English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51826578      Online Users : 539
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/34965
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34965


    Title: 從價值鍊的破壞增生看行動通訊產業的企業創新式成長
    Authors: 秦素霞
    Chyn,Cynthia
    Contributors: 管康彥
    秦素霞
    Chyn,Cynthia
    Keywords: 價值鏈
    價值店
    價值網絡
    資源基礎觀點
    交易成本理論
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 13:26:45 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 任何新興科技的演進有其發展軌跡,從一個主導性技術的產生、設計配置、技術體制結構、到技術典範的形塑,當新技術和舊有的科技典範產生斷裂的現象,主導性技術的演化與移轉將對廠商既有資源基礎的價值產生侵蝕性的影響,而由於技術存在於互補性資產更為廣泛的系統之中,因而支援性或是互補性資產的價值,亦隨之產生變化,並對廠商交易統轄結構產生結構性的影響。
    本研究針試圖以行動通訊產業為樣本產業,透過不同價值組態的領導廠商個案研究,了解廠商在面對技術典範移轉的產業重大轉折時,如何立足於既有的資源基礎之上,選擇不同的交易統轄結構與機制,兼顧能耐維繫與降低交易成本,強化其競爭力、形塑新的產業形貌。易言之,本研究探索的主題有二:一是探討廠商資源基礎與交易特性對交易統轄機制選擇的影響;二是描繪廠商交易統轄機制選擇對產業價值鏈構形的影響。研究結果發現如下:
    垂直整合統轄結構有利技術典範移轉時技術與服務的創新,然而舊有的技術典範可能使得既有廠商產生組織或互補性資產的僵固性(stickiness),不利廠商轉型。價值網絡型態之技術前沿廠商廠商藉由領先技術的專利權維繫其資源獨特性與專屬性,採取準垂直整合交易統轄模式,因而得以具備垂直整合的效率,同時維持組織與互補性資產的彈性。
    價值鏈型態之技術前沿廠商採取雙邊支配模式,與上游關鍵性合作夥伴共同持續投入專質型資產,從價值創造、利潤最大化著眼,促成雙方穩定而長期的交易關係。而在既有的技術典範中,隨著技術成熟與產品介面標準化,環境不確定性降低,投資專屬資產營造保護的成本亦隨之下降,市場統轄模式通常較具有效率,並鼓勵外部廠商投資專質性資產與建立廠商間競爭機制,可有效降低廠商行為的不確定性所產生的交易成本。
    技術跟隨型價值鏈型態廠商所銷售的產品多為市場主流,難以差異化,競爭關鍵在於效率最大化,垂直整合並不一定可以創造競爭優勢,反之,隨著專業分工廠商競爭力的提升,垂直分工可有效降低交易成本。同時,技術跟隨型廠商資源外溢隔離機制的設計難度較高,因而採取核心價值活動內部化搭配市場支配並行之統轄機制。市場支配可降低標準產品的交易成本,以強化廠商的價格競爭力。
    價值店型態廠商,解決顧客問題為其主要價值。技術前沿的價值店型態廠商為了促成新的技術典範的形塑,除了提供新的技術和配套的技術解決方案之外,並且關照新興價值鏈環節的缺口,運用其資源基礎延伸價值活動,提供中介平台,以三邊支配的統轄模式,降低廠商特用性資產的投入與環境不確定性,加速產業創新。
    關鍵字:價值鏈、價值店、價值網絡、資源基礎觀點、交易成本理論
    Reference: 1. Barney, J.B., (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17, pp. 99-120.
    2. Campbell, A. and R. Park, (1995), “The Growth Gamble”
    3. Coase, R.H., (1937), “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, 4, pp. 386-405.
    4. Conner, K.R., and C.K. Prahalad, (1996), “A Resource-based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge versus Opportunism,” Organization Science, 7(5), pp. 477-501.
    5. Dietrich, M., (1994), “Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond: Towards a New Economics of the Firm”
    6. Dierickx, I., and K. Cool, (1989), “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage,” Management Science, 35, pp. 1504-1511.
    7. Foss, N.J., C. Knudsen, and C.A. Montgomery, (1995), “An Exploration of Common Ground: Integrating Evolutionary and Strategic Theories of the Firm”
    8. Foss, N.J. and B. Eriksen, (1995), “Competitive Advantage and Industry Capabilities”.
    9. Furubotn, E.G. and R. Richter, (2000), “Institution and Economic Theory”
    10. Hill, C.W.L., (1990), “Cooperation, Opportunism, and the Invisible Hand: Implications for Transaction Cost Theory,” Academy of Management Review, 15(3), pp. 500-13.
    11. Jacobides, M.G. and S.G. Winter, (2005), “The Co-evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production”, Strategic Management Journal
    12. Knudsen, C., (1995), “Theories of the Firm, Strategic Management, and Leadership”.
    13. Langlois, R.N., (1995), “Capabilities and Coherence in Firms and Markets”
    14. Langlois, R.N., and P.L. Robertson, (1995), Firms, Markets and Economic Change: A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions, New York: Routledge.
    15. Levinthal, D.A., (1995), “Strategic Management and the Exploration of Diversity”.
    16. Monteverde, K., and D. Teece, (1982), “Appropriable Rents and Quasi-Vertical Integration,” Journal of Law and Economics, 25, pp. 321-28.
    17. Normann, R., and R. Ramirez, (1993), “From Value Chain to Value Constellation: Designing Interactive Strategy”, pp. 65-77
    18. Penrose, E.T., (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, White Plains, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
    19. Peteraf, M.A., (1993), “The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View,” Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 179-91.
    20. Pfeffer J., (1982), “Organizations and Organization Theory,”.
    21. Pitelis N.C.and Pseiridis N.A., (1999), “Transaction costs versus resource value?, ” Journal of Economic Studies, 26(3), pp.221-240.
    22. Porter E.M., (1997), “Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, ”.
    23. Prahalad, C.K., and G. Hamel, (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation,” Harvard Business Review, pp. 79-91.
    24. Priem L. R and E.J. Butler, (2001), “Is the Resource-Based ’VIEW’ A Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research?, ” Academy of Management Review, 26(1), pp.22-40.
    25. Reed R. and J. R. DeFillippi, (1990), “Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage, ” Academy of Management Review, 15(1), pp.88-102.
    26. Rindfleisch, A., and J.B. Heide, (1997), “Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications,” Journal of Marketing, 61, pp. 30-54.
    27. Rumelt, R., (1984), “Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm,” in R.B. Lamb, (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management, pp. 566-70, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
    28. Schumpeter, J.A., (1912), “The Theory of Economic Development”
    29. Slater, G., & D.A. Spencer, (2000), “The Uncertain Foundations of Transaction Costs Economics,” Journal of Economic Issues, XXXIV, pp. 61-87.
    30. Stabell B.C. and Fjeldstad D., (1998), ”Configuring Value for Competitive Advantage: On Chains, Shops, and Networks, ” Strategic Management Journal, 19, pp.413-437.
    31. Stalk G., Evans P, and Shulman E.L., (1992), “Competing on Capabilities: The New Rules of Corporate Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, pp.57-69.
    32. Teece, D.J., (1986), “Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Liscencing, and Public Policy,” Research Policy, 15, pp. 285-305.
    33. Thompson, J.D., (1967), Organizations in Action, New York: McGraw Hill.
    34. Tsang, E.W.K., (1998), “Motives for Strategic Alliance: A Resource-Based Perspective,”. Journal of Management, 14(3), pp. 207-21.
    35. Tsang, E.W.K., (2000), “Transaction Cost and Resource-based Explanations of Joint Ventures: A Comparison and Synthesis,” Organization Studies, 21(1), pp. 215-42.
    36. Wernerfelt, B., (1984), “A Resource-based View of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 5, pp. 171-80.
    37. Wernerfelt, B., (1995), “Resource-Based Strategy in a Stochastic Model”
    38. Williamson, O.E., (1979), “Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations,” Journal of Law and Economics, 22, pp. 233-61.
    39. Williamson, O.E., (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: The Free Press.
    40. Williamson, O.E., (1988), “The Logic of Economic Organizations,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4, pp. 65-93.
    41. Williamson, O.E., (1989), “Transaction Cost Economics,” in R. Schmalensee, & R. Willig, (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 135-82.
    42. Williamson, O.E., (1991), “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, pp. 269-96.
    Williamson, O.E., (1993), “Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory,” Industrial and Cor
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    90932518
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090932518
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    93251801.pdf183KbAdobe PDF2699View/Open
    93251802.pdf194KbAdobe PDF2769View/Open
    93251803.pdf196KbAdobe PDF2877View/Open
    93251804.pdf268KbAdobe PDF2774View/Open
    93251805.pdf205KbAdobe PDF2953View/Open
    93251806.pdf240KbAdobe PDF22022View/Open
    93251807.pdf304KbAdobe PDF29808View/Open
    93251808.pdf268KbAdobe PDF23574View/Open
    93251809.pdf204KbAdobe PDF21091View/Open
    93251810.pdf189KbAdobe PDF2898View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback