Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34944
|
Title: | 以聯合分析法探討消費者對忠誠方案屬性之偏好 |
Authors: | 沈佳穎 |
Contributors: | 張愛華 沈佳穎 |
Keywords: | 忠誠方案 品牌忠誠 品牌信任 品牌承諾 |
Date: | 2003 |
Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 13:23:26 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 由於今日顧客的忠誠度極易發生動搖,加上失去顧客的代價遠大於獲得顧客的代價,因此,企業如何與顧客建立與維持良好的關係,獲得顧客的信任、承諾,最終獲得顧客的品牌忠誠,則成為企業刻不容緩的重要課題。本研究的重點將放在能夠獲得消費者「行為忠誠」的忠誠方案上,以行動電話系統商續約方案的型式呈現,透過聯合分析法來找出消費者在選擇忠誠方案時所考量因素的優先順序。本研究主要在探討不同的顧客特徵如關係導向、人口統計變數、使用頻率對忠誠方案的選擇如何造成影響。不同的顧客在選擇忠誠方案時,各要素的偏好順序有何差異,並進而影響到最終的方案選擇。本研究之忠誠方案乃根據O’Brien and Jones所提出的忠誠方案要素加以設計;除了現金價值(Cash value)、選擇的空間(Choice of redemption options)情感價值(Aspirational value)、相關性(Relevance)之外,本研究另外加入「會員資格」作為欲探討的要素之一。本研究所獲得的實證結果如下: 1. 顧客關係導向區隔之實證結果:交易型:金錢價值>年約>選擇空間>享樂價值>會員資格 B. 關係型:年約>金錢價值>會員資格>選擇空間>享樂價值 2.人口統計變數與使用頻率區隔之實證結果 A. 女性、30-40歲、從事商業/服務業、重度使用者、高收入的消費者均重視「年約」勝過於「金錢價值」。 B. 除了關係型以及從事商業/服務業的消費者以外,其他區隔方式中的消費者,都將「會員資格」視為最不重要的屬性。 3.以重視之屬性為區隔之實證結果 A. 學生、低收入、輕度使用以及交易導向的消費者重視「金錢價值」勝於「年約」,而非學生、高收入、重度使用以及關係導向則較重視「年約」。 B. 在「享樂價值」以及「選擇空間」兩群中,人口特徵相類似,只是在「享樂價值」群中的男性較多,而在「選擇空間」群中的多為女性。
關鍵字:忠誠方案、品牌忠誠、品牌信任、品牌承諾 The unsteadiness of customer loyalty and the huge expense of losing a existing customer have made it an important issue to build up and maintain the good relationship with customers, to earn the trust, commitment, and brand loyalty ultimately. Therefore, this research will focus on the loyalty program which can improve the customers’ “behavioral loyalty”. First, this research will use the extending program provided by mobile phone system company as the loyalty program. Second, use the conjoint analysis to figure out customers’ preference toward the factor of loyalty program. This research confer the effect of different customer trait (relationship oriented, demographic statistics, the frequency of using the mobile phone) makes toward the preference of loyalty program, since different customers will have different preference for factors while choosing the loyalty program. The loyalty programs in this research are designed according to the research of O’Brien and Jones. In addition to the four composing factors from O’Brien and Jones: cash value, choice of redemption options, aspirational value, relevance, this research will add the” membership” into the factors to design the loyalty program.
The practical results of this research are as following. 1. Relationship-oriented as the segmentation: A. Low relationship-oriented customers: cash value> relevance>choice of redemption options> aspirational value> membership B. High relationship-oriented customers: relevance> cash value> membership> choice of redemption options> aspiration value
2. Demographic statistics and frequency of using the mobile phone as the segmentation: A. Female, age30-40, working in business/ service industry, heavy user, high salary customers prefer relevance to cash value. B. Except for the customers who are high relationship-oriented and working in the business/ service industry, other segment of customers consider the membership as least important factors.
3. Preference for factors as the segmentation: A. Student, low salary, light user and low relationship-oriented customers prefer cash value to relevance. Non-student, high salary, heavy user and high relationship-oriented prefer relevance. B. In the segment of “aspirational value” and “choice of redemption options”, the customer traits are similar, the only difference is that there are more men in the “aspirational value” then in the other, and the majority is women in the segment of “choice of redemption options.”
Key word: loyalty program, brand loyalty, brand trust, brand commitment |
Reference: | 中文部分 1. 王又鵬、吳佳純(民90年),購物網站之隱私權政策、聲譽與信任對消費者購物意圖之研究,交大管理學報,p.169 2. 田芝穎(民87年),行動電話門號產品屬性最佳化設計--以聯合分析法為例,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 3. 吳兆益(民71年),聯合分析法在果汁消費者知覺與偏好上之應用研究,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 4. 邱瓊慧(民91年),顧客利益與顧客行為關聯性之研究—以航空業為例,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文 5. 徐士雯(民89年),關係行銷結合方式與顧客行為意向關聯性之研究—關係型與交易型傾向之分析,銘傳大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文 6. 黃俊英(民89年),多變量分析,第七版,台北:中國經濟企業研究所。 7. 鍾惠萍(民91年),品牌情感、品牌信任對品牌忠誠度影響之研究—以信用卡產業為例,實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 英文部分 1. Aaker, D. A. (1991), Managing brand equity, New York : The Free Press. 2. Anderson, James C. & James A. Narus (1991), “Partnering as A Focused Market Strategy,” California Management Review, 33 (Spring), 95-114. 3. Bennett, Rebekah & Rundle-Thiele , Sharyn(2002), “A comparison of attitudinal loyalty measurement approaches”, Brand Management,9 (3), 193-209. 4. Berry, L. L. (1995), “Relationship Marketing of Services- Growing Interest, 5. Bhote, Keki R. (1996), Beyond Customer Satisfaction to Customer Loyalty-The Key to Greater Profitibility. American Management Association(pp.31). New York 6. Cattin, Philippe, & Wittink , Dick R(1982), "Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey," Journal of Marketing, 46 (Summer) 7. Chaudhuri,Arjun & Holbrook , Morris B(2001),” The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty”, Journal of Marketing,v65 (2),81-93 8. Delgado-Ballester ,Elena & Munuera- Aleman, J. L., “Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty,” European journal of marketing, Vol. 35, 1238-1258. 9. Dick, Alan S & Basu, Kunal (1994),“Customer loyalty : Toward an integrated conceptual framework” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,v22(2), 99-113 10. Doney, Patricia M. & Cannon, Joseph P. (1997),“An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships,”Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35-51. 11. Dwyer, F. R., Schurr ,P. H. & Oh,S.(1987), “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27. 12. Garbarino, Ellen & Johnson,Mark S.(1999),“The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, And Commitment in Customer Relationships,” Journal of Marketing , 70-87. 13. Green, P.E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978),”Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook,” Journal of Consumer Research,5(2),103-123. 14. Green, Paul E. & Wind, Yoram (1973), Multiattribute decisions in marketing: a measurement approach, Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden Press. 15. Gronroos, Christian (1990),“Relationship Approach to Marketing in Service Contexts: The Marketing and Organizational Behavior Interface,” Journal of Business Research , 20 (Jan), 3-12. 16. Gronroos, Christian (1991), “The Marketing Strategy Continuum: Towards a Marketing Concept for the 1990s,” Management Decision, 29, 7-13. 17. Gronroos, Christian (1994), “From Marketing Mix to Relationship Marketing: Towards a Paradigm Shift in Marketing,” Management Decision, 32 (2), 4-20. 18. Hagerty, M.R.(1985), "Improving the Predictive Power of Conjoint Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis and Cluster Analysis," Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (May), 168-184. 19. Hair, Joseph F., Anderson, Rolph E., Tatham, Ronald L.& Black, William C., Multivariate data analysis, 5th Ed.Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, Inc. 20. Heskett, J. L., W. Earl Sasser, Jr., & C.W. Hart (1989), Service Breakthrough. New York: The Free Press. 21. Holbrook, M.B.(1981), "Integrating Compositional and Decompositional Analyses to Represent the Intervening Role of Perceptions in Evaluative Judgements," Journal of Marketing Research, 18,(February),13-28. 22. Jackson,Bund, Barbara (1985), Winning and Keeping Industrial Customers:The Dynamics of Customer Relationships. Lexington, MA:D.C. Heath and Company. 23. Jacoby, Jacob, R. W.Chestnut(1978), Brand loyalty : measurement and management, New York : John Wiley 24. James H McAlexander, John W Schouten, Harold F Koening, “Building brand community,” Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 38-54. 25. Kotler, P. (1992), Marketing’s New Paradigm : What’s really happening out there, (pp.51-52) ,Planning Review 26. .Kotler, P.(1997), Marketing Management: Analysis Planning Implementation and Control,9 th ed., Upper Saddle River, N. J: Prentice-Hall. 27. Malhotra, N. K. (1982),"Structural Reliability and Stability of Nonparametric Conjoint Analysis," Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (May), 199-207. 28. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. & Schoorman, F.D.(1995),"An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, "Academy of Mnangement Review, 20 (3) 29. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. & Schoorman, F.D.(1995), "An Integrative Mode of Organizational Trust." Academy of Mnangement Review, 20 (3) 30. Money, Arthur, David Tromp, & Trevor Wegner (1988), "The Quantification of Decision Support Benefits Within the Context of Value Analysis", MIS Quarterly, June 31. Montgomery, D. B. & Wittink, D. R. (1980),“The Predictive Validity of Conjoint Analysis for Alternative Aggregation Schemes,” Market Measurement and Analysis, pp.298-309. Cambridge. MA:Marketing Science Institute. 32. Moore, W.L. (1980), "Levels of aggregation in conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison," Journal of Marketing Research,177, 516-523. 33. Moorman, C., Deshpand ,R. & Zaltman, G.(1992),"Relationships Between Providers and Users of Marketing Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol 29, 314-329. 34. Nunally, J. C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, NY: McGraw-Hill. 35. O’Brien, Louise & Jones, Charles (1995),”Do rewards really create loyalty?” Harvard Business Review, 73(3),75-82 36. Oliver, Richard L (1997), Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. Boston: McGraw-Hill. 37. Pierre, Chandon, Brian, Wansin & Gilles, Laurent (1998),” Hedonic and Utilitarian Benefits of Sales Promotions,” Centre for Marketing Working Paper, 98-203 (December) 38. Raphel, Murray (1995),“The art of direct marketing: Upgrading prospects to advocates,” Direct Marketing, 58(2), 34-38. 39. Reichheld, F. F. & W. Earl Sasser, Jr. (1990), “Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services,” Harvard Business Review, 68 (5), 105-111. 40. Reinartz, Werner J& Kumar, V.(2000),”On the profitability of long-life customers in a noncontractual setting: An empirical investigation and implications for marketing,”Journal of Marketing,64 (4),17-35 41. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998),”Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust,” Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404. 42. Shoemaker, Stowe & Lewis Robert C.(1999),“Customer loyalty: the future of hospitality marketing.” International Journal of Hospital Management, 345-370. 43. Singh, Jagdip & Sirdeshmukh, Deepak(2000),”Agency and Trust Mechanisms in Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty Judgements,”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science ,150-167. 44. Sitkin, S. B. & Roth, N. L (1993),”Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic “Remedies” for Trust/Distrust,” Organizational Science, 4(3), 367-392. 45. Stum, David L & Alain Thiry (1991), “Building Customer Loyalty,” Training and Development Journal,Vol. 45, 34-36. 46. Zucker, L.G.(1986), "Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, " Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.8, 53-111. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 企業管理研究所 90355020 92 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090355020 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [企業管理學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|