Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48972
|
| Title: | 私募可轉債與公開發行可轉債宣告效果之比較
The comparison of announcement effect on private convertible bond and public convertible bond |
| Authors: | 張舒雁 |
| Contributors: | 徐燕山
張舒雁 |
| Keywords: | 私募可轉債
公開發行可轉債
宣告效果 |
| Date: | 2010 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-12-08 01:54:29 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究探討國內上市櫃公司私募可轉債與公開發行可轉債宣告效果之比較。以臺灣2005年1月至2009年12月之間宣告進行私募可轉債及公開發行可轉債的上市櫃公司為研究樣本，分別以事件研究法(Event Study)、多元迴歸分析（Multiple Regression Analysis）與多元名義羅吉特迴歸（Multinomial Logistic Regression）探討私募可轉債及公開發行可轉債兩組樣本之宣告效果、影響宣告效果的解釋因素以及影響公司選擇私募或公開發行可轉債的因素。本研究之實證結果發現：1.公司宣告私募可轉債在事件日隔日有顯著正向宣告效果，宣告公開發行可轉債在事件日當天有顯著負向宣告效果。2.公司宣告私募可轉債與公開發行可轉債之間的累積異常報酬率，除了以董事會決議見報日為事件日、CAR(0,1)為事件期之外，其他情況下無顯著差異。3.實證結果顯示，私募可轉債方面，相對發行規模、公司規模、負債比率與累積異常報酬率為顯著正相關，內部人持股比例與累積異常報酬率為顯著負相關，營收成長率、股價淨值比與累積異常報酬率為不顯著正相關。公開發行可轉債方面，營收成長率、內部人持股比例與累積異常報酬率為顯著正相關，股價淨值比、負債比率與累積異常報酬率為顯著負相關，相對發行規模與累積異常報酬為不顯著負相關，公司規模對累積異常報酬率影響方向不明確。4. 利用多元名義羅吉特迴歸分析影響公司選擇以私募或公開發行可轉債融資方式的因素，結果顯示相對發行規模愈大、營收成長率愈高、股價淨值比愈高、公司規模愈大的公司，愈傾向公開發行。內部人持股比例愈高、負債比率愈高的公司，愈傾向私募。
The study investigates the announcement effect of those companies which have issued convertible bonds by private placement and by public offering in Taiwan. The empirical results show that:
1.The abnormal return of the announcement of convertible bond by private placement is positive at the next day of event day. The abnormal return of the announcement of convertible bond by public offering is negative at the event day.
2.The cumulative abnormal returns between companies who issued convertibles by private placement and by public offering are not significantly different.
3.In terms of private placement of convertible bonds: Relative issue size, firm size and debt ratio are significantly positive related to the cumulative abnormal return. The proportion of insider ownership is significantly negative related to the cumulative abnormal return. Sales growth rate and P/B ratio are not significantly positive related to the cumulative abnormal return. In terms of public offering of convertible bonds: Sales growth rate and the proportion of insider ownership are significantly positive related to the cumulative abnormal return. P/B ratio and debt ratio are significantly negative related to the cumulative abnormal return. Relative issue size is not significantly negative related to the cumulative abnormal return. The relation between firm size and the cumulative abnormal return is not clear.
4.Those companies, which have larger relative issue size, higher sales growth rate, higher P/B ratio, larger firm size, would prefer issuing convertible bonds by public offering. Those companies, which have higher proportion of insider ownership, higher debt ratio, would prefer issuing convertible bonds by private placement. |
| Reference: | 國內文獻
尤琬珺，2007，「私募公司債的宣告效果－贏家與輸家的分析」，南台科技大學國際企業系碩士論文。
呂季蓉，2006，「台灣上市上櫃公司私募之研究─論私募對象之影響」，國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。
李協昌，2006，「上市公司私募股權之資訊內涵及折價因素之探討」，國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
沈中華、李建然，2000，「事件研究法：財務與會計實證研究必備」，台北華泰書局。
林育安，2006，「私募股權之資訊內涵：上市（櫃）公司之實證研究」，國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
林士韡，2009，「公司治理、盈餘管理與可轉換公司債發行後長期績效之研究
」，國立政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
徐煜博，2005，「國內發行可轉換公司債宣告效果與財務特質關係之研究-以電子業及傳統產業為例」，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
許雪芳，2003，「上市上櫃公司私募之研究」，國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。
曹育欣，2003，「證券選擇與可轉換公司債發行宣告效果之研究」，國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
黃莉茹，2007，「私募股權之宣告效果－公司治理機制、盈餘管理行為與無形資產之影響」，國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
曾偉淳，2009，「公司治理對可轉換公司債發行後公司長短期績效影響之研究」，國立政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
詹曙銘，2003，「可轉換公司債發行宣告對長、短期股價報酬的影響」，朝陽科技大學財務金融系碩士班碩士論文。
溫庭琪，2007，「可轉換公司債發行前之盈餘管理與長短期股票績效及營運表現關連性之研究」，國立中正大學財務金融所碩士論文。
劉兆敏，2009，「台灣私募普通公司債與可轉換公司債宣告對股價影響之研究」，輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
陸潤生，2006，「私募宣告之資訊內涵」，國立政治大學會計系研究所碩士論文。
蔡明秀，2007，「私募宣告會影響股東財富? 以台灣上市上櫃公司為例」，國立臺灣科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
蘇德威，2009，「私募的股東財富效果及影響公司進行私募財務特性分析」，國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班財務金融組碩士論文。
國外文獻
Abhyankar, A. and A. Dunning, 1999,“Wealth Effects of Convertible Bond and Convertible Preference Share Issues: An Empirical Analysis of the UK Market,” Journal of Banking & Finance 23, 1043-1065.
Ammann, M. , M. Fehr and R. Seiz, 2006,“New Evidence on the Announcement Effect of Convertible and Exchangeable Bonds,” Journal of Multinational Financial Management 16, 43–63.
Barclay, M. J. , C.G. Holderness and D.P. Sheehan, 2007, “Private Placements and Managerial Entrenchment,” Journal of Corporate Finance 13, 461-484.
Barclay, M. and C. Smith, 1995, “The Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt,” Journal of Finance 50, 609–631.
Bayless, M. and S. Chaplinsky, 1996, “Is There a Window of Opportunity for Seasoned Equity Issuance?” Journal of Finance 51, 253-278.
Billett, M. T., M. J. Flannery and J. A. Garfinkel, 1995, “The Effect of Lender Identity on a Borrowing Firm’s Equity Return,” Journal of Financial Economic 15, 233-259.
Blackwell, D.W. and D.S. Kidwell, 1988, “An Investigation of the Cost Differences Between Public Sales and Private Placements of Debt,” Journal of Financial Economics 22, 253-278.
Brennan, M. and E. Schwartz, 1988, “The Case for Convertibles,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 55-64.
Cantillo, M. and J. Wright, 2000, “How Do Firms Choose Their Lenders? An Empirical Investigation,” Review of Financial Studies 13, 155-189.
Carey, M., S. Prowse , J. Rea and G. Udell, 1993, “The Economics of the Private Placements: A New Look,” Journal of Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments 23, 1– 66.
Cheng, W. , N. Visaltanachoti and P. Kesayan, 2005, “A Stock Market Reaction Following Convertible Bond Issuance: Evidence from Japan,” International Journal of Business 10, 4.
Cronqvist, H. and M. Nilsson, 2005, “The Choice Between Rights Offerings and Private Equity Placements, ”Journal of Financial Economics 78, 2, 375-407.
Dann, L. Y. and W. H. Mikkelson , 1984,“Convertible Debt Iissuance, Capital Structure Change and Financing Related Information,” Journal of financial economics, 157-186.
Denis, D.J. and V.T. Mihov, 2003, “The Choice Among Bank Debt, Non-bank
Private Debt, and Public Debt: Evidence from New Corporate Borrowings,”
DeRoon, F. and C. Veld, 1998, “Announcement Effects of Convertible Bond Loans and Warrant-Bond Loans: An Empirical Analysis for the Dutch Market,” Journal of Banking and Finance 22 , 1481–1506.
Diamond, D. W., 1991, “Monitoring and Reputation: The Choice Between Bank Loans and Directly Placed Debt,”Journal of Political Economy 99, 689-721.
Journal of Financial Economics 70, 3-28.
Dierkens, N., 1991, “Information Asymmetry and Equity Issues,”Journal of
Financial and Quantitative Analysis 26, 181–199.
Easterwood, J. and P. Kadapakkam., 1991, “The Role of Private and Public Debt in Corporate Capital Structures,” Financial Management 20, 3, 49-57.
Eckbo, B. ,1986,“Valuation Effect of Corporate Debt Offerings,” Journal of Financial Economic 15, 119-151.
Fama, E.F. and M.C. Jensen, 1983, “Separation of Ownership and Control,” Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301-325.
Fields, L. P. and E. L. Mais, 1991, “The Valuation Effects of Private Placements of Convertible Debt,” Journal of Finance 46, 5, 1925-1932.
Fulghieri, P. and D. Lukin, 2001, “Information Production, Dilution Costs, and Optimal Security Design,” Journal of Financial Economics 61, 3-42.
Gomes, A. and G. Phillips, 2005, “Why Do Public Firms Issue Private and Public Equity, Convertibles and Debt?”, http:// www.law.harvard.edu/programs olin_center/ corporate_governance/papers/Gomes_privatepublicnov2.pdf .
Hertzel, M. and R. L. Smith, 1993, “Market Discounts and Shareholder Gains for Placing Equity Privately,” Journal of Finance 48, 458-485.
Hertzel, M. and L. Rees, 1998, “Earnings and Risk Changes Around Private Placements of Equity,” Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance 13, 1, 21-35.
James, C., 1987, “Some evidence on the uniqueness of bank loans,”Journal of Financial Eco- nomics 19, 217-236.
Jensen, M. , 1986, “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers,” American EconomicReview 76, 323-329.
Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
Kang, J. K. , Y. C. Kim, K. J. Park and R.M. Stulz,1995, “An Analysis of The Wealth Effects of Japanese Offshore Dollar-Denominated Convertible And Warrant Bond Issues,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 30, 257-270.
Kang, J. K. and R. M. Stulz ,1996 , “How Different Is Japanese Corporate Finance? An Investigation of the Information Content of New Security Issues,” Review of Financial Studies9, 1, 109-139.
Kim, Y. O., 1990, “Informative Conversion Ratios：A Signaling Approach,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25, 2, 229-243.
Korajczyk, R. A. , D. J. Lucas and R. L. McDonald, 1992, “Equity Issues with Time Varying Asymmetric Information,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
27, 397-417.
Krishnamurthy, S. , P. Spindt, V. Subramaniam and T. Woidtke. , 2005, “Does Iinvestor Identity Matter in Equity Iissues? Evidence from Private Placements,” Journal of Financial Intermediation 14, 2, 210-238.
Krishnaswami, S., P. A. Spindt and V. Subramaniam, 1999, “Information Asymmetry, Monitoring and the Placement Structure of Corporate Debt,” Journal of Financial Economics 51, 407-434.
Lewis, C., R. Rogalski and J. Seward, 1999, “Is Convertible Debt a Substitute for Straight Debt or Common Equity?” Financial Management 28, 3, 5-27.
Lucas D. and R. McDonald,1990, “Equity Issues and Stock Price Dynamics ,” Journal of Finance 45, 1019-1043.
Masulis, R. W. ,1983, “The Impact of Capital Structure Change on Firm Value:
Some Estimates,” Journal of Finance 38, 107-126.
McLaughlin, R. , A. Sasieddine and G. K. Vasudevan, 1998 , “The Long-run Performance of Convertible Debt Issuers,” The Journal of Financial Research 4, 373-388.
Mikkelson, W. and M. Partch, 1986, “Valuation Effects of Security Offerings and the Issuance Process,” Journal of Financial Economics 15, 31-60.
Miller, M. H. , and K. Rock, 1985,“Dividend Policy Under Asymmetric Information,” The Journal of Finance 40, 4, 1031–1051.
Myers, S. , and N. Majluf, 1984, “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have,” Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187-222.
Ross, S. ,1977, “The Determination Of Financial Structure: The Incentive- Signalling Approach,” Bell Journal of Economics 27, 7-41.
Sharpe, I.G. and L.A. E. Woo, 2005, “Corporate Control, Expected Underpricing, and the Choice of Issuance Mechanism in Unseasoned Equity Markets,” Journal of Corporate Finance 11, 716–735.
Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny, 1986, “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control,” Journal of Political Economy 94, 461-488.
Smith, C.,1986, “Investment Banking and the Capital Acquisition Process,” Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 3-29.
Stein, J. , 1992, “Convertible Bonds as Backdoor Equity Financing,” Journal of Financial Economics 32, 3-21.
Stulz, R. , 1988, “Managerial Control of Voting Rights, Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control,” Journal of Financial Economics 20, 25-54.
Szewczyk, S. H. and R. Varma, 1991, “Raising Capital with Private Placements of Debt,” Journal of Financial Research 14, 1, 1-13.
Wallance, N. D. , J. L. Glastock and T. V. Schwarz, 1995, “Signaling with Convertible Debt,” Journal of financial and quantitative analysis 30, 3, 425-440.
Wruck, K. H. , 1989, “Equity Ownership Concentration and Firm Value-Evidence from Private Equity Financings,”Journal of Financial Economics 23, 1, 3-28.
Wu, Y. L., 2004, “The Choice of Equity-selling Mechanism,”Journal of Financial Economics 74, 93–119.
Yaman, D., 2005, “The Choice Between Private and Public Convertible Bond Offerings,” http:// The choice between private and public convertible bond offerings,www.westga.edu/~bquest/2005/choice.pdf. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
財務管理研究所
97357031
99 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097357031 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [財務管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
