Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34991
|
| Title: | 工作面談情境中應徵者防衛型印象管理策略應用之有效性研究
Exploring the Effects of Applicant Defensive Impression Management Tactics on Interviewer Evaluations in Job Interviews |
| Authors: | 羅逸琁 |
| Contributors: | 蔡維奇
羅逸琁 |
| Keywords: | 印象管理
道歉策略
合理化策略
開脫策略
工作面談 |
| Date: | 2006 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 13:30:30 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 防衛型印象管理策略( Defensive Impression Management )指的是個體在人際互動過程中，遇到負面事件而使得自我形象受到損害時，可以用來保護或修復形象的口語策略，主要可以區分為開脫、合理化及道歉三種策略。在過去探討工作面談中應徵者採用的印象管理策略的研究，多半著重在肯定型的策略，防衛型的策略則極少成為研究的關注焦點。本研究認為防衛型印象管理對面試官評價的提升具有影響，且在實際工作面談中亦有使用的可能性，因此本研究以防衛型印象管理的策略類型作為自變數，並以面試官質疑的負面事件類型（能力事件或道德事件）做為調節變數，探討工作面談中防衛型印象管理策略對面試官評價的影響。
本研究採二因子實驗設計方式，針對大台北地區20家企業組織中，196位具有面談經驗的主管，以隨機分派的方式觀看一組事先拍攝的面談錄影帶。研究結果發現，在受到面試官以負面事件質疑時，使用防衛型印象管理策略予以應對的應徵者，其面試官評價會高於未使用任何策略者；而在不同的事件類型下，應徵者採用策略之效果也有所不同：受到能力質疑時，採用道歉策略予以回應的應徵者其面試官評價最高；而道德受到質疑時，使用開脫策略予以辯解則是最有效的方式。
Defensive impression management (defensive IM) refers to a process by which individuals use verbal tactics after their image has been damaged either by one’s own behavior or by information that surfaces during the interaction in order to repair one’s image (Stevens & Kristof, 1995). The importance of defensive IM in job interviews has been overlooked in the past studies. Therefore, the intention of this research was to focus on the effect of defensive IM in job interviews, and to explore the interaction effect of defensive IM and different types of negative event on interviewer’s evaluation.
An experimental study was run to test the effects of interviewee’s defensive IM tactics on the interviewer’s evaluation following a negative event. The experimental was a 4*2 design. Defensive IM tactics (apologies, justifications, excuses, and no use of defensive IM) and types of negative events (ability-based and integrity based) were manipulated in the study. Subjects in present study are all managers who have at least one experience as interviewers in job interviews. Result has shown that: (1) Following a negative event, interviewees who perform defensive IM tactics will receive higher evaluation from interviewer than those who does not. (2) If the negative event is ability-based, interviewees who perform apologies tactics would receive higher evaluation from interviewer than those who use justifications tactic, and those who perform excuses would get lowest evaluation. (3) If the negative event is integrity-based, interviewees who perform excuses tactics would receive higher evaluation from interviewer than those who use justification tactic, and those who perform apologies would get lowest evaluation. |
| Reference: | 網頁部分
全球華文行銷知識庫（2004年2月16日）。行銷寫實--高科技及金融業新春徵才熱流延燒。2007年1月21日，取自全球華文行銷知識庫網站http://marketing.chinatimes.com/ItemDetailPage/ProfessionalColumnist/05ProfessionalColumnistContentByAuthor.asp?MMContentNoID=6224
中文部分
尤慧慧(2005)，應徵者外表吸引力與行為對甄選面談決策之影響：以職務性別取向符合程度、顧客接觸需求程度為干擾變項，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
楊庭懿(2002)，應徵者印象管理策略對甄選面談決策之影響：以面談訓練為干擾變數，國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
英文部分
Arvey, R.D., & Campion, J.e. (1982). The employment interview: A review and
summary of recent research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281-322.
Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers
University Press.
Butler, J. K., Jr., & Cantrell, R. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach
to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55, 19-28.
Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodal, W. G.. (1989). Noverbal communication.
New York: Harper & Row.
Cash, T. F., Gillen, B., & Burns, D. S. (1977). Sexism and “beautyism” in personnel consultant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 301-310.
DeGroot, T., & Motowidlo, S., J. (1999). Why visual and vocal interview cues can
affect interviewers’ judgments and predict job performance? Journal of
Applied Psychology, 84, 986-993.
Dipboye, R. L. (1992). Selection interviewing: Process perspectives. Cincinnati,
OH: Southwestern Management.
Ellis APJ, West BJ, Ryan AM, et al. (2002). The use of impression management
tactics in structured interviews: A function of question type? Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1200-1208.
Fincham, F. D., & Jaspars, J. M. (1980). The emergence and trans formation of
dispute: Naming, Blaming, claiming. Law & Society Review, 15, 631-654.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York : McGraw-Hill.
Gardner, W. L., & Martinko, M. J. (1988). The effects of applicant impression
management tactics on interviewer judgment. Journal of Management, 15,
557-564.
Gilmore, D. C., & Ferris, G. R. (1989). The effects of applicant impression
management tactics on interviewer judgments. Journal of Management, 15, 557-564.
Gundersen , D. E., Tinsley, D. B., & Terpstra, D. E., (1996). Empirical assessment of
impression management biases: The potential for performance appraisal error. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 57-76.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Higgins, R. L., Snydr, C. R., & Berglas, S. (1990). Self-handicapping: The paradox
that isn’t . New York: Plenum Press.
Kacmar, K. M., Delery, J. E., & Ferris, G. R. (1992). Differential effectiveness of
applicant management tactics on employment interview decision. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1250-1272.
Kahn, K. F. (1992). Does being male help? An investigation of the candidate gender
and campaign coverage on evaluations of U. S. Senate candidates. The Journal of Politics, 54, 497-517.
Kim, P. H., Dirks, K. T., Cooper, C. D., & Ferrin, D. L. (2006). When more blame
is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence-vs. integrity-based trust violation.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 99, 49-65.
Kim, P. H., Diekmann, K. A., & Tenbrunsel ,A. E. (2003). Flattery may get you
somewhere: The strategic implications of providing positive vs. negative
feedback about ability vs. ethicality in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 225-243.
Koch, J. W. (1999). Candidate gender and assessments of senate candidates. Social
Science Quarterly, 80, 84-96.
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Barrick, M. R., & Franke, M. (2002). Applicant impression management: Dispositional influences and consequences for recruiter perceptions of fit and similarity. Journal of Management, 28, 27-46.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). The effect of the
performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123-136.
Murphy, K. (2002). Using power analysis to evaluate and improve research. In S.
G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and
organizational psychology (pp. 119-137). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Nasby, W., Hayden, B., & Depaulo, B. M. (1980). Attributional bias among
aggressive boys to interpret unambiguous social stimuli as hostile displays. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 459-468.
Parsons, C. K., & Liden, R. C. (1984). Interviewer perceptions of applicant
qualifications: A multivariate field study of demographic characteristics and nonverbal cues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 557-568.
Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E., (2002). What women and men should be,
shouldn’t be are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269-281.
Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution
in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61-79.
Riggio, R. E., Widaman, K. F., Tucker, J. S., & Salinas, C. (1991). Beauty is more than skin deep: Components of attractiveness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 423-439.
Rowe, P. M. (1989). Unfavorable information and interview decisions. In R. W. Eder & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), The employment interview: Theory, research, and practice (pp.127-141). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a rish factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression managements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004-1010.
Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity,
and interpersonal relation. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Schlenker, B. R., & Weigold, M. F. (1992). International processes involving
impression regulation and management. Annual Review of Psychology, 43,
133-168.
Schmit, N. (1976). Social and situational determinants of interview decisions: Implications for the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 29, 79-102.
Schneider, D. J. (1981). Tactics self-presentation: Toward a broader conception. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.). Impression management theory and social psychological research, 23-40. New York: Academic Press.
Schonbach, P. (1990). Account episodes: The management or escalation of conflict.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Scott, M. R. ,& Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Reviews,
33, 46-62.
Shapiro, D. L. (1991) The effects of explanations on negative reactions to deceit.
Administrative Science Quarterly 36, 614-630.
Shaw, J. C., Wild, E. & Colquitt, J. A. (2003), To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic
review of the effects of explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 444-458.
Snyder, M., & Stukas, A. A., (1999) Interpersonal processes: The interplay of
cognitive, motivational , and behavioral activities in social interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 273-303.
Snyder, C. R., Higgins, R. L.,(1990). Reality negotiation and excuse-making. In
M.J. Cody & M. L. McLaughlin (Eds). The Psychology of Tactical Communication (pp.207-228). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Snyder, C. R., Higgins, R. L., & Stucky, R. J. (1983). Excuses: Masquerades in
search of grace. New York: Wiley.
Stevens, C. K. (1998). Antecedents of interview interactions, interviewers` ratings, and applicants` reactions. Personnel Psychology, 51, 55-85.
Stevens, C. K. & Kristof, A. L (1995). Making the right impression: a field study
of applicant impression during job interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology,
80, 587-606.
Tata, J. (2002). The influence of accounts on perceived social loafing in work
teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 292-319.
Tata, J. (2000). She said, he said. The influence of remedial accounts on
third-party judgments of coworker sexual harassment. Journal of
Management. 26,1133-1156.
Tedeshi, J. & Melburg, V. (1984). Impression management and influence in the
organization. In S. Bacharach & E.J. Lawler (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations,3, pp.31-58. Greenwich. CT: JAI Press.
Tedeshi, J. T., & Nowman, N. (1985). Social power, self-presentation, and the self.
In B. R. Schlenker(Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 293-322). New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Tetlock, P. E., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1985). Impression management versus
intrapsychic explanations in social psychology: A useful dichotomy?
Psychological Review, 92, 59-77.
Tomlinson, E. C., Dineen, B. R., & Lewicki, R. J.(2004). The road of reconciliation: antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of Management, 30(2), 165-187
Tsai, W. C., Chen, C. C., & Chiu, S. F. (2005). Exploring boundaries of the effects
of applicant impression management tactics in job interviews. Journal of
Management, 31, 108-125.
Wood B. E., & Mitchell T. R., (1981). Manager behavior in a social context: the
impact of impression management on attributions and disciplinary
actions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 28, 356-378. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所
93355035
95 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093355035 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [企業管理學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
