Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35160
|
Title: | 環保補貼相關問題之研究 |
Authors: | 鍾佩宇 Chung, Pei-Yu |
Contributors: | 施文真 Shih, Wen-Chen 鍾佩宇 Chung, Pei-Yu |
Keywords: | 環保補貼 SCM協定 污染防治 不可控訴補貼 Environmental subsidies SCM Agreement Pollution Prevention and Control Non-actionable subsidies |
Date: | 2005 |
Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 14:18:38 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 環保投資往往造成廠商成本負擔之增加,若缺乏政府管制或經濟誘因,廠商極有可能降低環保方面的投資,導致自然環境的污染及社會外部成本之發生,故透過公共環保政策之適度介入,似乎是不得不存在之必要手段。而本文所欲探討的環保補貼政策,即是存有多元見解及爭議之一種經濟誘因工具。 本文先介紹環保補貼之範圍、定義與各國適用之情形,並採用文獻回顧之方式,整理各學者對政府獎勵企業污染防治措施之爭議,以瞭解環保補貼對環境保護或全球整體經濟的影響。 肯定環保補貼對經濟發展及環境保護有正面的效果之後,接著討論環保補貼與SCM協定中「禁止性補貼」、「可控訴補貼」及「不可控訴補貼」類型間之關係,並探討當「不可控訴補貼」類型所依據之SCM協定相關規定停止適用後目前之定位,同時提出環保補貼於SCM協定下合法規避他國控訴之方式。 本文最後檢驗與分析我國之環保補貼於SCM協定下之適法性,並對我國環保補貼政策未來之發展與方向提出建議。 The use of subsidies as environmental policy instruments has increased in recent years since firms usually aren’t willing to pay for the expense of pollution prevention and control. Environmental subsidies involving financial support by the government, as an economical incentive approach, are deemed to be important and effective by many researchers. However, it still remains controversial because some researchers argue that government intervention would always result in resources distortion and economic inefficiency. Therefore, this thesis focuses on subsidies with a positive impact on the environment and aims to discuss their utility and compatibility with relevant WTO covered agreements, especially the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measure (the SCM Agreement). The thesis first introduces the definition, scope and practice of environmental subsidies, and, by using literature review, presents several studies on the environmental and economic impact of environmental subsidies. The thesis then discusses the relevant regulations under the SCM Agreement framework and finds that environmental subsidies may be categorized as more than one type, ie non-actionable subsidy, of subsidies under the SCM Agreement. Furthermore, the thesis also analyzes how environmental subsidies can be designed in a way that complies with the SCM Agreement, thus avoiding the risk of being challenged under the WTO by other WTO Members. Finally, the thesis examines various types of environmental subsidies provided by Taiwanese government to understand whether they are consistent with the regulations of the SCM Agreement. Suggestions based on this research are put forward at the end of the thesis. |
Reference: | 一、 書籍 (一)中文 1. 楊光華,《服務補貼規範必要性之初探》,收錄於「第四屆國際經貿法學發展學術研討會論文集」。國立政治大學商學院國際經貿組織暨法律研究中心,民國93年8月。 2. 劉碧珍、陳添枝、翁永和,《國際貿易理論與政策》。雙葉書廊,92年8月。 3. 羅昌發,《國際貿易法》。元照出版,民國88年。 4. 顏慶章、蔡英文主編,《國際經濟法規彙編(下冊)》,五南圖書。初版,民國80年6月。 5. 蔡英文,《國家之經濟干預與國際貿易法-補貼法與平衡稅法(上冊)》。政大法學評論第31期,民國74年6月。 6. 侯繼明、孫克難、鄭文輝,《獎勵投資條例之經濟效益評估方向報告(6),鼓勵污染防治》、《獎勵投資條例之經濟效益評估方向報告(7)鼓勵節約能源》,經濟部工業局委託研究計畫。台北:中華經濟研究院,民國76年。 7. 林全、馬凱、王國梁、吳惠林、蕭代基、余津津、鄭欽龍、林慧菁,《促進產業發展之獎勵政策的檢討與建議「獎勵投資條例」停止後的因應對策》,經濟部工業局委託研究計畫。台北:中華經濟研究院,民國77年。 8. 蕭代基《環境經濟學在污染防治上之應用》發表於第一屆環境系統分析研討會,台南成功大學環境工程學系,民國87年。 9. 王健全、黃宗煌、蔡坤宏、傅祖壇,《政府獎勵自動化及污染防治之效果評析》,經濟部工業局委託研究計畫。台北:中華經濟研究院,民國84年。 10. 溫麗琪、柏雲昌,《第二階段固定污染源空氣污染防治費之費率、徵收方式及影響衝擊研究計畫》。台北:中華經濟研究院,民國86年。 11. 孫克難、王健全、黃耀輝、陳元保、林世銘、蔡坤宏、屠美亞、柏雲昌、陳厚銘、陳志秀,《促進產業升級條例租稅減免獎勵措施之全面評估》,經濟部工業局委託研究計畫。臺北:中華經濟研究院,民國86年。 12. 孫克難、黃耀輝、林秀蓉,《邀請星馬韓專家講座計畫—所得稅制與租稅獎勵的經驗借鏡》,經濟部工業局委託研究計畫。台北:中華經濟研究院,民國87年。 13. 蔡英文,《國際貿易法專題研究》,國立政治大學法律學系法學叢書(二七)。國立政治大學法律學系法學叢書編輯委員會編印,民國79年4月。 14. 羅昌發,論美國貿易法對「可被課徵平衡稅之補貼」概念之界定,載「美國貿易救濟制度:國際經貿法研究(一)」。月旦出版,民國83年。 15. 侯繼明、孫克難、鄭文輝,《獎勵投資條例之經濟效益評估方向報告(6),鼓勵污染防治》、《獎勵投資條例之經濟效益評估方向報告(7)鼓勵節約能源》,經濟部工業局委託研究計畫。台北:中華經濟研究院,民國76年。 (二)英文 1. Marc Benitah, THE LAW OF SUBSIDIES UNDER THE GATT/WTO SYSTEM (Kluwer Law International, 2001). 2. John H. Jackson, THE WORLD TRADING SYSTEM (The MIT Press, 1989). 3. OECD, OECD WORKING PAPERS Vol. 1, No.1 (Paris: OECD 1993). 4. Kneese, A. V. & B. T. Bower, MANAGING WATER QUALITY: ECONOMICS, TECHNOLOGY, INSTITUTION (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 1968). 5. Mills, E. S., ECOLOGY AND ECONOMICS (M. I. Goldman ed., N.J. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1972). 6. Slitor, R. E., TAXATION AND DEVELOPMENT (Praeger Publishers, New York, 1976). 7. Baumol, W. J., & W. E. Oates, ECONOMICS, ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, AND THE QUALITY OF LIFE, N. J. (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1979). 8. Harberger, A. C., THE ECONOMICS OF TAXATION, (Henry Aaron and Michael Boskin ed., The Brookings Institution, 1980). 9. Fisher, A. C., RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983). 10. D. Fullerton & A. Wolverton, THE ECONOMICS OF HOUSEHOLD GARBAGE AND RECYCLING BEHAVIOR (Don Fullerton, Thomas C. Kinnaman ed., Edward Elgar Publishing Limited 1999). 11. Gary N. Horlick & Peggy A. Clarke, WTO AND NAFTA RULES AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION: SELECTED ESSAYS ON ANTIDUMPING, SUBSIDIES AND OTHER MEASURES (Cameron 2003). 12. Paul C. Rosenthal, PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE, THE COMMERCE DEPARTMENT SPEAKS (1992). 二、 期刊 (一)中文 1. 牛惠之,《補貼與自由貿易-從GATT/WTO之補貼規範論國際環境補貼之現行法律地位》,進口救濟法制論叢,12期,民國87年1月。 2. 陳惠欽,《環境成本內部化、環境補貼與貿易自由化之間的相互影響探討》,工業簡訊,26卷3期,民國85年3月。 3. 郭瑞基、王泰昌,《環保投資補貼與污染清除稽核政策之分析》,人文及社會科學集刊,16卷4期。中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心,民國93年。 4. 黃宗煌、李堅明,《污染防治之獎勵措施的效果比較》,台灣土地金融季刊,30卷3期,民國82年。 5. 牛惠之,《WTO之SCM協定之發展與重要議題》,進口救濟法制論叢 ,21期,民國91年。 6. 溫麗琪,「綠色矽島之環保政策省思」,經濟情勢暨評論季刊,第6卷第2期,經濟部,民國89年。 7. 溫麗琪,「污染者付費,還是補貼污染者」,《經濟前瞻》,第71期,中華經濟研究院,民國89年。 8. 黃宗煌:落實永續發展的經濟觀,全球變遷通訊,第38期,92年6月。 (二)英文 1. Thomas K. Plofchan Jr., Recognizing and Countervailing Environment Subsidies, 26 INTERNATIONAL LAWYER (1992). 2. Eliza Patterson, GATT and the Environment Rules Changes to Minimize Adverse Trade and Environment Effects, v.26 no.3 JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE (1992). 3. Laura J. Van Pelt, Countervailing Environment Subsidies: A Solution to the Environmental Inequities of the North American Free Trade Agreement, TEXAS INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL (1994). 4. John J. Barcel`oⅢ, Countervailing against Environment Subsidies, 23 CANADIAN BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL (1994). 5. Thomas M. Horwitz, International Environmental Protection after the GATT Tuna Decision: a Proposal for a United States Reply, 25 W. RES. J. INT`L L. (1993). 6. Sims, W. A. The Short-Run Asymmetry of Pollution Subsidies and Charge, 8(4) JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, (1976). 7. Rajah, N. & S. Smith, Taxes, Taxes Expenditures, and Environment Regulation, 9(4) OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY (1993). 8. D. Fullerton and W. Wu, Policies for Green Design, 36(2) JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (1998). 9. Miedema A. K., Economic Comparison of Solid Waste Policy Options, RESOURCE AND ENERGY (1983). 10. Sullivan, A. M., Policy Option for Toxic Disposal, 14(3) J.E.E.M. (1987). 11. Tullock, G., Asymmetry between Bribes and Charges: a Comment, 2(4) WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH (1966). 12. Plott, C.R., and S. Mestelman, A Note on the Symmetry between Bribes and Charges, 4(1) WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH (1968). 13. Regens, J. L., B. J. Seldon, and E. Elliott, Modeling Compliance to Environmental Regulation: Evidence from Manufacturing Industries, 19(6) JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING (1997). 14. Burrow, P., Pigovian Taxes, Polluters Subsidies, Regulation and the Size of a Polluting Industry, 12(3) CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS (1979). 15. Polinsky, A. M., Notes on the Symmetry of Taxes and Subsidies in Pollution Control, 12(1) CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS (1979). 16. William K. Wilcox, GATT-Based Protectionism and the Definition of a Subsidy, 16 B. U. INT`L L.J. (1998). 17. David W. Leebron, An Overview of the Uruguay Round Results, 34 (11) COLUM. J. TRANSNAT`L L. (1995). 18. Rosendo Lopez-Mata, Income Taxation, International Competitiveness and the World Trade Organization`s Rules on Subsidies: Lessons to the U.S. and to the World from the FSC Dispute, 54 TAX LAW (2001). 19. Steve Charnovitz, Free Trade, Fair Trade, Green Trade: Defogging the Debate, 27 CORNELL INT`L L.J. (1994). 20. Jennifer Schultz, Current Development: the GATT/WTO Committee on Trade and the Environment -- toward Environmental Reform, 89 A.J.I.L. (1995). 21. Sanford E. Gaines, Rethinking Environmental Protection, Competitiveness, and International Trade, U CHI LEGAL F (1997). 22. David A. Gantz, Failed Efforts to Initiate the Millennium Round in Seattle: Lessons for Future Global Trade Negotiations, 17 ARIZ. J. INT`L & COMP. LAW (2000). 23. Laplante B., Producer Surplus and Subsidization of Pollution Control Device: A Non-Monotonic Relationship, 39(1) THE JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS (1990). 24. Kort, P. M., Paul J. M. van-Loon and M. Luptacik, Optimal Dynamic Environmental Policies of a Profit Maximizing Firm, 54(3) JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS (1991). 25. Rousmusen E. and M. Zupan, Optional Taxes for Pollution Regulation: Dynamic, Spatial and Stochastic Characteristics, 6(2) NATURAL RESOURCE MODELING (1991). 26. Kamien, M. I., N. L. Schwartz, & F. T. Dolbear, Asymmetry between Bribes and Charges, 2(1) WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH (1966). 三、學術論文 1、 蕭堯仁,《貿易自由化與台灣漁業補貼制度因應之研究》。國立臺灣海洋大學漁業經濟研究所碩士論文,民國90年。 2、許正偉,《汙染防治獎勵措施之效果評估》。國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文,民國88年。 3、胡貝蒂,《台灣租稅獎勵與產業發展》。國立政治大學行政管理碩士論文,民國93年。 3、徐麗振,《投資抵減與其他經濟誘因污染防治政策之比較》。國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文,民國78年。 4、謝琦強,《預算平衡式環境保護政策效果之研究》。國立中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文,民國86年。 5、陳偉晃,《促進產業升級條例租稅減免措施之研究》。國立中山大學企業管理系碩士論文,民國76年。 6、林志森,《我國推動污染防治輔導機制與成效探討》。國立台北大學資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文,民國91年。 7、曾更瑩,《特定性要件於補貼規範之適用》。國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文,民國84年5月。 8、陳怡蓁,《中國匯率制度引發之國際經貿爭議研究》。國立政治大學國際貿易所碩士論文,民國94年7月。 9、陳偉晃,《促進產業升級條例租稅減免措施之研究》。國立中山大學企業管理系碩士論文,民國86年。 四、WTO文件 1. WT/DS46/R, Panel Report on Brazil - Export Financing Program for Aircraft (April 14, 1999). 2. WT/DS46/AB/R, Appellate Body Report on Brazil - Export Financing Program for Aircraft (August 2, 1999). 3. WT/DS70/AB/R, Appellate Body Report on Canada - Measures Affecting The Export of Civilian Aircraft (August 2, 1999). 4. WT/DS267/17, U.S. - Subsidies on Upland Cotton (October 20, 2004). 5. WT/DS139/AB/R, WT/DS142/AB/R, Appellate Body Report on Canada – Certain Measures Concerning the Automotive Industry (May 31, 2000). 6. WT/DS126/R, Panel Report on Australia - Subsidies Provided to Producers and Exporters of Automotive Leather (May 25, 1999). |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 國際經營與貿易研究所 92351045 94 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923510451 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|