English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114205/145239 (79%)
Visitors : 52584827      Online Users : 1034
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/49448
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49448


    Title: 癌症病患社會比較及其相關因素之研究—新癌症病患與舊癌症病患之比較
    Social Comparison and Its Related Variables of Cancer Patients: the Difference between New Cancer Patients and Old Cancer Patients
    Authors: 張丁升
    Contributors: 許文耀
    張丁升
    Keywords: 癌症病患
    社會比較
    社會比較動機
    社會比較效果
    比較模式
    比較面向
    cancer patients
    social comparison
    social comparison motive
    social comparison effect
    the models of social comparison
    the dimensions of social comparison
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2010-12-08 11:40:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究之主要目的在於瞭解癌症病患社會比較行為之現況與相關因素之探討,包括社會比較動機、不同之比較面向與比較模式之對象、社會比較效果,進而探索新癌症病患與舊癌症病患在社會比較行為上的差異性;其次,探討自尊、身心健康情形與社會比較之關係。本研究以問卷調查的方式,訪談全國癌症病友中心的癌症病患,共計134位,包括各50位新、舊乳癌病患與21位新腸癌病患、13位舊腸癌病患。本研究使用社會比較動機量表中文版、自尊量表中文版、一般健康量表中文版以及研究者自編的社會比較問卷,進行相關統計分析與假設考驗。研究結果發現,癌症病患主要社會比較動機是同盟、自我增進、自我彰顯等動機;新、舊癌症病患在社會比較行為上皆有顯著性的差異,包括社會比較動機、社會比較的對象與方式、以及社會比較的負向效果。另一方面,自尊越低與一般健康情形越差的癌症病患,其社會比較的負向效果也越大。最後,根據研究結果與討論,提出對未來相關研究、癌症病患的心理社會介入與臨床應用的建議。
    The main purpose of this study was to explore the social comparison process and its correlates among cancer patients. The first purpose of this study was to understand the differences of social comparison process between new cancer patients and old cancer patients, not only including the source of social comparative information, but the motives, the models, the dimensions, the targets and preferences of social comparison. The second purpose was to understand the influence of self-esteem on social comparison. The third purpose was to asses the relationship between social comparison and individual’s physical and mental health.
    The Chinese versions of the Social Comparison Motive Scale (Helgeson & Mickelson, 1995), the Chinese versions of Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965), the Chinese versions of General Health Questionnaire (Goldberger, 1978), and two self-constructed scales to measure the informative source, the models, the dimensions, the targets and preferences of social comparison were administered to 100 breast cancer patients and 34 colorectal cancer patients from Changhua Christian Hospital.
    Finally, the findings of this research were expected to apply to clinical psychooncology so as to help cancer patients have better psychological reaction and to improve their adaptation to illness.
    Reference: 一、中文書目
    吳佳璇、李明濱(民90)。癌症病患及家屬之心理反應與適應。台灣醫學期刊,5(4),423-428。
    徐富珍(民87)。社會比較的效果:對個人情感、認知及行為之影響研究。政治大學心理研究所博士論文。
    張玨(民76)。大專聯考壓力對青少年健康的影響。中華心理學刊,29(2),93-112頁。
    張春興(民78)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華書局。
    陳坤虎(民90)。青少年自我認同與父母管教態度及自尊之關係。台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
    許淑蓮、黃秀梨(民86)。Mishel疾病不確定量表之中文測試版。護理研究,4(1),59-68。
    楊小蕙(民90)。台北地區高中職學生社會比較及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    蔡芬芳(民86)。自尊對自利歸因的影響:自我概念內容與結構的交互作用。台大心理學研究所碩士論文。
    衛生署(民93)。行政院衛生署統計資料。
    二、英文書目
    Arrowood, A. J. (1986). Comments on “Social Comparison Theory: Psychology from the Lost and Found.” Personality and Social psychology Bulletin, 12(3), 279-281.
    Bogart, L. M., & Helgeson, V. S., (2000). Social comparison among women with breast cancer: a longitudinal investigation. Journal of applied social psychology, 30(3), 547-575.
    Bennenbroek, F. T. C., Buunk, B. P., van derZee, K. I., Grol, B., (2002). Social comparison and patient information: what do cancer patients want. Jouranl of patient education and counseling, 47(1), 5-12.
    Brickman, P., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1977). Pleasure and pain in social comparison. In J. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 149-186). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
    Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: self-enhancement biases in social judgment. Social cognition, 4, 353-376.
    Buunk, B. P. (1994). Social comparison process under stress: towards an integration of classic and recent perspectives. In M. Hewstone & W. Strobe(Eds.), European review of social psychology(Vol. 5, pp. 211-241). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
    Buunk, B. P. (1995). Comparison direction and comparison dimension among disabled individuals: toward a refined conceptualization of social comparison under stress. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 21, 316-330.
    Buunk, B. P., Collin, R. L., Taylor, S. E., Van Yperen, N. W., & Dakof, G. A. (1990). The effective consequences of social comparison: Either direction has it ups and downs. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59, 1238-1249.
    Buunk, B. P., & Gibbons, F. X. (1997). Health, coping, and well-being : perspectives from social comparison theory. Mahwah ,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: the impact of upward social comparison on self-envaluations. Psychology bulletin, 119(1), 51-69.
    Collins, R. L., Dakof, G. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1988). Social comparison and adjustment to a threatening events . Journal of personality and social psychology, 32, 287-305.
    DeVita, V. T., Jr., Hellman, S., & Rosenberg, S.A. (Eds.). (1989). Cancer: principles & practice of oncology (Vol. 1, 3 ed.). Philadelphia: J. P. Lippincott.
    Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological bulletin, 95, 542-575.
    Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1997). Social comparison and subjective well-being. In B. P. Buunk & F. X. Gibbons (Eds.), Health, coping, and well-being : Perspectives from social comparison theory(pp. 329-357). Mahwah ,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Elisabeth Kubler-Ross, M. D. (1962). On Death and Dying. New York: Touchstone Book.
    Gibbons, F. X. (1986). Social comparison and depression: Company’s effect on misery. Journal of personality and social psychology, 32, 287-305.
    Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M. (1991). Downward comparison and coping with threat. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: contemporary theory and research (pp. 317-345). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., Lando, H. A., & McGoven, P, G. (1991). Social comparison and smoking cessation: The role of the “ Typical smoker”. Journal of experimental social psychology. 54, 239-248
    Gruder, C. L. (1977). Choice of comparison person in evaluating oneself. In J. M. Suls, & R. C. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison process: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
    Hakmiller, K. L., (1966). Threat as a determinant of downward comparison. Journal of experimental social psychology, suppl, 1, 32-39.
    Helgeson, V. S., & Mickelson, K. D., (1995). Motive for social comparison. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 21(11), 1200-1209.
    Hemphill, K. J., & Lehman, D.R. (1991). Social comparison and their affective consequences: the important of comparison dimension and individual difference variables. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 10, 372-394.
    Jagacinski, C. M., & Nicholls, J. G., (1987). Competence and affect in tack involvement and ego involovement: The impact of social comparison information. Journal of educational psychology(study 1), 80-94.
    Latane, B. (1966). Studies in social comparison- introduction and overview. Journal of experimental social psychology, 2(study 1), 1-5.
    Kelein, W. M., (1997). Objective standards are not enough: Affective, self-evaluative, and behavioral responses to social comparison information. Journal of personality and social psychology. 72(4), 763-774.
    Kiesler, S. B. (1966). Stress, affiliation, and performance. Journal of experimental research in personality, 1, 227-235.
    Kruglanski, A. W., & Mayseless, O. (1990). Classic and current social comparison research: expanding the perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 195-208.
    Major, B., Testa, M., & Bylsma, W. H. (1991). Responses to upward and downward comparison: the impact of esteem-relevance and perceived control. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: contemporary theory and research (pp. 237-259). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Molleman, E., Pruyn, J., & van Knippenberg, A. (1986). Social comparison processes among cancer patients. British Journal of social psychology, 25, 1-13.
    Perloff, L. S., & Fetzer, B. K., (1986). Self-other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 50(3), 502-510.
    Pyzczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & LaPrelle, J. (1985). Social comparison after success and failure: Biased search for information consistent with a self-serving conclusion. Journal of experimental social psychology, 21, 195-211.
    Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Smith, R. H., & Insko, C. A. (1987). Social comparison choice during ability evaluation: the effects of comparison publicity, performance feedback, and self-esteem. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 13, 111-122.
    Suls, J. M., & Wills, T. A., (1991). Commentary: neo-social comparison theory and beyond. (Eds.), Contemporary: theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Ehbaum.
    Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events. American psychologist, 38, 1161-1173.
    Taylor, S. E., Aspinwall, L. G., Guiliano, T. A., Dakof, G. A., & Reardon, K. K. (1993). Storytelling and coping with stressful events. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 703-733.
    Taylor, S. E., & Dakof, G. A. (1988). Social support and the cancer patient. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health: The Claremont symposium on applied social psychology (pp. 95-116). Newberry Park, CA: Sage.
    Taylor, S. E., Falke, R. L., Mazel, R.M., & Hilsberg, B. L., (1988). Sources of satisfaction and dissatisfaction among members of cancer support group. In B. H. Gottlieb (Ed.), Marshaling social support: formats, processes, and effects. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review, 96, 596-575.
    Taylor, S. E., Wood, J. V., & Lichtman, R. R. (1983). It could be worse: selective evaluation as a response to victimization. Journal of social issues, 39, 19-40.
    Tesser, A., & Campbell, J., (1982). Self-evaluation maintentance and the perception of friends and strangers. Journal of personality, 50, 261-279.
    Tesser, A., & Collins, J. E., (1988). Emotion in social reflection and comparison situation: intuitive, systematic, and exploratory approaches. Journal of personality and social psychology, 55(5), 695-709.
    Tesser, A., Millar, M., & Moore, J. (1988). Some affective consequences of social comparison and reflection processes: The pain and pleasure of being close. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54, 49-61.
    Tesser, A., & Major, B. (1990). The impact of social comparison after failure: the moderating effects of perceived control. Basic and applied social psychology, 11, 205-218.
    Thompson, L. L., & Crocker, J. (1990). Downward social comparison in the minimal intergroup situation: a test of a self-enhancement interpretation. Journal of applied social psychology, 20, 1166-1184.
    Trope, Y. (1979). Uncertainity-reducing properties of achievement tasks. Journal of personality social psychology, 37, 1505-1581.
    VanderZee, K. I., Buunk, B. P., Sanderman, R., Botke, G., & VandenBergh, F., (2000). Social comparison and coping with cancer treatment. Personality and individual differences,28(2000), 17-34.
    Wheeler, L., & Miyake, K. (1992). Social comparison in everyday life. Journal of experimental social psychology, 20, 263-271.
    Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-271.
    Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparison of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231-248.
    Wood, J. V., Taylor, K. L. (1991). Serving self-relevant goals through social comparison. In Suls. J. & Wills. T. A. Social comparison-contemporary theory and research. (pp.23-49). Hillsdale, New Jersey Hove and London.
    Wood, J. V., Taylor, S. E, & Lichtman, R. R. (1985). Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of personality and social psychology, 49, 1169-1183.
    Wood, J. V. (1996). What is social comparison and how we study it? Personality and social psychology bulletin, 22(5), 520-537.
    Wood, J. V., & VanderZee, K. (1997). Social comparison among cancer patients: Under what conditions are comparisons upward or downward? In B. P. Buunk & F. X. Gibbons (Eds.), Health, coping, and well-being : Perspectives from social comparison theory(pp. 299-328). Mahwah ,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Wortman, C. B., & Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1979). Interpersonal relationship and cancer: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Social Issue, 35, 120-155.
    Yalom, I. D., & Greaves, C. (1977). Group therapy with the terminally ill. American journal of psychiatry, 134, 396-400.
    Ybema, J. F., & Buunk, B. P. (1995). Affective responses to social comparison: a study among disabled individuals. British journal of social psychology, 34(3), 279-292.
    Ybema, J. F., & Buunk, B. P., & Hessink, A. M. (1996). Affect and identification in social comparison after loss of work. Basic and applied social psychology, 18(2), 151-169.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學研究所
    91752006
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0917520061
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    52006101.pdf42KbAdobe PDF2637View/Open
    52006102.pdf87KbAdobe PDF2665View/Open
    52006103.pdf60KbAdobe PDF2908View/Open
    52006104.pdf70KbAdobe PDF2643View/Open
    52006105.pdf118KbAdobe PDF21086View/Open
    52006106.pdf192KbAdobe PDF23027View/Open
    52006107.pdf132KbAdobe PDF21285View/Open
    52006108.pdf210KbAdobe PDF2718View/Open
    52006109.pdf142KbAdobe PDF2821View/Open
    52006110.pdf79KbAdobe PDF2981View/Open
    52006111.pdf277KbAdobe PDF22153View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback