Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36597
|
| Title: | 品牌人物之塑造與管理-美日成功個案分析
Building and Management of Character Brands |
| Authors: | 葛彥伶
Ko, Yen-Ling |
| Contributors: | 陳建維
葛彥伶
Ko, Yen-Ling |
| Keywords: | 品牌人物
卡通人物
品牌管理
品牌關係
Character brands
Cartoon characters
Brand Management
Brand-customer relationship
Brand Benefits
Brand concpet |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 18:56:20 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | Character brands have become a trend in business. Firms create character brands to draw consumer’s attention. For successful character brands, a strong attachment will be created to the consumers, so the brand-customer relationship will be loyal and powerful. The purpose of this research is to examine and discuss the marketing strategies and brand management of firms adopted to build their character brands, and theoretical and managerial implications will be addressed.
This research adopts the method of case study research. Four character brands with various natures will be discussed separately, and a comparison will be made accordingly. The four character brands examined in this research are Saniro’s Hello Kitty, Fujio’s Doraemon, Walt Disney’s Mickey Mouse and Charles Schultz’s Snoopy. Hello Kitty and Doraemon are Japanese character brands; Mickey Mouse and Snoopy are American character brands. These four character brands are very popular among consumers. The focus of this research is to address the similarities and differences of character development and brand management of these four character brands.
The findings of this research are: First, characters with different nature (type) will have different brand concept management strategies. For comic character brands, firms will be focus on the development of character personalities. For pure character brand, firms will concentrate on the design and appearance of such characters. Second, the brand-customer relationship between character brands and consumers is very unique. Consumers gain emotional and self-expressive benefit from character brands. As a result, it is essential to reinforce the brand/character image consistently, so the attachment will be stronger. Third, similar brand management strategies, such as licensing, brand extensions, sponsorships and reinforce character image, are adopted by firms; however, the focus on character brand building for each firm is somewhat different.
These four character brands are successful examples on character brand management. In order to manage good character brands, character development is necessary, and it is also crucial to create a strong brand identity. Most importantly, the brand building/management strategies have to be consistent with the nature/types of the characters.
Key Word: Character, Character brand, brand management, brand-customer relationship
Character brands have become a trend in business. Firms create character brands to draw consumer’s attention. For successful character brands, a strong attachment will be created to the consumers, so the brand-customer relationship will be loyal and powerful. The purpose of this research is to examine and discuss the marketing strategies and brand management of firms adopted to build their character brands, and theoretical and managerial implications will be addressed.
This research adopts the method of case study research. Four character brands with various natures will be discussed separately, and a comparison will be made accordingly. The four character brands examined in this research are Saniro’s Hello Kitty, Fujio’s Doraemon, Walt Disney’s Mickey Mouse and Charles Schultz’s Snoopy. Hello Kitty and Doraemon are Japanese character brands; Mickey Mouse and Snoopy are American character brands. These four character brands are very popular among consumers. The focus of this research is to address the similarities and differences of character development and brand management of these four character brands.
The findings of this research are: First, characters with different nature (type) will have different brand concept management strategies. For comic character brands, firms will be focus on the development of character personalities. For pure character brand, firms will concentrate on the design and appearance of such characters. Second, the brand-customer relationship between character brands and consumers is very unique. Consumers gain emotional and self-expressive benefit from character brands. As a result, it is essential to reinforce the brand/character image consistently, so the attachment will be stronger. Third, similar brand management strategies, such as licensing, brand extensions, sponsorships and reinforce character image, are adopted by firms; however, the focus on character brand building for each firm is somewhat different.
These four character brands are successful examples on character brand management. In order to manage good character brands, character development is necessary, and it is also crucial to create a strong brand identity. Most importantly, the brand building/management strategies have to be consistent with the nature/types of the characters.
Key Word: Character, Character brand, brand management, brand-customer relationship |
| Reference: | 中文文獻
1. Wasko, Janet. 民國90年，了解迪士尼，林佑聖、葉欣怡譯，台北市，弘智出版。
2. 肯 貝爾森，布萊恩 布雷納，民國93年，Hello Kitty三麗鷗創造全球億萬商機的策略，周亞南譯，台北市，商周出版。
3. 瑞莎 葛林絲莉 強森 (Hohnson, Rheta G.)，民國87年，天阿! 我創造了史努比-查爾斯休茲的故事，溫力泰、陳靜萍、張海燕譯，新店市，高談文化。
4. 吳知賢，民國82年，國小兒童解讀卡通影帶的研究---以「龍貓」為例，初等教育學報，6，131-168。
5. 黃明月，民國84年，我國電視卡通影片內容價值取向研究報告，文化總會電研會，台北市。
6. 葉怡蘭，民國89年，認識卡通節目的特質，媒體視讀推廣中心。線上查詢。
7. 鄧旭宏，民國93年，卡通人物肖像授權商品之購買意願研究，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士學位論文。
8. 賴鏡鳳，民國89年，卡通人物商標與製造品牌對消費者購買意願影響之研究，國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
Journal References
1. Aaker, David. A. (1996), Building Strong Brands, New York: The Free Press.
97. Roehm, Michelle., Ellen B. Pullins, and Haprper A. Roehm Jr. (2002), “Designing Loyalty-Building Programs for Packaged Goods Brands.,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (May), 202-213.
98. Shocker, Allan D., and V. Srinivasan (1979), “Multiattribute Approaches for Product Concept Evaluation and Generation: A Critical Review,” Journal of
Marketing, Research, 16 (5), 159-80
99. Smith, Stephen (2001), America’s Greatest Brands, Vol. 1, New York: America’s Greatest Brands..
100. Spears, Nancy E., John C. Mowen, and Goutam Chakraborty. (1996),“Symobloic Role of Animals in Print Advertising: Content Analysis and Conceptual Development,” Journal of Business Research, 3, 8-95.
101. Sternberg, R. J. (1987), “Liking vs. loving: A comparative evaluation of theories,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 102, 331–345.
102. Stuever, Hank (2001 December 5), “America Loves to Hate the Mouse; Behind the Fantasy Walt Disney Built Looms a Dark Reality. On His 100th Anniversary, It Can Now Be Revealed,” The Washington Post, Washington, D.C, C.01.
103. Ross, Ivan (1971), “Self-Concept and Brand Preference,” The Journal of Business, 44(1), 38-50.
104. Thomson, M., D. MacInnis, and C. W. Park (2005), “The Ties That Bind: Measuring strength of Consumers,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 77-91.
105. Thompson, Stephanie (2002), “Coldwell Expands Icon from Web to TV ads, Signs,” Advertising Age, 73 (August 5), 4, 40.
2. Aaker, David. A. and Erich Joachimsthaler. (2000), Brand Leadership, New York:Free Press.
106. Till, Brian. D., and Michael Busler (2000), “The Match-Up Hypothesis: Physical Attractiveness, Expertise, and the Role of Fit on Brand Attitude, Purchase Intent and Brand Beliefs,” Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 1-13.
107. Triandis, Harry C. (1971), Attitude and Attitude Change, Wiley, New York, NY.
108. Wackman, Daniel B. “Theories in Interpersonal Perception,” in S. Ward and T. Robertson, eds., Consumer Behavior: Theoretical Sources. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 200-29.
109. Walster, E., V. Aronson, D. Abrahams, and L. Rottman (1966), “The Importance of Physical Attractiveness in Dating Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vo.4, 508-516.
110. Wheeler, Christian S., Richard E. Petty and George Y. Bizer (2005), “Self-Schema Matching and Attitude Change: Situational and Dispositional Determinants of Message Elaboration,” Journal of Consumer Research,31(March), 787-797.
103. Wind, Yoram (1973), “A New Procedure for Concept Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing, 37(10), 2-11.
104. Wright, Gary and Ross B Sherman. (2006), “Comics Redux,” ProQuest Education Journals Vol. 43(4), 165-173.
105. Yin, Robert K. (1981), “The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, 58-65.
106. Yin, Robert K. (1984), Case Study Research, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
107. Yin, Robert K. (1994), Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Aaker, David. A., and Kevin L. Keller. (1990), “Consumer Evaluations Of Brand,” Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27-41.
108. Yin, Robert K. (2003), Applications of Case Study Research (2nd ed.), London: International Educational and Professional Publisher.
109. Zisko, Allison (2006), “Zrike, Disney Enter Licensing Agreement on Decorative Home Products,” The Weekly Newspaper for the Home Furnishings Network, New York, 19.
110. Zoltak, James (2003 August 4), “Snoopy & Pals gave Knott`s marketing, merchandising muscle,” Amusement Business. New York, 115(31), 3.
Online References
1. Ask Oxford.com. (2007), 14 April 2007, <http://www.askoxford.com/?view=uk.>.
2. Cartoni Online. 20 May 2007,
<http://www.cartonionline.com/EN/characters/mickey_mouse.htm>.
3. Disney Online. 17 May 2007, 20 May 2007,
<http://disney.go.com/home/html/index.html?flash=false>.
4. Hofstede, Geert (2003), “Cultural Dimensions,” 30 May 2007, 5 June 2007, 16 June 2007, 21 June 2007, <http://www.geert-hofstede.com/>.
4. Aaker, Jennifer, Susuan Fournier, and Adam. S Brasel (2004), “When Good Brands Do Bad”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.31, 1-16.
5. Hoovers, A D&B Company. “The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS),” 20 May 2007,
<http://cobrands.hoovers.com/global/cobrands/proquest/overview.xhtml?ID=11603>.
6. Izawa, Eri. (2005), “Doraemon,” 25 May 2007, 11 June 2007, <http://www.ex.org/4.8/35-manga_doraemon.html>.
7. Sanrio Official Website (2007), 22 April 2007, < http://www.sanrio.com/>.
8. The Official Peanuts Website, 10 May, 17 May, 29 May, 18, May < http://www.snoopy.com/>.
9. TIMEeasiacom. “The Cuddliest Hero in Asia,” 26 May,
<http://www.time.com/time/asia/features/heroes/doraemon.html>.
10. Wikipedia. “Doraemon,” 25 May 2007, 26 May 2007, 11 June 2007, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doraemon>
5. Aaker, Jennifer (1999), “Brand Personality: A Path to Differentiation,” in Brands Face the Future, ed. Rory Morgan, NewYork: Research International, 13–21.
6. Ajzen, I. (1985), “From Intention to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior,” in Kuhl J., & Beckmann, J. (eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, New York: Springer Verlag, 11-39.
7. Ajzen, I. (1987), “Attitude, Traits and Actions: Dispositional Prediction of Behavior in Personality and Social Psychology,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 1-63.
8. Ajzen, I. (1989), “Attitude Structure and Behavior”, in Pratkanis, A., Breckler, S., & Greenwald, A. (eds.), Attitude Structure and Function, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 241-274.
9. Ajzen, I. (1991), “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
10. Altschiller, David (2000), “Do Dot-Coms’ Ads Reveal a More Basic Flaw?” Brandweek, 41 (12), 32.
11. Aron, A., and Westbay, L. (1996), “Dimensions of the prototype of love,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 535–551.
12. Baecker, Dirk (1996), “The Reality of Motion Pictures,” German Issue, 3(3), 560-577.
13. Baker, Michael J., and Gilbert A. Churchill J. (1977), “The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14(4), 538-555.
14. Basil, M.D. (1996), "Identification as a mediator of celebrity effects", Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(Fall), 478-95.
15. Beauchamp, Marc and Hiroko Katayama (1987), “Mickey Mouse, Meet Hello Kitty,” Forbes, New York: 139(11), 68-70.
16. Biel, Alexander (1993), “Converting Image into Equity,” Brand Equity and Advertising, David A. Aaker and Alexander Biel, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Bowlby, John (1980), Loss: Sadness and depression, New York: Basic Books.
18. Bowlby, John (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds, London: Tavistock.
19. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., and Shaver, P. R. (1998), “Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview,” In J. A. Simpson &W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76), New York: Guilford Press.
20. Brookman ,Faye. (2006 January 27), Hello Kitty Creates Mini Shops for Midtier Retailers, New York, 191(19), 11.
21. Callcott, Margaret F., and Wei-Na Lee (1994), “A Content Analysis of Animation and Animated Spokes-Characters in Television Commercials,” Journal of Advertising, 34(4), 1-12.
22. Castleman, Lana (2004 November 1), “Disney snaps into branding,”KidScreen, Toronto, 27.
23. Cheng, Maria (2001 March 9), “Your Money: Trends: Hello, Kitty, at 25, the pink Japaense character is going strong - and more profitable,” Asiaweek, 1.
24. Cobb, Nathan and Globe Staff (1988 December 2), “Mickey Mouse at 60: Still Disney’s Star Salesman,” Boston Globe, Boston, 29.
25. Collins, N. L., and Read, S. J. (1994), “Cognitive representations of attachment: The structure and function of working models,” In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (pp. 53–90), London: Jessica Kingsley.
26. Cross, Gary, and Gregory Smits (2005), “Japan, the U.S. and the Globalization of Children’s consumer culture,” Journal of Social History, 38(4), 873-894.
27. Darwent, Charles (2000), “HELLO KITTY,” World Link, 13(3), 61.
28. Dirda, Michael (2000 December 3), “At year`s end, a look at careers that are now a part of history--and an appreciation of absent friends,” The Washington Post, Washington, D.C, X.23.
29. Dotz, Warren, Jim Morton, and Jon W. Lund (1996), What a Character! Twentieth-Century American Advertising Icons, San Francisco: Chronicle Books.
30. Edmondson, A. C., R. M. Bohmer, and G. P. Pisano (2001), “Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative,” Science Quarterly, Vol. 46: 685–716.
31. Eisenhardt, Katherine M. (1989b), “Building theories from case study research,”Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, 532–550.
32. Eisenhardt, Katherine M., Melissa E. Graebner. (2007), “Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges,” Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32.
33. Emmons, Natasha (1999 November 15), “Charles M Schulz Museum to break ground in spring,” Amusement Business, New York, 30-32.
34. Engle, James F., Roger D. Blackwell and Paul W. Miniard (1995), Consumer Behavior, 3rd ed., The Dryden Press.
35. Fehr, B., and Russell, J. A. (1991), “The concept of love viewed from a prototype Perspective,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 60, 425–438.
36. Feeney, J. A., and Noller, P. (1996), Adult attachment, London: Sage.
37. Freiden, Jon B. (1984), “Advertising Spokesperson Effects: Examination of Endorser Type and Gender on Two Audiences,” Journal of Advertising Research, 24(October/November), 33-41.
38. Friedman, H.H. and Friedman, L. (1979), "Endorser effectiveness by product type", Journal of Advertising Research, 19 (5), 63-71.
39. Galunic, D. C., and K. M. Eisenhardt (2001), “Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 6, 1229–1249.
40. Garretson, Judith A., and Ronald W. Niedrich (2004) “Spokes-Characters: Creating Character Trust and Positive Brand Attitudes,” Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 25-36.
41. Gilbert, C. G.. (2005), “Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48, 741–763.
42. Glaser, B., and A. Strauss (1967), The discovery grounded theory: Strategies in qualitative research, London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.
43. Goch, Lynna (1999 May), “Name that brand,” Best`s Review, 24-25.
44. Hade, Daniels D. (2001), “Curious George gets branded: Reading as consuming,” Theory into Practice Columbus, 140(3), 158-164.
45. Halliday, Jean (1996, September 30), “Chrysler Brings Out Brand Personalities with ’97 Ads,” Advertising Age, 3.
46. Hazan, C., and Shaver, P. R. (1994), “Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships,” Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 5, 1–22.
47. Hiestand, Jesse (2003 August 25), “Disney has big plans for Mickey`s 75th,” Amusement Business, New York, 115(34), 7.
48. Home Textiles (2002, March), “WB and Sanrio team up to co-brand merchandise,” Today, 10.
49. Hovland, Carl I., Janis K. Irving and Kelly H. Harold (1953), Communication and Presuasion, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50. In – Store (2006, March), “BRANDING FOCUS: Cast from the past,” 21.
51. Ingersoll, Bruce (1986 February 3), “The Boys of Winter: Old-Timers` Hockey Is Pluck and a Puck --- Snoopy Tourney Helps Spur The Interest of Has-Beens; High Spirits, Slow Motion,” Wall Street Journal (Eastern edition), New York, 1.
52. Johnston, David C. (1995 December 27), “Connie Boucher, 72, a Pioneer In Licensing Cartoon Characters,” New York Times, New York, B.7.
53. Kahnemoan, D., and A. Tversky, A. (1973), “On the psychology of prediction,” Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
54. Kamins, Michael A. (1990), “An Investigation into the Match-Up Hypothesis in Celebrity Advertising: When Beauty May be only Skin Deep,” Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4-13.
55. Kahle, Lynn R. (1984), Attitudes and Social Adaptation: Person-Situation Interaction Approach, Oxford: Pergamon.
56. Kahle, Lynn R., and Pamela M. Homer. (1985), “Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective,” The Journal of Consumer Research, 2(4), 954-961.
57. Kahle, Lynn R., and Susan Goff Timmer. (1983), "A Theory and a Method for Studying Values," in Social Values and Social Change: Adaptation to Llfe in America, ed. Lynn R. Kahle, New York: Praeger.
58. Keller, Kevin L. (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 1-22.
59. Keller, Kevin L. (1998), Strategic Brand Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
60. Kelman, H.C. (1961), "Processes of opinion change", Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 25, 57-78.
61. Kinsella, Sharon (1995), “Cuties in Japan,” Women, Media and Consuption in Japan, ed. Lise Skov and Brian Moeran, Honolulu: Hawai University Express.
62. Kobayashi, Chihiro, and Jonathon D. Brown (2003), “Self-Esteem and Self-Enhancement in Japan and America,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 34, 567-582.
63. Kolter, Philip (1994), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning Implementation, and Control, 8th ed., Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hill.
64. Kreiter, Ted (2004 November/December), “The Most Magnificent Mood,” The Saturday Evening Post, Indianapolis, 276(6), 52-54.
65. Kremkow, Cheryl (2006), “Licensed to Sell,” Modern Jeweler. Melville, 105(6), 54-59.
66. Leiby, Richard and Sharon Waxman (1999 December 15), “Good Grief! `Peanuts` Ends; Cartoon`s Ailing Creator to Devote Energies to Recover,” The Washington Post, Washington, D.C, A.01.
67. Levitt, Theodore (1960), “Marketing Myopia,” Harvard Business Review, 38 (July-August), 117-21.
68. Levy, Sidney J. (1959), “Symbols for Sales,” Harvard Business Review, 37(4), 117-24.
69. Markus, Hazel (1977), “Self-Schemata and Processing Information about the Self,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(February), 63-78.
70. McCracken, G.rant (1989), “Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement Process,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310-321.
71. McGuire, William J. (1985), “Attitudes and Attitude Change,” in Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2 Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson, eds., New York: Random House, 233-346.
78. Miles, M., and A. M. Huberman (1984), Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sgae Publications.
79. Mintzberg, H., and J. A. Waters (1982), “Tracking strategy in an entrepreneurial firm,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol.25, 465–499.
80. Moorman, Christine, Rohit Deshpande, and Gerald Zaltman (1993), “Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 81–101.
81. Neeley, Sabrina M., and David W. Schumann (2004) “Using Animated Spokes-Characters in Advertising to Young Children. Does Increasing Attention to Advertising Necessarily Lead to Product Preference?” Journal of Advertising, 33(3), 7-23.
82. Neeley, Sabrina M., Wendy Macias, Tara M. Clark, and Wei-Na Lee. (2000), “Advertising Spokes-Character Attributes and the Use Relationships,” in Proceddings of the 2000 Society of Consumer Psychology Conference, J. Inman, J. Tepper, and T. Whittler, eds,. Santonio, TX: Society of Consumer Psychology, 94-99.
83. Nisbett, R., and L. Ross (1980), Human inferences: Strategies and Shortcomings of social judgment, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
84. Noguch, Kenji, Carol L. Gohm, David J. Dalsky, and Shinji Sakamoto (2007), “Cultural differences related to positive and negative valence,” Asian Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 10, 68–76
84. Ohanian, Roobina (1990), “Construction and Validation of A Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers’ Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness,”Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39-52.
85. Orwall, Bruce (2003), “Disney to Push Retail Gear Tied To Its TV Shows,” Wall Street Journal (Eastern edition), New York, B.1.
86. Osenton, Sara C. (2006), “Insidiously ‘Cute’:Kawaii Cultural Production and Ideology in Japan”, University of Toronto.
87. Oxenfeldt, Alfred R., and Carroll Swann (1964), Management of the Advertising Function, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
88. Pacific Research Consulting (2004, October 25), “New Puddings from Morinaga Milk Industry,” Japan Food Products & Service Journal, 29(10), 1.
89. Palaestra (1999 Summer), “Special Olymipics healthy Athletes,”, Macomb, 15(3), 10-12.
90. Park Whan C., Bernard J. Jaworski, and Deborah J. Maclnnis (1986), Journal of Marketing, 50(10), 135-145.
91. Park Whan C., Sandra Milberg, and Robert Lawson. (1991), “Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency, Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (2), 185-193.
92. Pereira, Joseph and Lisa Bannon (1995 July 13), “Goodbye, Dolly? Toy Makers` Addiction To Hollywood Figures Reshapes Kids` Play --- Licensed Characters Sell Big, And Studios Are Moving Into the Business, Too --- Now Showing: Entertoyment, ” Wall Street Journal (Eastern edition), New York, N.Y., A.1.
94. Pornpitakpan, Chanthika (2003), “The Effect of Celebrity Endorsers’ Perceived Credibility on Product Purchase Intention: The Case of Singaporeans,” Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 16(2), 55-74.
95. Plummer, Joseph T. (1985), “Brand Personality: A Strategic Concept for Multinational Advertising,” Marketing Educators’ Conference, New York:
96. Robins, Richard W., Avshalom Caspi, and Terrie E. Moffitt (2000), “Two Personalities, One Relationship,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (2), 251–59. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易研究所
94351042
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094351042 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 296 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
