政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/48919

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of Accounting > Theses > Item 140.119/48919

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48919

Title:	財務報表重編分析及對股價影響之研究--以台灣上市櫃公司為例 The restatement of financial statement and its impact on stock price--Taiwan listed companies
Authors:	顏立婷
Contributors:	戚務君顏立婷
Keywords:	財務報表重編事件研究法異常報酬
Date:	2009
Issue Date:	2010-12-08 01:53:10 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究針對台灣財務報表重編情形進行分類並對重編事件日調查資本市場的反應。就分類整理的調查而言，本論文彙總台灣1999年至2009年所有上市櫃公司發生財務報表重編的情形，依重編年度、重編原因、公司所屬產業、報表重編類型等方向予以分類。其次，本研究採用事件研究法，以對外公告之重編事件日為基準，計算該事件日之異常報酬及市值的變化，進一步依重編原因、重編類型、財報所屬季別、公司所屬產業等因素對異常報酬進行迴歸分析。本研究參考美國政府會計責信局(GAO)在2002及2006年報告之研究架構，對台灣上市櫃公司進行研究。實證結果發現重編事件日前後一日的累計異常報酬為負數。進一步的迴歸分析顯示，企業的財務危機情況以及財務報表誤述日至重編公告日的長度均與異常報酬有關。此外，針對不同重編原因檢視重編事件對異常報酬的進一步分析顯示，造成異常報酬下降最多的原因是虛增(漏列)交易，其次是轉投資相關與會計估計及評價，使異常報酬下降最少的原因則為損益期間的歸屬。關鍵字：財務報表重編、事件研究法、異常報酬。 This research employs both case study and empirical approaches to investigate the causes, demeanors and economic consequences of a sample of firms that were enforced by the Securities and future Bureau to restate their financial statements over the period of year 1999 to year 2009. This study was referred to the method mentioned in U.S. Government Accounting Accountability Office (GAO) 2002 and 2006 to conduct a research in Taiwan’s capital market. Empirical results indicate that event date the cumulative abnormal return is negative. Further regression analysis showed that enterprise as well as the financial crisis in the financial statements of misrepresentation to the length of the announcement date of restatement are related to abnormal returns. In addition, different reasons restated events on the further analysis showed that abnormal returns, resulting in the largest decline in abnormal returns due to inflated (the omission of) transactions, followed by the transfer and accounting estimates related to the investments and evaluation of abnormal returns decline cause the least loss was attributable to the period. Keywords: financial restatement; event study; abnormal return
Reference:	吳祥福，2003，財務報表重編與董監獨立性/專業性之研究，國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。李宛臻，2005，財務報表重編類型、特性與盈餘管理誘因及治理環境各性之關連性研究，國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。林宜潔，2007，財務報表重編對盈餘資訊內涵之影響，國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。林宛瑩、許崇源與戚務君，2005，財務報告重編、盈餘透明度與公司治理，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。林淑玲，1995，我國證管會對財務報表重編管制之股價影響，國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。林嬋娟與薛敏正，2004，財務報表重編決定因素與影響，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。邱秀清與鄭鈞介，2008，董監事會及審計品質與財務報表重編，商學學報，第 16期：67-86。陳牡丹，1999，上市公司財務報表重編次數、重編影響方向與操縱盈餘動機之關聯性研究，台中商專學報，第三十一卷：193-214。陳惠玲，2002，由財報重編看財報可信度及CPA簽證品質—財務透明度評估之一，貨幣觀測與信用評等，第37期：77-87。游智媛，2004，強制性財務報表重編之成因與後果，國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。黃培琳，2008，GAO對美國上市企業重編之研究，TEJ信用風險評估專刊第73 期：181-188。謝銘元，2008，TEJ重編資料庫簡介，TEJ信用風險評估專刊，第73期：1-11。謝銘元，2009，TEJ重編資料庫簡介(續)，貨幣觀測與信用評等，第75期：103-108。薛敏正、林嬋娟與林秀鳳，2008，董事會特性與財務報告重編，交大管理學報，第二十八卷，第2期 (12月)：73-103。 Agrawal, A. and Sahiba Chadha. 2003. Corporate governance and accounting scandals. Working Paper, University of Alabama. Akhigbe A., R. J. Kudla, and J. Madura. 2005 Why Are Some Corporate Earnings Restatements More Damaging? Applied Financial Economics 15 (March): 327-336. Anderson, L. K. and T. L. Yohn. 2002. The effect of 10-k restatements on firm value, information asymmetries, and investors’ reliance on earnings. Working Paper, University of Geogetown. Cheng, Q. and D. B. Farber. 2008. Earnings restatements, changes in CEO compensation, and firm performance. The Accounting Review 83 (Sep):1217-1250. DeFond, L. and J. Jiambalvo. 1991. Incidence and circumastances of accounting errors. The Accounting Review 66(Jul): 643-655. General Accounting Office. 2002. Financial statement restatements: trends, market, impacts, regulatory responses, and remaining challenges. Washington D.C. GAO-03-138. General Accounting Office, 2006. Financial restatements: Update of Public Company Trends, Market Impacts, and Regulatory Enforcement Activities,GAO-06-678. Hribar, P. and N. T. Jenkins. 2003. The effect of accounting restatements on earnings revisions and the estimated cost of capital. Working Paper, Cornel University. Palmrose, Z. V., V. J. Richardson and S. W. Scholz. 2000. Restated financial statements and auditor litigation. Working Paper, University of Kansas. _______. 2004. Determinants of Market Reactions to Restatement Announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37(Feb): 59-89. Palmrose, Z. V. and S. W. Scholz. 2004. The circumstances and legal consequences of Non-GAAP reporting: Evidence from restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research 21(Spr): 139-178. Richardson, S., I. Tuna and M. Wu. 2003. Predicting earnings management: The case of earnings restatements. Working paper, The Wharton School. Srinivasan, S. 2005. Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. Journal of Accounting Research 43(May): 291-334. Wilson, W. M. 2008. An empirical analysis of the decline in the information content of earnings following restatements. The Accounting Review 83 (Mar): 519-548. Wu, M. 2002. Earnings restatement: a capital market perspective. Working paper, New York University.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學會計研究所 97353044 98
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097353044
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Accounting] Theses

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

社群 sharing

Loading...