| Reference: | 一般文獻
李英明（2000）：《網路社會學》。臺北：揚智。
吳筱玫（2001.10）：〈賽伯人〉〔Online〕。網址：www.jour.nccu.edu.tw/SMWU/ nc/ch13.htm。
吳筱玫（2003）：《網路傳播概論》。臺北：智勝。
邱德亮（2001）：〈導讀：維希留加速2000年〉。收入於《消失的美學》，頁1-60。臺北：揚智。
林鬱主編（2001）：《尼采的智慧》。臺北：成陽。
黃金瑞（2000）：《歷史、身體、國家：近代中國的身體形成（1895—1937）》。臺北：聯經。
羅貴祥（1997）：《德勒茲》。臺北：東大。
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses: Note towards an investigation. In Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 127-186). New York: Monthly Review Press.
Althusser, L. (1972). Montesquieu, Rousseau, Marx. London: Verso.
Badmington, N. (2000). Introduction: Approaching posthumanism. In N. Badmington (Ed.), Posthumanism (pp. 1-10). New York: Palgrave.
Menser, M. ＆ Aronowitz, S. (1996). On cultural studies, science, and technology. In S. Aronowitz, B. Martinsons, M. Menser ＆ J. Rich (Eds.), Technoscience and cyberculture (pp. 7-28). New York ＆ London: Routledge.
Min-ha, T. T. (1986). Introduction to “She, the inappropriate/d other”. Discourse, 8: 1-9.
Min-ha, T. T. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Min-ha, T. T. (1998). Shifting the borders of the other: An interview with T. Min-ha [Online]. Available: http://www.telepolis.de/english/inhalt/kino/ 3265/1.html
Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Morse, M. (1994). What do cyborgs eat? Oral logic in an information society. Discourse, 16(3): 86-123.
Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In J. Law ＆ J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 74-89). Oxford: Blackwell.
Myerson, G. （2002 [2000]）：《唐娜•哈樂葳與基因改造食物》，吳秀瑾譯。臺北：貓頭鷹。
Parker, M. ＆ Cooper, R. (1998). Cyborganization: Cinema as nervous system. In J. Hassard ＆ R. Holliday (Eds.), Organization-representation: Work and organization in popular culture (pp. 201-228). London, Thousand Oaks ＆ New Delhi: Sage.
Pepperell, R. (1995). The post-human condition. England: Intellect Books.
Balsamo, A. (1995). Forms of technological embodiment: Reading the body in the contemporary culture. In M. Featherstone & R. Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace/cyberbodies/cyberpunk: Cultures of technological embodi- ment (pp. 215-237). London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: Sage.
Pickering, A. (1992). From science as knowledge to science as practice. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 1-26). Chicago ＆ London: The University of Chicago Press.
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Pickering, A. (2003). On becoming: Imagination, metaphysics, and the mangle. In D. Ihde ＆ E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality (pp. 96-116). Bloomington ＆ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Plant, S. (1996). The virtual complexity of culture. In G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis ＆ T. Putnam (Eds.), FuturalNatural: Nature/science/culture (pp. 203-217). London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Poster, M. (1990). The mode of information: Poststructuralism and social context. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Poster, M. (1996). Postmodern virtualities. In G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis ＆ T. Putnam (Eds.), FuturalNatural: Nature/science/culture (pp. 183-202). London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Prins, B. (1995). The ethics of hybrids subjects: Feminist constructivism according to Donna Haraway. Science, technology, ＆ human values, 20(3): 352-367.
Sandoval, C. (1995). New sciences: Cyborg feminism and the methodology of the oppressed. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 407-421). New York: Routledge.
Schrift, A. D. (1994 [1988]). Foucault and Derrida on Nietzsche and the end(s) of ‘man’. In B. Smart (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Critical assessments (vol. 2) (pp. 278-292). London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Slouka, M. （1998 [1995]）：《虛擬入侵：網際空間與科技對現實之衝擊》，張義東譯。臺北：遠流。
Balsamo, A. (1996). Technologies of the gendered body: Reading cyborg women. Durham ＆ London: Duke University Press.
Sofoulis, Z. (1988). Through the lumen: Frankenstein and the optics of re-origination. University of California at Santa Cruz, PhD Thesis.
Sofoulis, Z. (2002). Cyberquake: Haraway’s manifesto. In A. Jonson ＆ A. Cavallaro (Eds.), Prefiguring cyberculture: An intellectual history (pp. 84-103). Cambridge, Massachusetts ＆ London: The MIT Press.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson ＆ L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). Urbana ＆ Chicago: Illinois University Press.
Suleiman, S. R. (Ed.) (1985). The female body in western culture: Contemporary perspectives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Strathern, M. (1991). Partial connections. Savage Maryland: Rowman ＆ Littlefield.
Terranova, T. (1996). Posthuman unbounded: Artificial evolution and high-tech subcultures. In G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis ＆ T. Putnam (Eds.), FuturalNatural: Nature/science/culture (pp. 165-180). London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Tirado, F. J. (1999). Against social constructionist cyborgian territorializations. In Á. J. Gordo-López ＆ I. Parker (Eds.), Cyberpsychology (pp. 202-217). London: Macmillam.
Tirado, F. J., Alcaraz, J. M. ＆ Domènech, M. (1999). A change of episteme for organizations: A lesson from Solaris. Organization, 6(4): 673-690.
Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tuana, N. (2003 [1996]). Revaluing science: Starting from the practices of women. In R. C. Scharff ＆ V. Dusek (Eds.), Philosophy of technology: The technological condition: An anthology (pp. 116-125). Oxford: Blackwell.
Balsamo, A. (2000 [1988]). Reading cyborgs writing feminism. In G. Kirkup, L. Janes, K. Woodward ＆ F. Hovenden (Eds.), The gendered cyborg: The reader (pp. 148-158). London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Turkle, S. （1998 [1996]）：《虛擬化身：網路世代的身份認同》，譚天、吳佳真譯。臺北：遠流。
Turner, B. S. (1996). The body and society (2nd ed.). London, Thousand Oaks ＆ New Delhi: Sage.
Verran, H. (2001). Science and an African logical. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Vološino, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.
Waugh, P. (1984). Metafiction: The theory and practice of self-conscious fiction. London ＆ New York: Methuen.
Weber, M. （2001 [1976]）：《新教倫理與資本主義精神》，于曉等譯。臺北：左岸。
Whitehead, A. N. （2000 [1925]）：《科學與現代世界》，傅佩榮譯。臺北：立緒。
Wilson, R. R. (1995). Cyber(body)part: Prosthetic consciousness. In M. Featherstone & R. Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace/cyberbodies/cyberpunk: Cultures of technological embodiment (pp. 239-259). London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: Sage.
Wise, J. M. (1997). Exploring technology and social space. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Yi, D. (2004). Toward a posthuman ethics [Online]. Available: http://www. reconstruction.ws/043/yi.htm
Bartsch, I., DiPalma, C. ＆ Sells, L. (2001). Witnessing the postmodern jeremiad: (Mis)Understanding Donna Haraway’s method of inquiry. Configurations, 9: 127-164.
小說
洪凌（1995）：〈純真罪刑〉。收入於《肢解異獸》（頁23-46）。臺北：遠流。
Ballard, J. G. （2003 [1973]）：《超速性追緝》，張馨濤譯。臺北：商周。
Fleischer, L. （1995 [1994]）：《瑪麗雪萊之科學怪人》，朱乃長譯。臺北：映象文化。
漫畫
士郎正宗（Masamune Sirow）（1991）：《攻殼機動隊（中文珍藏版）》。臺北：東立。
士郎正宗（Masamune Sirow）（1996-1999）：《攻殼機動隊（1-2）》，張偉任譯。臺北：尖端。
士郎正宗（Masamune Sirow）（1997）：《攻殼機動隊（全）》，Arashi譯。臺北：尚登。
木城ゆきと（Yukito Kishiro）（1993-1995）：《銃Gunnm夢（1-9）》，林上園、洪瓊容譯。臺北：東立。
電影
Bell, D. (2001). An introduction to cybercultures. London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Cronenberg, D.（1996）：《超速性追緝》。臺灣：龍祥。
圖片
士郎正宗（1996）：〈學習課程〉，《攻殼機動隊（1）》，頁21-22。臺北：尖端。
士郎正宗（1996）：〈靈魂複製〉，《攻殼機動隊（1）》，頁136。臺北：尖端。
士郎正宗（1997）：〈靈魂入侵〉，《攻殼機動隊（全）》，頁34。臺北：尖端。
士郎正宗（1997）：〈毀滅原初〉，《攻殼機動隊（全）》，頁209。臺北：尖端。
士郎正宗（1999）：〈草薙素子〉，《攻殼機動隊（2）》封底。臺北：尖端。
士郎正宗（1999）：〈融合〉，《攻殼機動隊（2）》，頁150。臺北：尖端。
木城ゆきと（1994）：〈凱麗及其朋友〉，《銃Gunnm夢（7）》，頁26-27。臺北：尖端。
木城ゆきと（1995）：〈授勳儀式〉，《銃Gunnm夢（9）》，頁14-21。臺北：尖端。
Benjamin, W. (1969). Theses on the philosophy of history. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 253-264). New York: Schocken Books.
木城ゆきと（1995）：〈對自核夢〉，《銃Gunnm夢（9）》，頁54-107。臺北：尖端。
木城ゆきと(1996). Angel of Space [Online]. Available: http://jajatom.moo.jp/ E-top/Egunnm/gunnmCGgallery%20folder/g.gallery01.html
木城ゆきと (2001). Air Hole [Online]. Available: http://jajatom.moo.jp/E-top/ Egunnm/gunnmLO02/g.gallery01.html
Cronenberg, D. （1996）：〈慾望的孔洞〉，《急速性追緝》。臺灣：龍祥。
Cronenberg, D. （1996）：〈撞車〉，《急速性追緝》。臺灣：龍祥。
Durer, A. (1512). Ecce Homo [Online]. Available: http://www.conncoll.edu/ visual/Durer-prints/engravedpassion.all/web/box%2027-10.jpg
Eglash, R. (2000). Cultural Cybernetics [Online]. Available: http://www.rpi. edu/~eglash/eglash.dir/cyb/cultcyb.dir/hands.htm
Hoch, H. (1920). The pretty maiden [Online]. Available: http://www. msubillings.edu/art/Dada.htm
Klee, P. (1910). Angelus novus [Online]. Available: http://www.remue.net/ cont/benjamin.html
Randolph, L. M. (1989). Cyborg [Online]. Available: http://www.lynnrandolph. com/cyborgFrameset.html
Berman, M. (1982). All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Randolph, L. M. (1989). Self consortium [Online]. Available: http://herbergercollege.asu.edu/museum/randolph/rand1.jpg
Randolph, L. M. (1992). Diffraction [Online]. Available: http://www. lynnrandolph.com/shapeS.html
Randolph, L. M. (1995). The annunciation of the second coming [Online]. Available: http://www.lynnrandolph.com/cyborgFrameset.html
Randolph, L. M. (1996). Managed care [Online]. Available: http://www. lynnrandolph.com/cyborgFrameset.html
Randolph, L. M. (1997-1998). Mystery [Online]. Available: http://www. lynnrandolph.com/mysteries.html
Braidotti, R. (1994a). Toward a new nomadism: Feminist Deleuzian tracks; or, metaphysics and metabolism. In C. V. Boundas ＆ D. Olkowski (Eds.), Gilles Deleuze and the theater of philosophy (pp. 159-186). New York ＆ London: Routledge.
Braidotti, R. (1994b). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Braidotti, R. (1996). Cyberfeminism with a difference [Online]. Available: http://www.let.uu.nl/womens_studies/rosi/cyberfem.htm
Braidotti, R. (2000). Between the no longer and the not yet: Nomadic variations on the body [Online]. Available: http://www.women.it/quarta/ plenary/ braidotti.htm
Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Cambridge: Polity.
Bukatman, S. (1993). Terminal identity: The virtual subject in postmodern science fiction. Durham ＆ London: Duke University Press.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York & London: Routledge.
de Certeau. M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley, Los Angeles ＆ London: University of California Press.
Chow, R. (1992 [1990]). Postmodern automatons. In J. Butler ＆ Scott, J. W (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 101-117). New York ＆ London: Routeledge.
Cixous, H. （2001 [1976]）：〈美杜莎的笑聲〉，吳芬等譯。收入於《誰是第二性？》，頁591-620。臺北：貓頭鷹。
Clynes, M. E. ＆ Kline, N. S. (1995 [1960]). Cyborgs and space. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 29-33). New York: Routledge.
Cooper, R. ＆ Law, J. (1995). Organization: Distal and proximal views. Research in the sociology of organizations, 13:237-274.
Crenshaw, K. (1993). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminism theory, and antiracist politics. In D. K. Kelly (Ed.), Feminist Legal theory: Foundations (pp. 383-395). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Crewe, J. (1997). Transcoding the world: Haraway’s postmodernism. Sings: Journal of women in culture and society, 22(4): 891-905.
Cuff, E. C., Sharrock, W. W. ＆ Francis, D. W. （1999 [1998]）：《社會學理論的觀點》，林秀麗、林庭瑤、洪惠芬譯。臺北：韋伯。
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Derrida, J. (1978a). Writing and difference. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Derrida, J. (1978b). Spurs: Nietzsche’s styles. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Downwy, G. L., Dumit, J. ＆ Williams, S. (1995). Cyborg anthropology. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 341-346). New York: Routledge.
Dumit, J. ＆ Davis-Floyd, R. (1998). Cyborg babies: Children of the third millennium. In R. Davis-Floyd ＆ J. Dumit (Eds.), Cyborg babies: From techno-sex to techno-tots (pp. 1-18). New York ＆ London: Routledge.
Escobar, K. (2000). Welcome to cyberia: Notes on the anthropology of cyberculture. In D. Bell ＆ B. Kennedy (Eds.), The cybercultures reader (pp. 56-76). London: Routledge.
Everard, J. (2000). Virtual states: The internet and the boundaries of the nation-state. London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Featherstone, M & Burrow, R. (1995). Cultures of technological embodiment: An Introduction. In M. Featherstone & R. Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace/ cyberbodies/cyberpunk: Cultures of technological embodiment (pp. 1-19). London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: Sage.
Feher, M. (1987). Of bodies and technology. In H. Foster (Ed.), Discussions in contemporary culture (pp. 159-165). Seattle ＆ Washington: Bay.
Flax, J. (1992). The end of innocence. In J. Butler ＆ Scott, J. W (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 445-463). New York ＆ London: Routeledge.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus ＆ P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed.) (pp. 208-226). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1994 [1966]). The order of things: The archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Book.
Foucault, M. (1997a [1982]). Technologies of the self. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 221-251). New York: The New Press.
Foucault, M. (1997b). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 303-319). New York: The New Press.
Foucault, M. (1998 [1970]). What is an author? In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Aesthetics, method, and epistemology (pp. 205-222). New York: The New Press.
Gaggioli, A., Vettorello, M ＆ Riva, G. (2003). From Cyborgs to Cyberbodies: The Evolution of the Concept of Techno-Body in Modern Medicine. PsychNology Journal, 1(2): 75-86.
Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. New York: Ace Books.
González, J. (1995). Envisioning cyborg bodies: Notes from current research. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 267-279). New York: Routledge.
Grassie, W. (1996). Cyborgs, trickster, and Hermes: Donna Haraway’s metatheory of science and religion [Online]. Available: http://www. users.voicenet.com/~grassie/Fldr.Articles/Cyborgs.html
Gray, C. H. ＆ Mentor, S. (1995). The cyborg body politics and the new world order. In G. Brahm JR. ＆ M. Driscoll (eds.), Prosthetic territories: Politics and hypertechnologies (pp. 219-247). Boulder, San Francisco ＆ Oxford: Westview Press.
Gray, C. H., Mentor, S. ＆ Figueroa-Sarriera, H. J. (1995). Cyborology: Constructing the knowledge of cybernetic organisms. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 1-16). New York: Routledge.
Gray, C. H. (2001). Cyborg citizen: Politics in the posthuman age. New York and London: Routledge.
Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Gunkel, D. (2000). We are borg: Cyborgs and the subject of communication. Communication theory, 10(3): 332-357.
Hakken, D. (1999). Cyborgs@cyberspace? An ethnographer looks to the future. New York ＆ London: Routledge.
Hall, S. （1994 [1982]）：〈「意識型態」的再發現：媒體研究中被壓抑者的重返〉，黃麗玲譯。收入於《文化、社會與媒體：批判性觀點》（M. Gurevitch、T. Bennett、J. Curran ＆ J. Woollacott, Eds.），頁73-122。臺北：遠流。
Haraway, D. J. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1991a). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1991b). ‘Gender’ for a Marxist dictionary: The sexual politics of a word. In D. J. Haraway, Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 127-148). New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1991c). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In D. J. Haraway, Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149-181). New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1991d). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In D. J. Haraway, Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 183-201). New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1991e). The biopolitics of postmodern bodies: Constitutions of self in immune system discourse. In D. J. Haraway, Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 203-230). New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1991f). Cyborg at large: Interview with Donna Haraway. In C. Penley ＆ A. Ross (Eds.), Technoculture (pp. 1-20). Minneapolis ＆ Oxford: University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway, D. J. (1991g). The actors are cyborg, nature is coyote, and the geography is elsewhere: Postscript to “Cyborg at large”. In C. Penley ＆ A. Ross (Eds.), Technoculture (pp. 21-26). Minneapolis ＆ Oxford: University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway, D. J. (1992a [1989]). Ecce homo, ain’t (ar’n’t) I a woman, and inappropriate/d others: The human in a post-humanist landscape. In J. Butler ＆ Scott, J. W (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 86-100). New York ＆ London: Routeledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1992b). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossber, C. Nelson ＆ P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295-337). New York ＆ London: Routeledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1995). Cyborg and symbionts: Living together in the new world order. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. xi-xx). New York: Routledge.
Haraway,D.J.(1997).Modest_witness@second_millennium.femalman©_meets_oncomouse™: Feminism and technoscience. New York ＆ London：Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (2000). How like a leaf: An interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. New York ＆ London: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (2003). Cyborgs to companion species: Reconfiguring kinship in technoscience. In D. Ihde ＆ E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality (pp. 58-82). Bloomington ＆ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Haraway, D. J. (2004 [1992]). Otherworldly conversations; terran topics; local terms. In The Haraway reader (pp. 125-150). New York ＆ London: Routledge.
Hassan, I. (1977). Prometheus as performer: Towards a posthumanism culture. In M. Benamou ＆ C. Caramella (Eds.), Performance in modern change . Madison: Coda Press.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we become posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago ＆ London: The University of Chicago Press.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). New York: Harper ＆ Row.
Hoofd, I. (2002). Cyborg manifesto 2.0: Discussions in feminist figurations, new technologies and social change [Online]. Available: http://www. cyberartsweb.org/cpace/theory/hoofd/index.html
Honneth, A. (1995). Decentered autonomy: The subject after the fall. In C. W. Wright (Ed.), The fragmented world of the social: Essays in social and political philosophy (pp. 261-271). New York: State University of New York Press.
Jensen, C. B. (2003). Latour and Pickering: Post-human perspectives on science, becoming, and normativity. In D. Ihde ＆ E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality (pp. 225-240). Bloomington ＆ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Kember, S. (1996). Feminist figuration and the question of origin. In G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis ＆ T. Putnam (Eds.), FuturalNatural: Nature/science/culture (pp. 256-269). London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Kember, S. (1998). Virtual anxiety: Photography, new technologies and subjectivity. Manchester ＆ New York: Manchester University Press.
Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J, Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 264-280). London, Boston ＆ Henley: Routledge ＆ Kegan Paul.
Latour, B. (1993 [1991]). We have never been modern (C. Porter, Trans.). New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo ＆ Singapore: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In J. Law ＆ J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 15-25). Oxford: Blackwell.
de Lauretis, Teresa. (1987). Technologies of gender: Essays on theory, film, and fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes ＆ T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technical systems: New Directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 111-134). Cambridge ＆ Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Law, J. (1992). Note on the theory of the actor network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity [Online]. Available: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/ sociology/papers/law-Notes-on-ANT.pdf
Law, J. (1997). Heterogeneities [Online]. Available: http://www.comp.lancs.ac. uk/sociology/papers/Law-Heterogeneities.pdf
Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In J. Law ＆ J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 1-14). Oxford: Blackwell.
Law, J. (2000). Networks, relations, cyborgs: On the social study of technology [Online]. Available: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/ papers/Law-Networks-Relations-Cyborgs.pdf
Law, J. (2004). Enacting naturecultures: A note from STS [Online]. Available: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/law-enacting-naturecultures.pdf
van Loon, J. (1996). Technological sensibilities and the cyberpolitics of gender: Donna Haraway’s postmodern feminism. Innovation: The European journal of social sciences, 9(2): 231-243.
Luke, T. W. (2001). Reconstructing nature: How the new informatics are rewrighting the environment and society as bitspace. Capitalism, nature, socialism, 12(3): 3-27.
Lykke, N. (1996). Between monsters, goddesses and cyborgs: Feminist confrontations with science. In N. Lykke ＆ R. Braidotti (Eds.), Between monsters, goddesses and cyborgs: Feminist confrontations with science, medicine and cyberspace (pp. 13-29). London ＆ New Jersey: Zed Books.
Lyotard, J-F. （2001 [1988]）：《非人：時間漫談》，羅國祥譯。北京：商務。
Mackenzie, D. ＆ Wajcman, J. (1999). Introductory essay: The social shaping of the technology. In D. Mackenzie ＆ J. Wajcman (Eds.), The social shaping of the technology (pp. 3-27). Buckingham ＆ Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Marcuse, H. (1997 [1964])：〈從共識型態到工具性控制〉，林明澤譯。收入於《文化與社會：當代論辯》（J. C. Alexander ＆ S. Seidman, Eds.），頁329-339。臺北：立緒。
Mason, C. (1995). Terminating bodies: Toward a cyborg history of abortion. In J. Halberstam ＆ I. Livingston (Eds.), Posthuman bodies (pp. 225-243). Bloomington ＆ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. |
