政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/34363
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51621191      在线人数 : 464
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34363


    题名: 智慧資本與動態能耐對研發團隊創新績效的影響
    The Impact of Intellectual Capital and Dynamic Capabilities on R&D Teams’ Innovative Performance
    作者: 林良陽
    Lin,Liang-Yang
    贡献者: 吳思華
    Wu,Se-Hwa
    林良陽
    Lin,Liang-Yang
    关键词: 動態能耐
    智慧資本
    創新績效
    團隊
    結合能耐
    吸收能耐
    彈性
    Dynamic Capabilities
    Intellectual Capital
    Innovative Performance
    Team
    Combinative Capabilities
    Absorptive Capacity
    Flexibility
    日期: 2006
    上传时间: 2009-09-18 09:35:39 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 研究智慧資本領域的學者認為，智慧資本是組織競爭優勢的主要來源，而且也會影響組織績效（智慧資本愈高，其組織績效愈好）。但是，智慧資本與創新績效之間是否存在有正向關係，卻值得進一步探討。本研究認為，在動態環境下，智慧資本觀點並無法適當地解釋，為何組織有能力回應快速變動的外在環境，以產生較好的創新績效。智慧資本領域的學者與專家鮮少對「『靜態的』智慧資本」與「『動態的』運用智慧資本能力」進行區辨；而本研究認為這是兩種不相同的概念。本研究目的即希望瞭解研發團隊「運用」智慧資本對其創新績效的影響。

    另一方面，為了解釋為何某些企業在快速變動與無法預期的市場中依然可以保有其競爭優勢，某些學者擴張資源基礎觀點到動態市場中，並提出「動態能耐」觀點（Teece, Pisano, and Shuen, 1997）。本研究主張，研發團隊的動態能耐除了直接影響創新績效之外，也是其「運用」智慧資本的關鍵因素。動態能耐對組織績效與創新績效的關連，雖有學者著墨；但，其實證研究並不多見，有待相關學者提出更多的貢獻。再則，動態能耐是一複雜的概念，若要對其進行衡量，應該要進一步釐清該構念，甚至建構適合的衡量指標，提出較為完整的、且符合信度與效度的衡量量表，方能正確地衡量動態能耐。

    本研究同時採用質化與量化的研究方法。質性研究是從動態能耐相關文獻出發，在釐清各個學者對動態能耐的定義後，萃取出動態能耐之不同構面與架構，再經由各項假說之推演，提出本論文之初步研究架構。之後，選取N大學無線奈米生醫研究團隊為個案，深入瞭解該團隊兩項突破式創新計畫，分別是「抗SARS一號」與「無線奈米生醫感測晶片」研發計畫，用以觀察該團隊如何回應變動的外在環境，來說明智慧資本與研發團隊的動態能耐對其創新績效的影響。透過不同階段的觀察，進行分析與歸納，並找出其共同的特性，以瞭解本研究架構的初步解釋力，並進一步依個案研究的新發現修正各項假說，最後提出本研究之實證研究架構。

    在量化研究方面，首先，為了能精確地衡量動態能耐概念，本研究依照Hinkin（1998）量表發展步驟，以五階段三個樣本群來發展動態能耐的衡量量表。其次，在發展出符合信度、內容效度、模型適配度、收斂效度、鑑別效度的動態能耐衡量量表後，以第三群樣本進行本研究之假說檢定，以確認智慧資本與研發團隊的動態能耐對其創新績效的影響關係。

    研究發現，動態能耐是一個多面向多層次構念，可以以三構面八因子共19題項的問卷來衡量，三構面是指結合能耐、吸收能耐與彈性。在假說檢定部分，本研究共提出9項假說，結果有7項假說受到支持，另有2項假說未獲得支持。結果驗證本研究的主要論點，亦即智慧資本對研發團隊創新績效的影響並不顯著；而研發團隊如何運用智慧資本的能耐（亦即動態能耐），顯著地影響其創新績效。此外本研究發現，結合能耐是中介變項，它完全中介了吸收能耐對創新績效的影響；吸收能耐也是中介變項，它完全中介了人力資本以及關係資本對結合能耐的影響；而彈性則是交互變項，它會正向地強化各項智慧資本對吸收能耐的影響。最後，本研究也得到兩項特別的觀察，一是，具有動態能耐的研發團隊在研發能量提升上的兩種向度，二是，它是一種「彈性球體」的組織型態，方得以快速地回應外在環境的改變。
    The scholars who studied the field of intellectual capital (IC) argued that IC was the main source of organizational competitive advantages. Besides, they thought that the better the IC a company has, the better the business can have the ability to generate innovative performance. However, the relationship between IC and innovative performance needs to be explored further, because of being inconsistent with some practical cases. This research proposed that the view of IC could not explain appropriately why organizations could generate better innovative performance in the dynamic environment. Besides, the scholars who studied IC seldom distinguished “static IC” from “dynamic ability for utilizing IC”. Whereas, this research proposed that these two constructs were different concepts, and would like to explore the impact of utilizing IC on innovative performance.

    On the other hand, in order to explain why some enterprises could keep their competitive advantages in the rapidly changing environment, some scholars proposed the viewpoints of dynamic capabilities (DCs). This research argues that it has a directly significant effect of DCs on innovative performance, and DCs are the critical factors for utilizing IC. This research proposes that DCs are complex constructs. Therefore, we should clarify these constructs and provide an appropriate measurement tool with reliability and validity, if we would like to measure them.

    This research adopted qualitative and quantitative researches simultaneously to demonstrate these arguments. After clarifying the definition of DCs and extracting the components of DCs from the literature review, this research deduced several hypotheses and formed the research framework. This research selected the research team of N University for developing wireless nano-bio systems as a case, and thoroughly explored two of its radically innovative projects, including Anti-SARS R&D project and sensor chip for wireless nano-biotach R&D project. Through observing their response to the rapidly changing external environment, this research illustrated the impact of IC and DCs of R&D team on its innovative performance. By the two-stage observation, analysis and induction of this case, we could understand the preliminary power in explaining this research model, and amend the hypotheses.

    As for quantitative research, first, according to the scale developing steps, suggested by Hinkin (1998), this research developed the measurement tool of DCs with five stages and three samples to measure the concept of DCs precisely. Secondly, after developing the measurement scale of DCs, which surpassed the acceptable level for reliability, content validity, goodness of fit, convergent validity and discriminate validity, this research utilized the third sample testing the hypotheses to confirm the relationships among IC, DCs, and innovative performance of the R&D teams.

    The results showed that the concept of DCs is a multi-level and multi-dimension construct, which is composed of combinative capabilities, absorptive capacity and flexibility. In addition, it can be measured by three-dimension and eight-factor scale with nineteen items. As for the hypothesis testing, there were nine hypotheses in this research. Seven of them were supported, however, two of them were not supported. The results confirmed the main arguments of this research. That is, it doesn’t have a significant effect of IC on R&D team’s innovative performance. However, it does have a significant effect of DCs on R&D team’s innovative performance. In addition, the results showed that combinative capabilities and absorptive capacity are mediators. The combinative capabilities fully mediated the effect of absorptive capacity on innovative performance. The absorptive capacity also fully mediated the effects of human capital and relationship capital on the combinative capabilities. Meanwhile, the results showed that flexibility is a moderator, which enhanced the effects of different ICs on absorptive capacity. Finally, this research got two special observations. First, there are two dimensions of R&D energy promotion for R&D teams with DCs. Secondly, it is a type of “flexible sphere organization” for the R&D teams with DCs, so that they can respond to the rapidly changing external environment.
    參考文獻: 一、中文部分
    吳思華、黃宛華、賴鈺晶(1999), “智慧資本衡量因素之研究-以我國軟體業為例”，1999年科技管理年會暨科技管理論文研討會
    吳思華、賴鈺晶(2000), “我國網際網路智慧資本衡量及發展措施研究”, 經濟部工業局軟體五年計畫工作室委託計畫
    吳思華(2000), “策略九說：第六～七章”, 臉譜出版，城邦文化發行, pp.207-250
    吳思華(2005), “什麼是流程資本？”, 知識管理團隊討論會議紀錄
    林良陽(2001), “衡量研發機構智慧資本之研究—以工研院光電所為例”, 國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
    尚孝純(2006), “Chapter 9 流程資本的衡量與管理”, “智慧資本管理”一書, 國立政治大學商學院台灣智慧資本研究中心主編, 華泰文化出版, pp.221-248.
    Csiksentmihalyi (1999), “創造力：第一章”, 杜明城譯, 時報出版社, pp.10-32.
    Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1996), “平衡計分卡(The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action)”, 臉譜出版

    二、英文部分
    Abels, E. (2002), “Environmental scanning,” Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 28(3), pp.16-18.
    Adner, R. & C. E. Helfat (2003), “Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities,” Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), pp.1011-1025.
    Aiken, L. S. & S. G. West (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, London: SAGE Publications, Inc..
    Albright, K. S. (2004), “Environmental scanning: Radar for success,” Information Management Journal, 38(3), pp.38-45.
    Amabile, T. M. (1993), “Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace,” Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), pp.185-201.
    Anderson, J. C. & D. W. Gerbing (1991), “Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validates,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), pp.732-740.
    Aranda, D. A. & L. M. Molina-Fernandez (2002), “Determinants of innovation through a knowledge-based theory lens,” Industrial Management + Data Systems, 102(5/6), pp.289-296.
    Argote, L. (1999), Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
    Arora, A., A. Fosfuri, & A. Gambardella (2001), Markets for Technology—The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy, The MIT Press.
    Banker, R. (2003), “Returns on investment in information technology,” The International Intellectual Capital Conference 2003, National Chengchi University, Taipei, pp.1-27.
    Barney, J. B. (1986), “Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy,” Management Science, 42(10), pp.1231-1241.
    Barney, J. B. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
    Baron, R. M. & D. A. Kenny (1986), “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp.1173-1182.
    Beach, R., A. P. Muhlemann, D. H. R. Price, A. Paterson, & J. A. Sharp (2000), “Theory and methodology: A review of manufacturing flexibility,” European Journal of Operational Research, 122(1), pp.41-57.
    Bhandar, M., S. L. Pan, and C. Y. Tan (2007), “Towards understanding the roles of social capital in knowledge integration: A case study of a collaborative information systems project,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), pp.263-274.
    Blyer, M. & R. W. Coff (2003), “Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies,” Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), pp.677-686.
    Bontis, N. (2001), “Assessing knowledge assets: A review of the models used to measure intellectual capital,” International Journal of Management Review, 3(1), pp.41-60.
    Bontis, N., W. C. Keow, & S. Richardson (2000), “Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), pp.85-100.
    Bontis, N. (1998), “Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models,” Management Decision, 36(2), pp.63-76.
    Brooking, A. (1996), Intellectual Capital, London: International Thomson Business Press.
    Brown, S. L. & K. M. Eisenhardt (1995), “Product development: Past research, present findings, and future direction,” Academy of Management Review, 20(2), pp.343-378.
    Caddy, I. (2002), “Issues concerning intellectual capital metrics and measurement of intellectual capital,” Singapore Management Review, 24(3), pp.77-89.
    Caloghirou, Y., I. Kastelli, & A. Tsakanikas (2004), “Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance?” Technovation, 24(1), pp.29-39.
    Chen, M. C., S. J. Cheng, & Y. C. Hwang (2005), “An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firm’ market value and financial performance,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2), pp.159-176.
    Chen, S. & C. J. Choi (2004), “Creating a knowledge-based city: The example of Hsinchu Science Park,” Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(5), pp.73-82.
    Choo, C. W. & N. Bontis (2002), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, New York, NY: Oxfrod University Press.
    Coff, R. (1997), “Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory,” Academy of Management Review, 22(2), pp.374-402.
    Cohen, J. & P. Cohen (1983), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Science (2nd ed.), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Cohen, W. M. & D. A. Levinthal (1990), “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp.128-152.
    Collis, D. J. (1994), “How valuable are organizational capabilities?” Strategic Management Journal, 15, special issue, pp.143-152.
    Coombs, R. (1996), ”Core competencies and the strategic management of R&D,” R&D Management, 26(4), pp.345-355.
    Dewaele, J. M. (2005), “Investigating the psychological and emotional dimensions in instructed language learning: Obstacles and possibilities,” The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), pp.367-392.
    Dougherty, D. & C. H. Takacs (2004), “Team play: Heedful interrelating as the boundary for innovation,” Long Range Planning, 37(6), pp.569-590.
    Dyer, H. J. (1996), “Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry,” Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), pp.271-291.
    Edmondson, A. C., R. M. Bohmer, & G. P. Pisano (2001), “Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), pp.685-718.
    Edvinsson, L. & M. S. Malone (1997), Intellectual Capital, New York: Harper Collins Publishers Inc.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), “Building theory from case study research,” Academy of Management Review, 14(4), pp.532-550.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. & J. A. Martin (2000), “Dynamic capabilities: What are they?” Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), pp.1105-1121.
    Fornell, C. & D. F. Larcker (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39-50.
    Galbraith, J. K. (1969), The New Industrial State, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Galunic, D. C. & S. Rodan (1998), “Resource recombination in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation,” Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), pp.1193-1201.
    Geletkanycz, M. A. and D. C. Hambrick (1997), “The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), pp.654-681.
    Georgsdottir, A. S. & I. Getz (2004), “How flexibility facilitates innovation and ways to manage it in organizations,” Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(3), pp.166-175.
    Gerwin, D. (1993), “Manufacturing flexibility: A strategic perspective,” Management Science, 39(4), pp.395-410.
    Grant, R. M. (2002), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, Ch.8, OXFORD University Press, pp.133-148.
    Griffin, A., & J. R. Hauser (1992), “Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering, and manufacturing: A comparison between two new product teams,” Management Science, 38(3), pp.360-373.
    Gupka, A. K., & D. Wilemon (1998), “Managing global product development teams,” IEMC’98 Proceedings
    Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, & W. C. Black (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis (5th Edition), Prentice-Hall PTR.
    Helfat, C. E. & M. A. Peteraf (2003), “The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles,” Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), pp.997-1010.
    Hinkin, T. R. (1998), “A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires,” Organization Research Methods, 1(1), pp.104-121.
    Holmlund, M. & S. Kock (1996), “Relationship marketing: The important of customer-perceived service quality in retail banking,” The Services Industries Journal, 16(3), pp.287-304.
    Hu, L. & P. M. Bentler (1999), “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance Structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternative,” Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), pp.1-55.
    Joia, L. A. (2000), “Measuring intangible corporate assets: Linking business strategy with intellectual capital,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), pp.68-84.
    Jones, G. & W. J. Schneider (2006), “Intelligence, human capital, and economic growth: A Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach,” Journal of Economic Growth, 11(1), pp.71-93.
    Jöreskog, K. G. & D. Sörbom (1993), LISREL 8 User’s Reference Guide, Chicago: Scientific Software.
    Kim, L. (1998), “Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor,” Organization Science, 9(4), pp.506-521.
    Kogut, B. & U. Zander (1992), “Knowledge of the firm combinative capabilities and the replication of technology,” Organization Science, 3(3), pp.383-397.
    Kozlowski, S. W. J. & B. S. Bell (2003), “Work groups and teams in organizations,” In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, and R. J. Klimoski (Eds), Handbook of Psychology, 12, pp.333-375, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Press.
    Lane, P., J. E. Salk, & M. A. Lyles (2001), “Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures,” Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), pp.1139-1161.
    Lepak, D. P. & S. A. Snell (1999), “The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development,” The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), pp.31-48.
    Leonard-Barton, D. (1992), “Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development,” Strategic Management Journal, 13, special issue 1, pp.111-125.
    Lev, B. (2001), Intangibles: Management and Reporting, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
    Lievens, A., R. K. Moenaert, & R. S’Jegers (1999), “Linking communication to innovation success in the financial services industry: A case study analysis,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10(1), pp.23-47.
    Lin, L. Y., Y. L. Lo, & S. H. Wu (2006), “The influence of knowledge integration to international technological cooperation,” Annual Conference of the European Academy of Management (EURAM), Oslo, Norway.
    Long, R. J. (2001), “Pay systems and organizational flexibility,” Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 18(1), pp.25-32.
    Lowe, A., C. McMahon, & S. Culley (2004), “Characterising the requirements of engineering information systems,” International Journal of Information Management, 24(5), pp.401-422.
    Mavridis, D. G. (2004), “The intellectual capital performance of the Japanese banking sector,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), pp.92-115.
    McDonald, R. P. & M. R. Ho (2002), “Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis,” Psychological Methods, 7, pp.64-82.
    Miller, D. & J. Shamsie (1996) “The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965,” Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), pp.519-543.
    Mitchell, V. L. (2006), “Knowledge integration and information technology project performance,” MIS Quarterly, 30(4), pp.919-939.
    Mouritsen, J. (2004), “Measuring and intervening: How do we theorise intellectual capital management?” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(2), pp.257-267.
    Mowery, D. C. & J. E. Oxley (1995), “Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: The role of national innovation systems,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), pp.67-93.
    Nahapiet, J. & S. Ghoshal (1998), “Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage,” The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp.242-266.
    Nelson, R. R. & S. G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Nonaka, I. (1994) “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation,” Organization Science, 5(1), pp.14-37.
    Nozick, L. K., M. A. Turnquist, & N. Xu (2004), “Managing portfolios of projects under uncertainty,” Annals of Operations Research, 132(1-4), pp.243-256.
    OECD (1996), The Knowledge-Based Economy, Paris: Head of Publications Service.
    O’Reilly, C. A. & Tushman, M. L., “Using Culture for Strategic Advantage: Promoting Innovation through Social Control,” in Tushman, M. L. & P. Anderson (1997), Managing Strategic Innovation and Change, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.200-216.
    Okhuysen, G. A. & K. M. Eisenhardt (2002), “Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility,” Organization Science, 13(4), pp.370-386.
    Orlikowski, W. J. (2000), “Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations,” Organization Science, 11(4), pp.404-428.
    Pfeffer, J. (1994), Competitive Advantage through People, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Powell, W. W., K. W. Koput, & L. Smith-Doerr (1996), “Interorganizational collaboration and the focus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), pp.116-145.
    Prahalad, C. K. & G. Hamal (1990), “The core competence of corporation,” Harvard Business Review, 63(8), pp.79-91.
    Prusak, L. & D. Cohen “Knowledge buyers, sellers, and brokers: The political economy of knowledge,” in Neef, D., G. A. Siesfeld, & J. Cefola (1998), The Economic Impact of Knowledge (Resources for the Knowledge-Based Economy), Section Seven, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
    Quinn, J. B., “Managing intellect,” in Tushman, M. L. & P. Anderson (1997), Managing Strategic Innovation and Change, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.506-523.
    Ranchhod, A., C. Gurau, & R. Hackney (2000) “Marketing on the Internet:observations within the biotechnology sector,” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30(7/8), pp.697-709
    Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2003), “Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms: A study of the resource-based and stakeholder views,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(2), pp.215-226.
    Robbins, S. P. & M. Coulter (2003), Management, Prentice Hall Int’L.
    Roos, G., J. Roos, L. Edvinnsson, & N. Dragonetti (1998), Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape, New York: New York University Press.
    Roos, G. & J. Roos (1997), “Managing your company’s intellectual performance,” Long Range Planning, 30(3), pp.413-426.
    Roos, G., A. Bainbridge, & K. Jacobsen (2001), “Intellectual capital analysis as a strategic tool,” Strategy and Leadership, 29(4), pp.21-26.
    Saint-Onge, H. (1996), “Tacit knowledge: The key to the strategic alignment of intellectual capital,” Strategy & Leadership, 24(2), pp.10-14.
    Schriessheim, C. A., R. J. Eisenbach, & K. D. Hill (1991), “The effect of negation and polar opposite item reversals on questionnaire reliability and validity: An experimental investigation,” Education and Psychological Measurement, 51(1), pp.67-74.
    Sher, P. J. & V. C. Lee (2004), “Information technology as a facilitator for enhancing dynamic capabilities through knowledge management,” Information & Management, 41(8), pp.933-945.
    Snell, S. & J. Dean (1992), “Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: A human capital perspective,” Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), pp.467-504.
    Song, M. & R. J. Thieme (2006), “A cross-national investigation of the R&D-marketing interface in the product innovation process,” Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 308-322.
    Sorensen, C. & U. Lundh-Snis (2001), “Innovation through knowledge codification,” Journal of Information Technology, 16(2), pp.83-97.
    Stewart, T. A. (1994), “Your company’s most valuable asset: Intellectual capital,” Fortune, October 3, 130(7), pp.68-74.
    Stewart, T. A. (1997), Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
    Subramaniam, M. (2006), “Integrating cross-border knowledge for transitional new product development,” The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(6), pp.541-560.
    Sveiby, K. E. (1997), The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets, San Francisco, Calif.: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
    Swamidass, P. M. & W. T. Newell (1987), “Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance: A path analytic model,” Management Science, 33(4), pp.509-524.
    Teece, D. (1984), “Economic analysis and strategic management,” California Management Review, 26(3), pp.87-110.
    Teece, D., G. Pisano, & A. Shuen (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp.509-534.
    Ulrich, D. (1998), “Intellectual capital = competence x commitment,” Sloan Management Review, 39(2), pp.15-26.
    Uzzi, B. (1996), “The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect,” American Sociological Review, 61(4), pp.674-698.
    von Hipple, E. (1988), The Source of Innovation, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Wang, R. C. & T. F. Liang (2004), “Project management decisions with multiple fuzzy goals,” Construction Management and Economics, 22(10), pp.1047-1065.
    Wang, W. Y. & C. Chang (2005), “Intellectual capital and performance in causal models: Evidence from the information technology industry in Taiwan,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2), pp.222-236.
    Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A resourced-based view of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), pp.171-180.
    Wheatley, K. K. & D. Wilemon (1999), “Global innovation teams: A requirement for the new Millenniu,” PICMET Proceedings
    Williamson, O. E. (1979), “Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations,” The Journal of Law and Economics, 22, pp.233-261.
    Williamson, O. E. (1999), “Strategy research: Governance and competence perspective,” Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), pp.1087-1108.
    Winter, S. G. (2000), “The satisficing principle in capability learning,” Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), pp.981-996.
    Winter, S. G. (2003), “Understanding dynamic capabilities,” Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), pp.991-995.
    Wu, S. H., L. Y. Lin, & M. Y. Hsu (2006), “Intellectual capital, dynamic capabilities, and innovative performance of organizations,” International Journal of Technology Management, forthcoming.
    Yang, J. (2005), “Knowledge integration and innovation: Securing new product advantage in high technology industry,” Journal of High Technology Management Research, 16(1), pp.121-135.
    Yin, R. K. (1994), Case study research: Design and methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Youndt, M. A., M. Subramaniam, & S. A. Snell (2004), “Intellectual capital profiles: An examination of investments and returns,” The Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), pp.335-361.
    Zahra, S. A. & G. George (2002), “Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension,” Academy of Management Review, 27(2), pp.185-203.
    Zollo, M. & S. G. Winter (2002), “Deliberate learning and evolution of dynamic capabilities,” Organization Science, 13(3), pp.339-351.
    Zott, C. (2003), “Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study,” Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), pp.97-125.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理研究所
    91359503
    95
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913595031
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[科技管理研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    59503101.pdf48KbAdobe PDF2960检视/开启
    59503102.pdf22KbAdobe PDF21069检视/开启
    59503103.pdf22KbAdobe PDF21029检视/开启
    59503104.pdf24KbAdobe PDF21021检视/开启
    59503105.pdf53KbAdobe PDF21372检视/开启
    59503106.pdf115KbAdobe PDF21465检视/开启
    59503107.pdf472KbAdobe PDF22121检视/开启
    59503108.pdf203KbAdobe PDF25031检视/开启
    59503109.pdf767KbAdobe PDF22834检视/开启
    59503110.pdf289KbAdobe PDF21233检视/开启
    59503111.pdf32KbAdobe PDF21099检视/开启
    59503112.pdf41KbAdobe PDF21230检视/开启
    59503113.pdf703KbAdobe PDF21126检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈