English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51619793      Online Users : 548
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49482


    Title: 新聞自律機制—台灣電視媒體建立公評人制度之可行性分析
    The Mechanism of Journalistics Discipline---Analysis on the Feasibility of News Ombudsman System for Taiwan TV Media
    Authors: 王建雄
    Chen-hshiung Wang
    Contributors: 劉幼琍
    Yu-li Liu
    王建雄
    Chen-hshiung Wang
    Keywords: 新聞自律
    新聞公評人
    News Ombudsman
    Journalistic Discipline
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2010-12-08 12:26:43 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 台灣電視新聞媒體,為了追求收視率,不顧法律和道德的規範,新聞製作上強調聳動和誇張的報導,讓議題失焦,也讓民眾失去對新聞的信任。為了維持新聞的品質,過去透過政府的法令、民間團體的監督,以及新聞同業者組成自律組織,但成效不彰。近年來,有新聞專業工作者和媒體改革人士呼籲引進國外公評人制度,盼對各台新聞自律能有所提昇。

    新聞公評人制度,最早概念起源於1922年的日本朝日新聞。美國也在1967年地方報中設立了第一位新聞公評人。起初,公評人都只在平面媒體中,隨著媒體的多樣化發展,目前在國外電視、廣播或是網路媒體,都有新聞公評人出現。公評人代表閱眾,除了要對內部新聞產製監督,對外要回應來自大眾的意見和批評,盼藉由新聞公評人的角色,能達到新聞品質的改善。

    在國外,新聞公評人在平面媒體居多,電視頻道仍不多見。為了因應台灣各電視台未來設立新聞公評人制度,本研究將先瞭解國外各媒體公評人的職責、角色定位和執行的情形,並深度訪談台灣各電視新聞頻道,負責新聞自律的主管和製作人,從中瞭解目前國內媒體環境,並因此來建立一套台灣電視媒體公評人制度,對其可行性進行分析,提供給未來各電視新聞媒體,在聘請新聞公評人的參考。
    In pursuit of high ratings, News Media in Taiwan regardless of norms of law or ethics, have overemphasized provocative and exaggerated news reports. This has given rise to the making of out-of-focus reports, which has resulted in audience’s losing confidence in the News. In the past, the way to maintain News quality was based on official regulations, on supervision from non-governmental groups and on organizations set up within the News industry to promote journalistic discipline - the problem being, it didn’t function well. In recent years, there have been many news professionals and media revolutionists calling for an adoption of the News ombudsman System, which they expect, to improve the journalistic discipline of news channels’.

    The News Ombudsman System’s concept, originates from Japan`s Asahi Shimbun (the influential newspapers in Japan) in 1922. In 1967, the first news ombudsman was set up for local newspapers in United States. In the early years, the news ombudsmen only existed in the print media, but over the years has developed and moved into every facet including TV, Radio and the Internet media, all now boasting their own independent news ombudsmen. The news ombudsman represents the audience, not only for internal supervision of news productions, but also acts as a mechanism for listening to the public’s opinions and criticisms, in the hope of improving the news quality.

    In foreign countries, more news ombudsmen are set for the print media. This research will collect data about the role, position and condition of news ombudsman in foreign countries, and conduct in-depth interviews with the directors and producers of TV news channels in Taiwan, to map out the future media environment in our country. According to these researches, the thesis will construct a system of the news ombudsman in Taiwan, and analyze its feasibility, which will give references to the implementation of news ombudsmen for TV news channels in the future.
    Reference: 一、中文部份
    王文科(1990)。《質的教育研究法》。台北:師大書苑。
    王洪鈞(1971)。(十年來新聞自律的組織與活動),台北新聞記者公會編,《中華民國新聞年鑑》,95-185頁,台北:台北新聞記者公會。
    文崇一、楊國樞(2000)。《社會及行為科學研究法下冊》。台北:東華。
    中時晚報(1994)。(支持「編輯部公約」運動聲明),8月30日,版12。
    中華民國新聞評議會(1994)。《中華民國新聞評議會:簡介、組織章程、規範》。台北:新聞評議會。
    台灣媒體觀察基金會(2006)。(媒觀的聲明與公告:建立結合他律的自律機制:「電視新聞自律座談會」媒觀發言稿)。上午日期:2009年4月21日,取自 http://www.mediawatch.org.tw/modules/news/article.php?storyid=414
    台灣廣告主協會(2001)。(宣言)。上網日期:2009年4月20日,取自 http://www.brain.com.tw/taa/manifesto/manifesto.htm。
    宋雙峰(2006)。(國外媒介批評機制研究),《新聞記者》,6: 61-63。
    宋雙峰(2006)。(媒介與媒介批評的良性互動),《今傳媒》。上網日期:2007年5月16日,取自 Hhttp://www.jinchuanmei.com/2006/12-6/105551568.html
    行政院新聞局(2004)。(廣電白皮書)。上網日期:2009年4月15日,取自 http://info.gio.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=13303&CtNode=2087mp=1。
    朱梅芳(2005)。(自律委員會機制啟動,七家新聞台,未來五層把關),《中國時報》,8月30日,版A8。
    朱梅芳(2006)。(71家頻道成立STBA打開新生機),《中國時報》,3月30日,版D2。
    李芳甄(2002)。《虛擬攝影棚在台灣電視經營模式之關鍵成功因素探討》。國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
    李瞻(1987)。《新聞學原理》。台北:國立政治大學新聞研究所。
    呂郁女(2003)。(從NCC談評鑑媒體的省思)。上網日期:2009年4月20日,取自http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/EC/092/EC-C-092.050.htm。
    呂惠敏(2005)。《專業取勝?商業至上?電視台高階主管對新聞主播的角色認知與決策探討》國立政治大學新聞學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    林振春(1992)。《社會調查》(三版)。台北市:五南圖書。
    林照真(2009)。(收視率綁廣告 主宰電視內容),《媒體公民行動網》。上網日期:2009年7月12日,取自http://www.nccwatch.org.tw/news/20090717/43738
    林照真(1999)。(當前台灣近似媒體觀察組織的幾個盲點),《新聞學研究》,6: 76-171。
    林淑伶(2003)。(新評會:自律營造優質媒體),中國時報,4月17日,版2。
    林意玲(2003)。《新聞深度採訪報導》。基督教論壇報社內訓練。
    林書煒(2008)。《電視新聞主播工作倦怠的成因與影響》。國立政治大學傳播學院在職專班碩士論文。
    林麗雲(2000)。(台灣威權體制下「侍從報業」的矛盾與轉型:1949-1999),《台灣產業研究》,3: 89-148。
    胡元輝(2005)。(既是踏石,也是防火牆—從國外媒體經驗談公視建構觀眾申訴制度),《目擊者》,48。
    胡幼慧編(1996)。《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北:巨流。
    徐志明(2004)。《我國新聞自律制度之研究》。私立世新大學法學院碩士論文。
    袁衷(2004)。(新聞公評人的譯法),《新聞記者》,12:45。
    唐琪珮(2002)。《影響台灣媒體代理商購買方式因素之研究》。銘傳大學傳播管理研究
    所在職專班碩士論文。
    程宗明(1998)。(析論台灣傳播研究實務的生產(1949-1980)與未來:從政治經濟取向
    思考對比典範的轉向),林靜伶編,《1998中華傳播學會論文集》,381-437,台北:中華傳播學會。
    傳播學生鬥陣(2008)。(傳學鬥簡介)。上網日期:2009年7月12日,取自:http://blog.roodo.com/scstw/archives/6469473.html
    陳曉宜(2007)。(落實編輯室公約與公評人機制),《目擊者》,61: 4。
    曹琬凌(2002)。《電視新聞專業規範與研究》。台北:公共電視編印。
    黃俊英(1996)。《企業研究方法》。台北:東華。
    許 倩(2004)。(美國新聞公評人制度的歷史和現狀),《新聞記者》,10: 49-50。
    張錦華(2006)。(邁向自律—台灣電視台的里程碑),《大紀元》。上網日期:2009年4月25日,取自 http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/6/11/7/n1512353.htm
    耿 曙(2007)。(深度訪談法:意義、實踐、問題),「2007政大研究生研究方法研習營」,台北市木柵。
    彭后諦(1999)。(「新聞橋」為何走入歷史?───從「新聞橋」停播看新評會重新定位)
    《台灣新聞記者協會》,上網日期:2009年4月26日,取自http://atj.yam.org.tw/mw2175.htm
    楊宜真(1999)。《傳播科技人才之能力需求與學程設計原則:修正式德菲研究》。國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
    萬文隆(2004)。(深度訪談在質性研究中的應用),《生活科技教育》,37: 17-23。
    劉昌德(2006)。(結構去管制下的內容再管制:台灣商營電視節目內容管制的演變),《廣播與電視》,26: 77-116。
    劉昌德(2007)。(民主參與式的共管自律—新聞自律機制之回顧與再思考),《台灣民主季刊》,1: 109-139。
    謝邦昌、柯惠新、盧傳熙(2000)。《市場調查與分析技術》。台北:曉園。
    潘淑滿(2003)。《質性研究 理論與應用》。台北市:心理。
    羅筠(2004)。(新聞公評人制度的特點與尷尬),《新聞記者》,10: 51。
    蕭蘋(1999)。(介紹國外媒體監督組織FAIR和Media Watch),《新聞學研究》,60: 63-151。
    蘇欣儀(2003)。《電視媒體品牌權益衡量指標之建構》。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
    二、英文部份
    Babbie, E. (2004). The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
    Bardoel, J., L. d’Haenens (2004). Media Meet the Citizen: Beyond Market Mechanisms and
    Government Regulations. European Journal of Communication, 19,(2), 165-194.
    Bertrand, C. (1997). Media Accountability Systems: An Overview. In U. Sonnenberg
    (ed.),Organizing Media Accountability: Experience in Europe (pp. 6-16). Maastricht,
    Netherlands:European Journalism Centre.
    Burns, k. (2003). Post Ombudsman Connects Readers and Journalists. Quill, 3, 4.
    Case, T. (1996). Ombudsmen Overboard?. Editor & Publisher,129(21), 8-9.
    Cunningham, R. (1995). Ombudsman Gives High Marks to Washington Post. Quill, 7, 16.
    Dorroh, J. (2005). The Ombudsman Puzzle. American Journalism Review,1(27), 48-53.
    Dunn, W.N. (1994). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction.New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Dempsey, J. (2007). ESPN ombudsman knows the score. Variety,7(408), 26.
    Eggerton, J. (2006). Did PBS Do the Right Thing?. Broadcasting & Cable, 32, 12.
    Ettema, J., & Glasser, T. (1987). Public Accountability or Public Relations? Newspaper
    Ombudsmen Define Their Role. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 3-12.
    Getlin, J. (2000). Ombudsman. Columbia Journalism Review, 6,
    Hartung, B., JaCoby, A., & Dozier, D. (1988). Readers’ Perceptions of Purpose of Newspaper
    Ombudsman Program. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 914-919.
    Hearn, T. (2005). Through The Wire. Multichannel News, 23, 8.
    Hodges, L. (1998). Ombudsman:Effort to promote press accountability.History of the Mass Media
    in the United States:An Encyclepedia, 484-485.
    Howard, K. (2004. November 22). At NPR, Ombudded With the Troops. The Washington Post, C01.
    JaCoby, A. (2003). The Newspaper Ombudsman: A Personal Memoir of the Early Days.Retrieved December 12, 2008, from http://www.newsombudsmen.org/jacoby.html
    Jones, T. A, & Twiss, B. C. (1978). Forecasting Technology for Planning Decision.New York:Petrocelli Books.
    Kadushin, A. (1990). The Social Work Interview: A Guide for Human Service Professionals. New York: Columbia University Press.
    LaMont, S. (1999). Ten Commandments of Ombudsmen. Retrieved December 12, 2008, from http://www.newsombudsmen.org/lamont5.html
    MacKenna, K. (1993). The Loneliest Job in the Newsroom. American Journalism Review, 41-44.
    Maezawa, T. (1999). The Controversy Over the Origins and Functions of Ombudsmanship. Retrieved December 12, 2008. from http://www.newsombudsmen.org/maezawa.html
    McEvoy, P. (2008). The lonely hell of the ombudsman. Retreived July 12, 2009, from http://www.newsombudsmen.org/mcevoy.html
    McQuail, D. (1997). Accountability of Media to Society: Principles and Means. European Journal
    of Communication, Vol. 12, No. 4:511-529.
    Michael, H. (2005, June 1). ESPN adds former newspaper sports editor as ombudsman. USA TODAY, Sports, Pg. 02c.
    Mishler, E. (1986). Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative.Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
    McLellan, M. (1999). Address to THE Association of Turkish Journalists. Retrieved December 14, 2008, from http://www.newsombudsmen.org/mclellan1.html
    McNulty, H. (1993). NBC News Hires An Ombudsman. Editor & Publisher,126(2), 30.
    Meyers, C. (2000). Creating an Effective Newspaper Ombudsman Position. Journal of Mass Media
    Ethics, 15, 248-256.
    Mills, D. (2000). New Ombudsman Named for CBC French-Language Network. Broadcaster, 2, 25.
    Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis(2nd ED.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
    Mogavero, D. (1982). The American Press Ombudsman. Journalism Quarterly, 59, 548-580.
    Nauman, A. C. (1994). News Ombudsmanship: Its History and Rationale. Retrieved December 13, 2008. http://www.newsombudsmen.org/nauman2.html
    Neal, C. (2006). NPR`s Ombudsman Bows Out. Retrieved April 10, 2009. from database: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nfh&AN=6XN200607061501&lang=zh-tw&site=ehost-live
    Nemeth, N. (2003). News Ombudsmen in North America: Assessing An Experiment in Social
    Responsibility.Westport,CT:Praeger.
    Nerone, J. (1995). Last Rights: Revisiting Four Theories of the Press. Urbana and Chicago.
    IL:University of Illinois.
    NPR ombudsman sez Gross unfair to O`Reilly. (2003, October). Daily Variety, 11, 5.
    Palzer, C. & Scheuer, A. (2003). Self-regulation, co-regulation, public regulation. Promote or Protect, 165-177.
    Payne, R. L., Fineman, S., & Wall, T. D. (1976). Organizational Climate and Job Satisfaction a
    Conceptual Synthesis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16.
    Pritchard, D. (1993). The Impact of Newspaper Ombudsmen on Journalists’ Attitudes. Journalism
    Quarterly, 70, 77-86.
    Raymond, L. (1999). We Were Wrong. Retrieved December 12, 2008. http://www.newsombudsmen.org/raymond.html
    Rieder, R. (2003). Wanted: One Good Ombudsman. American Journalism Review,25(6) , 6.
    Santos, M. V. (2008, May 28). New Media and New Methods. Retrieved from http://www.newsombudsmen.org/santos.html
    Schewe, S. (2008, August 5). US: The Loss of the Ombudsman; The Courier-Journal, First Paper to Have a Public Editor, Cuts Position. Retrieved
    http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2008/08/us_the_loss_of_ombudsmen.php
    Shields, T. (2000). Ombudsman Shipp Sails Away. Editor & Publisher,43, 9.
    Solomon, G. (2005). Keeping ESPN in Line. Broadcasting & Cable, 135(27), 6-6.
    Starck, K., & Eisele, J.(1999). Newspaper ombudsmanship as viewed by ombudsmen and their editors. Newspaper Research Journal, 20, 37-49.
    Stein, M. L. (1997). Ombudsman Offer: Conscience, Detachment. Editor and Publisher, 53.
    Triplett, W., & Learmonth, M. (2005). PBS Alters Policy Amid Bias Claims. Dailey Variety, 54, 5.
    Welch, M. (2003). Anything but the Ombudsman! Reason, 35(4), 16.
    Zargoria, S. (1986). The Ombudsman as a Dispute Resolver in the Newspaper Industry. Arbitration Journal, 41, 3-6.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院碩士在職專班
    95941004
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095941004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[傳播學院碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    100401.pdf93KbAdobe PDF2934View/Open
    100402.pdf126KbAdobe PDF2870View/Open
    100403.pdf119KbAdobe PDF21026View/Open
    100404.pdf114KbAdobe PDF2933View/Open
    100405.pdf204KbAdobe PDF21197View/Open
    100406.pdf274KbAdobe PDF21083View/Open
    100407.pdf203KbAdobe PDF23584View/Open
    100408.pdf269KbAdobe PDF21187View/Open
    100409.pdf828KbAdobe PDF22454View/Open
    100410.pdf441KbAdobe PDF21621View/Open
    100411.pdf206KbAdobe PDF21082View/Open
    100412.pdf218KbAdobe PDF21541View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback