Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49043
|
Title: | 專業服務差異化優勢隻行銷與績效管理--以A會計師事務所為例 Marketing, performance management and competitive advantage through service differentiation in the accounting profession - a case study |
Authors: | 陳依蘋 Chen, Iping |
Contributors: | 林宛瑩 Lin, Wan Yin 陳依蘋 Chen, Iping |
Keywords: | 競爭優勢 績效管理 平衡計分卡 知識管理 Competitive Advantage Performance Management Balanced Scorecard Knowledge Management |
Date: | 2009 |
Issue Date: | 2010-12-08 01:57:51 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 會計師因為社會所賦予的責任,是投資大眾對資本市場的信心所在,扮演著監督企業是否誠實表達其經營狀況的公正第三者。但是隨著企業經營國際化的程度越深,跨國營運模式更加成熟之際,會計師除了必須具備在地的專業之外,尚須具備全球經營環境、產業及稅務法規等相關知識,以提供符合客戶國際化需求的服務。同時由於各界對會計師業的管理與獨立性的要求也愈來愈嚴格,在獨立性與追求成長的雙重挑戰下,對投資大眾負有社會責任的會計師業,如何透過其品牌價值之建立,獲取大眾信任;並透過品牌的差異化,在同業競爭中同中求異,脫穎而出,拉大差異,以追求成長。
個案A會計師事務所運用國際聯盟組織的全球專家資源及區域性人才運作的整合,透過「整合行銷溝通」與「知識分享」的方式,包含提出產業別及各領域的研究報告、在媒體發表相關論點文章、於學校開闢產學合作課程、舉辦研討會等方式,不但塑造出其產業專家的形象,同時也引進全球最新的議題與觀念,建立在專業知識領域上的議題領先性(Thought leadership)形象,透過議題領先性的建立,塑造其具備在地化與全球化的專家智識品牌價值,建立其專業服務差異化的優勢,拉大競爭差距,並進而追求成長。
本研究嘗試探討個案事務所在議題領先性的做法及其績效管理,以提供專業服務業在差異化優勢的建立及其績效管理上之參考依據,並對專業服務業在議題領先性之建立上提出建議。A會計師事務所藉由其全球組織聯盟之全球性品牌基礎為發展,透過知識分享擴及組織外部,包括顧客端及相關社群、社會大眾端,並運用整合性行銷之手法來達到議題領先性之塑造與品牌聲譽的差異性,藉以強化A會計師事務所之競爭優勢。
關鍵字:競爭優勢、績效管理、平衡計分卡、知識管理 Accountants are relied on by the investing public to act as neutral third parties in their role as monitors of whether corporate reporting faithfully reflects actual operating conditions. However, with the increasing internationalization of corporate operations and the spread of cross-border business models, accountants are required to possess, in addition to local professional knowledge, knowledge relating to international operations, industries and regulations, in order to provide services that meet the needs of their globalizing clients. At the same time, standards for accounting management and independence requirements have grown increasingly strict. Given the dual challenges of remaining independent and pursuing growth, how do accounting firms, with their responsibility to the investing public, build brand value and acquire the public’s trust, and how do they distinguish themselves through brand differentiation, stand out from their competitors and achieve growth?
In the case referred to in this thesis as Accounting Firm A, the firm leveraged the resources of its global alliance, global experts and regional integration of talent, and used “integrated marketing and communication” and “knowledge sharing” (including presentation of studies in different industries and fields, publishing articles on relevant topics, providing courses to the academic community jointly with industries, holding seminars, etc.), to introduce the latest issues, create its image as industry experts, and establish a reputation for professional thought leadership. This, in turn, created brand value based on local and global expertise, and allowed the firm to build competitive advantage in differentiated professional services, thereby enlarging its competitive lead and achieving growth.
This thesis explores the methods that the subject firm used in building thought leadership and in its performance management, and provides evidence and suggestions for professional service providers on the establishment of advantage through service differentiation and performance management. It finds that Accounting Firm A, based on the development of its global brand and global alliance, utilized integrated marketing to establish thought leadership and brand differentiation. The firm further strengthened its competitive advantage by extending knowledge sharing to those outside the organization, including customers, relevant communities and the general public.
Knowledge itself does not create value. The value of knowledge is fully realized only through management, communication and sharing, and the power of information technology. 中文摘要 IV
英文摘要 V
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究議題 3
第三節 論文章節架構 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 競爭優勢 6
第二節 績效管理 15
第三節 平衡計分卡 21
第四節 知識管理 34
第三章 個案背景 39
第一節 全球會計師產業之發展現況 39
第二節 國內會計師產業之發展現況 41
第三節 會計師產業的行銷 50
第四節 個案會計師事務所介紹 57
第四章 建立差異化優勢與績效管理 60
第一節 建立差異化優勢 60
第二節 績效管理 67
第五章 結論與建議 70
第一節 研究結論 70
第二節 研究限制與建議 75
參考文獻 76 |
Reference: | 一、中文部分 于泳泓.陳依蘋合著,2004,「平衡計分卡完全教戰守策」,台北,梅霖文化。 方至民,2000,「企業競爭優勢」,台北:前程企管。 王奕偉,2007,以計劃行為理論探討大型會計師事務所審計人員之知識分享行為-團隊氣候及領導風格為外生變數,淡江大學會計學系碩士論文。 江美欣,2001,影響知識管理策略及其效益之因素研究,國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。 吳安妮, 2003,「平衡計分卡之精髓、範疇及整合」,會計研究月刊,第 211期,頁 45-54。 吳琮璠、郭宇閎,2004,國際會計師產業合併與競爭結構之變遷與影響,會計研究月刊,第227期:82-97。 吳德豐,2010,「公司稅務治理」,尚未出版之書籍序文。 吳錦錩,2006,建構企業持續性競爭優勢-以台灣資訊科技公司為例,東吳經濟商學學報,第五十三期:95-134。 李明軒、邱如美譯,2010再版,Michael E. Porter 原著,「競爭優勢」,台北:天下文化。 李書行,1996,「務實創新策略性績效評估」,會計研究月刊,第 113 期,19頁。 沈孝廉,2008,動態競爭模型之研究-以台灣四大會計師事務所為例,中華大學科技管理學系碩士論文。 卓宗雄,2002,「強勢競爭」,台北:楊智文化。 周恬如,2004,會計師事務所之組織知識吸納能力及影響因素之研究,輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。 林昌汶,2004,知識型技術服務業關鍵成功因素之研究,大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。 林靖傑,2009,會計師事務所及審計人員知識分享影響因素及其效果之研究,臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 林嬋娟、王泓達,2004,大型會計師事務所合併之影響,會計研究月刊,第227期:98-108。 徐作聖.邱奕嘉合著,2000,「高科技創新與競爭」,台北:遠流文化。 高登第譯,大衛艾克及艾瑞克喬幸斯瑟勒合著,2002,「品牌領導」,台北,天下文化。 張君強,1998,專業服務業知識管理之研究──以會計師事務所為例,國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文。 張明輝,2006,會計師獨立性之研究,國立台灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班會計與管理決策組碩士論文。 張漢鐘,1992,會計師事務所經營策略、行銷模式與績效之研究,國立台灣科技大學管理研究所企業管理學程碩士論文。 張慧珍,2005,用平衡計分卡建構績效衡量指標之研究-以台北都會區大眾捷運系統土地開發基金為例,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。 莊蕎安,2008,會計師事務所的經營與挑戰,會計研究月刊,第266期:60-77。 郭柔蘭,2008,我國會計師事務所品牌價值之探討-以國際型四大事務所為例,國立台北大學會計學系碩士論文。 陳光華,1995,會計師事務所之企業形象與大型企業選擇因素之關聯性研究,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 陳依蘋、鄭惠之,2004,專業組織的未來-會計師、律師向前走,會計研究月刊,第226期:30-40。 陳嘉鈴,2006,我國中小型會計師事務所知識管理之個案研究,淡江大學會計學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。 陳碧桂,2009,會計師事務所事業組織間業務綜效之研究:以PwC台灣為例,國立台灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班商學組碩士論文。 彭志宏,2004,知識創造對組織績效的影響,國立中山大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。 黃鳳姿,2007,會計師事務所之社會資本、人力資源管理實務與知識管理績效及組織績效之關聯性研究,淡江大學會計學系碩士論文。 楊振富、潘勛譯,Freidman 原著,2005,「世界是平的」,台北,雅言文化。 劉順仁,2004,「建立非營業特種基金績效衡量指標之研究」,行政院研究發展考核委員會、行政院主計處編印。 鍾媚芳,2006,組織文化與知識分享之研究:以會計師事務所為例,中興大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 鍾惠珍,2002,會計師行銷座談會紀實,會計研究月刊,第195期:48-61。 魏忠華,2002,專業諮詢服務組織之知識管理策略研究-以安侯建業會計師事務所確認性服務為例,國立交通大學高階主管管理學程碩士論文。 二、英文部分 Allen P. W. and Arnold D.R. 1991. How to Develop an Advertising Program for an Accounting Practice, The CPA Journal April: 32-35 Aaker D. A. and Joachimsthaler E . 2000. Brand Leadership, Free Press. Barney, J.B. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management 17: 99-120. Cokins G. 2004. Performance Management:Finding the Missing Pieces to Close the Intelligence Gap, John Wiley& Sons, Collis, D. J. & C. A. Montgomery. 1995. Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s, Harvard Business Review, July-August, Day, G. S. & P. Nedungadi.1994.Managerial Representations of Competitive Advantage, Journal of Marketing 58: 31-44. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (Deloitte) 2009 Annual Review. Ernst & Young (EY) Global review 2009 GAO 2003. Accounting firm consolidation-Selected large Public Company views on audit fees, quality, independence, and choice, September 30. GAO. 2008. Audits of Public Companies, Januanry 09. Grant, R. M. 1996: Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal 17: 109-122. Hammer, M and J. Champy. 1993. Reengineering the Corporation, New York: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc., Hill, C W. L. and G. R. Jones. 2002. Strategic Management Theory, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, Holsapple C.W., M. Singh. 2001. The knowledge chain model: activities for competitiveness. Expert System with Applications 20: 77-98 Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. 1996. The balanced scorecard:translating strategy into action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. 2001. The strategy-focused organization: how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment, Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. 2004. Strategy maps: converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kaplan, R. S. and R. Cooper. 1997. Cost & effect: using integrated cost system to drive profitability and performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kaplan, R.S. and D. P. Norton. 1992. The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review 70 (1): 77-79. Kotnour, T., Orr, C., Spaulding, J. & Guidi, J. (1997) Determining the Benefit of Knowledge Management Activities. Internal Conference on Computational Cybernetics and Simulation 1: 94-99 KPMG International Annual Review 2009. Leonard-Barton, D.1992.Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development, Strategic Management Journal 13: 111-125. Niven, P.2002. Balanced Scorecard Step by Step, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. Prahalad, C. K. & G. Hamel. 1990. The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review 68: 79-91. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Global Annual Review 2009. Rayport, J. F. 1995. Exploiting the virtual value chain. Harvard Business Review, 73(6): 75-86 Reed, R. & R. Defillippi. 1990. Causal Ambiguity Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Academy of Management Review 15: 88-102. Teece. D. J. 1998. Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets, California Management Review 40: 55-79. Wernerfelt, B.1989. From Critical Resources to Corporate Strategy, Journal of General Management 14: 4-12. Zack, M. H. 1999. Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review Summer: 45-57. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA) 92932310 98 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0092932310 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 240 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|