Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37299
|
| Title: | 國小校園中英語環境中之印刷文字佈置成效調查研究:以台北縣某國小為例
A Study on the Effectiveness of Elementary School`s Environmental Print: A Case Study of One Taipei County Elementary School |
| Authors: | 鄧嘉雯
Teng, Chia-wen |
| Contributors: | 葉潔宇
Yeh, Leah C.Y.
鄧嘉雯
Teng, Chia-wen |
| Keywords: | 英語環境印刷文字佈置
學習環境
與腦相容的學習
自主學習
environmental print
learning environment
brain-based/compatible learning
learner autonomy |
| Date: | 2009 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-19 13:05:53 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 近年來台灣政府積極推動「營造英語生活環境行動方案」，再加上「國小英語課程」的實施，使得國小校園中充斥各種英語印刷文字佈置。本研究旨在了解這些校園英語環境印刷文字佈置之設計與成效及如何有效運用這些英語教學資源。
本研究對象來自於台北縣一國小九位教職員(其中包括四位行政人員和五位英語教師)以及622位三到六年級的學童。資料收集主要來源為訪談及問卷。收集的資料(主要採用描述性統計及卡方檢定)分別進行分析比較。
本研究主要的發現如下:
1.校園英語環境印刷文字佈置設計規劃主要由教育主管機關以及學校行政人員決定和負責。
2.英語教師參與校園英語環境印刷文字佈置設計規劃的程度會影響她們是否使用這些英文印刷文字進行教學的意願。
3.80%以上的受訪學生都注意到校園中的英語環境印刷文字佈置，也顯示高度的學習意願。但是由於多數英語教師未使用這些英語環境印刷文字於教學，這些校園英語環境印刷文字佈置對於學生英語學習幫助不明顯。
4.大部分的受訪者贊同校園中英語環境印刷文字佈置的必要性，並提出建議。
本研究有助於初步瞭解校園中英語環境印刷文字佈置的設計使用情形和成效。文末作者進一步提供英語環境印刷文字佈置設計和應用之相關建議，作為未來校園英語環境印刷文字佈置設計之參考。
In Taiwan, with the policy of creating an English-friendly environment and new elementary school English curriculum, different kinds of environmental print (EP) such as English signs and English learning related posters can be seen in nearly every elementary school. It is important to have a clear idea about the effectiveness of elementary school’s environmental print (ESEP) and how to make use of ESEP. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the design of the ESEP and its effect in language learning and teaching.
Participants of the study were nine school staff and 622 students sampled from the third grade to the sixth grade in one elementary school in Taipei county. Two sets of interviews and questionnaires were employed to collect data. Both qualitative analysis of interviews and quantitative statistical analysis (descriptive statistics focusing on frequency and percentage examination, and chi-square test) of the questionnaire were employed.
The major findings are summarized as follows. First, the design of ESEP is primarily a top-down process. The educational authority and the school’s administrative staff directed the design of ESEP. Second, the degree of the involvement of the design of ESEP influenced English teachers’ willingness to conduct ESEP instruction. Third, more than 80% of the students noticed the existence of ESPE and showed high interest in learning about ESEP. However, without English teachers’ instruction, the effectiveness of ESEP in students’ language learning was not obvious. Fourth, most participants appreciated the existence of ESEP, and they gave suggestions for future ESEP development. Finally, some implications and suggestions for future research were discussed. |
| Reference: | Aldridge J., Kirkland L., & Kuby, P. (1995). Jumpstarters: Integrating environmental print through the curriculum. Birmingham, AL: Learner Resources.
Assink, E. M. H. (Ed.). (1994). Literacy acquisition and social context. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Benson, P. (1997). The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp.18-34). Lodon: Longman.
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. London, UK: Longman Press.
Benson, P., & Voller, P. (Eds.). (1997). Autonomy and independence in language learning. Lodon: Longman.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Bodgan, R., & Biklen, S. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Broady, E., & Kenning, M. (Eds.). (1996). Promoting learner autonomy in university language teaching. London: Association for French Language Studies CILT.
Burch, L. (2004, January 27). Brain compatible learning environment. Retrieved August 18, 2007, from http://www.ets.org/Media/Campaign/2306/pdf/BrainCompatibleLearningEnvironments.pdf
Caine, G., Nummela-Caine, R., & Crowell, S. (1999) Mindshifts: A brain-based process for restructuring schools and renewing education (2nd ed.). Tucson, AZ: Zephyr Press.
Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1990). Understanding a brain based approach to learning and teaching. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 66-70.
Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1994). Making Connections: Teaching and the human brain. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Chang, Z.P., & Liu, W.Y. (張振平、劉文英) (2004). 談小學雙語教育環境的創設 [Discussion on creating the bilingual education environment in elementary schools]. 河北教育，11. Retrieved July 8, 2008, from http://www.cqvip.com
Cheng, H. W. (2007). An investigation of EFL university students’ outside learning tasks and autonomous learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Chowdhury, M. (2009, Jan 21). Importance of grammar to learn English as a second language [Message 1]. Message posted to http://www.englishforums.com/
English/ImporatnceGrammarLearnEnglishSecond-Language/hngml/post.htm
Corin, D. (2000, April). Memory-friendly teaching. Retrieved July 25, 2007, from http://www.eltnews.com/features/kids/002_dc_1.shtml
Crabbe, D. (1996). Examining claims for autonomy and seeking evidence. Proceedings of the International Conference Autonomy 2000: The Development of Learning Independence in Language Learning (pp. 26-33). Bangkok: Cambridge University Press.
Curtain, H., & Pesola, C. A. B. (1994). Language and children: Making the match. Foreign language instruction for an early start grades K-8. New York: Longman Publishing Group.
Daniel, J., Clarke, T., & Ouellette, M. (2001, February 14). Developing and supporting literacy-rich environments for children. Retrieved August 6, 2007, from http://www.nga.org/Files/pdf/IB022401LITERACY.pdf
Diamond, M. & Hopson, J. (1998). Magic trees of the mind: How to nurture your child’s intelligence, creativity, and healthy emotions from birth through adolescence. New York: Penguin Putnam.
Escamilla, K. (1994). The sociolinguistic environment of a bilingual school: A case study introduction. Bilingual Research Journal, 18(1&2), 21-47.
Enright, D. S., & McCloskey, M. L. (1988). Integrating English: Developing English language and literacy in the multilingual classroom. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Esch, K. V., & Elsen, A. (2004). Effecting change: Research into learner autonomy in foreign language learning and teaching. In K. V. Esch & O. St. John (Eds.), New insights into foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 191-218). New York: Peter Lang.
Esch, E. (1996). Promoting learner autonomy: Criteria for the selection of appropriate methods. In R. Pemberton, E. S.L. Li, W. W.F. Or & H. D. Pierson (Eds.), Taking control: Autonomy in language learning (pp. 13-26). Hon Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Fogarty, R., (1997). Brain compatible classrooms. Arlington, IL: SkyLight Training and Publishing.
Fogarty, R., (1998). The intelligence-friendly classroom: It just makes sense. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(9), 655-657. Retrieved August 15, 2008, from http://www.ets.org/efolio/pdf/Intelligence-Friendly_Classrm.pdf
Fortin, C. (2008, June 30). Teaching foreign language: Environmental print presenting foreign language labels, signs, posters, and readings. Retrieved August 9, 2008, from http://languagestudy.suite101.com/article.cfm/
environmental_print_in_foreign_language_class
Fourgeaud-Cornuejols, C. (1990). The use of advertisements from French magazines in the teaching of French as a foreign language. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, United States. (UMI No. AAT 9120127)
Hall, N. (1987). The literate home corner. In P. Smith (Ed.), Parents and teachers together (pp. 134-144). London: Macmillan.
Hallet, E. (1999). Signs and Symbols: Environmental Print. In J. Marsh & E. Hallet (Eds.), Desirable literacies: Approaches to language and literacy in the early years (pp. 52-67). London: P. Chapman; Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Hamner, D. (2002). From stop sign to the golden arches: environmental print. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED480225)
Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hart, L. A. (1983). Human brain and human learning. New York: Longman.
Hiebert, E. H., & Raphael, T. E. (1998). Early literacy instruction. USA: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Huang, Z.J. (黃政傑) (1990). 課程 [Curriculum]. In K.H. Huang (黃光雄) (Ed.), 教育概論 [An introduction to education] (pp. 341-363). Taipei, Taiwan：師大書苑.
Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Jensen, E. (2007). Introduction to brain-compatible learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Jensen, E. (2008). Brain-based learning: The new paradigm of teaching. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Johnson, L., & Lamb, A. (n.d.). Brain-based (compatible) learning. Retrieved March 10, 2008, from: http://eduscapes.com/tap/topic70.htm
Kassow, D.Z. (2006). Environmental print awareness in young children. Talaris Research Institute 1(3), 1-8.
Kaufeldt, M. (1999). Begin with the Brain: Orchestrating the learner-centered classroom. Chicago, Illinois: Zephyr Press.
Kaufeldt, M. (2005). Teachers, change your bait! Brain-compatible differentiated instruction. Williston, VT: Crown House Publishing.
Kirkland, L., Aldridge, J., & Kuby, P. (1991). Environmental print and the kindergarten classroom. Reading Improvement, 28(4), 219-222.
Kovalik, S. (1994). Integrated thematic instruction: The model (3rd ed.). Kent, WA: Susan Kovalik and Associates.
Kotulak, R. (1996). Inside the brain: Revolutionary discoveries of how the mind works. Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel Publishing.
Kuby, P. (1994). Early reading ability of kindergarten children following environmental print instruction. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, University of Alabama, Birmingham.
Kuby P., & Aldridge, J. (1997). Direct versus indirect environmental print instruction and early reading ability in kindergarten children. Reading Psychology, 18(2), 91-104.
Kuby, P., & Aldridge, J. (2004). The impact of environmental print instruction on early reading ability. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(2), 106-114.
Kuby, P., Kirkland, J. & Aldridge, J. (1996). Learning about environmental print through picture books. Early Childhood Education Journal 24, 33-36.
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
Littlewood, W. (1996). Autonomy: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24(4), 427-435.
Lombardi, J. (2004). Practical ways Brain-based research applies to ESL learners. The Internet TESL Journal, X(8). Retrieved August 8, 2004, from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lombardi-BrainResearch.html
Maloch, B. (2005).Becoming a “wow reader”: Context and continuity in a second grade classroom. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40(1), 5-17.
Manninen, J., & Pesonen, S. (1997). New learning environments (in Finnish). Aikuiskasvatus, 4, 267-274.
Manning, M. (2004). A world of words. Teaching Pre K-8, 34(7), 78-79. Retrieved August 7, 2008, from http://www.teaching k-8.com/archives/celebrations-in-reading/
Marsh, J., & Hallet, E. (Eds.). (1999). Desirable literacies: Approaches to language and literacy in the early years. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: P. Chapman ; SAGE Publications.
Marsick, V.J., & Watkins, K. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. New York: Routledge.
McGeehan, J. (2001). Brain-compatible learning. Green Teachers. 64, 7-12.
Morrow, L. M. (1989). Literacy development in the early years: Helping children read and write. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Nelson, C. (1995). Language diversity and language arts. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED384072)
Neuman, S. B., & Roshos, K. (1989). Preschools’ conceptions of literacy as reflected in their spontaneous play. In S. McCormick & J. Zutell (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction (pp. 87-94). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
Neuman, S. B., & Roskos, K. (1990). The influence of literacy-enriched play settings on preschooler’s engagement with written language. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Literacy theory and research: Analyses from multiple perspectives (pp. 179-187). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
Neuman, S. B., & Roskos, K. (1992). Literacy objects as cultural tools: Effects on children’s literacy behaviors in play. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 202-225.
Neuman, S. B., & Roskos, K. (1993). Access to print for children of poverty: Differential effects of adult mediation and literacy-enriched play settings on environmental and functional print tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 95-122.
Neuman,S. B., & Roskos, K. (1997). Literacy knowledge in practice: Contexts of participation for young writers and readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 10-32.
Neuman, S. B. (1999). Books make a difference: A study of access to literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 286-312.
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (1996). Toward autonomous learning: Some theoretical, empirical, and practical issues. In R. Pemberton, E. S.L. Li, W. W.F., Or & H. D. Pierson (Eds.), Taking control: Autonomy in language learning (pp. 13-26). Hon Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Prior, J., & Gerard, M. R. (2004). Environmental print in the classroom: meaningful connections for learning to read. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Richards, J.C. (2005). Materials development and research –making the connection. Paper presented at a colloquium on research and materials development, at the TESOL Convention, San Antonis, March 2005. Retrieved August 2, 2007, from http://www.professorjackrichards.com/pdfs/materials-development-making-connection.pdf
Rieber, L.P. (1990). Effects of animated visuals on incidental learning and motivation (Report No. IR-014-535). College Station, TX: In: Proceedings of Selected Paper Presentations at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED323943)
Roskos, K., & Neuman, S. B. (2002). Environment and its influences for early literacy teaching and learning. In Neuman, S. B. & Dickinson, D. K (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 281-292). New York: The Guilford Press.
Rutherford, W., & Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Consciousness raising and universal grammar. Applied Linguistics, 6(3), 274-82.
Ryan, S. M. (1997). Preparing learners for independence: resources beyond the classroom. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 215-224). Lodon: Longman.
Schalkwijk, E., Esch, K.V., Elsen, A., & Setz, W. (2004). Learner autonomy in foreign language learning and teaching. In K. V. Esch & O. St. John (Eds.), New insights into foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 169-189). New York: Peter Lang.
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-159.
Schmidt, R. W. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: a tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Short, K., Kaufman, G., Kaser, S., Kahn, L., & Crawford, K. (1999). Teacher watching: Examining teacher talk in literature circles. Language Arts, 76(5), 377-385.
Smeets, Ed. (2005). Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers & Education, 44(3), 343-355.
Smith, F. (1994). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read(5th ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
Tao, L., & Robinson, H. (2005). Print rich environments: Our pre-service teachers` report of what they observed in their field experiences. Reading Horizons, 45(4), 349-366.
Teale, W. H. (1986). Home background and young children’s literacy development. In W. H. Teale & E. Sulzby (Eds.), Emergent literacy: Writing and reading (pp. 173-206). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Teberosky, A. (1986). The language young children write: Reflections on a learning situation. In Y.M. Goodman (Ed.), How children construct literacy (pp. 45-58). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Usuki, M. (2002). Learner autonomy: Learning from the student’s voice. CLCS Occasional Paper 60, 1-29.
Voller, P. (1997). Does the teacher have a role in autonomous learning? In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 98-113). London: Longman.
Westwood, P. (2004). Reading and learning difficulties: Approaches to teaching and assessment. London: David Fulton.
Wilson, B. G. (1995). Metaphors for instruction: Why we talk about learning environments. Educational Technology, 35 (5), 25-30.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
94951020
98 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094951020 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [英國語文學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
