Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36775
|
| Title: | 運用無線通訊科技提昇病人安全之研究以高風險通報為例
Using Mobile Technology to Improve Patient Safety Based on High Risk Reminder System Evaluation |
| Authors: | 趙嘉成
Chao，Victor |
| Contributors: | 季沿平
趙嘉成
Chao，Victor |
| Keywords: | Mobile System
High Risk Reminder
Patient Safety
IT Evaluation |
| Date: | 2005 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 19:34:01 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | Objective: High Risk Reminder (HRR) system is the lately mobile application technology developed by Taipei Medical University of Medical Informatics Research Institute. The objective of HRR is to provide high risk patient test results such as lab, radiology, pathology to physician immediately by mobile short message and internet e-mail. The mobile short message is to provide abstract information to physician such as patient name, inpatient bed ward number, the abcdrmal test result. The physician can receive the latest patient’s abcdrmal test information at any place, time. Therefore, the physician can take intervention treatment as soon as possible for patient treatment. Moreover, the physician wants to know more detail the high risk patient’s information can open the e-mail to review the patient’s profile in order to provide treatment plan. The purpose of using the mobile and internet technology is to improve patient safety.
The WF Teaching Hospital has using the HRR system to serve its patient and physician for 6 months. There are more than 600 mobile short messages and e-mail communication for physicians. To reach the patient safety goals is the critical mission of WF Hospital. Therefore, the evaluation of HRR patient safety contribution needs to analyze.。This study is introducing HRR system functions and evaluating HRR’s contribution.。This research is based on the empirical study. We investigate the HRR’s impaction to assist high risk patient severe test result information communication for physician to assist patient’s treatment for physician and hospital. Meanwhile, the two mobile short message and e-mail communication media which one is more effective for physician is analyzed also.
Design: This study measures dimensions of information quality, system quality, use, user satisfaction, individual impact and organizational impact based on the D&M IS Success Model. Multivariate techniques were used to evaluate the relationships of the Model.
Measurements: The dimensionality of each scale and degree of association of each item with the attribute of interest were determined by principal components factor analysis with orthogonal varimax rotation. The reliability of each resultant scale was computed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Construct validity was examined through factor analysis and by correlation analyses. Multiple regression techniques were used to evaluate the relationship between the set of six dimensions and comparison of PHS and e-mail.
Results: Physicians have using the HRR systems are the surveyors composed of this survey samples. There are 56 questionnaires had been distributed the physicians. Seven questionnaires are invalid due to rarely using the HRR system. The valid questionnaires are 85%。Of the respondents, 93% were male; 73% were undergraduate; 90% were primary physicians.。 From the research finding , the two communication medias of short message, and e-mail are positive relationships for effective and efficiency communication for physicians to assist high risk patient severe test result information delivery. The research two constructs of PHS and e-mails’ indicators are positive for improving better communication; The information quality for user’s effectiveness, satisfaction relationship impacts for users and organization. Comparison effective communication between PHS and e-mail media, the research finding is PHS is more powerful than e-mail to deliver information for physician. From regression analysis, each □ value of PHS is higher than e-mail. The individual using PHS and e-mail is positive to effect the hospital to diffuse of HRR system.
Conclusion: The survey of user’s satisfaction of using the HRR system is reached over 70%. However, 60 % of physicians indicates the HRRS provides efficiency and effectiveness each high risk patient’s information causing the information overload. This is the drawback of the implementation HRR system. How to decrease the information overload pressure needs to solve in the near future to improve HRR system. Furthermore, utilization mobile technology to provide two channel communication for physician to access the patient‘s database treatment, test, medication information to integrate all required information to develop the well treatment plan to improve patient safety and reduce patient risk. |
| Reference: | [0] Leape, Lucian; Lawthers, Ann G.; Brennan, Troyen A, et al. Preventing Medical Injury, Quality Rev Bull. 19(5):144- 149, 1993
[1] Institute of Medicine. To err is human: Building a safer health system. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1999.
[2] Lenert LA, Soetikno RM. Automated computer interviews to elicit utilities: potential applications in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. JAMIA 1997;4: 49-56.
[3] Ruland CM, White T, Stevens M, Fanciullo G, Khilani SM. Effects of computerized system to support shared decision making in symptom management of cancer patients: preliminary results. JAMIA 2003;10:573-579.
[4] Ruland CM. Decision support for patient preference-based care planning: effects on nursing care and patient outcomes. JAMIA 1999;6:304-312.
[5] Lenert LA, and Sturley AE. Use of the Internet to study the utility values of the public. Proceedings of AMIA Symposium 2002:40-444.
[6] Lenert LA. IMPACT3: online tools for development of web sites for the study of Patients’preferences and utilities. Proceedings of AMIA Symposium 2000:1172.
[7] Leape LL. Error in medicine. JAMA 1994;272:1851-1857.
Reason JT. Human Error. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1990.
[8] Ruland CM. Improving patient safety through informatics tools for shared decision making and risk communication. Int J Med Inform 2004;73:551-557.
[9] Sackett D, Straus S. Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the ‘evidence cart. JAMIA 1998;280:1336-1338.
[10] Fishman S, Prince J, Herman J, Cassem N. Pocket-sized electronic clinical referencing. MD Comput 1996;13:310-313.
[11] Michalowskia W, Rubinb S, Slowinskic R, Wilkc S. Mobile clinical support system for pediatric emergencies. Deci Supp Sys 2003;36:161-176.
[12] Wagner M, Eisenstadt S, Hogan W, Pankaskie M. Preferences of interns and residents for e-mail, paging, or traditional methods for the delivery of different types of clinical information. Proc of the AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1998:140-144.
[13] Lombardo JS, McCarty M, Wojcik RA, An evaluation of mobile computing for information access at the point of care, Biomed Instrum Technol 1997;31: 465-475.
[14] Eisenstadt S, Wagner M, Hogan W, Pankaskie M, Tsui FC, Wilbright W. Mobile workers in healthcare and their information needs: are 2-way pagers the answer? Proc of the AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1998:135-139.
[15] Acuff R, Fagan L, Rindfleisch T, Levitt B, Ford P. Lightweight, mobile e-mail for intra-clinic communication. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1997:729-733.
[16] Andrade R, Wangenheim A, Bortoluzzi MK. Wireless and PDA: a novel strategy to access DICOM-compliant medical data on mobile devices. Int J Med Inform 2003;71:157-163.
[17] Ammenwerth E, Buchauer A, Bludau B, Haux R. Mobile information and communication tools in the hospital. Int J Med Inform 2000;57:21-40.
[18] Andrade R. Wangenheim AV, Bortoluzzi MK, DeBias HH. A strategy for a wireless patient record and image data. Int Cong Seri 2003;1256:869-872.
[19] Maglaveras N, Koutkias V, Chouvarda I, Goulis DG, Avramides A, Adamidis D, Louridas G, Balas EA. Home care delivery through the mobile telecommunications platform: the Citizen Health System (CHS) perspective. Int J Med Inform 2002;68:99-111.
[20] Michalowskia W, Rubinb S, Slowinskic R, Wilkc S. Mobile clinical support system for pediatric emergencies. Deci Supp Sys 2003;36:161-176.
[21] Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health. Reducing Medical Errors: A Review of Innovative Strategies to Improve Patient Safety. House Washington, DC 2002.
[22] Boxwala AA, Dierks M, Keenan M, Jackson S, Hanscom R, Bates DW, Sato L. Organization and Representation of Patient Safety Data: Current Status and Issues around Generalizability and Scalability. JAMIA 2004;11:468-478.
[23] DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable, Inform Sys Rese 1992;3:60-95.
[24] DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information Systems Success Revisited. Proc 35th Hawaii int conf on sys scie 2002.
[25] Fineber H, Hiatt H. Evaluation of medical practices. The case for technology assessment. N Engl J Med 1979;301:1086-1091.
[26] VanDer Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Troost J, Hasman A. Determinants of Success of Inpatient Clinical Information Systems: A Literature Review. JAMIA 2003;10: 235-243.
[27] Grover V, Jeong SR, Segars AH. Information systems effectiveness: The construct space and patterns of application. Inform & Mgt 1996; 4:117-191.
[28] Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory (2nd ed). NY: McGraw-Hill.
[29] Ruland CM. Improving patient safety through informatics tools for shared decision making and risk communication. Int J Med Inform 2004;73:551-557.
[30] Chan YE, Huff SL, Copeland DG, Barclay DW. Business strategy, information systems strategy and strategic alignment. Inform Sys Res 1997;8:125-150.
[31] Hatcher M. Impact of information systems on acute care hospitals: results from a survey in the United States. J Med Sys 1998;22:379-387.
[32] Sneiderman CA, Ackerman MJ. Cellular radio telecommunication for health care: benefits and risks. A brief review. JAMIA 2004:11:479-481.
[33] Bagian JP, Gosbee J, Lee CZ, Williams L, McKnight SD, Mannos DM. The Veterans Affairs roots cause analysis system in action. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2002;28:531-45.
[34] Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Root Cause Analysis in Health Care: Tools and Techniques. IL: Joint Commission Resources 2002.
[35] Miller MN, McGowen RK. The painful truth: Physicians are not invincible. South Med. J. 2000;10:966-973.
[36] Engel W, Seime R, Powell V. Clinical performance of interns after being on call. South Med J 1987;80:761
[37] Bovier P, Perneger TV. Predictors of work satisfaction among physicians. Euro J Public Health 2003;13:299-305.
[38] Mawardi BH. Satisfactions, dissatisfactions, and causes of stress in medical practice. JAMA 1979; 241:1483-1486.
[39] Sloan FA, Mergenhagen PM, Burfield WB, Bovbjerg RR, Hassan M. Medical Malpractice Experience of Physicians: Predictable of Haphazard? JAMA 1989;262:3291-3297. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
資訊管理研究所
89932099
94 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089932099 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [資訊管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
