Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35047
|
| Title: | 自我形象一致性對真實與虛擬產品購買意願之影響-功能型、享樂型與象徵型產品之比較分析 |
| Authors: | 李吉彬
Lee, Chi-ping |
| Contributors: | 別蓮蒂
Bei, Lien-ti
李吉彬
Lee, Chi-ping |
| Keywords: | 自我形象一致性
虛擬產品
功能型產品
享樂型產品
象徵型產品
Self-Congruency
Virtual Product
Functional Product
Hedonic Product
Symbolic Product |
| Date: | 2004 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 13:39:18 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究探討當消費者的自我形象與產品形象符合一致性時，對真實和虛擬產品之購買意願的影響。在消費者自我形象方面，分為真實我形象與理想我形象，在「依滿足消費者需求之產品分類」(Woods, 1960) 為調節作用下，即將產品分為真實產品與虛擬產品，再各細分為「功能型產品」(Utilitarian Product)、「享樂型產品」(Hedonic Product) 與「象徵型產品」(Symbolic Product)，用以衡量真實我形象一致性和理想我形象一致性對不同產品類別的購買意願會有何不同程度的影響。
本研究經由前測選出了各類型產品之代表性產品，對於一般的真實產品與網路上的虛擬產品，分別以牙刷和解毒靈丹代表功能型產品，KTV和虛擬電子情人代表享樂型產品，以及戒指和騎士團徽章代表象徵型產品。透過十五組項目之五點量表語義差異法，衡量消費者自我形象與產品形象，並以「考慮購買」、「購買意願」、「購買該產品是很重要的消費」和「擁有該產品是很重要的」四題來衡量對產品購買意願的強度。分為真實產品與虛擬產品二種問卷，分別發出228份與201份，透過迴歸分析，驗證自我形象一致性對產品購買意願之影響程度。
研究結果顯示：一、在功能型產品方面，不管是一般的真實產品或是網路上的虛擬產品，自我形象一致性對功能型產品的購買意願並無顯著影響。二、享樂型產品之購買意願受真實我形象一致性的影響較大。三、象徵型產品可分為角色定位和自我提昇兩大類，其產品購買意願將分別受到真實我一致性和理想我一致性因素的影響。四、當產品購買決策變成群體決策時，個體自我形象一致性的影響將受到限制。
整體而言，在產品形象定位上，應以目標客群的自我形象為參考依據，而非其人口變數。並依不同的產品類別，塑造不同的屬性，功能型產品應塑造產品功能屬性的品質形象，而享樂型與象徵型產品得依吻合消費者之自我形象來形塑成個性鮮明的產品形象，都將有助於企業對品牌與產品定位之效果。
The purpose of this study is to discuss the effects of consumers` self-congruency on purchase intentions of real products versus virtual products in terms of functional, hedonic, and symbolic products as moderate effect. Self-image includes actual self and ideal self; as for the moderating effects of “psychological demand character” (Woods, 1960), this study divides both real and virtual products into utilitarian product, hedonic product, and symbolic product to measure the influences of actual-self image congruency and ideal-self image congruency on different product categories.
After two pretests to find out the representative product for each category of real and virtual products, this study takes toothbrush and detoxification medicine for functional products; KTV and virtual e-lover for hedonic products; and ring and Knight insignia for symbolic products. Self-image and product-image are measured by the 15-item semantic differential scale. The magnitude of purchase intention is measured with four questions, “consider to buy”,“intend to buy”, “it’s an important consumption”, and “it’s important to ownTwo-hundred-twenty-eight paper-based questionnaires and 201 virtual questionnaires were collected and regressed to verify the effects of consumers` self-congruency on purchase intentions.
There are some key findings. 1. For functional products, regardless of real or virtual products, the effect of consumers` self-congruency on purchase intentions is not significant. 2. Actual-self image congruency influences the purchase intention of hedonic product more. 3. Symbolic product can be classified into self-enhancing and role-positioning. These two product purchase intentions are respectively affected by actual-self image congruency and ideal-self image congruency. 4. When product purchasing decision becomes group decision, individual self-congruency will be constrained.
To sum up, product image positioning should consider the target customers’ self-images, instead of demography data. Also, according to different product categories, product images should be shaped differently. Functional product should focus on quality image. Hedonic and symbolic products should adopt the images matching consumers’ self images. This will help form better brand and product positioning strategies. |
| Reference: | 黃德祥、李介至 (民92年)，電玩沈迷對青少年敵意、社會關係與學業成就之影響，中學教育學報，第十期，六月，頁37-70。
Addis, Michela and Morris B. Holbrook (2001), “On the Conceptual Link between Mass Customisation and Experience Consumption: An Explosion of Subjectivity,” Journal of Consumer Behavior, Vol.1 (June), 50-66.
Birdwell, Al E. (1968), “A Study of Influence of Image Congruence on Consumer Choice,” Journal of Business, Vol.41 (January), 76-88.
Belch, Geroge E. and E. Laird Landon Jr. (1977), “Discriminant Validity of a Product-Anchored Self-Concept Measure,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14 (May), 252-256.
Bracken, Bruce A. and M. Susan Lamprecht (2003), “Positive Self-Concept: An Equal Opportunity Construct,” School of Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 18, No 2, 103-121.
Chang, Chingching (2002), “Self-Congruency as a Cue in Different Advertising Processing Contexts,” Communication Research, Vol. 29 (October), 503-536.
Dolich, Ira J. (1969), “Congruence Relationship Between Self-Image and Product Brands,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 6 (February), 201-214.
Ekinci, Yuksel and Michael Riley (2003), “An Investigation of Self-Concept: Actual and Ideal Self-Congruence Compared in the Context of Service Evaluation,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 10, 201-214.
Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Funk, Jeanne, B. and Debra D. Buchman (1996),“Playing Violent Video and Computer Games and Adolescent Self-Concept,” Journal of Communication, Vol. 46 (Spring), 19-32.
Grubb, Edward L. and Harrison L. Grathwhohl (1967), “Consumer Self-Concept, Symbolism, and Market Behavior: A Theoretical Approach,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31 (October), 22-27.
Hoelter, Jon W. (1985), “The Structure of Self-Conception: Conceptualization and Measurement,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 49 (May), 1392-1407.
Johar, J.S. and M. Joseph Sirgy (1991), “Value-Expressive Versus Utilitarian Advertising Appeals: When and Why to Use Which Appeal,” Journal of Advertising, Vol. 20 (September), 23-33.
Kempf, DeAnna S. (1999), “Attitude Formation from Product Trial: Distinct Roles of Cognition and Affect for Hedonic and Functional Products,” Psychology & Marketing, Vol.16 (January), 35-50.
Kotler, Philip and Gary Armstrong (1933), Marketing: an introduction, 3rd, 5-6.
Landon, Jr., E. Laird (1974), “Self Concept, Ideal Self Concept, and Consumer Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.1 (September), 44-51.
Lavidge, Robert J. and Gary A. Steiner (1961), “A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 25 (October), 59-62.
Lee, C. and Robert T. Green (1991), “Cross-Culture Examination of the Fishbein Behavioral Intentions Model,” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 3 No. 1, 27-50.
Malhotra, Naresh K. (1981), “A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts, and Product Concepts,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 18, (November), 456-464.
O’Curry, Suzanne and Michal Strahilevitz (2001), “Probability and Mode of Acquisition Effects on Choices between Hedonic and Utilitarian Options,” Marketing Letters, Vol. 12 (February), 37-49.
Park, C. Whan, Bernard J. Jaworski and Deborah J. Maclnnis (1986), “Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 50 (October), 135-145.
Quester, Pascale G. and Amal Karunaratna, Li Kee Goh (2000), “Self-congruity and product evaluation: a cross-cultural study,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, 525-535.
Schiffman, Leon G. and Leslie L. Kanuk (2000), Consumer Behavior, 7th ed., Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Sirgy, M. Joseph (1982), “Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 9 (December), 287-300.
Sirgy, M. Joseph (1985), “Using Self-Congruity and Ideal Congruity to Predict Purchase Motivation,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 13 (June), 195-206.
Sirgy, M. Joseph, Dhruv Grewal, Tamara F. Manglegurg, Jae-ok Park, Kye-Sung Chon, C.B. Claiborne, J.S. Johar, and Harold Berkman (1997), “Assessing the Predictive Validity of Two Methods of Measuring Self-Image Congruence,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 25 (Summer), 229-241.
Tauber, Edward M.(1973), “Reduce New Product Failures: Measure Needs As Well As Purchase Interest,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 37 (July), 61-64.
Todd, Sarah (2001), “Self-Concept: A Tourism Application,” Journal of Consumer Behavior, Vol. 1,2, (November), 184-196.
Woods, A. Walter (1960), “Psychological Dimensions of Consumer Decision,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 24 (April), 15-19. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所
92355007
93 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923550071 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [企業管理學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
