Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49570
|
| Title: | 併購支付方式之決定因素及其對公司股價之影響 |
| Authors: | 施宗憲 |
| Contributors: | 陳明進
施宗憲 |
| Keywords: | 支付方式
決定因素
股價影響
Mode of payment
Deterministic factor
the effect on the stock price |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-12-08 14:06:57 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著國際競爭壓力增加及國內金融環境開放，國內企業運用併購策略已成為企業成長之重要方法。其中併購支付方式決策由於受到許多企業內外在因素左右，諸如稅法規定、法令限制、外部監督力量要求、企業的資本結構及股東結構等因素，而對企業財務結構及股價有重大影響，進而牽動併購的效益。本文乃欲檢驗併購支付方式的各項決定因素，以及支付方式對股價的效果，以供企業作為決策之參考。
本文之研究係以民國86年至95年間宣告併購的國內上市櫃企業為對象，同時排除行業性質特殊之金融業，以Logit模型及複迴歸模型從事實證模型分析。
本文研究議題有二：
一.探討影響併購支付模式之決定因素為何?本文以支付方式之虛擬變數為應變數，以每股現金流量等為自變數。
二.探討併購支付模式對公司股價之影響為何? 本文以累積異常報酬率為應變數，以支付方式之虛擬變數為自變數。
本研究實證結果發現，支付方式之決定因素方面，相對規模、併購地點、外資持股比例、併購宣告時間及負債權益比達到顯著水準。其中作為風險分攤因素之代理變數中負債權益比及相對規模之實證結果，均顯示與預期相符，即併購風險愈大，主併公司傾向選擇以股票支付，而併購地點卻與預期相反；另外資持股比例越高，傾向採現金支付，亦與預期相符。又併購宣告時間在企業併購法公布以後者，併購企業傾向採用股票支付。在支付方式對公司股價影響方面，實證結果雖與預期相符，即現金支付之累進異常報酬較股票支付方式佳，但其結果並不顯著。
With the increasing pressure from international competition and opening domestic economic environment, the strategy to Business Combinations has become a more and more important way to promote enterprise and economy progress. The strategy of payment for Merger & Acquisition depends much on the various internal and external enterprise factors, and it has an significant impact on the capital structure of enterprises and the price of Stock. It also influences the effectiveness of merging. The present study was designed to investigate the possible deterministic factors of the mode of payment for Merger & Acquisition and how the mode of payment affected the price of stock, which might provide a good reference for planning enterprise strategies.
The data were collected from the domestic enterprises which declared to merge other enterprises between 1997 and 2006. The financial industry with special marketing characteristics was excluded. The Logit and multiple linear regression models were used for the analyses.
The aims of the present study were:
1. To investigate the possible deterministic factors of mode of payment for Merger & Acquisition. A dummy variable regarding mode of payment was used as the dependent variable, and variables such as per cash flow were used as the independent variables.
2. To determine how mode of payment for mergers affected the price of stock. Cumulative abnormal return ratio (CAR) was used as the dependent variable, and a dummy variable regarding mode of payment was used as the independent variable.
The results showed that RS, CROSS, FRG, Dyear and DE significantly determined the mode of payment. The results were in accordance with the concept of risk-sharing. The higher the risk of merging, the more tendencies that the main enterprise chooses to pay by stocks. The higher percentage of FRG, the more tendency that the main enterprise chooses to pay by money or cash. The main enterprise also tends to choose to pay by stocks when the time of merging was declared after the publication of the law. For the results of the effect of mode of payment on the stock price, the results were also under expectation. The CAR for payment by cash or money is better than that by stocks. However, this result was not statistically significant. |
| Reference: | 中文文獻
王志誠，2005，企業組織再造法制，台北：元照出版社。
方嘉麟與樓永堅，2007，企業併購個案研究，台北：元照出版社。
伍忠賢，2002，企業併購理論與實務，台北，新陸書局股份有限公司。
余文彬，2003，公司分割之型態、會計處理及租稅措施（上），實用稅務，第345期：95-98。
余文彬，2003，公司分割之型態、會計處理及租稅措施（下），實用稅務，第346期：92-96。
杜曉君，2000，購併事件宣告時主併公司特質對股東財富影響之研究-以台灣上市公司為例，東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
林存政，2006，臺灣公司併購交易媒介之選擇，國立清華大學經濟研究所碩士論文。
武忠賢，2002，企業併購理論與實務－全球投資觀點，台北：新陸書局。
洪嘉良，2004，合併購併類型、長短期超額報酬與優勢資訊內涵，銘傳大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
馬嘉應與劉敬業，2000，企業合併之會計及稅務問題探討，財稅研究，第32卷第1期：67-79。
梁秀芳，2004，公司收購制度之研究，證交資料，第510期：2-36。
梁秀芳，2005，論企業併購之會計及租稅處理，證交資料，第518期：2-38。
陳弘榮，2002，企業購併支付方式的決定因素與股價反應，國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
陳春山，2005，企業併購及控股公司法實務問題，台北：新學林出版股份有限公司。
陳匯中，1995，購併宣告對股東財富的影響，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳繼萱，2001，購併事件主併公司盈餘管理行為之研究，東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
黃蘭霙，1993，管理決策與資本結構關係之研究─負債監督理論運用於臺灣地區上市公司合併之實證分析，東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
彭一正，1991，臺灣企業進行國際併購對股東財富影響之實證研究，輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
連育德，2002，購併支付方式對股價行為之影響，國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
張慈芳，2001，證券商購併方式之研究，文化大學會計研究所碩士論文。
楊維君，1993，臺灣企業併購支付方式與財務特質關係之實證研究，國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
葉秋美，1993，台灣企業購併宣告對股東財富之影響，國立政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。
廖烈龍與徐曉婷，企業併購稅務處理之探討，全國律師，5月號：22-38。
劉紹樑、葉秋英、蘇鴻霞、張宏賓、曾沂、吳志光與王麗真，2002，企業併購與金融改組，台北：財團法人台灣金融研訓院。
劉紹樑，2003，我國併購法制的蛻變與前瞻，經社法制論叢，第32期（7月）：1-30。
潘隆政，1997，企業併購支付方式影響因素之研究－台灣上市主併公司之實證，淡江大學國際貿易學系碩士論文。
簡秀薇，1997，股權結構與購併宣告對股價之影響，淡江大學國際貿易學系碩士論文。
羅素良，1991，購併支付方式之理論探討與實證研究，國立成功大學企業管理系碩士論文。
英文文獻
Amihud, Y., B. Lev, Travlos, and G. Nickolaos. 1990. Corporate control and the choice of investment financing: The case of corporate acquisitions, The Journal of Finance 45 (Jun.): 603-616.
Asquith, P., R. Bruner, and D. Mullins. 1983. The gains to bidding firms from merger. Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April): 121–140.
Bharadwaj, A., and A. Shivdasani. 2003. Valuation effects of bank financing in acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics 67 (Jan.): 113–148.
Carleton, W. T., D. Guilkey, R. Harris, and J. Stewart. 1983. An empirical anal-ysis of the role of the medium of exchange in Mergers. Journal of Finance 38 (Jun.): 813– 826.
Chang, S., and E. Mais. 2000. Managerial motives and merger financing. The Financial Review 35 (Nov.): 139-152.
Choe, Hyuk, R. Masulis, and V. Nanda. 1993. Common stock offerings across the business cycle. Journal of Empirical Finance 1: 3-31.
Doukas, John, and G. Nickolaos. 1988. The effect of corporate multinationalism on shareholders` wealth: evidence from international acquisitions. The Journal of Finance 43 (Dec.): 1161-1175.
Eckbo, B. E, and H. Langohr. 1989. Information disclosure, method of payment, and takeover premiums: public and private tender offers in France. Journal of Financial Economics 24 (Oct.): 363-404.
Emery, G. W., and J. A. Switzer. 1997. Expected market reaction and the choice of method of payment for acquisitions. Financial Management 28 (Winter): 73-86.
Faccio, Mara and W. Masulis. 2005. The choice of payment method in European mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Finance 60: 1345-1387.
Hansen, Robert G.. 1987. A theory for the choice of exchange medium in mer-gers and acquisitions. Journal of Business 60: 75-95.
Heron, R., and E. Lie. 2002. Operating performance and the method of payment in takeovers. Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis 33 (4): 137-155.
Jensen, Michel C.. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review 76: 323–329.
Jensen, Michael C.. 1991. Corporate control and the police of finance. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 4: 13-33.
Jung, Kooyul, Y. Kim, and R. Stulz. 1996. Timing, investment opportunities, managerial discretion, and the security issue decision. Journal of Financial Economics 42: 159-185.
Lang, Larry H.P., R. Stulz, and R. Walkling. 1989. Managerial performance, Tobin’s q, and the gains from successful tender offers. Journal of Financial Economics 24: 137–154.
Loughran, T. and A. Vijh. 1997. Do Long-Term Shareholders Benefit From Corporate Acquisitions. Journal of Finance 52: 1765-1790.
Marsh, Paul. 1982. The choice between equity and debt: an empirical study. Journal of Finance 37: 121-144.
Martin, Kenneth J.. 1996. The method of payment in corporate acquisitions in-vestment opportunities and management ownership. The Journal of Finance 51 (Sep.): 1227-1246.
Myers, Sterwart C., and M. Nicolas. 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13: 187–221.
Pound, J.. 1988. Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of financial economics 20: 237-265.
Raj, M. and M. Forsyth. 2002. UK horizontal takeovers and bidder gains. Working paper.
Roll, R.. 1986. The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. The Journal of Business 59 (April): 197-216.
Stulz, Rene M.. 1988. Managerial control of voting rights. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 25–54.
Sung, H. M.. 1993. The effect of overpayment and form of financing on bidder returns in mergers and tender offers. Journal of Financial Research 4 (Winter): 351-365.
Travlos, and G. Nickolaos. 1987. Corporate takeover bids, method of payment, and bidder firms’ stock returns. Journal of Finance 42: 943–963.
Wansley, J. W., W. Lane, and H. Yang. 1987. Gains to bidder firms in cash and securities transactions. Fianacial Review 22: 403–414.
Wansley, J. W., W. Lane, and H. Yang. 1983. Abnormal return to acquired firms by the type of acquisition and method of payment. Financial Management 12: 16-22.
Yook, Ken C., G. Partha, and M. George. 1999. Information asymmetry, man-agement control, and method of payment in Acquisitions. Journal of Fi-nancial Research 22: 413 – 427.
Zhang, and Pinghshun. 2001. What really determines the payment methods in M&A deals. Working paper, Manchester School of Management. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
92353052
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923530521 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
