政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/36898
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51782710      Online Users : 589
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36898


    Title: 財務報表重編和資金成本之關聯性
    Authors: 周玉娟
    Contributors: 戚務君
    周玉娟
    Keywords: 報表重編
    資金成本
    Fama-French三因子模型
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 20:05:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究主要在探討財務報表重編事件是否導致要求之資金成本提高。探究重編事件之經濟後果，除了彌補此議題之實證證據外，研究結果亦能提供警訊給予企業之管理當局，以抑減財務報表舞弊之發生，同時提供投資人投資決策參考。
    本研究以民國86年7月至96年6月間曾重編財務報表之國內上市公司為重編研究樣本建構財務報表重編投資組合，與同期間之其他對應之上市公司投資組合，運用Fama-French三因子模型，加入財務報表重編因子，建構四因子模型，進行最小平方法(OLS)迴歸分析檢測假說。實證結果顯示，在控制市場、規模、淨值市價比因子之後，財務報表重編因子為風險因子，顯示財務報表重編，導致投資者要求之資金成本提高。此外，投資者對於財務報表重編次數之反應並無明顯的不同，而對重編變動之金額程度之反應則有顯著之差異。同時，投資者對於小規模公司發生財務報表重編之反應較大規模公司來的劇烈。最後，在事件影響存續期間研究結果顯示，財務報表重編事件對於公司之資金成本長期而言有明顯的影響，顯見財務報表重編對公司之價值影響重大。
    Reference: 方智強與姚明慶，1998，台灣上市公司的淨值市價比現象，管理學報，第十五卷，第3期：367-391。
    李建然與陳政芳，2004，審計客戶重要性與盈餘管理—以五大事務所組別為觀察標的，會計評論，第38期：59-80。
    林宛瑩、許崇源與戚務君，2005，財務報告重編、盈餘透明度與公司治理，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
    邱秀清與鄭鈞介，2008，董監事會及審計品質與財務報表重編，商學學報，第16期：67-86。
    洪榮華與雷雅淇，2002，公司規模、股價、益本比、淨值市價比與股票報酬關係之實證研究，管理評論，第二十一卷，第3期：25-48。
    黃一祥、王元章、何加政與許嘉惠，2003，台灣股市系統性風險之估計及橫斷面預測報酬之分析，財務金融學刊，第十一卷，第3期：1-25。
    陳牡丹，1999，上市公司財務報表重編次數、重編影響方向與操縱盈餘動機之關聯性研究，臺中商專學報，第三十一卷：193-214。
    陳惠玲，2002，由財報重編看財報可信度及CPA簽證品質—財務透明度評估之一，貨幣觀測與信用評等，第37期：77-87。
    陳安琳，2002，台灣股票報酬之穩定因素-交叉確認、因素分析與模擬分析，管理學學報，第十九卷，第3期(6月)：519-542。
    詹玉霞與蘇裕惠，2003，財務績效、財務剝奪假說對財務報告重編之影響，2003會計理論與實務研討會。
    劉亞秋、黃理哲與劉維琪，1996，國內股市系統風險之探討，證券發展季刊，第八卷，第1期：45-66。
    鄭丁旺，2006，中級會計學。
    薛敏正、林嬋娟與林秀鳳，2008，董事會特性與財務報告重編，交大管理學報，第二十八卷，第2期 (12月)：73-103。
    Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(Mar): 69-87.
    Agrawal, A., and S. Chadha. 2005. Corporate governance and accounting scandals. Journal of Law and Economics 48 (Oct): 371-406.
    Aier, J. K., J. Comprix, M. T. Gunlock, and D. Lee. 2005. The financial expertise of CFOs and accounting restatements. Accounting Horizons 19(Sep): 123-135.
    Anderson, K. L., and T. L. Yohn. 2002. The effect of 10-K restatement on firm value, information asymmetries, and investors’ reliance on earnings. Working paper, Georgetown University.
    Ball, R. and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journalof Accounting Research 6: 159-178.
    Banz, R. W. 1981.The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economics 9 (Mar): 3-18.
    Basu, S. 1983. The relationship between earinings yield, market value and return for NYSE common stocks: further evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 12 (Jun): 129-156.
    Chan, L. C., Y. Hamao, and J. Lakonishok. 1991. Fundamentals and stock returns in Japan. The Journal of Finance 46 (Dec): 1739-1764.
    Cheng, Q. and D. B. Farber. 2008. Earnings restatements, changes in CEO compensation, and firm performance. The Accounting Review 83 (Sep): 1217-1250.
    Davis, J. L., E. F. Fama, and K. R. French. 2000. Characteristics, covariances, and average Returns: 1929 to 1997. The Jounrnal of Finance 55 (Feb): 389-406.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13(1): 1-36.
    DeFond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1991. Incidence and circumstances of accounting errors.The Accounting Review 66 (Jul): 643-655.
    Desai, H., C. E. Hogan, and M. S. Wilkins. 2006. The reputational penalty for aggressive accounting: earnings restatements and management turnover. The Accounting Review 81(1): 83-112.
    Fama, E. F., and K. R. French.1992. The cross-section of expected stock return. The Journal of Finance 47 (June): 427-465.
    ________, and ________. 1993.Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33 (Feb): 3-56.
    ________, and ________. 1995. Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns. The Journal of Finance 50 (Mar): 131-155.
    ________, and ________. 1996. Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. The Journal of Finance 51 (Mar): 55-84.
    ________, and ________. 1998. Value versus growth the international evidence. The Jounrnal of Finance 53 (Dec): 1975-1999.
    ________, and ________. 2006. The value premium and the CAPM. The Journal of Finance 61 (Oct) : 2163-2185.
    Francs, J., D. Nanda, and P. Olsson. 2008. Voluntary disclosure, earnings quality, and cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (Mar): 53-99.
    General Accounting Office. 2002. Financial statement restatements: trends, market impacts, regulatory responses, and remaining challenges. Washington D.C. GAO-03-138.
    General Accounting Office. 2006. Financial statement restatements: update of public company trends, market impacts, and regulatory enforcement activities. Washington D.C. GAO-06-678.
    Heston, S., G. Rouwenhorst, and Wessels R. 1999. The role of beta and size in the cross-section of European stock returns. European Financial Management 4: 9-28.
    Hribar, P., and N. T. Jenkins. 2004. The effect of accounting restatements on earnings revisions and the estimated cost of capital. Review of Accounting Studies 9 : 337-356.
    Huang Yen-Sheng, 1997. The size anomaly on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. Applied Economics Letters 4: 7-12.
    Kinney, W. J. and L. S. McDaniel. 1989. Characteristics of firms correcting previously reported quarterly earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11 (Feb): 71-93.
    Maroney, N. and A. Protopapadakis. 2002. The book-to-market and size effects in a general asset pricing model: evidence from seven national markets. European Finance Review 6: 189-221.
    Palmrose, Z. V., V. J. Richardson, and S. Scholz. 2004. Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37 (Feb): 59-89.
    Palmrose, Z. V., and S. Scholz. 2004. The circumstances and legal consequences of Non-GAAP reporting: evidence from restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research 21: 139-190.
    Reinganum, M. R. 1981. Misspecification of capital asset pricing : empirical anomalies based on earnings` yields and market values. Journal of Financial Economics 9 (Mar): 19-46.
    Richardson, S., I. Tuna, and M. Wu. 2002. Predicting earnings management: the case of earnings restatements. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania and University of Science and Technology.
    Rouwenhorst, K. G.1999. Local return factors and turnover in emerging stock markets. The Journal of Finance 4 (Aug): 1439-1464.
    Srinivasan, S. 2005. Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. Journal of Accounting Research 43(May): 291-334.
    Wilson, W. M. 2008. An empirical analysis of the decline in the information content of earnings following restatements. The Accounting Review 83 (Mar): 519-548.
    Wu, M. 2002. Earnings restatement: a capital market perspective. Working paper, New York University.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    96353016
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096353016
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    301601.pdf92KbAdobe PDF2882View/Open
    301602.pdf102KbAdobe PDF2875View/Open
    301603.pdf130KbAdobe PDF21002View/Open
    301604.pdf183KbAdobe PDF21087View/Open
    301605.pdf212KbAdobe PDF22170View/Open
    301606.pdf251KbAdobe PDF24242View/Open
    301607.pdf235KbAdobe PDF25961View/Open
    301608.pdf222KbAdobe PDF21095View/Open
    301609.pdf118KbAdobe PDF21051View/Open
    301610.pdf129KbAdobe PDF21623View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback