English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114014/145046 (79%)
Visitors : 52073725      Online Users : 737
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/36890
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36890


    Title: 資訊揭露評鑑系統對企業盈餘管理行為之影響 -以第三屆分級結果探討
    Authors: 鄭欣婷
    Contributors: 鄭丁旺
    鄭欣婷
    Keywords: 資訊揭露
    盈餘管理
    Information disclosure
    Earnings management
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 20:03:42 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 為提升資訊透明度,國內於2003年開始實施資訊揭露評鑑系統,由過去實證結果發現,系統實施後有助於降低企業盈餘管理行為。第三屆起,評鑑結果分五級揭示並新增自願性揭露較透明名單,期以再強化資訊透明度。因此,本研究乃針對第三屆系統改變及其結果,進一步探討對於企業盈餘管理行為的影響。
      本研究實證結果發現,第三屆資訊揭露評鑑系統改採分五級揭示評鑑結果,比前兩屆僅揭示較透明者更能降低企業盈餘管理行為。另外,在系統實施後,公司規模較大者,其盈餘管理行為降幅較小公司為多。而在評鑑結果對於盈餘管理行為之鑑別上,以級別來說,前兩級(A+、A級)明顯小於後兩級(B、C級),但後兩級之間則無差異;以自願性揭露較透明與否來說,較透明者其盈餘管理小於較不透明者。
      In order to improve the transparency of information, Taiwan Securities and Futures Institute (SFI) begins to implement Information Disclosure and Transparency Ranking System (IDTRS) in Taiwan in 2003, since that the past study shows applying IDTRS can reduce earnings management behaviors of the enterprise. In the third time of practice, the result of IDTRS was divided into five grades and released a more transparent list on companies in order to strengthen the transparency of information better. Therefore, this study focuses on the result of IDTRS released in 2006 and discusses the effect of the result to earnings management behaviors.
    The empirical result of this study shows that the change does reduce earnings management. Besides, this study also shows that, after the change, the earnings management behavior of the large company decreases more than that of the small company. Finally, to determine whether the result of IDTRS can differentiate earnings management behavior of each company, the study shows, from the perspective of the grade, the first two grades (A+, A) are obviously smaller than last two grades (B, C), and it has no difference between the last two grades; from the perspective of voluntary disclosure of transparency, the earnings management of the more transparent company is lower than the that of the less transparent company.
    Reference: 方滋聰,2003,會計師與承銷商對現金增資公司從事盈餘管理之影響,逢甲大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    王佩珍,2005,資訊揭露評鑑制度對股價影響之研究,中原大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    邱碧珠,2000,資訊揭露程度與權益資金成本之關係:我國資訊電子業之關係,台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    邱彩容,2005,我國上市公司季盈餘動機之研究,逢甲大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    邱靖博,2006,資訊揭露評鑑系統建置緣起暨實施成效,中華民國證券暨期貨市
    場發展基金會第四屆資訊揭露評鑑宣導說明會簡報資料。
    李儒哲,2001,我國企業盈餘管理手法之研究,稅務研究月刊,第88期:1-12。
    李建然、陳信吉與張石羨珍,2005,資訊揭露評鑑系統與股票評價之攸關性,2005當前會計理論與實務研討會論文集,銘傳大學會計系。
    沈宜慶,2002,企業資訊透明度與債券資金成本關係之實證研究,淡江大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    沈中華、池祥麟,2003,從投資人保護觀點與展望理論探討各國銀行業盈餘管理之現象與動機,經濟論文,第三十一卷,第3期:407-458。
    吳家宜,1999,股利政策與盈餘品質關聯性之研究,政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    周建宏,2002,提高資訊透明度以因應全球化的資本市場,會計研究月刊,第200期:78-86。
    林欣怡,2003,公司資訊透明度與權益資金成本之關係探討,中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
    林問一、楊和利與方滋聰,2006,會計師與承銷商對現金增資公司從事盈餘管理
    之影響,風險管理學報,第八卷,第2期:157-176。
    陳樹,2002,我國企業盈餘操縱問題之誘因、影響與因應對策,當代會計,第三
    卷,第2期:231-242。
    張瑞當、方俊儒,2006,資訊揭露評鑑系統對企業盈餘管理行為之影響,會計評論,第42期:1-22。
    曹常鴻、陳彰文,2005,會計師知名度及其任期對初次上市櫃公司會計報表品質
    之影響,經營管理論叢,第一屆管理與決策2005年學術研討會特刋:275-285。
    許崇源、陳瑞斌與翁慈青,2005,公司治理結構對於資訊透明度之影響,2005台灣財務金融學會年會暨學術論文研討會論文集,成功大學財金系暨會計系。
    葉銀華,2002,從台灣上市公司網站資訊揭露看透明度,會計研究月刊,第200
    期:70-77。
    楊麗玲、沈明鑑,2005,公司治理:董事會組成、股權結構與盈餘管理,證券櫃檯月刋,第114期:68-77。
    楊朝旭、吳幸蓁,2003,總經理薪酬績效敏感性、績效門檻與盈餘管理關聯性之研究,會計評論,第36期:55-87。
    蔡坤哲,2003,資訊揭露程度與盈餘管理關係之探討-以上市電子類為例,東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    歐進士、李佳玲與詹茂昆,2004,我國企業盈餘管理與經營風險關聯之實證研究,風險管理學報,第六卷,第2期:181-206。
    薛敏正、林嬋娟,2003,自由現金流量與盈餘管理關聯性之研究,台灣管理學刋,
    第三卷,第1期:151-168。
    薛明玲、蔡朝安,2003,從資訊揭露看公司治理,月旦法學雜誌,第96期:335-343。
    Ball, R. and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6: 159-178.
    Botosan, C. A. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 72 (3): 323-349.
    Burgstahler, D. and I. Dichev. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 99-126.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70 (2): 193-225.
    Dye, R. 1988. Earnings management in an overlapping generation model. Journal of Accounting Research 26 (2): 195-235.
    Francis, J., D. Nanda, and P. Olsson. 2006. Voluntary disclosure, earnings quality, and cost of capital. Working paper, Duke University.
    Glosten, L., and P. Milgrom. 1985. Bid, ask and transaction price in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed trader. Journal of Financial Economics 14 (1): 71-100.
    Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decision. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 (1-3): 85-107.
    _________, A. P. Hutton, and K. G. Palepu. 1999. Stock performance and intermediation changes surrounding sustained increase in disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research 16 (3): 485-520.
    _________, and J Wahlen. 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting, Accounting Horizons 13 (4): 365-383.
    _________, and K. G. Palepu, 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital market: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Jounral of Accounting and Economics 31: 405-440.
    Kim, O., and R. E. Verrecchia. 1994. Market liquidity and volume around earnings announcement. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1,2): 41-68.
    Kim Y., C. Liu, and S. G.. Rhee. 2003. The effect of firm size on earnings management. Working paper, Hawaii University.
    Lang, M., and R. Lundholm. 1993. Cross-sectional determinants of analyst rating of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (2): 246-271.
    ____, and ___________. 1996. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review 71 (4): 467-492.
    Lobo, G., and J. Zhou. 2001. Disclosure quality and earnings management. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 8 (1): 1-20.
    Richardson, V. J. 2000. Information asymmetry and earnings management: Some evidence. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 15 (4): 325-347.
    Spence, M. 1973. Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (3): 355-379.
    Trueman, B., and S. Titman. 1988. An explanation for accounting income smoothing. Journal of Accounting Research 26 (supplement): 127-139.
    Watts, R. L., J. L. Zimmerman. 1978. Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53 (1): 112-134.
    Welker, M. 1995. Disclosure policy, information asymmetry, and liquidity in equity markets. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 801-827.
    Xiong, Y. 2006. Earnings management and its measurement: A theoretical perspective. Journal of American Academy of Business 9 (1): 214-219.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    94353018
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094353018
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    301801.pdf48KbAdobe PDF2911View/Open
    301802.pdf72KbAdobe PDF2940View/Open
    301803.pdf60KbAdobe PDF2912View/Open
    301804.pdf72KbAdobe PDF2870View/Open
    301805.pdf111KbAdobe PDF21342View/Open
    301806.pdf279KbAdobe PDF23125View/Open
    301807.pdf173KbAdobe PDF29539View/Open
    301808.pdf187KbAdobe PDF21322View/Open
    301809.pdf96KbAdobe PDF2944View/Open
    301810.pdf93KbAdobe PDF21589View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback