English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51726161      Online Users : 635
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/4337


    Title: 示範訴訟契約之研究
    Other Titles: On the Test Action Agreement
    Authors: 沈冠伶
    Keywords: 示範訴訟契約;裁判外紛爭處理制度;停止爭訟協議(不起訴協議)拘束力協議;執行名義;示範訴訟程序;律師前和解制度
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2007-04-18 16:51:38 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 臺北市：國立政治大學法律學系
    Abstract: 本研究計畫主要以示範訴訟契約，作為研究對象。參考比較示範訴訟在德國; 奧地利及瑞士之發展經驗，並進一步探討在我國現行民事訴訟法及裁判外紛爭處理制度下，有無具備發展之基礎及條件，或是否有立法規範之必要。示範訴訟契約在內容上包括數項協議之結合：(1)「停止爭訟協議」(或「不起訴協議」); (2)「拘束力協議」; (3)「執行名義之取得」; (4)「關於示範訴訟程序本身之進行的約定」。其中不可或缺的部分是：停止訟爭協議及拘束力協議。基於當事人在程序上的主體地位及選擇權，為使當事人之程序利益受到保護，並賦予當事人追求實體利益與程序利益平衡的機會，只要不違反公益; 損害於司法資源之合理分配或訴訟經濟，均宜承認當事人得就訴訟進行之相關事項予以約定。因此，上述協議均可承認其合法性，並具有契約之拘束力。當事人一方如違背契約中之約定，他方當事人得主張示範訴訟契約作為抗辯。示範訴訟契約一方面具有裁判外紛爭處理制度的機能：透過示範訴訟契約之締結，可保留當事人自主解決紛爭之優點，尊重當事人對於紛爭解決方式之選擇。另一方面在同類型的其他紛爭，以示範訴訟之判決作為處理; 解決之依據時，能保有以司法機關之裁判作為紛爭解決依據之優點，如此有助於社會大眾預見法之所在及其發展，具有使法律秩序明確; 安定化的機能。不過，示範訴訟契約之內容較為複雜，常須藉重律師之協助才能完成，而且為了便利當事人能夠取得執行名義，宜考慮在立法上引進律師前和解制度。再者，由於紛爭當事人眾多，常難以期待所有當事人都能締結示範訴訟契約，而宜考慮立法：由法院依職權選擇示範訴訟。
    The subject of the present project is focusing on study of "Test action agreement" (Musterprozessvertrag). Refer to and compare with the experience of the test action developed in German, Austria and Switzerland so as to further investigate whether we have possessed the basis and condition for development of the said "test action" under the current Civil Procedural Law as well as mechanism for "Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR)"or there is any necessity to standard it through legislation. The contents of the test action agreement includes the combination of several agreements: (1) Agreement of non-commencing civil procedure (2) Agreement of claim preclusion (3) Acquirement of execution (4) The contract of the action of litigation proceedings of test action itself. The essential parts thereof are: "agreement of non-commencing civil procedure" and "agreement of claim preclusion".
    Description: 核定金額：331600元
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    912414H004019.pdf55KbAdobe PDF21756View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback