Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36689
|
Title: | 台灣IPO公司市場擇時與資本結構之研究 Market Timimg and Capital Structure of Taiwan`s IPO Companies |
Authors: | 康茵婷 |
Contributors: | 顏錫銘 康茵婷 |
Keywords: | 市場擇時 資本結構 Market Timimg Capital Structure IPO |
Date: | 2006 |
Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 19:17:58 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 本研究以台灣企業為研究對象,探討公司融資決策與市場時機之關係。以樣本研究期間內每月份辦理初次公開發行(IPO)家數相對多寡為衡量股市冷熱性之指標,藉由觀察於冷、熱市辦理IPO公司的融資決策差異來分析國內企業是否存在市場擇時行為以及其對資本結構的長短期影響。
實證結果顯示,熱市IPO公司於IPO當年之權益融資幅度明顯多於冷市IPO公司,使其負債比率顯著低於冷市IPO公司,然自IPO後二年起,擇時效果便逐年遞減,顯示擇時行為對資本結構的影響相當短暫,由於不論冷、熱市IPO公司,於IPO後均仍傾向依國內企業偏好之融資順位即先權益後舉債之方式籌資,且IPO後負債比率有逐年回升並趨近於IPO前水平之趨勢,顯示長期而言,國內公司資本結構相當穩定,因此推測國內企業資本結構之決定方式可能為動態抵換理論與融資順位理論之結合,即公司會在可接受之負債比率波動範圍內依照偏好之融資順位進行籌資。由於市場擇時並非調整資本結構時之主要考量,故其對資本結構的影響也相對有限,因此隨時間經過,之前的擇時行為便無法解釋公司後來資本結構之變動。
之前相關實證研究均採用市值對帳面價值比為擇時行為代理變數,本研究於比較不同方法之實證結果後發現,在台灣,市值對帳面價值比除了可作為衡量股市錯價之指標外亦可衡量公司未來成長機會,故若單使用市值對帳面價值比為代理變數將使得實證結果對於市場擇時的解釋力較為薄弱。 This paper examines the capital structure implications of market timing. I use initial public offering as a single timing event of financing. Market timers would be those firms that go public in hot issue markets. I find that hot-market IPO firms issue more equity and hence their debt ratios decline more than cold-market ones at the end of IPO year. However, the timing effect diminishes with time and in two years after IPO, there is no significant difference between hot and cold-market firms’ debt ratios anymore.
After the initial public offering, both firms’ tend to raise capital needs based on their preference financing order, which means retained earnings first, then equity issuance and finally raising debts in Taiwan. In addition, the debt ratios seem to steadily approach to their pre-IPO levels. These all might reveal that, the dynamic trade-off theory and pecking order theory would be better than the market timing theory to explain firms’ capital structures in Taiwan.
Some related studies followed Baker and Wurgler(2002)’s approach, using market to book ratio as firms’ market timing proxy. I compare the results of different proxies and find that in Taiwan, market to book ratio could not only be a timing proxy but referring to a firm’s growth opportunity as well. Hence, it should be avoided using market to book ratio as a single proxy of firms’ market timing behavior when studying firms’ capital structures in Taiwan. |
Reference: | 一、中文文獻 1、石孟國,民國80年,主要影響資本結構的因素—台灣地區股票上市公司的 實證研究,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文 2、朱家萱,民國85年,我國上市公司現金增資後經營績效之研究,國立中正 大學會計學研究所碩士論文 3、邱正仁、周庭楷、張慈媛,民國94年,新上市公司首次辦理現金增資時程 之探討:原因與後果,財務金融年會暨學術論文研討會 4、邱惠文,民國81年,資本結構決定因素之探討,淡江大學管理科學研究所 碩士論文 5、姜家宏,民國85年,臺灣資訊電子業融資行為與資本結構之探討,國立中 山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文 we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data”, Journal of Finance 50, P.1421— 1460 23、Ritter, Jay R., 1991, “The long-run performance of initial public offerings”, Journal of Finance 42, P.365—394 24、Smith, C., and J. Warner, 1979, “On financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenants”, Journal of Financial Economic 7, P.117—161 25、Stiglitz, J., 1972, “Some aspects of the pure theory 6、陳中德,民國88年,影響發行公司接受上市上櫃輔導因素之研究,中原大 of corporate finance: bankruptcies and takeovers,” Bell Journal of Economics 3, P.458—482 26、Taggart, Robert A., 1977, “A model of corporate financing decisions”, Journal of Finance 32, P.1467— 1484 27、Titman, Sheridan, and Roberto Wessels,1988,”The determinants of capital structure choice”, Journal of Finance 43, P.1—19 學會計學系研究所碩士論文 7、陳帥文,民國89年,台灣地區上市公司最適資本結構之實證研究,國立中 山大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文 8、陳品樺,民國91年,台灣上市公司現金增資擇時之相關研究,國立中正大 學財務金融研究所碩士論文 9、康峻維,民國92年7月,初次公開發行後資本結構之實證研究分析--以台 灣地區電子業與非電子業上市公司為例,國立清華大學經濟學系研究所碩 士論文 10、曾煥祥,民國82年,上市公司現金增資與股價關聯性之實證研究,國立台 灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文 11、辜儀芳,民國90年,臺灣上市公司資本結構選擇之實證研究,國立中正大 學財務金融研究所碩士論文 12、楊明杰,承銷新制簡介,證券櫃檯第102期,頁19—21 13、劉宏彥,民國86年,上市公司現金增資前後經營績效改變之實證研究,國 立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文 14、潘梧仁,民國85年,現金增資長期之價格與經營績效,國立中正大學財務 金融研究所碩士論文 15、鄭博文,民國92年6月,市場擇時與資本結構,國立中正大學財務金融研 究所碩士論文 二、英文文獻 1、Allen, D.E., 1991, “The determinants of the capital structure of listed Australian companies: The financial manager’s perspective”, Australian Journal of Management 16, P.103—127 2、Alti, Aydogan, 2006, “How persistent is the impact of market timing on capital structure? ”, Journal of Finance, VOL.LXI, No.4, P.1681—1710 3、Amihud, Yakov, and Baruch Lev, 1981,”Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers, Bell Journal of Economics 12, P.605—617 4、Baker, Malcolm P., and Jeffrey Wurgler, 2002,”Market timing and capital structure”, Journal of Finance 57, P.1—32 5、Baskin, J., 1989,”An empirical investigation of the pecking order hypothesis”, Financial Management 18, P.26—35 6、Berger, Philip G., Eli Ofek, and David L. Yermack, 1997,”Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions”, Journal of Finance 52, P.1411—1438 7、Fama, Eugene F., 1980,”Agency problems and the theory of the firm”, Journal of Political Economy 88, P.288—3 07 8、Fischer, Edwin O., Robert Heinkel, and Josef Zechner, 1989,”Dynamic Capital Structure Choice: Theory and Tests”, Journal of Finance 44, P.19—40 9、Friend, Irwin, and Larry H. P. Lang,1988,”An empirical test of the impact of managerial self-interest on corporate capital structure, Journal of Finance 47, P.271—281 10、Graham, John R., and Campbell R. Harvey, 2001,”The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field”, Journal of Financial Economics 60, P.187— 243 11、Jensen, M. and W. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics 3, P.305— 360 12、Jensen, Michael C., 1986, “Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers”, American Economic Review 76, P.323—339 13、Kim, E. H., 1978, “A mean-variance theory of optimal capital structure and corporate debt capacity”, Journal of Finance 33, P.45—64 14、Litzenberger, R. H., and K. Ramaswamy, 1979, “The effect of personal Taxes and Dividends on Capital Asset Prices,” Journal of Financial Economics, 7, P.163—196 15、Loughran, Tim, and Jay R. Ritter, 1995, “ The new issue puzzle”, Journal of Finance 50, P.23—51 16、Modigliani, F., and M. Miller, 1958, “The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment”, American Economic Review 48, P.655—669 17、Modigliani, F., and M. Miller, 1963,” Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction”, American Economic Review 53, P.433—443 18、Myers, Stewart C., 1977, “Determinants of corporate borrowing”, Journal of Financial Economics 5, P.147— 175 19、Myers, Stewart C., 1984, “The capital structure puzzle”, Journal of Finance 39, P.575—592 20、Myers, Stewart C., and S. Majluf Nicholas, 1984, “Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have”, Journal of Financial Economics 13, P.187—221 21、Novaes, Walter and Luigi Zingales, 1995,”Capital structure choice when managers are in control: Entrenchment versus efficiency”, Working paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago 22、Rajan, Raghuram G., and Luigi Zingales, 1995,”What do |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 財務管理研究所 93357012 95 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093357012 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [財務管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 219 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|