 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51735624
Online Users : 618
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/4401
|
| Title: | 個人資料保護與警察資料蒐集權之研究 - 以警察職權行使法第九條至第十三條之規定為中心 |
| Other Titles: | Personal Data Protection and the Collection of Police Data: Focusing on Sections 9 to 13 of the `Police Duties Enforcement Act` |
| Authors: | 李震山 |
| Keywords: | 警察職權;資料蒐集;監視器;監視;資訊自決權;資訊隱私權;行政危害;刑事危害;犯罪預防
Data Protection;Police Duties Enforcement Act;Video Surveillance Equipment;informational self-determination;information privacy;human rights |
| Date: | 2004 |
| Issue Date: | 2007-04-18 16:52:10 (UTC+8) |
| Publisher: | 臺北市：國立政治大學法律學系 |
| Abstract: | 本研究係以二○○三年六月五日立法院三讀通過,同年十二月一日施行之「警察職權 行使法」第二章(第6-18 條)中,最具資料蒐集核心意義之條文為第9-13 條,為本研究之對 象,各條要旨如下： (1). 集會遊行之攝影、錄音(第9 條) (2). 公共場所或公眾得出入之場所裝置監視器(第10 條) (3). 對無隱私或秘密合理期待行為或生活情形之監視(第11 條) (4). 遴選治安人員以外第三人秘密蒐集資料(第12 條、第13 條) 在資訊時代下,人民對資訊自決(主)權或資訊隱私權保障之期望甚殷,警察基於治安 亦須擁有上述職權,兩者間之緊張關係應予調和,該研究主題,即饒富意義。 本研究之主要目的如次： (1). 警察資料蒐集權涉及人民資訊自決權或資訊隱私權,其內涵與作為基本權利相 關理論之探討。 (2). 探討警察行政危害防止與刑事危害(犯行追緝)間之「犯罪預防」領域。釐清介 於刑事與行政領域中衍生諸多法理與實際問題。此問題困擾警察法理論與實務界甚久, 公法學界對此亦甚重視,有必要深入研究。 (3). 除個人資料保護、警察犯罪預防等理論闡明外,擬以逐條釋義的方式,詳細評析 警察職權行使法第9-13 條,以供警察法學研究與實務參考。
This study aims at charting the second chapter (ss. 6-18) of "Police Duties Enforcement Act", which was enacted on 5 June 2003 and was implemented on 1 December 2003. The main 91/10/30 修訂 content of the chapter is as follows: 1. Videotaping and Recording in the Assembling and Parade; 2. Installment of Video Surveillance Equipment in the public place; 3.Surveillance under no reasonable expectation of privacy; 4.Selection of an informant to collect data clandestinely. Public concerns about right to informational self-determination or information privacy have arisen in the information age. On the other hand, police must have these powers to maintain public order. Thus, it is crucial to explore how to reconcile the growing tension between privacy interests and law enforcement objectives. The main purpose of this study is 1. To explore the basic principle of right to informational self-determination or information privacy as human rights; 2. To clarifying the distinction of policing between criminal law and administrative law; 3. To analyze the provisions of the second chapter article by article and to introduce the theories of data protection and crime prevention. It is hoped that this study can provide a comprehensive guide to police study and practice. |
| Description: | 核定金額：472000元 |
| Data Type: | report |
| Appears in Collections: | [法律學系] 國科會研究計畫
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 932414H004072.pdf | | 801Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 4616 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
