| Reference: | 一、中文部份
專書
史蒂芬．布蘭克(Stephen J. Blank)編，馮國震、楊紫函譯，擴張後的北約:新挑戰、新任務、新部隊（臺北：史政編譯局，民88年）。
邱恩田，北約：從冷戰到熱戰（北京：新華出版社，1999年）。
許智偉編，鈕先鍾翻譯，華沙公約組織（臺北：黎明文化，民75年）。
翁明賢、林德澔、陳聰銘著，歐洲區域組織新論（臺北：五南圖書，1994年）。
宋燕輝、焦興鎧主編，聯合國與歐美國家論文集（臺北：中央研究院歐美研究所，1997年）。
亞倫．包爾(Alan R. Ball)、蓋．彼得斯(Guy B. Peters)著，陳一新、鄧毓浩、陳景堯譯校，最新現代政治與政府（臺北：韋伯文化，民92）。
道格拉斯．諾斯(Douglas North)著，劉瑞華譯，制度制度變遷與經濟成就（臺北：時報文化，1994年）。
渠梁、韓德主編，國際組織與集團研究（北京：中國社會科學出版社，1989年11月）。
葉至誠、葉立誠着，研究方法與論文寫作（臺北：商鼎文化，1999年）。
錢武南、楊連仲譯，北約擴張與歐洲情勢譯文彙輯（臺北：國防部軍務局，民87年）。
聯合國社會發展研究所，蔡慶年、沈浦娜譯，全球化背景下的社會問題（北京：北京大學出版社，1997年）。
期刊論文
甘逸驊，「北約東擴－軍事聯盟的變遷與政治意涵」，問題與研究，第42卷第4期（民國92年7、8月），頁1-24。
甘逸驊，「冷戰結束後的北約與國際關係理論」，問題與研究，第42卷第5期（民國92年9、10月），頁1-24。
李大中，「北約之轉型：德國與大西洋兩岸秩序的重建」，問題與研究，第35卷第3期（民國85年3月），頁65-80。
胡婉玲，「論歷史制度主義的制度變遷理論」，新世紀智庫論壇，第16期（2001年12月），頁86¬-95。
徐坤明，「波黑背後的大國明爭暗鬥」，時事報告， 第3期（1994年）。
湯紹成，「後冷戰時期北大西洋公約組織角色與功能的轉變」，問題與研究，第39卷第1期（民國89年1月），頁67-78。
楊淑珩，「歐、美、俄在波黑的角逐」，和平與發展，第3期（1994年），頁30。
彭慧鶯，「戰後美國外援法案的決策運作」，問題與研究，第31卷第1
期（民國80年1月），頁63-72。
翟雲瑞，「南斯拉夫民族間內戰的由來和發展」，東歐中亞研究，第3期（1995年），頁57-61。
盧倩儀，「區域整合理論的比較與分析」，美歐季刊，第12卷第1期（1997年春季刊號），頁27-44。
博碩士學位論文
吳欣蓉，「歐盟安全自主發展與北約組織關係之研究（1990-2003）」，碩士論文，私立淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文，民國92年。
胡婉玲，「從新制度主義論歐洲議會職權之變遷」，碩士論文，中國文化大學中山學術研究所博士論文，民國90年。
陳麒安，「後冷戰時期美國聯盟外交之研究」，碩士論文，私立淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士論文，民國92年。
張鑑昇，「後冷戰時期北約角色轉變之研究」，碩士論文，國立中興大學國際政治研究所碩士論文，民國93年。
劉志鴻，「後冷戰時期歐洲安全機制演變與德國角色之研究」，碩士論文，私立淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士論文，民國90年。
戴慶正，「聯合國維持和平行動的變遷與發展－波士尼亞案例之研究」，國立政治大學外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班碩士論文，民國93年。
報紙
中國時報，民國90年10月9日，11版。
二、英文部分
專書
Arthur, W. Brian, Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994).
Della Porta, Donatella and Michael Keating edited, Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).
Dodd, C. Lawrence and Calvin C. Jillson edited, The Dynamics of American Politics (Boulder: Westview, 1994).
Durch, J. William, UN Peacekeeping, American Politics, and the Uncivil Wars of the 1990s (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996).
Eckstein, Harry and David Apter edited, Comparative Politics (Glencoe, Free Press, 1963).
Evans, B. Peter, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol, Bringing the State Back In (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985).
Gheciu, Alexandra, NATO in the New Europe (California: Stanford University Press, 2005).
Golden, R. James, Daniel J. Kaufman, Asa A. Clark IV, and David H. Petraeus edited, NATO at Forty (Boulder: Westview Press, 1989).
Gow, James, Legitimacy and the Military: the Yugoslav Crisis (New York: St.
Martin’s Press, 1992).
Krugman, Paul, Pop Internationalism (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1996).
March, G. James, Johan P. Olsen, Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York: The Free Press, 1989).
McDonald, J. Terrance edited, The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996).
Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1965).
Peters, B. Guy, Institutional Theory in Political Science (New York: Pinter, 1999).
Schmalensee, Richard and Robert D. Willig edited, Handbook of industrial organization (New York: Elsevier Science, 1989).
Schmidt, Gustav edited, A History of NATO -The First Fifty Years (New York: Palgrave, 2001).
Sloan, R. Stanley, NATO in the 1990s (Washington: Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defense Publisher, 1989).
Soysal, N. Yasemin, Limits of Citizenship (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).
Thelen, Kathleen and Fran Longstretch, Structuring Politics: Historical
Institutionalism in Comparative Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press,
1992).
Yost, S. David, NATO Transformed: The Alliance’s New Roles in International Security (Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1998).
期刊論文
Art, J. Robert, “Why Western Europe Needs the United States and NATO,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 111, No. 1 (Spring 1996), pp. 1-39.
Arthur, W. Brian, “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 99, No. 394 (March 1989), pp. 116-131.
Cornish, Paul, “European Security: The End of Architecture and the New NATO,” International Affairs , Vol. 72, No. 4 (October 1996), pp. 751-769.
Cragg, Anthony, “A New Strategic Concept for a New Era,” NATO Review, No. 2 (Summer 1999), pp. 19-22.
Croft, Stuart, Jolyon Howorth, Terry Terriff and Mark Webber, “NATO`s Triple Challenge,” International Affairs, Vol. 76, No. 3, Europe: Where Does It Begin and End? (July 2000), pp. 495-518.
Duffield, John S, “NATO’s Functions after the Cold War,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 109, No. 5 (Winter 1994-1995), pp. 763-787.
Glaser, L. Charles, “Why NATO is Still Best: Future Security Arrangements for Europe,” International Security, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Summer 1993), pp. 5-50.
Hall, A. Peter and Rosemary C. R. Taylor, “Political Science and the Three `New Institutionalisms,`” Political Studies, Vol. 44, Issue 4 (December 1996), pp. 935-957; also published in Karol Soltan et al., eds., Institutions and Social Order. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998), pp. 15-43.
Hellmann, Gunther and Reinhard Wolf, “Neorealism, Neoliberal institutionalism and the Future of the NATO,” Security Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1 (Autumn 1993), p. 17.
Immergut, M. Ellen, “The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism,” Politics and Society, Vol. 26, (1998), pp. 5-34.
Kay, Sean, “The `new NATO` and the enlargement process,” European Security, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Winter 1997), pp. 1-16.
Keohane, O. Robert and Lisa L. Martin, “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Summer 1995), pp. 39-51.
Koeble, A. Thomas, “The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology,” Comparative Politics, Vol.27, (1995), pp. 231-245.
Krasner, D. Stephen, “Review: Approaches to the States: Alternative Conceptions and History Dynamics,” Comparative Politics, Vol. 16, No. 2 (January 1984), pp. 223-246.
Krugman, Paul, “History and Industry Location: The Case of the Manufacturing Belt,” American Economic Review, Vol. 81, No. 2 (May 1991), pp. 80-83.
Kydd, Andrew, “Trust Building, Trust Breaking: The Dilemma of NATO Enlargement,” International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 4, (Autumn 2001), pp. 801-828.
Levi, Margaret, “Theories of Historical and Institutional Change,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 20, No. 3 (Summer 1987), pp. 684-688.
Liebowitz, S. J. and Stephen E. Margolis, “Path Dependence, Lock-in, and History,” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, Vol. 11, No. 1 (April 1995), pp. 205-226.
Mahoney, James, “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology,” Theory and Society, Vol. 29, No. 4 (August 2000), pp. 507-548.
March, G. James and Johan P. Olson, “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 78, No. 3 (September 1984), pp. 734-749.
Mearsheimer, J. John, “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War,” International Security, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Summer 1990), pp. 5-56.
McCalla, B. Robert, “NATO’s Persistence after the Cold War,” International Organization, Vol. 50, No. 3 (Summer 1996), pp. 445-475.
Ness, D. Gayl and Steven R. Brechin, “Bridging the Gap: International Organizations as Organizations,” International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 2 (Spring 1988), pp. 245-273.
Peters, B. Guy, Jon Pierre and Desmond S. King, “The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 67, No. 4 (November 2005), pp. 1275-1300.
Pierson, Paul, “The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis,” Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 29, No. 2 (1996), pp. 123-163.
Pierson, Paul, “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 94, No. 2 (June 2000), pp. 251-266.
de Nevers, Renée, “NATO’s International Security Role in the Terrorist Era,” International Security, Vol. 31, No. 4 (Spring, 2007), pp. 34-66.
Schimmelfennig, Frank, “Nato enlargement: A constructivist explanation,” Security Studies, Vol. 8, No. 2/3, Special Issue (Winter 1998/99~Spring 1999), pp. 198-234.
Sloan, R. Stanley, “NATO’s Future in a New Europe: An American Perspective,” International Affairs, Vol. 66, No. 3 (July 1990), pp. 495-511.
Sloan, R. Stanley, “US Perspectives on NATO`s Future,” International Affairs, Vol. 71, No. 2 (April 1995), pp. 217-231.
Thelen, Kathleen, “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics,” Annual Review, Vol. 2 (1999), pp. 369-404.
Wallander, A. Celeste, “NATO`s Price: Shape Up or Ship Out,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 81, No. 6 (1999), pp. 2-9.
Wallander, A. Celeste, “Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO after the Cold War,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 4 (Autumn 2000), pp. 705-735.
Walt, M. Stephen, “Testing Theories of Alliance Formation: the Case of Southwest Asia,” International Organization, Vol. 42, No.2 (Spring 1988), pp. 275-316.
Waltz, N. Kenneth, “The Emerging Structure of International Politics,” International Security, Vol. 18, No. 2 (Autumn 1993), pp. 44-79.
Wedgewood, Ruth, “NATO’s Campaign in Yugoslavia,” The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 4 (October 1999), pp. 828-834.
Woodliffe, John, “The Evolution of a New NATO for a New Europe,” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 1 (January 1998), pp. 174-192.
網路資料
北約組織官方網站：http://www.nato.int/docu/handbook/2001/index.htm |
