Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49261
|
| Title: | 臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處效率之研究：三階段資料包絡分析法之應用
A study of efficiency of taipei county revenue service office：the 3-stage dea approach |
| Authors: | 劉學文
Liu, Hsueh Wen |
| Contributors: | 王國樑
Wang, Kuo Liang
劉學文
Liu, Hsueh Wen |
| Keywords: | 資料包絡分析法
技術效率
規模效率
稅捐
Data Envelopment Analysis
Technical Efficiency
Scale Efficiency
Tax |
| Date: | 2009 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-12-08 02:03:06 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究以臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處為對象，採用2001-2008年資料，共有56筆樣本資料進行實證研究。應用三階段DEA作為分析模型，以滿足產出多樣、品質差異及產出環境各異之特殊要求。考量稅捐稽徵處特性下，探討其經營效率，提出改善經營效率之政策性建議，以提升有限資源的效率化利用。
臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處之經營效率值(三階段純技術效率值)評估之結果為1.0186。研究發現，若未摒除稅捐稽徵處所提供服務的不同產出品質，以及受到環境變數之影響，經營效率值將會低估44.16%。此外，若未考量規模效率，經營效率值也會高估18.23%。
實證結果顯示，利用DEA對於本文地方稅分類方式分析，會產生很好的效果。透過本文提供的分類方法，管理機關可獲得較為有效的管理方式。再者，依據隨機邊界法分析、產出投入比與效率值的相關分析等結果，各地方稅的管理單位應可瞭解其擁有資源的優劣勢，以改善其相對無效率或進步緩慢的窘境。
This research tries to estimate the operational efficiency of Taipei County Revenue Service Office using empirical data from 2001 to 2008. In order to meet the characteristics including various outputs, different output qualities and specific production environments, 3-stage DEA model is chosen and modified for empirical study. The findings of this research may give policy suggestions to improve the operational efficiency.
The estimated operational efficiency, the pure technical efficiency in third stage, is 1.0186. The study shows the operational efficiency will be underestimated by 44.16% if output quality variable and production environment variable are ignored. In addition, if scale efficiency is not taken under consideration, the efficiency will be overestimated by 18.23%.
Empirical results indicate that DEA is an effective approach applied to the local tax classification model of this study. Furthermore, according to the findings of SFA analysis, output-input ratio and efficiency index, each management unit of local tax could find out its strength and weakness of resources endowment to improve the relative inefficiency and to make progress in the future. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部份
王必涵（2009），「臺北市稅捐稽徵處各分處稽徵績效之研究－三階段資料包絡分析法之應用」，國立政治大學社會科學學院碩士論文。
王宗富（2001），「我國國稅稽徵機關績效之評估－以資料包絡分析法研究」，國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
王美華（2004），「精省前後地方政府財政努力績效分析：資料包絡分析法之應用」，國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。
王國樑、張美玲、陳麗雪（2009），「台灣地方法院管理效率之探討─三階段資料包絡分析法之應用」，《管理學報》，第26卷，第5期，頁559-576。。
江勁毅、曾國雄（2000），「新的DEA效率衡量方式：以模糊多目標規劃建立之效率達成度」，《管理學報》，第17卷，第2期，頁369-388。
李艷玲（1997），「稅捐稽徵機關績效評估之研究」，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
邱荃瑩（2005），「我國地方稅捐稽徵機關績效評估之研究－以資料包絡分析法」，元智大學會計研究所碩士論文。
邱麗英（2007），「地方政府財政努力績效分析：資料包絡分析法之應用」，元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
長野史裕、山口俊和、福川忠昭（1995），「出力值にファジィ數を用いたDEA」，作業研究8月號。
孫遜（2004），《資料包絡分析法－理論與應用》，台北：揚智文化公司。
高強、黃旭男、Toshiyuki Sueyoshi（2003），《管理績效評估》，台北：華泰文化事業公司。
許怡雯（1997），「我國租稅稽徵技術效率之研究」，國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
黃旭男、張元哲、林進財（1997），「郵政總局分支機構經營效率及效率變動之評估」，《交大管理學報》，第17卷，第2期，頁125-144。
黃鳳月（2007），「以資料包絡分析法應用於我國國稅稽徵機關組織整併方案選擇之評估」，國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系研究所碩士論文。
臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處會計室（2001），《臺北縣政府稅捐統計要覽》，第33期，臺北縣板橋市：臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處。
臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處會計室（2002），《臺北縣政府稅捐統計要覽》，第34期，臺北縣板橋市：臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處。
臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處會計室（2003），《臺北縣政府稅捐統計要覽》，第35期，臺北縣板橋市：臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處。
臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處會計室（2004），《臺北縣政府稅捐統計要覽》，第36期，臺北縣板橋市：臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處。
臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處會計室（2005），《臺北縣政府稅捐統計要覽》，第37期，臺北縣板橋市：臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處。
臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處會計室（2006），《臺北縣政府稅捐統計要覽》，第38期，臺北縣板橋市：臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處。
臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處會計室（2007），《臺北縣政府稅捐統計要覽》，第39期，臺北縣板橋市：臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處。
臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處會計室（2008），《臺北縣政府稅捐統計要覽》，第40期，臺北縣板橋市：臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處。
劉國萍（2006），「國稅局稽徵績效之研究」，國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
歐文國（2006），「以資料包絡分析法評估地方稅捐機關之經營績效」，南華大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
賴俊佑（2005），「地方政府施政效率評估、統籌分配稅款與施政滿意度」，國立東華大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
鍾淑芬（2003），「我國地方稅捐稽徵機關稽徵效率之評估研究－資料包絡分析法之應用」，國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部分
Ali, A. L., W. D. Cook and L. M. Seiford (1991), “Strict vs. Weak Ordinal Relations for Multipliers in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Sciences, 37(6), 733-738.
Andersen, P. and N. C. Petersen (1993), “A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, 39(10), 1261-1264.
Avkiran, N. K. and T. Rowlands (2008), “How to Better Identify the True Managerial Performance：State of the Art Using DEA,”OMEGA：International Journal of Management Sicence, 36, 317-324.
Banker, R. D. (1984), “Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, 17, 35-44.
Banker, R. D. and R. C. Morey (1986), “Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Output,” Operations Research, 34(4), 513-521.
Banker, R. D. and R. C. Morey (1986), “The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, 32, 1613-1627.
Banker, R. D. and R. M. Thrall (1992), “Estimation of Returns to Scale Using Data Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, 62(1), 74-84.
Banker, R. D., A. Charnes and W. W. Cooper (1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Banker, R. D., R. F. Conrad and R. P. Strauss (1986), “A Comparative Application of DEA and Translog Methods：An Illustrative Study of Hospital Production,” Management Science, 32, 30-44.
Boussofiane, A., R. G. Dyson and E. Thanassoulis (1991), “Applied Data Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, 52(1), 1-15.
Chang, K. P. and Y. Y. Guh (1991), “Linear Production Function and the Data Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, 52(2), 215-223.
Charnes, A. and W. W. Cooper (1984), “The Non-Archimedean CCR Ratio for Efficiency Analysis：A Rejoinder Boyd and Fare,” European Journal of Operational Research, 15, 333-334.
Charnes, A., T. Clark, W. W. Cooper and B. Golany (1985), “A Developmental Study of Data Envelopment Analysis in Measuring the Efficiency of Maintenance Units in the U. S. Air Forces,” Annals of Operations Research, 2, 95-112.
Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes (1978), “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, R. C. Morey and J. Rousseau (1985), “Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in DEA,” Annals of Operation Research, 2, 139-156.
Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford and J. Stutz (1983), “Invariant Multiplicative Efficiency and Piecewise Cobb-Douglas Envelopments,” Operations Research Letters, 2(3), 101-103.
Cooper, W.W., K. S. Park and G. Yu (1999), “IDEA and AR-IDEA：Models for Dealing with Imprecise Data in DEA,” Management Science, 45, 597-607.
Daft, R. L. (2007), Organization Theory and Design, 9th Edition, South-Western College Publishing.
Doyle, J. and R. Green (1994), “Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA：Derivations, Meanings and Uses,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567-578.
Dyson, R. G. (2001), “Performance Measurement and Data Envelopment Analysis – Ranking are ranks,” OR Insight, 13(4), 3-8.
Dyson, R. G. and E. Thanassoulis (1988), “Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39, 563-576.
Färe, R. S., S. Grosskopf, and G. Whittaker (2005), “Network DEA,” Discussing Paper, Chapter 9.
Farrell, M. J. (1957), “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, 120(3), 253-281.
Forsund, F. R. (1992), “A Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Efficiency Eeasures：The case of Norwegian ferries,” The Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 25-43.
Fried, H. O., C. A. K. Lovell, S.S. Schmidt, and S. Yaisawarng (2002), “Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17, 157-174.
Fried, H. O., S. S. Schmidt and S. Yaisawarng (1999), “Incorporating the Operating Environment Into a Nonparametric Measure of Technical Efficiency,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 12(3), 249-267.
Golany, B. and Y. Roll (1989), “An Application Procedure for DEA,” OMEGA：International Journal of Management Science, 17(3), 237-250.
Greene, W. H. (2000), Econometric Analysis, 4th Edition, New Jersey：Prentice Hall.
Lewin, A. Y. and J. W. Minton (1986), “Determining Organizational Effectiveness：Another Look and an Agenda for Research,” Management Science, 32(5), 514-538.
Li, X. B. and G. R. Reeves (1999), “A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 507-517.
Lovell, C. A. K. (1993), “Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency,” in Fried, H. O., C. A. K. Lovell and S. S. Schmidt (ed.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency： Techniques and Applications, New York：Oxford University Press.
Margari, B. B., F. Erbetta, C. Petraglia and M. Piacenza (2006), “Regulatory and Environmental Effects on Public Transit Efficiency：A Mixed DEA-SFA Approach,” Working Paper, Center for Research on Regulated Services, Italy.
Norman, M. and B. Stocker (1991), Data Envelopment Analysis：The Assessment of Performance, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
Pastor, J. T. (1995), “How to Account for Environmental Effects in DEA：An Application to Bank Branches,” Working Paper, Departmento de Estadistica e Investigacion Operativa. 03071 Alicante, Spain：Universidad de Alicante.
Pastor, J. T. (2002), “Credit Risk and Efficiency in the European Banking System：A three-stage analysis,” Applied Financial Economics, 1212, 895-911.
Sandford, C., M. Godwin and P. Hardwick (1989), “Administrative and Compliance Costs of Taxation,” Fiscal Publications, Bath.
Seiford, L. M. (1996), “Data Envelopment Analysis：The Evolution of the State of the Art (1978-1995),” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 99-138.
Slemrod, J. (1992), Why People Pay Taxes：Tax Compliance and Enforcement, Press Ann Arbor, University of Michigan.
Sueyoshi, T. (1997), “Measuring Efficiencies and Returns to Scale of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone in Production and Cost Analyses,” Management Science, 43(6), 779-796.
Sueyoshi, T. (1999), “DEA-discriminant Analysis in the View of Goal Programming,” European Journal of Operational Research, 115(2), 564-582.
Thanassoulis E. (2001), Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis：A foundation text with integrated software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Hardbound.
Thompson, R. G., L. N. Langemeier, C. T. Lee and R. M. Thrall (1990), “The Role of Multiplier Bounds in Efficiency Analysis with Application to Kansas Farming,” Journal of Econometrics, 46, 93-108.
Timmer, C. P. (1971), “Using a Probabilistic Frontier Production Function to Measure Technical Efficiency,” Journal of Political Economy, 79, 776-794.
Tone, K. and M. Tsutsui (2007), Network DEA：A Slacks-based Measure Approach, Discussing Paper：07-08, GRIPS Policy Information Center.
Wim, M. and P. Annick (2002), “Measuring and Explaining the Productive Efficiency of Tax Offices：a Non-Parametric Best Practice Frontier Approach,” Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management, XLVII, 406-415.
三、網際網路部份
臺北縣政府主計處網站，網址：http://www.bas.tpc.gov.tw
臺北縣政府財政局網站，網址： http://www.finance.tpc.gov.tw
臺北縣政府稅捐稽徵處網站，網址：http://www.tax.tpc.gov.tw |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
96921043
98 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096921043 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 350 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
