English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51746848      Online Users : 634
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34648


    Title: 單一性別環境對國中女生數學成就的影響
    Effects of a Single-sex Curriculum on Girls` Achievements in Mathematics during Junior High School
    Authors: 林詩琪
    Lin,Shih-Chi
    Contributors: 關秉寅
    Kuan,Ping-Yin
    林詩琪
    Lin,Shih-Chi
    Keywords: 數學成就
    性別差異
    單一性別班級
    階層線性模式
    Math achievement
    gender differences
    single-sex class
    Hierarchical Linear Model
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 10:49:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文從教育社會學角度探討造成數學成就性別差異現象的成因,以班級的性別環境為研究脈絡,研究影響國中女生數學成就的可能原因。假設數學成就的性別差異是受到後天學習歷程影響,班級環境中隱含的性別刻板印象為其中一個重要社會文化影響因素。透過比較國一到國三階段女生班和一般男女合班女生數學成就的異同,嘗試找出造成數學成就性別差異現象的成因,是否與班級性別環境、師生的性別刻板印象等因素有關。利用階層線性模式(Hierarchical Linear Models,HLM)統計方法,分析資料取自由中央研究院、教育部和國科會共同規劃的全國性長期的調查計畫:「台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」(Taiwan Education Panel Survey,簡稱TEPS)。研究結果發現女生班、數學老師性別及班級學業氣氛等因素對於國中女生數學成就有顯著影響力,但進一步考慮學校公私別變項之後,女生班的影響力即消失。
    The main purpose of this study is to assess the magnitude of individual and contextual influences to explain gender differences in math achievements. Adopting the hierarchical linear model analysis to determine whether or not statistically significant differences between the mathematical achievements of 7th grade students who attend all-girls classes compared with those who attend coeducational classes at the same time, and their academic performance after two years. The result shows that there are three factors that have significant influences on girls’ math achievement in junior high schools, which are the single-sex classes, female math teachers and the academic climate of each class. However, if private schools are taken into consideration, the significant influence of the gender composition of classes will disappear.
    Reference: Connel, R.W.(2004),劉泗翰譯,《Gender性/別多元時代的性別角力》。台北:書林出版有限公司
    王木榮 (1999),〈影響山地學童學業成就因素之研究〉,《原住民教育研究》2:161-180
    巫有鎰(1999),〈影響國小學生學業成就的因果機制--以臺北市和臺東縣作比較〉,《教育研究集刊》43:213-242
    林奕宏 林世華 (2004),〈國小高年級數學科成就測驗中與性別有關的DIF 現象〉,《台東大學教育學報》15,1:67-96
    林俊瑩(2007),《檢視個人與家庭因素、學校因素對學生學業成就的影響:以SEM與HLM分析我國國中教育階段機會均等及相關問題》,國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文
    高新建(1997),〈階層線性模式在內屬結構教育資料上的應用:以數學學習機會為例〉,《行政院國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學》7(4):597-611
    徐新逸 黃麗鈴(1999),〈高中生學業成就自我效能與學業成就表現之探討:影響自我效能因素與成就表現相關研究〉,《教育與心理研究》22:267-294
    黃幸美(1994),〈女性教育與勞動參與的發展、現況與問題〉,《婦女與兩性學刊》5:133-163
    ---------(1995),〈數理與科學教育的性別差異之探討〉,《婦女與兩性學刊》6:95-135
    許崇憲 (2002),〈家庭背景因素與子女學業成就之關係--臺灣樣本的後設分析〉,《中正教育研究》,1(2),25-62。
    教育部(2004),《中華民國教育統計》。台北:教育部。
    張苙雲(2005)台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫:第二波資料使用手冊2005.02.01版,台北:中央研究院
    國立師範大學科學教育中心(1992),《八十學年度高級中學科學資優學生追蹤調查研究報告》,台北
    曾心怡(1999),《性別,班級組成型式,師生互動與學習動機 以高三自然組物理科為例》,國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所未出版碩士論文
    楊龍立(1991),《中小學生在科學成就及對科學態度中性別差異的探討》,國立師範大學教育研究所博士論文
    陳皎眉 孫旻暐(2006),〈從性別刻板印象威脅談學業表現上的性別差異〉,《教育研究月刊》,147:19-30
    陳婉琪(2005),〈族群、性別與階級:再探教育成就的省籍差異〉,《台灣社會學》10:1-39
    陳怡靖(2004),《台灣地區高中多元入學與教育階層化關連性之硏究》,國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文
    陳建志(2002),〈人力資本差異或性別歧視?就業市場性別階層化之探討〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》14, 3:363-407
    謝小芩(1996),〈教育:從父權的複製到女性的解放〉,選自劉毓秀編,《台灣婦女處境白皮書》。台北:時報,頁181-218
    ---------(1998),〈性別與教育期望〉,《婦女與兩性學刊》9:205-231
    謝雨生、吳齊殷、李文傑(2006),〈青少年的友朋相似性與友誼變遷〉,《台灣社會學》11: 175-234
    謝臥龍、駱文慧、莊勝發(1995),《從課堂師生互動關係分析學前兒童性別角色發展之研究》,行政院國科會專題研究報告
    簡茂發(1985),《臺北市高中學生家庭社經背景教師期望與學業成就的關係》,台北市:研考會
    鄭建良 2002,〈國民小學六年級學童數學科教師期望、成就動機、學業成就與成敗歸因關係之研究〉,《國民教育研究學報》9:47-77
    蕭昭君,2003,〈國小師資培育教導的是誰的知識?_語文教育入門教科書性別內容的初步檢視〉,《女學學誌:婦女與性別研究》16:1-3
    蘇芊玲(2002),《兩性平等教育的本土發展與實踐》,臺北市:女書文化
    莊明貞(1998),〈教育與性別〉。收錄於陳奎熹主編《現代教育社會學》。台北:師大書苑,頁380-407。
    黃口麗莉(2003),〈游移於生物決定論與社會建構論之間:心理學中的性別意識〉,《女學學誌:婦女與性別研究》:85-120
    蔡淑鈴(1987),〈職業隔離與教育成就差異:性別之比較分析〉,《中國社會學刊》11:61-91
    Alexander, K. L. & Eckland, B. K. (1974). “Sex Differences in The Educational Attainment Process” American Sociological Review 39, 5: 668-682.
    Auster, C.J. & Auster, D.S. (1981). “Factors influencing women’s choice of nontraditional careers: the role of family, peers, and counselors.” Vocational Guidance Quarterly 29, 253-263.
    Benbow, C.P. & Stanly, J.C. (1980). “Sex Differences in Mathematics Ability: Fact or Artifact?” Science, 210: 1262-1264
    Bielby, D.D.V. (1978). “Career Sex-Atypicality and Career Involvement of College Educated Woman: Baseline Evidence From the 1960s.” Sociology of Education 51(1) : 7-28.
    Bressler, M. and Wendell, P. (1980). “The Sex Composition of Selective Colleges and Gender Differences in Career Aspirations” The Journal of Higher Education 51, 6: 650-663
    Brutsaert, H. (1999). “Coeducation and Gender Identity Formation: a Comparative Analysis of Secondary Schools in Belgium.” British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20,3:343-353
    Brutsaert, H. & Van Houtte, M. (2002). “Girls’ and Boys’ Sense of Belonging in Single-Sex Versus Co-educational Schools.” Research in Education, 68:48-56
    Campbell, K. T. & Evans, C. (1997). “Gender Issues in the Classroom: A Comparison of Mathematics Anxiety.” Education, 117,3: 332-338
    Canada, K. & Pringle, R. (1995). “ The Role of Gender in College Classroom Interactions: A Social Context Approach.” Sociology of Education, 68, 3:161-186
    Canter, R.J.(1979). “Achievement-related expectations and aspirations in college women.” Sex Roles 5(4), 453-470
    Caplan, P., Crawford, M., Hyde, J. S. and Richardson, J. T. (1997). Gender Differences in Human Cognition. U.K.: Oxford University Press
    Carpenter, P. and Hayden, M. (1987) “Girls’ Academic Achievements: Single-Sex Versus Coeducational Schools in Australia.” Sociology of Education, 60,3: 156-167.
    Carter, R. S. and Wojtkiewicz, R.A. (2000) “Parental Involvement with adolescents’ education: do daughters or sons get more help?” Adolescence: 35,137: p.29-44
    Catsambis, S. (1994) “The Path to Math: Gender and Racial-Ethnic Differences in Mathematics Participation from Middle school to High School” Sociology of Education, 67,3: 199-215
    Chaplain, R. P. (2000). “Beyond Exam Results? Differences in the Social and Psychological Perceptions of Young Males and Females at School.” Educational Studies, 26, 2: 177-190
    Charles, M and Bradley, K. (2002). “Equal but Separate? A Cross-National Study of Sex Segregation in Higher Education” American Sociological Review 67, 4: 573-599
    Coleman, J. S. (1961) The Adolescent Society. New York. Free Press.
    Correl, S. J. (2001) “Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments.” The American Journal of Sociology: 106: 1691-1730.
    David, M. E., Ball, S. J., Davies, J. and Reay, D. (2003). “Gender Issues in Parental Involvement in Student Choices of Higher Education” Gender and Education 15, 1:21-37
    Duncan, L. E. Wentworth, P. A. Owen-Smith, A. and LaFavor, T. (2002). “Midlife Educational, Career and Family Outcomes of Women Educated at Two Single-Sex Colleges” Sex Roles 47, 5/6:237-247
    Ercikan, K., McCreith, T. and Lapointe, V. (2005). “Factors Associated with Mathematics Achievement and Participation in Advanced Mathematics Courses: An Examination of Gender Differences from an International Perspective” School Science and Mathematics 105, 1: 5-10
    Entwistle D. R., Alexander, K. L. and Olson, L. S. (1994) “The Gender Gap in Math: Its Possible Origins in Neighborhood Effects” American Sociological Review 59, 6: 822-838
    Evans, E. M., Schweingruber, H. and Stevenson, H. W. (2002). “Gender Differences in Interest and Knowledge Acquisition: The United States, Taiwan, and Japan” Sex Roles 47, 3/4:153-166
    Fan, X., Chen, M., and Matsumoto, A. R. (1997). “Gender Differences in Mathematics Achievement: Findings From the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988”. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 3: 229-242
    Galejs, I. & Albert, G. (1983). “Sex-Role Perceptions of Traditional and Nontraditional College Women.” Journal of Psychology, 113, 2: 257-263
    Harker, R. (2000). “Achievement, Gender and the Single-Sex/ Coed Debate” British Journal of Sociology of Education 21, 2: 203-218
    Hearn, J. C. and Olzak, S. (1981). “The Role of College Major Departments in The Reproduction of Sexual Inequality.” Sociology of Education 54: 195-205
    Herr, K. and Arms, E. (2004). “Accountability and Single-Sex Schooling: A Collision of Reform Agendas” American Educational Research Journal 41, 3:527-555
    Holland, D. C. and Eisenhart, M. A. (1990) Educated in Romance: Women, Achievement, and College Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
    Hubbard, L. and Datnow, A. (2005). “Do Single-Sex Schools Improve the Education of Low-Income and Minority Students? An Investigation of California’s Public Single-Gender Academies ” Anthropology and Education Quarterly 36, 2: 115-131
    Jackson, C. and Smith, I. D. (2000). “Poles Apart? An Exploration of Single-Sex and Mixed-Sex Educational Environments in Australia and England” Educational Studies 26, 4: 409-422
    Jacobs, J.A. (1996). “Gender Inequality and Higher Education.” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 153-186
    ---------------(1999). “Gender and the Stratification of Colleges.” The Journal of Higher Education 70 (2): 161-185
    Jones, J. C. and Shallcrass, J. (1972). “Coeducation and Adolescent Values” Journal of Educational Psychology 63. 4: 334-341
    Keller, A. (2001). “Effect of Teachers’ Stereotyping on Students’ Stereotyping of Mathematics as a Male Domain” The Journal of Social Psychology 141, 2: 165-173
    Kelly, A. (1988). “Gender Differences in Teacher-Pupil Interaction: A Meta-Analytical Review. ” Research in Education, 39: 1-23
    Kianian, A. M. (1996). “Gender and Mathematics Achievement Parity: Evidence from Post-Secondary Education” Education, 116, 4: 586-592
    Kim, M. & Alvarez, R. (1995). “Women-Only Colleges: Some Unanticipated Consequences.” The Journal of Higher Education, 66, 6: 641-668
    Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and Cognition. MA: MIT Press
    Kohlberg, L. A. (1966). “Cognitive-Development Analysis of Children’s Sex-Role Concepts and Attitudes” In “The Development of Sex Differences” Pp.82-173, edited by E. E. Maccoby. Stanford University Press.
    Lareau, A. (1995) “Gender Differences in Parental Involvement in Schooling.” in “Education and Gender Equality” Pp. 207-224, edited by Julia Wrigley, Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press
    Leder, G. C. (1986). “Mathematics: Stereotyped as a Male Domain?” Psychological Reports, 59:955-958
    Lee, J. D. (1998) “Which Kids Can “Become” Scientists? Effects of Gender, Self-Concepts, and Perceptions of Scientists” Social Psychology Quarterly 61,3:199-219
    Lee, V. E. & Bryk, A. S. (1986). “Effects of Single-Sex Secondary Schools on Student Achievement and Attitudes” Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 5: 381-395
    ----------------------------- (1988) . “Curriculum Tracking as Mediating the Social Distribution of High School Achievement” Sociology of Education, 61: 78-84.
    ----------------------------- (1989). “A Multilevel Model of the Social Distribution of High School Achievement” Sociology of Education, 62: 172-192.
    ----------------------------- (1989). “Effects of Single-Sex Schools: Response to Marsh” Journal of Educational Psychology, 81: 647-650.
    Lee, V. E. & Marks, H. M. (1990). “Sustained Effects of the Single-Sex Secondary School Experience on Attitudes, Behaviors, and Values in College.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 3: 578-592
    Lee, V. E. & Marks, H. M. (1992). “Who Goes Where? Choice of Single-Sex and Coeducational Independent Secondary Schools.” Sociology of Education, 65, 3: 226-253.
    Lee, V. E.& Marks, H. M.& Bryd, T. (1994) “Sexism in Single-Sex and Coeducational Independent Secondary School Classrooms.” Sociology of Education 67, 2: 92-120.
    Long, (1990). ”The Origin of Sex Differences in Science.” Social Forces 68,4:1297-1316.
    Ma, X. (2003) “Effects of Early Acceleration of Students in Mathematics on Attitudes Toward Mathematics and Mathematics Anxiety” Teachers College Record 105,3:438-464
    Ma, X. & Xu, J. (2004) “The Causal Ordering Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematics Achievement: A Longitudinal Panel Analysis.” Journal of Adolescence 27: 165-179
    Maccoby, E.E. and Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The Psychology of Sex Difference. CA.: Stanford University Press.
    Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). “Attitude toward Self, Social Factors and Achievement in Mathematics: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Educational Psychology Review, 9 ,2 : 89-120
    McEwen, A., Knipe, D. and Gallagher, T. (1997). “The Impact of Single-Sex and Coeducational Schooling on Participation and Achievement in Science: a 10-year perspective” Research in Science & Technological Education 15, 2: 223-233
    Mael, F. A. (1998). “Single-Sex and Coeducational Schooling: Relationships tp Socioemotional and Academic Development” Review of Educational Research 68,2: 101-129
    Manning, M.L. (1998). “Gender Differences in Young Adolescents’ Mathematics and Science Achievement” Childhood Education 74, 3: 168-171
    Marsh, H. W. (1989). “Effects of Attending Single-Sex and Coeducational High Schools on Achievement, Attitudes, Behaviors, and Sex Differences.” Journal of Educational Psychology 81, 1: 70-85
    Mason, C. L. and Kahle, J. B. (1989). “Student Attitudes toward Science and Science-Related Careers: A Program Designed to Promote a Stimulating Gender-Free Learning Environment” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 26:25-39
    Meece, J. L., Parsons, J. E., Kaczala, M., Goff, S. B. & Futterman, R. (1982). “Sex Differences in Math Achievement: Toward a Model of Academic Choice.” Psychological Bulletin, 91: 324-348
    Monaco, N. M. and Gaier, E. L. (1992). “Single-Sex versus Coeducational Environment and Achievement in Adolescent Females” Adolescence 27, 107: 579-594
    Morgan, Stephan L. (2001). “Counterfactuals, Causal Effect Heterogeneity, and the
    Catholic School Effect on Learning.” Sociology of Education 74: 341-374.
    Mickelson, R. A. (1992). “Why Does Jane Read and Write so Well? The Anomaly of Women’s Achievement.” in “Education and Gender Equality” Pp. 207-224, edited by Julia Wrigley, Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press
    Pallas, A. M., Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L. and Stluka, M. F. (1983). “Ability-Group Effects: Insructional, Social, or Institutional?” Sociology of Education 67:26-47
    Pallas, A. M. & Alexander, K. L. (1983). “Sex Differences in Quantitative SAT Performance: New Evidence on the Differential Coursework Hypothesis.” American Educational Review Journal, 20: 165-182
    Petersen, T. and Morgan, L.A. (1995). “Separate and Unequal: Occupation-Establishment Sex Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap.” The American Journal of Sociology 101(2): 329-365
    Polachek, S. (1978). “Sex Differences in College Major.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 31: 498-508
    Raudenbush & Bryk, (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage Publications
    Riordon, C. (1994). “The Value of Attending a Women`s College: Education, Occupation, and Income Benefits.” The Journal of Higher Education 65 (4): 486-510
    Sadker, M. and Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at Fairness: How Our Schools Cheat Girls. New York: Touchstone
    Schmader, T., Johns, M. and Barquissau, M. (2004). “The Costs of Accepting Gender Differences: The Role of Stereotype Endorsement in Women’s Experience in the Math Domain” Sex Roles 50, 11/12: 835-850
    Shapka, J. D.and Keating, D. P. (2003) “Effects of a Girls-Only Curriculum During Adolescence: Performance, Persistence, and Engagement in Mathematics and Science.” American Educational Research Journal 40, 4: 929-960
    Singh, K., Vaught, C. and Mitchell, E. M. (1998). “Singe-Sex Classes and Academic Achievement in Two Inner-City Schools” The Journal of Negro Education 67, 2: 157-167
    Simpson, J. C. (2001). “Segregated by Subject: Racial Differences in the Factors Influencing Academic Major Between European Americans, Asian Americans, and African, Hispanic, and Naïve Americans” The Journal of Higher Education 72, 1: 63-99
    Smith, T. E. (1992). “Gender Differences in the Scientific Achievement of Adolescents: Effects of Age and Parental Seperation” Social Forces 71, 2:469-484
    Solnick, S. J. (1995). “Changes in Women’s Majors from Entrance to Graduation at Women’s and Coeducational Colleges” Industrial & Labor Relations Review 48, 3: 505-514
    Stoecker, J. L. and Pascaraella, E. (1991). “Women’s Colleges and Women’s Career Attainments Revisited” The Journal of Higher Education 62, 4: 394-406
    Streitmatter, J. (1998). “Single-Sex Classes: Female Physics Students State Their Case” School Science and Mathematics 98, 7:369-375
    Thompson, J. S. (2003). “The Effect of Single-Sex Secondary Schooling on Women’s Choice of College Major” Sociological Perspectives 46, 2: 257-278
    Van de gaer, E., Pustjens, H., Damme, J. V. and De Munter, A. (2004). “Effects of Single-Sex versus Co-Educational Classes and Schools on Gender Differences in Progress in Language and Mathematics Achievement” British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 3: 307-322
    VanLeuvan, P. (2004). “Young Women’s Science/Mathematics Career Goals from Seventh Grade to High School Graduation.” The Journal of Educational Research 97, 5: 248-267
    Wang, J. and Goldschmidt, P. (2003). “Importance of Middle School Mathematics on High School students’ Mathematics Achievement.” The Journal of Educational Research 97,1:3-19
    Watson, C. M., Quatman, T. & Edler, E. (2002). “Career Aspirations of Adolescent Girls: Effects of Achievement Level, Grade, and Single-Sex School Environment.” Sex Roles, 46, 9/10: 323-335
    Wilkins J. L. M. (2004). “Mathematics and Science Self-Concept: An International Investigation” The Journal of Experimental Education 72, 4: 331-346
    Wilson, K. L. and Boldizer, J. P. (1990). “Gender Segregation in Higher Education: Effects of Aspirations, Mathematics Achievement, and Income.” Sociology of Education 63, 1: 62-74
    Xie, Y and Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. MA: Harvard University Press.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    社會學研究所
    90254009
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0902540091
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Sociology] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    54009101.pdf47KbAdobe PDF21026View/Open
    54009102.pdf48KbAdobe PDF2165340View/Open
    54009103.pdf66KbAdobe PDF21147View/Open
    54009104.pdf89KbAdobe PDF21434View/Open
    54009105.pdf138KbAdobe PDF22493View/Open
    54009106.pdf190KbAdobe PDF26204View/Open
    54009107.pdf205KbAdobe PDF22382View/Open
    54009108.pdf278KbAdobe PDF21601View/Open
    54009109.pdf140KbAdobe PDF21509View/Open
    54009110.pdf149KbAdobe PDF21722View/Open
    54009111.pdf206KbAdobe PDF21848View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback