政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/37301
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51680767      線上人數 : 586
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37301


    題名: 台灣綜合高中學生字彙學習策略之研究
    An Exploratory Study on Vocabulary Learning Strategies by Comprehensive High School Students in Taiwan
    作者: 董佳雯
    Tung, Chia-wen
    貢獻者: 廖昭文
    Liaw, Chao-wen
    董佳雯
    Tung, Chia-wen
    關鍵詞: 綜合高中
    字彙
    字彙學習策略
    comprehensive high school
    vocabulary
    vocabulary learning strategies
    日期: 2006
    上傳時間: 2009-09-19 13:06:11 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究旨在探討台灣綜合高中學生學習字彙時所運用的字彙學習策略，研究問題主要探討：學術學程及職業學程的學生在學習字彙時是否運用不同的字彙學習策略並找出其較常和較少使用之字彙學習策略，以及字彙學習高成就者和低成就者字彙學習策略之差異。藉此俾能提供英文老師幫助不同學程、成就的學生運用字彙學習策略，以期達到更佳的字彙學習成效。
    本研究抽樣台北縣、市8所綜合高中共648位高三學生為調查對象，研究工具為字彙學習策略問卷與字彙能力測驗。分析方法主要採量化分析，包括獨立樣本t檢定、描述性統計、斯皮爾曼等級相關，本研究結果發現如下：
    一、學術學程及職業學程的學生之字彙學習策略使用頻率具有顯著差異，學術學程的學生比職業學程的學生運用較多決定策略及記憶策略。
    二、學術學程及職業學程的學生之字彙學習策略使用頻率排序相同，在發現字義部份依序為決定策略、社會策略；在鞏固字義部份依序為認知策略、記憶策略、後設認知策略、社會策略。
    三、字彙學習高成就者和低成就者之字彙學習策略使用頻率具有顯著差異，高成就者比低成就者運用較多字彙學習策略。
    最後，本文依據研究結果，提出老師英語教學上之應用及未來研究之建議。
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the vocabulary learning strategies used by comprehensive high school students in Taiwan. There were three questions focusing on the differences of use frequency of vocabulary learning strategies between academic-oriented and vocational-oriented students, the strategy use rank between these two groups of students, as well as the relation between vocabulary achievement and vocabulary learning strategy use frequency.
    A total of 648 students in Taipei City and Taipei County participated in the study. A vocabulary learning strategy questionnaire and a vocabulary achievement test were applied as instruments to obtain the data needed. Data from the students’ responses were computed and analyzed by means of independent-sample t-tests, descriptive statistics, and Spearman’s rank correlation.
    The findings of this study were summarized as follows.
    1.There was a significant difference in vocabulary learning strategy use frequency between academic-oriented students and vocational-oriented students. The former applied more determination strategies to discover the meaning of a new word, and more memory strategies to consolidate the words encountered.
    2.The ranking order of use frequency in vocabulary learning strategies by academic-oriented and vocational-oriented students was identical. In Part 1 (discovering the meaning of a new word), determination strategies were used most frequently, then followed by social strategies. In part 2 (consolidating the words encountered), cognitive strategies were used most frequently, followed by memory strategies, metacognitive strategies, and the last, social strategies.
    3.There was a significant difference between good learners and poor learners in vocabulary learning strategy use frequency. Good learners applied more vocabulary learning strategies than poor learners to know an English word’s meaning.
    Based on the above results, some pedagogical implications for English teachers were developed and suggestions for future research were provided at the end of the study.
    參考文獻: Ahmed, M. O. (1989). Vocabulary learning strategies. In P. Meara (Ed.), Beyond words (pp. 3-14). London: CILT.
    Angelis, P. (1974). Listening comprehension and error analysis. In G. Nickel (Ed.), Applied contrastive linguistics. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.
    Baddeley, A. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Bialystok, E. (1978). A Theoretical Model of Second Language Learning. Language Learning, 28(1), 69-83.
    Bialystok, E. (1979). The Role of Conscious Strategies in Second Language Proficiency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 35, 372-394.
    Bremner, S. (1999) Language learning strategies and language proficiency: Investigating the relationship in Hong Kong. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 490-514.
    Brown, C., & M. E. Payne (1994). Five Essential Steps or Processes in Vocabulary Learning. Paper presented at the TESOL 1994, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
    Cameron, L (2001). Teaching Languages to Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Catalan, R. M. J. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54-77.
    Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.) (1991). Language teaching approaches: An overview. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (2nd ed.) Boston: Heinle & Heinele Publishers.
    Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227-249.
    Chamot, A. U., & O`Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA Handbook: How to Implement the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Chen, B. C. (1999). Discrepancy of vocabulary learning strategies between high achievers and low achievers at a junior college in Taiwan. The proceedings of the 14th national conference on technical and vocational education (pp. 223-231). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.
    Chen, H. J. (1998). Second language learning vocabulary strategies: A preliminary investigation of Chinese EFL learners. The proceedings of the 6th international symposium on English teaching (pp. 219-230). Taipei: Crane.
    Chen, L. C. (2003). The effects of “word meanings inferred from context” instruction in English vocabulary learning of vocational high school students: A case study. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (Eds.). (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
    Cohen, A. D. (2001). The Learner’s Side of Foreign LanguageLearning: Where do Styles, Strategies, and Tasks Meet? Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.
    Cook, L. K., & Mayer. R. E. (1983). Reading strategies training for meaningful learning from prose. In M. Pressley and J. Levin (Eds) Cognitive strategy research. New York: Springer Verlag.
    DeCarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In Celces-Murcia M. (Ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 285-299). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    Duffy, Gerald G.. (2003) Explaining reading: A resource for teaching concepts, skills, and strategies (pp. 57-78). New York: Guilford Press.
    Ebel, R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.
    Fan, Y. M. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222-241.
    Gorman, T. P. (1979). Teaching reading at the advanced level. In M. Celce-Murcia & L. McIntosh (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 154-162). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.
    Gung Hsiao, T. Y. (1997). An exploratory study of language learning strategies by learners of English as a foreign language. The proceedings of the fourteenth conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp.57-78). Taipei: Crane.
    Gu, Y. (2002). Gender, academic major, and vocabulary learning strategies of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 33(1), 35-54.
    Gu, Y. (2005). Vocabulary learning strategies in the Chinese context. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish.
    Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language learning, 46(4), 643-679.
    Gung, W. C. (2004). An exploratory study on vocabulary learning strategies by Taiwanese EFL elementary school students. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis, National Taipei Teachers College.
    Huang, C. C. (2001). An investigation of ESP students’ vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension. The proceedings of the tenth conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp.436-445). Taipei: Crane.
    Huang, T. L. (1997). A study of word analysis and inference on vocabulary teaching and learning. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
    Judd, E. L. (1978). Vocabulary teaching and TESOL: A need for reevaluation of existing assumptions. TESOL Quarterly, 12(1), 71-76.
    Kelly, P. (1991). Lexical ignorance: The main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language teachers. IRAL, 29(2), 135-149.
    Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students with different verbal abilities. The modern Language Journal, 78, 285-299.
    Kojic-Sabo, I., & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Students’ approaches to vocabulary learning and their relationship to success. Modern Language Journal, 83, 176-192.
    Kudo, Y. (1999). L2 vocabulary learning strategies (NFLRC NetWork #14) [HTML
    document]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Retrieved [September 25, 2005] from the World Wide Web: http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW14/
    Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In J. L. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126-132). London: MacMillan.
    Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don’t know, words you think you know, and words you can’t guess. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 20-34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Laufer, B. Shmueli, K. (1997) Memorizing new words: Does teaching have anything to do with it? RELC Journal, 28, 89-108
    Lawson, M. J., & Hogben, D. (1996). The vocabulary learning strategies of foreign language students. Language Learning, 46, 101-135.
    Lin, L. (2001). Taiwanese children’s EFL vocabulary learning strategies. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chinhua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
    Maiguashca, R. U. (1993). Teaching and learning vocabulary in a second language: Past, present, and future directions. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50 (1), 83-100.
    McCarthy, J. (1989). Artificial Intelligence, Logic and Formalizing Common Sense. In Thomason, R., (Ed.), Philosophical Logic and Artificial Intelligence. Klüver Academic.
    Ministry of Education, Taiwan. (2007). 綜合高中資訊網 [HTML document] Retrieved [May 3, 2005] from the World Wide Web: http://page.phsh.tyc.edu.tw/com/index¬_1.htm
    Mohamed A.E. (1996). Language Learning Strategies employed by Secondary School Students Learning English as a Foreign Language in Malaysia. Doctoral Dissertation. School of Education, University of Leeds.
    Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H. H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, The Modern Language Center.
    Nation, I. S. P. (1982). Beginning to learn foreign vocabulary: A review of the research. RELC Journal, 13, 14-36.
    Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Heinle and Heinle.
    Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Küpper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985a). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46.
    O`Malley, J. M. (1987). The effects of training in the use of learning strategies on learning English as a second language. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Ed.). Learner strategies in language learning (pp.133-144). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Oxford, R. L. & Crookall, D. (1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues. Modern Language Journal, 73, 404-419.
    Oxford R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    Oxford, R. L. (1992/1993). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. TESOL Journal, 2 (2), 18-22
    Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M.E. (1995). Adults learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System, 23, 359-386.
    Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 291-300.
    Pimsleur, P. (1967). A memory schedule. The Modern Language Journal, 51, 73-75.
    Politzer, R. L., & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviors and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESO Quarterly, 19, 103-123.
    Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 229-258.
    Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77-89.
    Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51.
    Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15-30). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Sanaoui, R. (1995). Adult learners’ approaches to learning vocabulary in second languages. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 15-28.
    Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.) Vocabulary: description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 199-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304-318.
    Stoffer, I. (1995). University foreign language students’ choice of vocabulary learning strategies as related to individual difference variables. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Alabama.
    Su, M. L. (2003). Comparison of English learning attitudes, motivation and strategies between vocational-oriented students and college-oriented students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaoshiung Normal University, Kaoshiung, Taiwan.
    Sunderland, J. (2000). Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language Teaching, 33, 203-223.
    Sy, B. M. (1996). Sex Differences and Language Learning Strategies. In T. H. Nash, J. W. Chiu, & R. Schulte (Eds.), Papers from the Eleventh Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp.19-51). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
    Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 143-163.
    Tsuchida, M. (2002). The learning strategies: Helping students learn how to learn. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED463655)
    Wang, Y. H. (2004). An investigation into vocabulary learning strategies used by senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Wenden, A. L. (1987). Conceptual background and utility. In A.L. Wenden, & J. Rubins (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp.3-13). London: Prentice Hall International.
    Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching (p. 111). London: Edward Arnold.
    Wu, R. T. Y. (1996). Comprehensive high school: An effective way to integrate academic and vocational education in Taiwan, Republic of China. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED404545)
    Zheng, H. H.（2002）。《高中英文參考詞彙表之編輯方法及原則》。台北：大學入學考試中心。
    Zimmerman, C. B. (1997). Do reading and interactive vocabulary study make a difference? An empirical study. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (1), 121-140.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
    91951013
    95
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0919510133
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    51013301.pdf45KbAdobe PDF21003檢視/開啟
    51013302.pdf37KbAdobe PDF2897檢視/開啟
    51013303.pdf21KbAdobe PDF21339檢視/開啟
    51013304.pdf66KbAdobe PDF21138檢視/開啟
    51013305.pdf24KbAdobe PDF21462檢視/開啟
    51013306.pdf49KbAdobe PDF27729檢視/開啟
    51013307.pdf148KbAdobe PDF22717檢視/開啟
    51013308.pdf157KbAdobe PDF21066檢視/開啟
    51013309.pdf94KbAdobe PDF21101檢視/開啟
    51013310.pdf26KbAdobe PDF21222檢視/開啟
    51013311.pdf57KbAdobe PDF23756檢視/開啟
    51013312.pdf219KbAdobe PDF21776檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋