English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51735376      Online Users : 638
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36970


    Title: 台灣產物保險業費率自由化、市場競爭與核保績效
    Deregulation,Market Competition and Underwriting Performance in Taiwan Property-Liability Insurance
    Authors: 吳欣樺
    Wu, Hsin Hua
    Contributors: 張士傑
    吳欣樺
    Wu, Hsin Hua
    Keywords: 核保利潤
    赫芬多指數
    自留綜合成本率
    預期均衡核保利潤
    Underwriting profit
    Herfindahl indexes
    Combined ratio
    Expected underwriting profit
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 20:19:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討費率自由化政策與台灣產物保險市場經營效益,利用實證資料評估產物保險公司之整體經營績效及核保利潤。本研究自保險年鑑、台灣經濟新報資料庫及保險市場重要指標,選取1998年至2006年間財務及業務資訊來進行實證分析。
    依Klein (1999)分類,台灣產物保險市場屬於類似獨占性競爭市場,產物保險公司高度競爭。依實證結果顯示,實施費率自由化政策,公司自留費用率持續緩慢增加,自留綜合成本率亦呈現上升趨勢。多數產物保險公司之實際核保利潤仍大於依Fairley (1979)計算之均衡核保利潤。
    實證結果摘要如下:
    (1) 類似獨占性競爭市場:赫芬多指數皆小於0.1,市場呈現競爭狀態。1996年後,火險及車險之簽單保費成長率似乎每四、五年會呈現負成長。另外,1998-2003年費用率與公司規模呈現顯著負相關(p=0.01)。2004-2006年,此負相關並不顯著(p=0.1),顯示大公司漸不具有成本優勢,即產險市場之進入障礙有減少之趨勢。
    (2) 成本費用支出增加:除2001年外,1998至2006年之產物保險公司自留綜合成本率介於91.09% 和 93.49%。2006年之自留綜合成本率為93.49%。2006年之產物保險公司費用率上升至40.51% 且損失率下降至52.97%。
    (3) 核保利潤呈現正值:依Fairley(1979)計算之2006年預期均衡核保利潤。20家產物保險公司,17家實際核保利潤大於預期均衡核保利潤。
    This paper provides an empirical study of rate deregulation plan and profit performance in Taiwan property-liability insurance market. The data used in this study are from Insurance Year Book, Taiwan Economic Journal Data Bank, and Important Indexes of Insurance Industry (Taiwan) during the period from 1998 to 2006.
    Based on the classification by Klein (1999), the market structure of Taiwan property-liability insurance industry is similar to monopolistic competitive market and the property-liability insurers are engaged in intense competition. The results of this study show that the expense ratios of insurers rise slightly from year to year and the combined ratios also follow a trend of increase. The actual underwriting profits of most property-liability insurers are larger than the expected numbers estimated by using the methodology in Fairley (1979). The empirical results are as follows:
    (1) The market structure is similar to monopolistic competitive market for that the Herfindahl indexes are all below 0.1. The growth ratios of written premium on fire insurance and automobile insurance seem to become negative every four or five years after 1996. Besides, the negative correlation between expense ratio and the scale of economics in insurance market from 1998 to 2003 was significant at the p = 0.01 level. However, this correlation from 2004 to 2006 was not significant at the p = 0.1 level. It seems that larger insurers do not have significant cost advantages over smaller insurers in the recent years, namely the entry barriers decline.
    (2) The expenses and costs keep increasing. Except 2001, the combined ratios ranged from 91.09% in 1998 to 93.49% in 2006. The expense ratio increased to 40.51% while the net loss ratio decreased to 52.97% in 2006.
    (3) The underwriting profits of most insurers are positive. The expected underwriting profits by using the methodology in Fairley (1979) is less than the actual ones in 2006. Among the 20 property-liability insurers, the actual underwriting profits of 17 insurers were larger than their expected underwriting profits.
    Reference: Bailey, D., and S. E. Boyle. 1971. The optimal measure of concentration. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66: 702-206.
    Biger, N., and Y. Kahane. 1987. Risk considerations in insurance ratemaking. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 45: 121-132.
    Casualty Actuarial Society. 1996. Foundation of Casualty Actuarial Science. Casualty Actuarial Society United Book Press Inc.
    Chang, S. C., Y. W. Hwang, and S. C. Chan. 2008. Underwriting performance of property-liability insurers: Empirical study for Taiwan between 1999 to 2003. Insurance Issues and Practices 7: 1-19.
    Chen, H.H. 2005. Taiwan non-life insurance 2004-market report. Insurance Issues and Practices 4: 231-260.
    Chen, P. Y. 2005. The impact of rate deregulation on the auto insurance market in Taiwan. Graduate thesis of National Chengchi University Executive Master of Business Administration.
    Chen, R., K. A. Wong, and H. C. Lee. 1999. Underwriting cycles in Asia. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 66: 29-47.
    Cummins, J. D., and J. F. Outreville. 1987. An international analysis of underwriting cycles in property-liability insurance. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 54: 246-262.
    Deltuvaitė, V., V. Vaškelaitis, A. Pranckevičiūtė. 2007. The Impact of Concentration on Competition and Efficiency in the Lithuanian Banking Sector. Engineering Economics 54:7-19.
    Doherty, N. A., and J. R. Garven. 1986. Price regulation in property-liability insurance: A contingent-claims approach. The Journal of Finance 41: 1031-1050.
    Fairley, W. B. 1979. Investment income and profit margins in property-liability insurance: Theory and empirical results. The Bell Journal of Economics 10: 192-210.
    Hall, M., and N. Tideman. 1967. Measure of concentration. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62: 162-166.
    Harrington, S. 1984. The impact of rate regulation on prices and underwriting results in the property-liability insurance industry: A survey. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 51: 577-623.
    Higgins, J. J. 2004. Introduction to modern nonparametric statistics. Thomson Learning Academic Resource Center, the United States of America.
    Hill, R. D. 1979. Profit regulation in property-liability insurance. The Bell Journal of Economics 10: 172-191.
    Huebner, S. S., K. Black, and B. L. Webb. 1996. Property and liability insurance. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall.
    Insurance Institute of the Republic of China. 1998. Insurance Year Book, the Republic of China .
    _______________________________________. 1999. Insurance Year Book, the Republic of China.
    _______________________________________. 2000. Insurance Year Book, the Republic of China.
    _______________________________________. 2001. Insurance Year Book, the Republic of China.
    _______________________________________. 2002. Insurance Year Book, the Republic of China.
    _______________________________________. 2003. Insurance Year Book, the Republic of China.
    _______________________________________. 2004. Insurance Year Book, the Republic of China.
    _______________________________________. 2005. Insurance Year Book, the Republic of China.
    _______________________________________. 2006. Insurance Year Book, the Republic of China.
    Insurance Institute of the Republic of China. 2007. The Important Indexes of Insurance Industry (Taiwan).
    Joskow, P. L. 1973. Cartels, competition and regulation in the property-liability insurance industry. The Bell Journal of Ecocnomics and Management Science 4: 375-427.
    Klein, R. W. 1999. A regulator’s introduction to the insurance industry. National Association of Insurance Commissioners Publications Department, the United States of America.
    Kraus, A., and S. A. Ross. 1982. The determination of fair profits for the property-liability insurance firm. The Journal of Finance. 37: 1015-1028.
    Sharpe, W. F. 1964. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance 19: 425-442.
    Yang, C. Y., and F. K. Ling. 2001. The study of loading expenses of a property-liability insurance company in Taiwan. Insurance monograph 65:108-130 .
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    風險管理與保險研究所
    95358010
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095358010
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[風險管理與保險學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    801001.pdf55KbAdobe PDF2827View/Open
    801002.pdf148KbAdobe PDF2848View/Open
    801003.pdf156KbAdobe PDF21070View/Open
    801004.pdf50KbAdobe PDF2898View/Open
    801005.pdf40KbAdobe PDF21154View/Open
    801006.pdf113KbAdobe PDF21390View/Open
    801007.pdf179KbAdobe PDF21199View/Open
    801008.pdf452KbAdobe PDF21397View/Open
    801009.pdf48KbAdobe PDF21148View/Open
    801010.pdf59KbAdobe PDF2880View/Open
    801011.pdf68KbAdobe PDF2886View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback