政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/38534
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造访人次 : 51802735      在线人数 : 385
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/38534


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38534


    题名: 電視功能選單圖形介面呈現形式之探討
    作者: 游鳳怡
    贡献者: 黃淑麗
    游鳳怡
    关键词: 雙重編碼理論
    互動電視介面設計
    眼動儀
    強迫選擇作業
    介面設計建議
    日期: 2008
    上传时间: 2010-04-09 13:00:21 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 介面設計是重要的議題，好的介面減低使用者與介面互動所需的時間及認知資源，進而樂於使用該功能。近年來互動式數位電視的使用漸增，卻未有既定的使用介面。本研究試圖探討應如何呈現該功能選單，較能有效與介面互動。
    本研究共三個實驗。實驗一採單因子參與者間實驗設計，獨變項為「提示項目類型」，含「圖示」、「文字」、「圖示加文字」三種；以強迫選擇再認作業，比較以不同方式呈現初次接觸的提示項目，是否造成學習上的差異；達相同學習程度後，不同呈現類型是否導致各組間行為反應有所差異。
    實驗二排除了使用者接收文字或圖示刺激時，各組別的參與者形成不同程度的雙重編碼；操弄目標項目類型，即「文字」或「圖示」。以強迫選擇再認作業觀察同時呈現「文字」、「圖示」兩提示項目，使用者初次接觸時較傾向以何種訊息作判斷。除紀錄反應時間及正確率外，亦計算眼動反應指標。
    實驗三欲探討「經驗效果」，依呈現項目類型分為三組，觀察各組參與者與不同熟悉程度之介面互動時，表現是否會有所差異。採三因子混合設計，「呈現項目類型」為參與者間變項，可分為「圖示」、「文字」及「圖示加文字」三種；「時間變項」及「區段變項」則是參與者內變項，前者指本實驗中的不同日期；後者則為各次實驗中的不同區段。依變項則為參與者完成作業的反應時間、反應正確率及眼動資料。
    研究結果顯示在實驗一中，學習新的功能項目時，具文字敘述之組別表現會較佳；達相同學習程度後，具圖示訊息的組別之反應較只有文字的組別佳。實驗二中，參與者與陌生功能項目互動初期，同時呈現圖示及文字兩種形式的提示項目時，使用者會較傾向以文字訊息判斷。實驗三則顯示在互動時普遍依賴圖示訊息，呈現圖示項目的組別整體而言皆表現得較好；但在互動前期同時呈現「圖示加文字」組的表現與「文字」組較相似，互動後期則與「圖片」組較相似。以上研究結果，可供未來電視功能選單呈現方式設計之參考。
    參考文獻: 中文部分
    李長龍（1999）。迎接數位電視的來臨。數位時代。1999年4月，取自http://dss.ccivs.cyc.edu.tw/science/
    認知心理學（李玉琇、蔣文祁合譯）（2005）。台北：雙葉。（原著出版年：2003）
    楊秋南（2004）。數位電視的現況與未來。資訊尖兵雜誌。2003年1月18日，取自http://www.iii.org.tw/itpilotmz/unit3/6_1.htm。
    賴雅芹（2002）。台灣地區互動電視產業發展現況之研究。國立台灣師範大學圖文傳播研究所碩士論文。
    魏澤群（2007）。優使性2.0(Usability 2.0)網站經驗設計與使用者研究。台北：網奕資訊。
    英文部分
    Anderson, J. (1990). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. New York: W. H. Freeman Publishers.
    Andrew, T. D.(2007). Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice.(2nd ed.). London: Springer.
    Banks, W. P., & Flora, J. (1977) Semantic and perceptual processes in symbolic comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 278-290
    Blankenberger. S, Hahnt, K. (1991). Effects of icon design on human-computer interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 35(3), 363–377
    Bruneau, D., Sasse, M. A., & McCarthy, J. D. (2002). The eyes never lie: The use of eye tracking data in HCI research. In Proceedings of the CHI’02 Workshop on Physiological Computing. NY: ACM Press.
    Byrne, D. M. (1993, April). Using Icons to Find Documents: Simplicity Is Critical. In the Proceedings of INTERCHI, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 446–453
    Calvo, M. G., Nummenmaa, L., & Hyönä, J. (2008) Emotional scenes in peripheral vision: selective orienting and gist processing, but not content identification, Emotion, 8(1), pp. 68–80.
    Egido, C. & Patterson, J. (1988). Pictures and category labels as navigational aids for catalog browsing. Proceedings of ACM CHI -88 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 127-132. Washington, D.C.
    Ferreira, J., Noble, J., & Biddle, R. (2006). A case for iconic icons. Proceedings of the 7th Australian User Interface Conference, Hobart, Australia.
    Galitz,W. O. (1996). The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques. New York: John Wiley.
    Gittens, D. (1986). Icon based human-computer interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 24, 519-543.
    Goldberg, H. J., & Kotval, X. P. (1999). Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: Methods and constructs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24, 631-645.
    Goonetilleke, R. S., Shih, H. M., On, H. K. & Fritsch, J. (2001). Effects of training and representational characteristics in icon design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55 (5), 741–760
    Green, A.J.K. & Barnard, P.J. (1990). Iconic interfacing: The role of icon distinctiveness and fixed or variable screen locations. In D. Diaper et al. (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction – Interact ‘90. North-Holland: Elsevier.
    Haramundanis, K., (1996). Why icons cannot stand alone. Journal of Computer Documentation, 20(2) 1–8.
    Hemenway, K. (1982, March 15-17). Psychological issues in the use of icons in command menus, Proceedings of the 1982 conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.20-23, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
    Hirose, Y., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2007). Equally attending but still not seeing: An eye-tracking study of change detection in own- and other-race faces. Visual Cognition, 15(6), pp. 647-660.
    Horton, W. (1994). The Icon Book: Visual Symbols for Computing Systems and Documentation. New York: Wiley.
    Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441-480.
    Mack, A., Pappas, Z., Silverman, M. & Gay, R. (2002). What we see: Inattention and the capture of attention by meaning. Consciousness & Cognition, 11, 488-506.
    McDougall, S., de Bruijn, O., & Curry, M. (2000). Exploring the effects of icon characteristics on user performance: The role of icon concreteness, complexity and distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6, 291-306.
    McDougall, S. & Curry, M. (2004, September). More than just a picture: Icon interpretation in context. Coping with Complexity Workshop, University of Bath, pp. 16-17.
    http://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/~complex/cwc2004/Published/L04McDougall.pdf
    McFadden, E., & Tepas, D.I. (1997). Effects of time of day and task demand on simulated sign recognition. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting, 1392-1396. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
    Moyes, J. (1994). When users do and don`t rely on icon shape. Proceedings of the CHI ‘94 Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1994, pp. 283–284.
    Moyes, J., & Jordan, P.W. (1993). Icon design and its effect on guessability, learnability and experience user performance. In J.D. Alty, D. Diaper & S. Guest (Eds.), People and Computers VIII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Society.
    Navon, D. (1984). Resources: a theorectical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216- 234.
    Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. San Diego: Academic Press.
    Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publishing.
    Niemelä, M., & Saarinen, J. (2000). Visual search for grouped versus ungrouped icons in a computer interface. Human Factors, 42, 630-635.
    Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Paivio, A. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding. Cognit. Psychol. 45, 176–206.
    Paivio, A. & Csapo, K. (1969). Concrete image and verbal memory codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 279-285.
    Peirce, C.S. (1932). In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.) The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Pomplun, M., & Sunkara, S. (2003). Pupil dilation as an indicator of cognitive workload in Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of HCI International 2003: Vol 3 (pp. 542-546). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Poole, A., & Ball, L.J. (2005). Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research: Current Status and Future Prospects. Retrieved 14 December 2006
    http://www.alexpoole.info/academic/Poole&Ball% 20EyeTracking.pdf
    Potter, M.C., & Faulconer, B.A. (1975). Time to Understand Pictures and Words. Nature, 253, 437-438.
    Raskin. J, (2000) The humane interface: new directions for designing interactive systems. ACM Press
    Rayner, K.(1998). Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research, Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
    Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Richards, D., & McDougall, S. (1999). Road traffic signs: How implicit category knowledge improves learning. In D. Harris (Ed.) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, Vol. 3 Transportation Systems, Medical Ergonomics & Training, pp. 329-336.
    Rogers, Y. (1989). Icons at the interface: their usefulness. Interacting With Computers, 1, 105-117.
    Robert, J. K. J & Keith, S. K. (2003). Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research: Ready to Deliver the Promises (Section Commentary). In R. Radach, J. Hyona, and H. Deubel (Ed.), The Mind`s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (pp. 573-605). Amsterdam, Elsevier Science
    取自http://www.cs.tufts.edu/~jacob/papers/ecem.pdf
    Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Scott, D. (1993). Visual search in modern human-computer interfaces. Behaviour & Information Technology, 12(3), 174–189.
    Shepard, R. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6(1), 156-163
    Somberg, B. (1987). A comparison of rule-based and positionally constant arrangements of computer menu items. In J. M. CARROLL&P. P. TANNER, Eds. Human Factors in Computing Systems─IV and Graphics Interface. Amsterdam: North-Holland, (pp. 255-260).
    Susan, W. (1999) The use of icons and labels in an end user application program: an empirical study of learning and retention. Behaviour & Information Technology 18, 68–82
    Wandmacher, J., & Müller, U. (1987). On the usability of verbal and iconic command representations. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. Suppl. 9, 35-45
    Whiteside, J., Jones, S, Levy, P.S. & Wixon, D. (1985). User performance with command, menu and iconic interfaces. CHI `85: Human Factors in Computing, 185-191.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學研究所
    95752007
    97
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0957520071
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[心理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    007101.pdf95KbAdobe PDF2744检视/开启
    007102.pdf150KbAdobe PDF2810检视/开启
    007103.pdf62KbAdobe PDF2838检视/开启
    007104.pdf68KbAdobe PDF2811检视/开启
    007105.pdf456KbAdobe PDF21791检视/开启
    007106.pdf1154KbAdobe PDF21065检视/开启
    007107.pdf278KbAdobe PDF2956检视/开启
    007108.pdf173KbAdobe PDF21102检视/开启
    007109.pdf1004KbAdobe PDF2793检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈