Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36881
|
| Title: | 部落格影音混搭著作權問題及因應之研究
The Research of Copyright Issues of Audio-Visual Mashups on Blogs |
| Authors: | 黃曉薇
Huang, Hsiao Wei |
| Contributors: | 劉江彬
Liu, Chang Bin
黃曉薇
Huang, Hsiao Wei |
| Keywords: | 部落格
混搭
著作權
合理使用原則
創作共用
商業模式
Blog
Mashups
Copyright
Fair Use
Creative Commons
Business Model
CC |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 20:02:03 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著科技的進展，產生了許多新興的創作媒介與方式，使得終端的網路使用者不再甘於僅做為主流媒體所提供內容之接收者，也想進一步地成為內容的提供者，網路上混搭創作的興盛正是在此種潮流趨勢下的一種社會文化現象。網路混搭創作可依其創作內容之不同而區分為三種：網路混搭、影片混搭與音樂混搭；但其創作之方式都有一個共同的特徵：將不同來源之資訊、素材，經由混搭創作者發揮創意後，以嶄新面貌而呈現之作品。著作權制度之目的乃在促進人類智識文化之進展與累積，因此對於新興之網路創作也應賦予一定之保護，才能真正發揮著作權制度之功能。然而，現行著作權制度制定時並未充分考量到數位時代下各種創作方式與媒介之特性，所以並無法提供此類創作適當之保護。為了社會文化之發展，現行的著作權制度有其修正之必要，讓負責平衡公私益之合理使用原則能夠發揮其功能，而不再僅具有象徵性之意義，而是能更實際地落實保護之功能。此外，在現行著作權制度尚未修正前，本文也嘗試提出兩個體制內解決之方法：創作共用以及創新之商業模式。透過創作共用可以讓目前的著作權制度更有彈性；創新的商業模式則能讓所有著作權關係人能夠互利共生，更有助於問題之實際解決。
This thesis aims to study on copyrights concerning the mashups on blogs. The technology evolution brings about new media and new mode for creation and the end-users can both be the information recipients and providers. Mashups become one of the frequently adopted modes among the internet creation and the copyright of mashups call for a closer study.
The main idea of mashups is to mash and recombine materials taken from different sources with the creator’s own creativity. Mashups are regarded as a creation, which requires legal protection. However, the protections for mashups and their creators in current laws are still incomplete and needed to be amended for a better environment for creators. Beside the amendment of copyright laws, other solutions are as well available, such as Creative Commons and new business models. Creative Commons provides authors with some licensing clauses, which helps to create a more flexible creative environment. On the other hand, a good business model could transform legal issues into a commercial opportunity and provide the best solution for all parties related.
The first chapter of this thesis will outline the main purpose and possible contribution of this thesis.
The second chapter will introduce the blogs. The introduction will begin with the streaming technology and concerning legal issues. Streaming technology is a crucial factor in the developments and the functions of blogs. Further on, the thesis will elaborates the history and future trend of blogs. In the third section of the chapter, some main copyright issues of blogs will be brought into discussion.
The third chapter is the introduction of audio-visual mashups on blogs. The discussion begins with website mashup technology and the types of mashups. Remix Culture plays an important role in the development of mashups and its connection between audio-visual mashups on blogs will be elaborated. The chapter will also include some copyright issues of audio-visual mashups on blogs and a detailed discussion on the fair use doctrine of the current copyright law.
The fourth chapter will focus on the Creative Commons and new business models, which should be an alternative solution beside the law amendments. The discussion will involve with an introduction about Creative Commons. The ccMixter and Jamendo can be taken as two examples of combination of Creative Commons and audio-visual mashups. The chapter will as well include some latest digital music business models and suggestions for future mashup business models.
This thesis indicates the deficiency of current copyright laws concerning the protection of mashups and calls for attentions to the necessity of law amendments. In addition, the thesis propose two alternative solutions for the copyright dilemma: the Creative Commons and new business models, through which the mashups problems can hopefully dealt with in a more practical way. |
| Reference: | 壹、中文參考文獻
一、論文
朱稚芬（2006），論著作權法與公共領域之衝突與調和機制，世新大學，碩士論文。
全正玟（2005），韓國與台灣 P2P 相關著作權案例比較研究，國立台灣大學，碩士論文。
杜惠錦（2005），著作權存續期間之變遷與著作權公共領域之研究，國立交通大學，碩士論文。
林聖斌（2006），公共領域在數位環境中面臨的衝擊，國立交通大學，碩士論文。
胡心蘭（2001），論科技發展對合理使用與著作財產權限制之影響，中原大學，碩士論文。
莊心潔（2001）， Peer-to-Peer 多媒體傳輸科技著作權問題之研究，東吳大學，碩士論文。
黃怡騰（1996），著作權法上合理使用之研究，國立政治大學，博士論文。
黃昱彰（2005），一種可傳遞重用性多媒體物件之P2P平台，義守大學資訊工程研究所，碩士論文。
賴俊廷（2005），P2P 軟體對網路影響之研究，國立交通大學資訊工程學系，碩士論文。
陳榮林（2003），點對點傳輸之著作權侵害問題－以美國法為中心，國立交通大學科技法律研究，碩士論文。
廖建智（2000），分散式資源分享與推薦，交通大學資訊科學研究所，碩士論文。
廖偉迪（2003），資訊時代著作權合理使用原則演變之探討—以美國著作權法為中心，國立中正大學，碩士論文。
蔡惠如（2006），著作權合理使用之價值創新與未來展望，國立交通大學，博士論文。
二、專書
吳漢東（1996，10月），著作權合理使用制度研究。
金海軍譯（2005），William M. Landes；Richard A. Posner著，知識產權法的經濟結構，北京大學。
施文高（1988），國際著作權法制析論上冊（再版），作者自印。
洪慧芳譯（2006），傑若米˙萊特著，部落格行銷：百萬顧客同步發聲，開啟雙向溝通的新消費時代（Blog marketing：The Revolutionary new way to increase sales, build your brand, and get exceptional results），台北：美商麥格羅‧希爾。
葉茂林譯（2000），Paul Goldstein著，捍衛著作權—從印刷術到數位時代之著作權法。
劉靜怡譯（2002），勞倫斯˙雷席格著（Lawrence Lessig），網路自由與法律，台北：商周。
盧文祥（2006），智慧財產權不確定法律概念的剖析研究，台北：瑞興圖書。
陳宜君譯（2003），希瓦˙維迪亞那桑著，著作權保護了誰？台北：商周。
賴文智（2003，11月），數位著作權法。
羅明通（2005），著作權法論，六版，台英商務法律事務所。
三、專文與期刊
范曉玲（2001），網路音樂『同儕共享』與『合理使用』－從Napster案談起，月旦法學雜誌78期。
章忠信著（2003），「著作權保護、科技發展與合理使用—談新著作權法關於合理使用的已然與未然」，全國科技法律研討會。
馮震宇（1998），論新著作權法合理使用之規定，萬國法律雜誌，第102 期。
劉孔中（2001），著作人格權之研究，收錄於整體著作權法制之檢討，經濟部智慧財產局委託。
陳家駿（1997，4月），網路傳播媒體適用現行法律規範之探討，萬國法律。
陳家駿（2004，4月），對網路P2P業者著作權補償金制度提議之意見，智慧財產局智慧財產權月刊。
陳家駿（2006，3月），「從網路電子交易評我國首宗P2P著作權重製與傳輸之ezPeer案判決」，月旦法學第130期。
陳家駿（2005，12月），從臺北地院KURO案判決談P2P網站著作權爭議，全國律師。
陳志民著（2003），巨人的肩膀或自己的腳尖？－從「競爭平台模型」理論看著作權「合理使用」原則，2003全國科技法律研討會，新竹國立交通大學。
陳美玲、林淑惠（2004），合理使用是權利嗎？－論臺北地院九十三年度小上字第四號判決，全國律師，第8卷第11期。
賴文智、劉承慶（2003），網路圖片搜尋服務與著作權—由美國Kelly v. Arriba案談起。
蔡念中、張宏源（2005，3月），匯流中的傳播媒介—以美國與台灣為例。
羅明通（2003，3月），P2P資源共享架構之傳輸及重製在著作權法上之評價─兼論折衷式與無階式（NO-TIER）P2P之技術差異，月旦法學雜誌94期。
羅明通（2001，5月），從Napster案論「公開傳播權」建立之必要性－網路上資訊公開傳輸在我國著作權法定性評斷。
四、網路資源：
（一）網路文章
吳尚崑（2000，10月），著作財產權存續期間之研究，2007年10月17日取自：<http://www.sunnylaw.com.tw/thesis11.html>
吳尚崑（2001，7月），著作權法的合理使用與個人使用，2007年10月18日取自：<http://www.sunnylaw.com.tw/copyright-personal%20use.htm>
吳國維（2007，6月），創造更和諧的智慧財產權環境，2007年10月18日取自：<http://mag.udn.com/mag/dc/storypage.jsp?f_MAIN_ID=2&f_SUB_ID=4&f_ART_ID=73772>
章忠信（2003，1月），著作權法制中「科技保護措施」與「權利管理資訊」之探討，2007年10月21日取自：<http://www.copyrightnote.org/paper/pa0016.doc>
章忠信（2003，2月），著作權法基本原則，2007年10月16日取自：<http://www.copyrightnote.org/crnote/bbs.php?board=1&act=read&id=38>
章忠信（2003，2月），『科技保護措施』與著作的『合理使用』，2007年8月8日取自：<http://www.copyrightnote.org/crnote/bbs.php?board=4&act=bbs_ read&id
=61&reply=61>
章忠信（2006，8月），網路鏈結面面觀，2007年10月19日取自：<http://openepaper.nat.gov.tw/epaper/org_new/9/09_07_9.htm>
章忠信（2007，7月），從資訊分享到利益分配--YouTube--你的頻道，我的財富，2007年10月14日取自：<http://www.copyrightnote.org/crnote/bbs.php?board=2&act=read&id=138>
劉靜怡（2006，2月），當「自由社會」不再有「合理使用」，2007年11月12日取自：< http://www.ithome.com.tw/itadm/article.php?c=35673>
陳家駿、謝銘洋（2005，9月），電腦網路上使用之著作權法律問題探討，2007年10月16日取自：<http://www.ascc.sinica.edu.tw/nl/86/1315/06.txt>
湯永鋼（2007，3月），案例:用戶為音樂付費的動機，2007年11月5日取自：< http://www.trb.cn/wordpress/index.php/2007/03/10/290/>
黃怡騰（2001，8月），著作之合理使用案例介紹，2007年6月12日取自：<http://www.tipo.gov.tw/copyright/copyright_book/copyright_book.asp#c>
（二）網站資源（最後瀏覽日期：2008/1/10）
1. 個人網站/部落格
著作權筆記，<http://www.copyrightnote.org/>
嘻嘻樂園（ccGarden），<http://blog.yam.com/ccgarden>
2. 企業/組織網站
E世代公民對話誌（ALS），<http://www.als.org.tw/index.asp>
台灣創用CC計畫（Creative Commons Taiwan），<http://creativecommons.org.tw/>
亞太智財（ATIPS），<http://www.atips.com/index.htm>
政大智慧財產研究所案例資料庫，<http://iip.nccu.edu.tw/iip/NEW-iip/page/c_0_7.htm>
經濟部智慧財產局（TIPO），<http://www.tipo.gov.tw/>
數位內容產業推動服務網，<http://www.digitalcontent.org.tw/>
貳、外文參考文獻
一、論文與專書
Ball, Horace G. (1944). The Law of Copyright and Literary Property.
Besenjak, Cheryl (2001). Copyright Plain & Simple.
Betting, Ronald V. (1996). Copyright Culture: The Political Economy of intellectual Property. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Bruns, Axel; Joanne Jacobs (2006). Uses of Blogs. New York: Peter Lang.
Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class.
Garner, Bryan A. (1996). Black’s Dictionary. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.
Gillmor, Dan (2006). We the Media: Grassroots Journalism By The People, For the People. Calif.: Oreilly & Associates Inc.
Goldstein Paul (1989). Copyright Principle: Law and Practice.
Hartley, John (ed.) (2005). Creative Industries. Oxford: Blackwell.
Howkins, John (2001). The Creative Economy: how people make money from ideas. London: Penguin.
Kline, David; Burstein, Dan (2005). Blog!: How the Newest Media Revolution is Changing Politics, Business, and Culture. Squibnocket Partners, L.L.C..
Leaffer, Marshall A. (1999). Understanding Copyright Law 6 (3rd ed.).
Lessig, Lawrence (1999). Code And Other Laws Of Cyberspace.
Lessig, Lawrence (2001). The Future Of Ideas: The Fate Of The Commons In A Networked World.
Lessig, Lawrence (2004). Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: The Penguin Press.
Litman, Jessica (2001). Digital Copyright, The Bargaining Table.
McCarthy, J. Thomas (1996). Public domain is the rule; intellectual property is the exception. McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition 1-4.
Morley, Paul (2003). Words and Music: A History of Pop in the Shape of a City. Bloomsbury.
Nimmer, M.; Nimmer, D. (1994). Nimmer on Copyright 8D-10.
Oler, Harriet L.; Kretsinger, Marilyn J. (1989). Copyright Law and The Fair Use of Visual Images. Fair Use And Free Inquery—Copyright Law And The New Media. John Shelton Lawrence et al. eds., 2nd ed.
Party, Willam F. (1994). Copyright Law And Practice.
Patterson, L. Ray; Lindberg, Stanley W. (1991). The Nature of Copyright – A Law of Users’ Rights.
Samuels, Edward (2000). The Illustrated Story of Copyright.
Suzor, Nicolas (2006). Transformative Use of Copyright Material.
Toyfl, Markus (2003). K-Logs, Definition und Analyse möglicher Erfolgsfaktoren. Diplomarbeit eingereicht an der Universität Krems.
Vaidhyanathan, Siva (2001). Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity.
Weiler, Paul (2002). Entertainment, Media, and the Law (2nd ed.).
二、專文與期刊
Adelstein, Richard P.; Peretz, Steven I. (1985). The Competition of Technologies in Markets for Ideas: Copyright and Fair Use in Evolutionary Perspective. 5 Int’l Rev. L. & Econ..
Benkler, Yochai (1999). Free as the Air to Common Use: First Amendment constraints on Enclosure of the Public Domain. 74 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 354, 361.
Benton, Gary L. (March, 2004). The Digital Millennium Copyright Act: The Digital Copying War Between Hollywood And The Silicon Valley. The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel 18 (Northeast Edition).
Boyle, James (2003). The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. 66 Law & Contemp. Probs..
Butler, Declan (2006). Mashups mix data into global service. Nature 439 (5).
Carnachan, Rachael (1999). Sampling and the Music Industry: A Discussion of the Implications of Copyright Law. Auckland University Law Review 8 (4).
Cornish, William R. (1993). The International Relations of Intellectual Property, 52 Cambridge Law Journal.
Damstedt, Benjamin G. (2003). Limiting Locke: A Natural Law Justification for the Fair Use Doctrine. 112 Yale L.J..
Depoorter, Ben; Parisi, Francesco (2002). Fair use and copyright protection: a price theory explanation. International Review of Law and Economics 21.
Engle, Eric Allen (2002). When is Fair Use Fair?: A Comparison of E.U. and U.S. Intellectual Property Law. 15 Transnat’l Law.
Fisher, William (1998). Property and Control on the Internet. 73 Chi. –Kent L. Rev..
Fitzgerald, Brian; O’Brien, Damien (2005). Digital Sampling and Culture Jamming in a Remix World: What Does the Law Allow? Media and Arts Law Review 10 (4).
Gordon, Wendy J. (1982). Fair Use as Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and its Predecessors. 82 Columbia L. Rev..
Heller, Michael A. (1998). The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition From Marx to Markets, 111 Harv. L. Rev..
Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr. (1897). The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev..
Houle, Jeffrey R. (1992). Digital Audio Sampling, Copyright Law and the American Music Industry: Piracy or Just a Bad “Rap”? 37 Loy. L. Rev..
Hughes, Justin (1998). The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Georgetown Law Journal, 77 GEO. L. J..
Jaszi, Peter (1991). Toward a Theory of Copyright: The Metamorphoses of “Authorship”. 1991 Duke L. J..
Korn, Alan (2007). Issues Facing Legal Pratitioners in Measuring Substantiality of Contemporary Musical Expression. 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L..
Lange, David (1981). Recognizing the Public Domain 44 Law & Contemp. Probs..
Lape, Laura G. (1995). Transforming Fair Use: the Productive Use Factor in Fair Use Doctrine. 58 Alb. L. Rev..
Lesser, Lori E. (2006). Advanced Seminar on Copyright Law 2006: Fair Use. 863 PLI/Pat.
Litman, Jessica (1990). The Public Domain, 39 Emory L.J..
Mueller, Jennifer R.R. (2006). All Mixed Up: Bridgeport Music v. Dimension Films and De Minimis Digital Sampling. Indiana Law Journal Vol. 81: 435.
O`Brien, Damien; Fitzgerald, Brian (2006). Mashups, remixes and copyright law. Internet Law Bulletin 9 (2).
O`Brien, Damien; Fitzgerald, Brian (October 20, 2006). Digital copyright law in a YouTube World.
Packard, Ashley (2002). Copyright Term Extension, the Public Domain and Intertextuality Interwined. 10 J. Intell. Prop. L..
Palmer, Tom G. (1990). Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified? The Philosophy of Property Rights and Ideal Objects. 13 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 6.
Samuelson, Pamela (2001). A Map of Public Domain and Adjacent Terrains. Digital Information,Digital Networks, and the Public Domain, Conference On The Public Domain At Duke University Law School.
Srikantiah, Jayashri (1996). The Response of Copyright to the Enforcement Strain of Inexpensive Copying Technology. 71 N.Y.U. L. Rev..
三、網路資源
（一）網路文章
Axton, Neal R. (November 15, 2007). Fair Use and Mashups. Retrieved November 27, 2007, from the World Wide Web: < http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/law_librarian_blog/2007/11/fair-use-and-ma.html>
Blood, Rebecca (September 7, 2000). Weblogs: A History and Perspective. Retrieved October 14, 2007, from the World Wide Web: <http://www.rebeccablood.net/essays/weblog_history.html>.
Boynton, Robert S. (January 25, 2004). The Tyranny of Copyright? Retrieved October 14, 2007, from the World Wide Web: <http://web.archive.org/web/20041018073641/www.cepr.net/Economic_Reporting_Review/nytimesarticles/tyrannycopyright.htm>.
Caro, Mark (April 24, 2006). Love those trailer mashups. Retrieved October 14, 2007, from the World Wide Web: <http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/entertainment_popmachine/2006/04/love_those_trai.html>.
Fair Use Economy Represents One-Sixth of U.S. GDP (September 12, 2007). Retrieved November 27, 2007, from the World Wide Web: <http://www.ccianet.org/artmanager/publish/news/First-Ever_Economic_Study_Calculates_Dollar_Value_of.shtml>.
Fitzgerald, Brian (2005). Fair Use for “Creative Innovation”: A Principle We Must Embrace. A Submission in Response to the A-G’s Issues Paper on Fair Use and Other Copyright Exceptions. Retrieved October 15, 2007, from the World Wide Web: <http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/rwpattach.nsf/VAP/(AEEBC4E05675B564D2489B776B8B056A)~p151+Prof+Brian+Fitzgerald.PDF/$file/p151+Prof+Brian+Fitzgerald.PDF>.
Krazit, Tom. Google Makes Video Play with YouTube Buy. Retrieved Jan. 10, 2008, from the World Wide Web : <http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-6124094.html?tag=nl.e589>
O’Hear, Steve (Sep. 12, 2007). Universal Music Group exploring ISP file-sharing tax. Retrieved Nov. 6, 2007, from the World Wide Web: <http://www.last100.com/2007/09/12/universal-music-group-exploring-isp-file-sharing-tax/>
One College Librarian Worries About `Atomizing` Books ... (June 3, 2005). Information Technology, Volume 51, Issue 39. Retrieved October 17, 2007, from the World Wide Web: <http://chronicle.com/free/v51/i39/39a02501.htm>
Schultz, Jason (May 16, 2007). P10 v. Google: Public Interest Prevails in Digital Copyright Showdown. Retrieved August 6, 2007, from the World Wide Web: <http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005259.php>
Shirata, Hideaki (August 22, 2004). The origin of two American copyright theories – A case of the reception of English law. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from World Wide Web: <http://orion.mt.tama.hosei.ac.jp/hideaki/twocopy.htm>.
Sprigman, Chris (March 5, 2002). The Mouse that Ate the Public Domain: Disney, The Copyright Term Extension Act, And eldred v. Ashcroft. Findlaw’s Legal Commentary. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from the World Wide Web: <http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20020305_sprigman.html>.
Terdiman, Daniel (February 27, 2006). `Copyright criminals` look to remix the noise—legally. Retrieved Nov. 8, 2007, from the World Wide Web: < http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-6043247.html>
（二）網站資源（最後瀏覽日期：2008/1/10）
1. 企業/組織網站
BitLaw, <http://www.bitlaw.com/index.html>
Chilling Effects Clearinghouse, <http://www.chillingeffects.org/index.cgi>
EFF, <http://www.eff.org/>
Last100, <http://www.last100.com/>
Web TV Wire, <http://www.webtvwire.com/>
Wikipedia, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page>
YouTube, <http://www.youtube.com/>
2. 學術網站
Fair Use Network, <http://fairusenetwork.org/>
Fair Use News, <http://blogs.fairusenetwork.org/>
Free Expression Policy Project of New York University, <http://fepproject.org/>
Intellectual Property: Knowledge, Culture and Economy of Queensland, <http://www.ip.qut.edu.au/>
Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic of Berkeley, <http://www.law.berkeley.edu/clinics/samuelson/>
Stanford Center for Internet and Society, <http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/>
Stanford Copyright & Fair Use, <http://fairuse.stanford.edu/index.html> |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
智慧財產研究所
93361017
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093361017 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [Graduate Institute of Intellectual Property] Theses
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
