政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/37288
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51731636      Online Users : 605
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37288


    Title: 論漢語中形容詞詞類的非必要性
    On the Non-existence of the Adjective Category in Mandarin Chinese
    Authors: 黃琬茹
    Huang, Wan-Ju
    Contributors: 何萬順
    Her, One-Soon
    黃琬茹
    Huang, Wan-Ju
    Keywords: 詞類
    形容詞
    特徵界定
    普遍性
    lexical categories
    adjectives
    feature specification
    universality
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2009-09-19 13:03:35 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本篇論文論證在漢語中動詞以及文獻中所認定的形容詞(putative adjectives)之間的區分是非必要的。本文探討了文獻中區分和辨別漢語形容詞詞類的各項準則,並論證這些準則並無法全面性解釋所有傳統上被視為是形容詞的詞彙,也因此使得漢語語法更加複雜和歧異。文獻中所認定的形容詞在句法上並未呈現出形容詞的特性;相反地,它們無論是從時貌標記來看或就範疇功能(categorial function)等方面而論都與動詞一致。因此,把文獻中所認定的形容詞與動詞歸於一類將可維持漢語語法的簡單性。
    此外,我們認為Chomsky (1965)以兩個正負號特徵(±N, ±V)所界定出的四個詞類(名詞、動詞、形容詞以及介係詞)並不是普遍性的(universal);意即,並非所有語言都需要同時擁有這四個詞類。功能語言學派的看法亦同,他們認為語言中最少只需要兩個詞類來執行語言功能,即動詞與名詞,因此只有這兩個詞類具有普遍性,而另兩個詞類的語意功能可藉由它們來執行。對此,我們引用了缺乏形容詞(如:韓語(cf. Kim 2002a, 2002b))及介係詞(如:賽德克語(cf. Huang 1998))語言的語料來佐證只有動詞與名詞具有普遍性的看法。最後,本文採用Bhat (1994)在觀察跨語言間形容詞詞類的行為表現後所提出的形容詞鑑定標準,來證明漢語中並沒有一個獨立的形容詞詞類。
    This thesis argues that the verb-adjective distinction in Mandarin Chinese is unnecessary. The criteria for identifying a distinct adjectival category have been proposed by many linguists, e.g., Zhu (1982), Yin (2003), Huang et al (2008); however, they fail to accommodate all putative adjectives as a category. A distinct adjective category requires stipulations to account for the verb-adjective distinction and thus complicates the grammar. Descriptively, putative adjectives in Mandarin Chinese do not exhibit adjectival characteristics; rather, they are unmarked predicates and thus behave similarly as verbs in terms of aspectual marking, N’-ellipsis, and reduplication. Putative adjectives should thus be conflated with verbs to maintain the simplicity of the grammar.
    From a typological perspective, some languages have been argued to lack adjectives (e.g., Korean (cf. Kim 2002)) and others, prepositions (e.g., Seediq (cf. Huang 1998)). Therefore, Chomsky’s (1965) four categories defined by two universal feature specifications [±N] and [±V] do not seem to be ubiquitous. Functionalist linguists also assert that only Noun and Verb are universal, for they represent the elementary and central concepts at two extremes of the world while Adjective and Preposition may not be syntactically realized and their semantic concepts are thus associated with either Noun or Verb. Finally, Chinese putative adjectives are further examined with the cross-linguistic criteria proposed in Bhat (1994). The only logical conclusion is that Mandarin Chinese does not distinguish adjectives as a distinct category.
    Reference: References
    Baker, Mark C. 2003. Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    Beck, David. 2002. The Typology of Parts of Speech System: The Markedness of Adjectives. New York: Routledge Press.
    Bhat, D.N.S. 1994. The Adjectival Category. Criterion for Differentiation and Identification. Philadelphia USA: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
    Branigan, Phil. 2000. Cross-linguistic variation in syntax. Linguistics 2103: Reading #7. Available at:
    http://www.ucs.mun.ca/~branigan/courses/2103/Readings/reading-7.pdf
    Chao, Y. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angles: University of California Press.
    Cheng, L. Robert. 1985. A comparison of Taiwanese, Taiwan Mandarin, and Peking Mandarin. Language 61.2: 352-377.
    Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. Readings in English Transformational Grammar, ed. by Roderick. A. Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum, 184-221. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn. and Co.
    Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Holland: Foris Publications.
    Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relation: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Culicover, Peter W. 1997. Principles and Parameters. New York: Oxford University Press.
    DeLancey, Scott. 1999. Lexical prefixes and the bipartite stem construction in Klamath. International Journal of American Linguistics 65.1: 56-83.
    DeLancey, Scott. 2003. Lectures on Functional Syntax. Unpublished ms. Available at: http://www.uoregon.edu/~delancey/sb/functional_syntax.doc
    Dixon, R. M. W. 1981. Where Have All the Adjectives Gone? and Other Essays in Semantics and Syntax. NY: Mouton.
    Dixon, R. M. W., Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. Eds. 2004. Adjective Classes: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Oxford University Press.
    Dragunov A. A. 1960. Untersuchungen zur Grammatik der modernen chinesischen Sprache. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
    Givón, T. 1984. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Givon, T. 1995. Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Haegeman, Liliane. 1994. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory, 2nd edition.Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
    Harada, Naomi. 1999. Interactions between functional and lexical categories: Are adjectives ‘verbal’ or verbs ‘adjectival’? The Proceedings of IACL-7/NACCL-10, 151-168.
    Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Parts of speech. Layered Structure and Reference in a Functional Perspective, ed. by Michael Fortescue, Peter Harder, and Lars Kristofferson, 29-56. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    Her, One-Soon. 1991. Grammatical Functions and Verb Subcategorization in Mandarin Chinese. Published Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Hawaii. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
    Her, One-Soon. 1997. Interaction and Variation in the Chinese VO Construction. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
    Her, One-Soon. 1998. Hanyu zhuti zai yufa cengmian shang de xianzhi [Syntactic constraints on topicalization in Chinese]. Journal of National Chengchi University 77, 1-13.
    Her, One-Soon. 2008. Language and group identity: On Taiwan mainlander’s mother tongues and Taiwan Mandarin. Accepted for publication in Language and Linguistics.
    Huang, C.-T., Li, Y.-H. & Li, Yafei. 2008. The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge University Press.
    Huang, Shuanfan. 1998. Seediq: Spatial representation in a language without prepositions. National Taiwan University Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 189-208.
    Kayne, R. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    Kim, Min-Joo. 2002a. The absence of adjectives in Korean. Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Korean Linguistics, Hankwak Mwunhwasa: Seoul, Korea.
    Kim, Min-Joo. 2002b. Does Koran have adjectives? ed. by T. Ionin et al. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 43, 71-89
    Lee, Huichi. 2005. On DE in SHI…DE construction. UST Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 131-160.
    Li, C., Thompson, S. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
    Lin, Jo-Wang. 2000. On the temporal meaning of the verbal –le in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 1, 109-133.
    Lin, Jo-Wang. 2003. Temporal reference in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 12, 259-311.
    Liu, C.-M., 2006. Degree Modification of Adjectives in Mandarin Chinese. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan.
    Liu, Chen-Sheng. 2005. Adjectival predicates and the aspectual suffix –le in Chinese. UST Working Papers in Linguistics 1, 205-228.
    Liu, Yue-Hua. 1988. Dongtain zhuci guo1, guo2, le yongfa bijiao [A Comparative Study on the Dynamic Functional Word guo1, guo2 and le]. Yuwen Yanjiu 6-16.
    McCawley, J. 1992. Justifying part-of-speech assignments in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 20.2: 211–246.
    Nerbonne, John, and Wybo Wiersma. 2006. A measure of aggregate syntactic distance. Proceedings of the Workshop on linguistic Distances, 82-90.
    Ou, Tzu-Shan. 2007. Suo Relative Clauses in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics 8.3: 913-937.
    Paul, Waltraud. 2005. Adjectival modification in Mandarin Chinese and related
    issues. Linguistics 43.4: 757 -793.
    Radford, Andrew. 1988. Transformational Grammar: A First Class. UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Perlmutter, D.M. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusativity hypothesis.
    Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 157-189. Berkeley Linguistic Society, University of California.
    Saeed, John I. 1997. Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
    Saito, Mamoru, T.-H. Jonah Lin, and Keiko Murasugi. 2008. N’-ellipsis and the structure of noun phrases in Chinese and Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17.3: 247-271.
    Simpson, Andrew. 2003. On the status of ‘modifying’ DE and the structure of the Chinese DP. On the Formal Way to Chinese Languages, ed. by Sze-Wing Tang and Cheng-Sheng Kuther Liu, 74-101.
    Simpson, Andrew and Z. Wu. 1999. The syntax and interpretation of sentence-final DE. Proceedings of NACCL 10, 257-274.
    Smith, Carlota. 1990. Event types in Mandarin. Linguistics 28, 309-336.
    Smith, Carlota. 1994. Aspectual viewpoint and situation type in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3, 107-146.
    Soh, Hooi Ling and Jenny Yi-Chun Kuo. 2005. Perfective aspect and accomplishment situations in Mandarin Chinese. Perspectives on Aspect, ed. by Angeliek van Hout, Henriette de Swart and Henk Verkuyl, 199-216. Dordrecht: Springer.
    Soh, Hooi Ling and Meijia Gao. 2006. Perfective aspect and transition in Mandarin Chinese: An analysis of double –le sentences. Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society Conference, ed. by Pascal Denis et al., 107-122. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    Stowell, Tim. 1981. The Origins of Phrase Structure. Ph. D. dissertation. MIT.
    Sybesma, Rint. 1997. Why Chinese verb le is a resultative predicate. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6, 215-261.
    Tanangkingsing, Michael. 2003. Do we move in different ways or do we differ in our ways to move: A Study of Motion Verbs in Four Austronesian Languages. Presented at the Second Workshop on The Verb in Formosan Languages, Academia Sinica, Taipei, November 1-2.
    Tang, Ting-Chi. 1982. Guoyu xingrongci de chongdie guilv [Reduplication of adjectives in Chinese]. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University 27, 279-294.
    Thompson, Sandra A. 1988. A discourse approach to the cross-linguistic category “adjective”. Explaining Language Universals, ed. by John A. Hawkins, 167-185. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Tian, Qingqiang. 2004. Chinese Adjectives and Their Event Structure Representations. MA thesis, College of Foreign Languages, Chongqing University, China.
    Tsao, Feng-fu. 1996. On verb classification in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 24.1: 138-191.
    Yin, Shiyu. 2003. The Criteria for the Independent Existence of the Adjectival Category. MA thesis, Tianjin Normal University, China.
    Yuan, Yu-Lin. 1993. Xiandai Hanyu Qishiju Yanjiu (Contemporary study of imperatives). Beijing University Press.
    Zhang, Niina. 2006. On the configuration issue of coordination. Language and Linguistics 7.1: 176-223.
    Zhu, Dexi. 1982. Yufa Jiangyi (Lecture notes on grammar). Shangwu inshuguan, Hong Kong.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    94555002
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094555002
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Linguistics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    500201.pdf128KbAdobe PDF21076View/Open
    500202.pdf63KbAdobe PDF2910View/Open
    500203.pdf64KbAdobe PDF2986View/Open
    500204.pdf175KbAdobe PDF21224View/Open
    500205.pdf89KbAdobe PDF2935View/Open
    500206.pdf118KbAdobe PDF21095View/Open
    500207.pdf83KbAdobe PDF2972View/Open
    500208.pdf116KbAdobe PDF21210View/Open
    500209.pdf251KbAdobe PDF21344View/Open
    500210.pdf227KbAdobe PDF21300View/Open
    500211.pdf230KbAdobe PDF21293View/Open
    500212.pdf250KbAdobe PDF21188View/Open
    500213.pdf87KbAdobe PDF21026View/Open
    500214.pdf105KbAdobe PDF21673View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback