Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36150
|
| Title: | 挑三揀四--連續性搜尋的擇偶過程模擬 |
| Authors: | 陳佳穎
Chen,Chia-ying |
| Contributors: | 陳信木
陳佳穎
Chen,Chia-ying |
| Keywords: | 擇偶
連續性搜尋
婚姻配對
電腦模擬
婚姻市場
理性選擇 |
| Date: | 2002 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 17:15:18 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 日常生活中，人們是如何挑選結婚對象的？隨著時代的演進，在現代社會中，婚姻配對已由傳統的「媒妁之言」轉變為「自由戀愛」的結合方式。不過，「自由戀愛」並非等同於完全的自由選擇或隨機配對，人們由於其特定的地位背景條件，是在一個特定的「候選對象群」中擇定配偶。本研究修正過去擇偶研究中「單一指標觀」的侷限，改採用「多重指標觀」來檢視人們的擇偶行為，主張個人之行為會遵循「理性選擇」原則，依據「多重指標」的擇偶條件，在候選對象群中進行「連續性搜尋」，歷經一番「挑三揀四」，篩選若干對象後，方能覓得伴侶。
本研究的目的，即是透過電腦模擬(simulation)的方式，以人們挑選伴侶時常用的五種偏好類型—一試定終身型、專挑極品型、面面俱顧型、差別偏好型、截長補短型做為基礎架構，分別模擬在婚姻市場中人們為了「覓得良緣」，所可能採取的不同挑選伴侶策略及搜尋結果，分析重點鎖定在以下兩點：一是持不同擇偶偏好類型的人，能夠成功覓得良緣的機會；以及若能成功覓得良緣，所需篩選的對象數量為何。此外，面對同樣一個婚姻市場，個人因其對「市場價格範圍」的掌握與否，也會發展出兩種不同類型的擇偶策略：經驗法則與門檻法則，本研究亦針對這兩種策略分別進行模擬分析。研究最後並為後續研究可行之方向，提出幾點建議，例如：與實證資料相互比對、與其他如婚姻品質、婚姻滿意度等之相關主題結合、進一步將「時間面向」納入模型結構等。
關鍵字：擇偶、連續性搜尋、婚姻配對、理性選擇、電腦模擬、婚姻市場
How do people pick their “another half” in their daily life? People now have more and more freedom in choosing their spouses, unlike the situation before when arranged marriage was the main stream. However, choosing spouses freely doesn’t mean that they are free to choose whomever they like or they are matched randomly. People tend to select their spouses within a pool in which the “candidates” share similar backgrounds with them. In this study, people’s mate selecting process, previously analyzed with single indicator, is now examined with multiple indicators. This study suggests that people, who intent to find mates, would follow the rational choice principle, go through a sequential “picking and choosing” process with multiple spouse-choosing criteria, and find their spouses in the “candidate pool” finally.
The purpose of this study is to explore the mate-selecting strategies and results with the technique of computer simulation, based on five principles of mate-selection preference people usually have. The five principles are 1) the immediately matching type, 2) the choosing for the best only type, 3) the deliberate type, 4) the individual diversity-admiring type, and 5) the compensatory type. The focuses of the analysis are twofold. Firstly, it looks into the chance of successfully finding a mate by people with different preference. Secondly, it tries to find out the number of “candidates” which are sifted out before people can make a final decision. Besides, although in the same marriage market, individuals tend to develop two types of searching strategies—rule of experience and rule of threshold—that depends on their grasp of the “range of the market price.” This study conducts simulation of the two rules. Moreover, the study also indicates some potential issues for following researches, for example, comparing the research outcomes with empirical data, combining topics such as the quality or satisfaction of marriage, and incorporating the “time” element in the simulation model.
Keywords: mate-selection (or mate-searching), sequential searching process, assortative marriage, rational choice, computer simulation, marriage market |
| Reference: | • 于若蓉(1998)，「台灣的婚姻市場—嫁妝與聘金的決定」。國科會補助專題研究計畫(NSC86-2415-H032-023-T )。
• 朱岑樓(1991)，婚姻研究。臺北：東大圖書公司。
• 伊慶春與熊瑞梅(1994)，「擇偶過程之網絡與婚姻關係：對介紹人、婚姻配對、和婚姻滿意度之分析」。見伊慶春(主編)，台灣民眾的社會意向，頁135-78。臺北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。
• 李放春與劉瑜譯(2000)，禮物的流動－一個中國村莊中的互惠原則與社會網絡。上海：上海人民出版社。
• 李紹嶸與蔡文輝譯(1984)，婚姻與家庭。臺北：巨流圖書公司。
• 吳安迪譯(2002)，基督教的婚姻哲學。石家莊：河北教育出版社。
• 林秋萍(2002)，「未婚青年擇偶偏好之研究」，國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
• 林鴻達(1989)，「臺灣都市山地青年擇偶態度行為與問題之研究：以北部都市山地教會未婚青年為例」，國立臺灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
• 林顯宗(1985)，家庭社會學。臺北：五南圖書出版公司。
• 胡幼慧與馬淑榮(1989)，「台灣都市地區已婚及非婚人口之組成及社會特質探討」，見伊慶春與朱瑞玲(主編)，台灣社會現象的分析，頁89-114。中央研究院三民主義研究所叢刊(25)。
• 孫清山與黃毅志(1997)，「台灣階級結構：流動表與網絡表分析」，見張苙雲等(主編)，九○年代的台灣社會：社會變遷基本調查系列二，頁57-101。臺北：中研院社研所籌備處。
• 許木柱等譯(1996)，社會階層。臺北：紅葉文化。
• 許嘉猷(1986)，社會階層化與社會流動。臺北：三民書局。
• 陳雅麗(2001)，「自身條件在擇偶歷程中的角色：演化論與社會經濟模式之檢驗」，國立屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
• 郭松義(2000)，倫理與生活—清代的婚姻關係。北京：商務印書館。
• 周素鳳譯(2001)，親密關係的轉變：現代社會的性、愛、慾。臺北：巨流。
• 周麗端等(2000)，婚姻與家人關係。臺北：空中大學。
• 張美惠譯(1999)，美之為物：美的科學。臺北：時報文化。
• 張惠芬譯(1998)，步入婚姻之道。臺北：揚智文化。
• 張華葆(1987)，社會階層。臺北：三民書局。
• 陽琪與陽琬譯(1995)，婚姻與家庭。臺北：桂冠圖書公司。
• 葉至誠(1997)，蛻變的社會—社會變遷的理論與現況。臺北：洪葉文化。
• 藍采風(1986)，婚姻關係與調適。臺北：張老師出版社。
• 藍采風(1996)，婚姻與家庭。臺北：幼獅文化事業公司。
• 蔡文輝(1986)，家庭社會學。臺北：五南圖書出版公司。
• 蔡淑鈴(1994)，「台灣之婚姻配對模式」。人文及社會科學集刊 6(2): 335-371。
• 謝復生(2000)，「理性抉擇的回顧與前瞻」，見何思因與吳玉山(主編)，邁入二十一世紀的政治學，頁141-54。臺北：中國政治學會。
• 魏章玲譯(1988)，家庭社會學。臺北：桂冠圖書公司。
• Blackwell, Debra L. and Litcher, Daniel T. 2000. “Mate Selection Among Married and Cohabiting Couples.” Journal of Family Issues 21(3): 275-302.
• Blau, P. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
• Bulcroft, Kris. 2000. “Mate Selection Theories.” Pages 1774-80 in Encyclopedia of Sociology. 2nd edition. Ed. Borgatta, Edgar F. and Rhonda J. V Montgomery. New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
• Buss, D. M. 1994. The evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating. New York: Basic Books.
• Frey, Bruno S. and Eichenberger, Reiner. 1996. “Marriage Paradoxes.” Rationality and Society 8(2): 187-206.
• Goode,W. 1982. The Family. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Halpin, Brendan. 1999. “Simulation in Sociology.” American Behavioral Scientist 42(10): 1488-508.
• Haug, Marie R. 1977. “Measurement in Social Stratification.” Annual Review of Sociology 3:51-77.
• Hurst, Charles E. 1995. “Status Inequality.” Pages 31-56 in Social Inequality: Forms, Causes, and Consequence. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Lamont, Michele and Molnar, Virag. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167-95.
• Laner, Mary Reige. 2000. “Courtship.” Pages 483-90 in Encyclopedia of Sociology. 2nd edition. Ed. Borgatta, Edgar F. and Rhonda J. V Montgomery. New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
• Lee, Gary R. and Stone, Lorene Hemphill. 1980. “Mate-Selection Systems and Criteria: Variation According to Family Structure.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 42(2): 319-26.
• Lenski, Gerhard E. 1954. “Status Crystallization: A non-Vertical Dimension of Social Status.” American Sociological Review 19(4): 405-13.
• McCubbin, H. & Dahl, B. B. 1985. Marriage and Family: Individuals and Life Cycles. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
• Mortensen, Dale T. 1988. “Matching: Finding a Partner for Life or Otherwise.” American Journal of Sociology 94(Supplement): S215-S240.
• Mosteller, F. 1987. Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability with Solutions. Massachusetts: Addision-Wesley Publishing Company.
• Mustein, B. I. 1986. Path to Marriage. London: Sage Publications.
• Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincade. 1986.“A Theory of Marriage Timing.” American Journal of Sociology 94(3): 563-91.
• Shimer, Robert and Smith, Lones. 2000. “Assortative Matching and Search.” Econometrica 68(2): 343-69.
• Smeenk, Wilma. 1998. Opportunity and Marriage: The Impact of Individual Resources and Marriage Market Structure on First Marriage Timing and Partner Choice in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
• Surra, Catherine A. 1990. “Research and Theory on Mate Selection and Premarital Relationships in the 1980s.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 52(4): 844-65.
• Todd, Peter M. 1997.“Searching for the Next Best Mate.” Pages 419-36 in Simulating Social Phenomena. Ed. Rosaria Conte, Rainer Hegselmann, and Pietro Terna. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
• Whyte, Martin King. 1990. Dating, Mating, and Marriage. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, Inc.
• Xiaohe, Xu and Whyte, Martin King. 1990. “Love Matches and Arranged Marriages: A Chinese Replication.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 52(Aug.): 709-22. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學研究所
89254006
91 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089254006 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [社會學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 407 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
