English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51716504      Online Users : 635
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 廣告學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/38342
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38342


    Title: 企業社會責任訊息揭露形式對組織聯想之影響
    The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure Forms on Organization Association
    Authors: 蔡叔瑾
    Contributors: 孫秀蕙
    蔡叔瑾
    Keywords: 企業社會責任
    揭露
    組織聯想
    corporate social responsibility
    disclosure
    organization association
    CSR
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2010-04-09 14:42:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 因應世界潮流,現代企業越來越重視企業責任(CSR),讓消費者知曉企業做了哪些「善行」是件重要的事,然而學術界關於CSR的研究雖然眾多,但針對CSR揭露進行探討的卻不多見。為此,本研究希望探討CSR訊息之揭露形式對於消費者的組織聯想有何影響。
    提出三個問題:一、CSR揭露形式是否影響消費者對訊息的「信任程度」及對企業的「組織聯想」?以及如何影響?二、消費者對產品的涉入度是否影響消費者對企業CSR訊息的「信任程度」及對企業的「組織聯想」?三、消費者對CSR揭露訊息之信任程度,是否影響「組織聯想」?主要研究變項為產品涉入度、文本形式、揭露者以及議題類型。
    研究發現,單一變項對於訊息信任程度以及組織聯想皆無顯著影響,但在有固定條件、或一個以上的交叉變項時,有多組交叉變項對於信任程度以及組織聯想出現顯著影響,且對訊息的信任程度確實影響組織聯想。
    研究者提出以下結論:一、CSR訊息的揭露形式會影響消費者的組織聯想。二、設計CSR揭露訊息應該考量消費者的產品涉入度。三、CSR訊息之可信度會影響消費者的組織聯想。四、博愛類型的議題並不一定最好。
    Reflecting the world trend, Modern enterprises take corporate social responsibility (CSR) more seriously, and it’s important to let consumers know what beneficence enterprise have done. Though researches about CSR are numerous, there is few studies focusing on CSR disclosure.
    This article probes into the effect of CSR message disclosure forms on organization association of consumer. And focus on three questions: (1) Do disclosure forms of CSR messages affect consumers’ trust level as well as their organization association? And how do they affect? (2) Do different product involvement of customers will affect their trust level as well as their organization association? (3) Whether or not will the consumers’ trust level affect their organization association ? In order to answer these three questions, there are four major variables in this research: product involvement, text forms, discloser, and issue types.
    The findings indicate that each single variable has no significantly effect on trust level or organization association. However, when it was under some preconditions or cross- variable(more than one variable), multiple situations show that different variables of disclosure messages do affect trust level and organization association.
    The research findings include:(1)forms of disclosing CSR messages would affect consumers’ organization association,(2)consumers’ product involvement should be considered when designing the disclosure message,(3)Reliability of CSR information would affect customers’ organization association, and(4)philanthropy is not the best type of issues.
    Reference: 一、中文部份
    王中喬(2004)。《議題相關行銷的社會顯著性對品牌權益影響之研究》。真理大 學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
    李政義(1995)。企業社會責任論。國立編譯館主編。台北:巨流。
    林佩儀(1989)。《企業經理人之知覺品質、品牌聯想、生活型態與消費行為關聯 性之研究-以國際觀光旅館業為例》。國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    林雅惠(2006)。《台灣企業社會責任發展之現況研究》。國立台北科技大學環規劃與管理研究所碩士論文。
    林宜諄、高希均(2008)。企業社會責任入門手冊。台北市:天下遠見。
    范惟翔、莊立民、林忠勳(2006)。〈品牌聯想、知覺風險對企業主管購買意願之影響研究〉。《經營管理論叢》,2(2),21-37。
    周文賢(2002)。多變量統計分析。台北:智勝。
    美國企業社會責任的一般原則(2004)。亞洲國際工商資訊。亞洲(澳門)國際公開大學現代管理中心編制。
    陳春山(2008)。企業社會責任及治理─CSR策略實務手冊。財團法人中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會。
    陳柏蒼(2001)。《企業贊助對企業品牌權益影響之研究》。國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    陳禹廷(2009)。《企業網站表現對毒奶粉危機溝通需求之影響:組織–公眾關係之中介效果檢驗》。世新大學公共關係暨廣告學研究所碩士論文。
    陳為華(1995)。《企業社會責任的本質》,國立中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    陳照明(2001)。《行動電話手機消費者之涉入程度及購買決策相關因素之關聯性 研究。國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
    張美燕、馮景如(1993)。《台灣經理人員企業倫理研究》,行政院國科會專題研究。
    張盈馨(2005)。《企業贊助節慶活動之動機與效益評估研究》,大葉大學休閒企業管理學系碩士論文。
    陽正中(2005)。《企業參與公益活動與組織承諾影響之研究》。政大經營管理碩士學程。
    黃郁君(2002)。《品牌聯想對品牌權益影響之研究》。淡江大學國際貿易學系研究所碩士論文。
    楊凱婷(2005)。《企業進行贊助活動對企業品牌權益影響之研究》。朝陽科技大 學企業管理系研究所碩士論文。
    蔡季綾(2005)。《產品置入型態與置入效果、品牌態度間關係之研究—以產品涉. 入度與年齡為干擾變數》。成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
    鄭安盛、陳禎祥、王英宏(2006)。〈通路自有品牌定位、形象與品牌權益關係之研究〉。《遠東學報》,23(1),1-21。
    謝千之(2000)。產品資訊情境、參考價格與知覺品質對消費者購買行為之影響。 東吳大學企管系碩士論文。
    喜馬拉雅研究發展基金會(1997)。台灣基金會現況概述。台北市:喜馬拉雅研究發展基金會。
    錢為家(2009)。企業社會責任實務全書。台北市:商周出版。
    二、英文部份
    Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: The Free Press.
    Aaker, D. A. (1996), “Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets,”California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120.
    Berens, G., Riel, Cees B.M. (2004). Corporate associations in the academic literature: Three main streams of thought in the reputation measurement literature. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(2), 161-178.
    Bhattacharya, C. B. & Sen, S.(2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumer’s relationship with companies. Journal of Marketing,67(2),76-88.
    Brown, T. J. & Dacin P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate
    associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84.
    Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-49.
    Celsi, R., Olson, J.C.(1988). The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 210-224.
    Chen, C.H.(2001). Using free association to examine the relationship between the characteristics of brand associations and brand equity. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10(7), 439-451.
    Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B.& Parker, L. D.(1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, organizations and society, 12(2), 111.
    Davis, K.,(1973). The case for and against Business assumption of social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 16, 312.
    Dodds, W.B., Monroe, K.B. & Grewal, D.(1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers` product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
    Elles, R. & Walton, C.C.(1974). Conceptual foundation of business(3rd edit.).
    Fombrun, C.J., Gardberg, N.A., Sever, J.Weds. (2000). The reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management. 7(4), 241–255.
    Galaskiewicz, J.(1985). Professional networks & the institutionalization of a single mind set. America Sociological Review, 50(5), 639-658.
    Henrik, U.(2004). The brand association base: a conceptual model for strategically leveraging partner brand equity. Journal of Brand Management, 12(2), 105-123.
    Herremans, I. M.(1989). An investigation of the triadic relationship of social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance.
    Huang, Y. H.(2004). Is symmetrical communication ethical and effective?. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(4), 333.
    Lafferty, B. & Goldsmith, R.(1999). Corporate credibility`s role in consumers`
    attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad-recipient`s access to attitude-relevant information in memory. Journal of Business Research, 44(2), 109-116.
    Lantos, G. P.(2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595.
    Lastovicka, J.L. & Gardner, D. M. (1979). Consumer involvement Profiles: A new practical approach to consumer involvement. Journal of Advertising Research, 25(6), 48-56.
    Margolin, J. B.(1991). Foundation Fundamentals. New York:The Foundation Center.
    Marin, L., Ruiz, S. & Rubio, A.(2009). The role of identity salience in the effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 65-78.
    Modic, S. J.(1988). Movers and shakers. Industry Week January,18,47.
    Mohr, L. A. & Webb, D.J.(2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121-47.
    Prabu, D., Kline, S. & Dai, Y.(2005). Corporate social responsibility practices, corporate identity, and purchase intention: A dual-process model. Journal of Public Relations Research,17(3),291.
    Podnar, K. & Golob, U.(2007). CSR expectations: The focus of corporate marketing, Corporate Communications,12(4),326.
    Quazi, A. M. & O`Brien D.(2000). An empirical test of a cross-national model of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(1), 33.
    Schnietz, K.E. & Epstein, M.J.(2005). Exploring the financial value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility during a crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(4), 327-345.
    Sethi, S.P.(1975). Dimension of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California Management Review. 17(3), 58 -65.
    Singh, J., Salmones, M. M. G. & Bosque, I. R.(2008). Understanding corporate social responsibility and product perceptions in consumer markets: A cross-cultural evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 597.
    Stein, N.(2003). America`s most admired companies. Fortune, 3, 81-82.
    Toth, E. L. & Trujillo, N.(1987). Reinventing corporate communications. Public Relations Review, 13(4), 42-53.
    Ven, B.(2008). An Ethical Framework for the marketing of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 339-352.
    Wigley, S.(2008). Gauging consumers` responses to CSR activities: Does increased awareness make cents? Public Relations Review, 34(3), 306.
    Zaichkowsky, Lynne, J.(1985). Measuring the involvement construct, Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352.
    Zenisk, T. J.(1979). Corporate social responsibility: A conceptualization based on organizational literature. Academy of management. 4(3), 359-388.
    三、其他電子資源
    王文霞,(1999)。〈英國工會主義的起源與工會的發展(上)(1800-1880)〉。
    西洋史集刊。9,267-307。
    企業社會責任,世界企業永續發展協會。2004年5月27日,
    取自:http://www.bcsd.org.tw/
    余朝權(2005)。現代行銷學,p.93。取自http://books.google.com.tw/
    國家語文綜合連結檢索系統華語字典列。教育部重編國語辭典修訂本【反托拉斯法案】。取自:
    http://www.nlcsearch.moe.gov.tw/EDMS/admin/dict1/dict/25/m_24850.html
    費邊社會主義思想。2003年7月31日,取自:http://www.books.com.tw/exep/prod/booksfile.php?item=0010230283
    DJ電子知識庫-財經百科。總體經濟相關名詞解釋〈卡特爾〉。2007年7月12日,取自:http://www.moneydj.com/z/glossary/glexp_1462.asp.htm
    DJ電子知識庫-財經百科。總體經濟相關名詞解釋〈托拉斯〉。2007年7月12日,取自:http://www.moneydj.com/z/glossary/glcat_27.asp.htm
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    廣告研究所
    96452007
    98
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0964520071
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[廣告學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback