Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37344
|
| Title: | 不動產估價師與地價人員估值決定行為之研究
A study on valuation behavior of appraisers and assessors |
| Authors: | 徐詩怡
Hsu,Shih I |
| Contributors: | 陳奉瑤
Chen,Feng Yao
徐詩怡
Hsu,Shih I |
| Keywords: | 不動產估價
行為研究
估值決定
Real Estate Appraisal
Behavior Research
Valuation Behavior |
| Date: | 2006 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-19 13:13:46 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 不動產估價為一連串的估值決定行為下，所得之結果。不動產估價過程並非絕對的理論，而存在非規範性的自我主觀，此種特質正是行為研究方法可著力之處。
本文運用行為研究方法，以基準地查估為平台，在相同的估價制度和規範，比較基礎一致的情形下，探討公部門的地價人員與私部門的不動產估價師之估值決定行為，試圖探究兩者行為決策模式是否有所不同。並進一步分析，若估值決定行為存有差異，該差異是否影響估值準確程度。
研究採實驗方式進行，結果顯示，不動產估價師與地價人員於估價過程中，所為估值決定有所不同。透過本實驗觀察，估價師較符合本研究設定之行為模式，且於個案估價準確程度方面，有其專業的展現。本文得到估值決定行為，存在影響估值準確程度的可能，故建議後續研究焦點可置於估價過程之行為探討，而非單就估價結果論之。
關鍵字：不動產估價、行為研究、估值決定
The real estate is appraised for a succession of behaviors of valuation. Real estate appraisal is really not an absolute theory, and exists non-regulatory subjective judgment. This is what we can exactly put forth effort on behavioral property research.
This paper uses the behavioral property research, under the situation that the comparative foundation is unanimous, and investigates valuation behavior of appraisers and assessors in the same appraisal system and norm. We further analyze the difference of the valuation behavior whether it would influence the accurate degree of valuation.
The result shows the valuation behavior of appraisers and assessors is different. In addition, appraisers relatively accord with the hypothesis of the research, especially they represent the accuracy of the case through the experiment of behavioral property research. The text finds out the difference of the valuation behavior might affect the accuracy of valuation. Therefore, follow-up study could focus on the valuation behavior, instead of the appraisal result. |
| Reference: | 中文參考文獻
1. 王士鳴（2006），「不動產估價師信心判斷行為之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
2. 李易璇（2005），「不動產估價師估值決定行為之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
3. 汪駿旭（2005），「不動產估價人員受客戶影響之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
4. 林英彥（2006），不動產估價，第十一版，台北：文笙書局股份有限公司。
5. 張小燕（2005），「從行為觀點檢視不動產估價中的市場比較法」，國立台北大學不動產與城鄉規劃學系碩士論文。
6. 張春興（1995），張氏心理學辭典，第二版，台北：東華書局。
7. 張能政（2004），「不動產估價行為研究-行為理論之應用」，國立台北大學不動產與城鄉規劃學系碩士論文。
8. 許天威（2003），個案實驗研究法，台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
9. 陳奉瑤（2002），公告現值與市場交易價格關係之研究，第三屆地政學術研討會，台北。
10. 陳奉瑤（2003），土地公告現值與交易價格關係之研究，土地經濟年刊，第14期，第1頁至第24頁。
11. 廖咸興、李阿乙、梅建平（1999），不動產投資概論，第三版，台北：華泰書局。
12. 蘇文賢（2000），應用大量估價法進行公告土地現值評估之研究，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
外文參考文獻
1. Appraisal Institute (2001) The Appraisal of Real Estate(12th Edition). Chicago.
2. Black, R. T. (1997) Expert Property Negotiators and Pricing Information, Revisited, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, Vol.15,no.3, pp 274-81.
3. Black, R.T., Brown, M. G.., Diaz, J. III, Gibler, K.M., Grissom, T. V. (2003) Behavioral research in real estate: A search for the boundaries, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, Vol.6 ,no.1, pp85-112.
4. Cole, R. (1988)A New Look at Commercial Real Estate Returns, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Ann Arbor, MI, University Microfilms International.
5. Diaz, J. III (1990a) How appraisers do their work: a test of the appraisal process and the development of a descriptive model, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol.5, no.1, pp1-15.
6. Diaz, J. III (1990b) The process of selecting comparable sales, The Appraisal Journal, Vol.58, no.4, pp533-540.
7. Diaz, J. III (1997) The use of previous expert value estimates by expert appraisers operating in areas of geographic uncertainty, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, Vol.15.
8. Diaz, J. III (1997) An investigation into the impact of previous expert value estimates on appraisal judgement, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol.13, no.1, pp57-67.
9. Diaz, J. III and Hansz, J.A. (1997) How valuers use the value opinions of others, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, Vol.15, no. 3, pp256-260.
10. Diaz, J. III and Wolverton, M.L. (1998) A longitudinal examination of the appraisal smoothing hypothesis, Real Estate Economics, Vol.26, no.2, pp349-358.
11. Diaz, J. III , Gallimore, P. and Levy, D.S. (2004) Multicultural Examination of Valuation Behavior , Journal of Property Investment and Finance, Vol.22, no.4, pp339-346.
12. Gallimore, P. (1994) Aspects of information processing in valuation judgement and choice, Journal of Property Research, Vol.11,no.2, pp97-110.
13. Gallimore, P. (1996) Confirmation bias in the valuation process: a test for corroborating evidence, Journal of Property Research, Vol.13,no.4, pp261-273.
14. Gallimore, P. and Wolverton, M.L. (1997) Price-knowledge-induced bias: a cross-cultural comparison, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, Vol.15, no.3, pp261-273.
15. Hardin, W. (1999) Behavioral research into heuristics and bias as an academic pursuit: lessons from other disciplines and implications for real estate, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, Vol.17, pp333-357.
16. Ibbotson, R. and Siegel, L. (1984) Real Estate Returns: A Comparison with Other Investments, AREUEA Journal, Vol.12, no.3, pp 219-242.
17. International Association of Assessing Officers (1999) Standard on Ratio Studies , Assessment Journal, Sep/Oct. pp23-64.
18. International Valuation Standards Committee (2005) International Valuation Standards Seventh Edition.
19. Kummerow, M. (2002) A Statistical Definition of Value, The Appraisal Journal, Vol.70, no.4, pp407-416.
20. Levy, D.S. (1997) The Impact of the Examination of a Property on the Perception of Value and Desirability of a Following Property, Cutting Edge.
21. Matysiak, G. and Wang, P. (1994) Commercial Property Market Prices and Appraisals: Analyzing the Correspondence, American Real Estate Society l0th annual conference.
22. Nasir, A.M. (2006) Valuation variance of commercial properties in Malaysia, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol.12, no.3, pp272-282.
23. Northcraft, G.B. and Neale, M.A. (1987) Experts, amateurs, and real estate: an anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.39, pp84-97.
24. Paglin, M. and Fogarty, M. (1972) Equity and the property tax: a new conceptual focus , National tax journal, Vol25, pp557-565.
25. Quan, D.C. and Quigley, J.M. (1991) Price formation and the appraisal function in real estate markets, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol.4, no.1, pp127-146.
26. Ratcliff, R. U. (1950) Net Income Can’t be Split, The Appraisal Journal, April.
27. Ratcliff, R. U.（1972）Valuation for real estate decisions, Democrat Press, Santa Cruz, CA.
28. Tversky, A. and Kaheman, D. (1974) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, science, Vol.185 no.4157, pp1124-1131.
29. Webb, B. (1994) On the Reliability of Commercial Appraisals: An Analysis of Properties Sold from the Russell-NCREIF Index (1978-1992), Real Estate Finance Vol.11, no.1, pp62-65.
30. Wolverton, M.L. (1996) Investigation into price knowledge induced comparable sale selection bias, Dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
|
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
地政研究所
94257016
95 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094257016 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [地政學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
