M. (2008). The CDM Market in China: Developments and Challenges. In Kim Carnahan ed., Greenhouse Gas Market 2008: Piecing Together a Comprehensive International Agreement for Truly Global Carbon Market. Geneva, Switzerland: IETA. Fearon, J. D. (1998). Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organization, 52(2), 269-305. Glass, A. J. & Saggi, K. (1998). International technology transfer and the technology gap. Journal of Development Economics. 55, 369–398. Grossman, G. M. & Helpman, E. (1991). Quality Ladders and Product Cycles. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 557-586. Grossman, G. M. & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic Growth and the Environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377. Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1-35. Haggard, S. & Simmons, B. (1987). Theories of International Regimes. International Organization, 41, 491-517. Hardin, G., (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science.162(3859):1243-48 Jotzo, F., & Michaelowa A. (2002). Estimating the CDM market under the Marrakech Accords. Climate Policy, 2(2), 179-196. Keller, W., Pauly, L. (1997). Globalization at Bay. Current History, Nov. 1997, 370-376. Keohane, R. O. (1982). The demand for international regimes. International Organization, 36(2), 141-171. Krugman, P. (1979). A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income. Journal of Political Economy, 87(2), 253-266. De Lemos, H. M. (2006). Environmental Technologies and International Trade. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 4(1), 56-72. Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World Society and the Nation State. American Journal of Sociology. 103(1), 144-181. Parson, E. A., & Fisher-Vanden, K. (1999). Joint implementation of greenhouse gas abatement under the Kyoto Protocol’s ‘Clean Development Mechanism’: its scope and limits. Policy Sciences, 32, 207–224. Qi, Y., Ma, L., & Zhang. L. (2007). Climate Change Governance in China: A Case Study. China Population, Resources and Environment, 17(2), 8-12. Rix, R. & Paul, L. (2008). Broader and Deeper: Proposed Reforms to the Third Phase of the EU ETS. In Kim Carnahan ed., Greenhouse Gas Market 2008: Piecing Together a Comprehensive International Agreement for Truly Global Carbon Market. Geneva, Switzerland: IETA. Rowlands, I. H. (2001). The Kyoto Protocol’s ‘Clean Development Mechanism’: a sustainability assessment. Third World Quarterly, 22(5), 795–811. Seres, S. (2008). An Analysis of Technology Transfer in CDM Projects. In Kim Carnahan ed., Greenhouse Gas Market 2008: Piecing Together a Comprehensive International Agreement for Truly Global Carbon Market. Geneva, Switzerland: IETA. Schofer, E. (2004). Cross-national Differences in the Expansion of Science, 1970–1990. Social Forces, 83(1), 215-248. Shenhav, Y., & Kamens, D. (1991). The ‘Costs’ of Institutional Isomorphism in Non-Western Countries. Social Studies of Science 21, 427-545. Stolper, W. F., & Samuelson, P. A. (1941). Protection and Real Wages. Review of Economic Studies, 9, 58-73. Vernon, R. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quaterly Joural of Economics, 80, 190-207. Vig, N. J. (2005). Introduction: Governing the International Envirionment. In Axelrod Regina S., Downie, David L., & Vig, Norman J. eds., The Global Environment: Institutions, Law, and Policy. Washington, D.C.: CQPress. Weiss, L. (2004). Guiding Globalization in East Asia: new roles for old developmental states. In Linda Weiss ed., States in the Global Economy. New York : Cambridge University Press. Zheng, S. (2004). Mitigating Climate Change through the CDM—The Case of China. International Review for Environmental Strategies, 5(1), 289-300. Zhuang, G. (2006). Role of China in Global Carbon Market. China & World Economy, 14(5), 93-104. 網路資料 中國清潔發展機制網,http://cdm.ccchina.gov.cn/web/index.asp 國家發展改革委員會,(2005)。清潔發展機制項目運行管理辦法 。Retrieved May 10, 2008, from http://cdm.ccchina.gov.cn/web/NewsInfo.asp?NewsId=2179 EU ETS. (2005). Questions & Answers on Emissions Trading and National Allocation Plans. Retrieved May 28, 2008, from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/05/84&format=HTML&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en Eurostat website. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/ Fenhann, J. (2009). UNEP Risoe CDM/JI Pipeline Analysis and Database. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from http://cdmpipeline.org/ Frieden, J., & Martin, L. L. (2001). International Political Economy: The State of the sub-discipline. Retrived June 30, 2008, from http://weber.ucsd.edu/~jlbroz/Courses/PS245/syllabus/frieden_martin_IPE.pdf IETA. (2007). State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2007. Retrived May 9, 2007, from http://www.ieta.org/ieta/www/pages/download.php?docID=2281 IGES. (2008). CDM in Charts. Retrieved May 9, 2008, from http://www.iges.or.jp/en/index.html IGES. (2009). CDM Country Fact Sheet: China. Retrieved January 04, 2010, from http://www.iges.or.jp/en/cdm/report_country.html IMF website. http://www.imf.org/external/index.htm Klepper, G. & Peterson, S. (2005). Emissions Trading, CDM, JI, and More - The Climate Strategy of the EU. Retrieved May 14, 2008, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=703881 Seres, S. (2007). Analysis of Technology Transfer in CDM Projects, Retrieved May 10, 2008, from http://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Reports/TTreport/report1207.pdf Stern, N. (2006). Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Chage, Retrieved December 13, 2009, from http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/sternreview_index.htm UNFCCC. (1999). UNFCCC guidelines on reporting and review. Retrieved January 1, 2010, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop5/07.pdf UNFCCC. (2007). GHG without LULUCF. Retrieved May 9, 2008, from http://unfccc.int/ghg_data/ghg_data_unfccc/time_series_annex_i/items/3814.php UNFCCC. (2009a). Expected average annual CERs by host party. Retrieved December 28, 2009, from http://cdm.unfccc.int/Statistics/Registration/AmountOfReductRegisteredProjPieChart.html UNFCCC. (2009b). Registered projects by AI and NAI investor parties. Retrieved December 28, 2009, from http://cdm.unfccc.int/Statistics/Registration/RegisteredProjAnnex1PartiesPieChart.html UNFCCC. (n.d.a). Kyoto Protocol. Retrieved December 18, 2007, from http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php UNFCCC. (n.d.b). Kyoto Protocol base year data. Retrieved May 13, 2008, from http://unfccc.int/ghg_data/kp_data_unfccc/base_year_data/items/4354.php UNFCCC. (n.d.c). Parties & Observers. Retrieved December 18, 2007, from http://unfccc.int/parties_and_observers/items/2704.php |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 政治研究所 95252002 98 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095252002 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [政治學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
200201.pdf | | 897Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 953 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|