English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51719007      Online Users : 623
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34358


    Title: 關係鑲嵌性與子公司興業導向關係之研究
    The Relationship between Relational Embeddedness and Subsidiary’s Entrepreneurial Orientation
    Authors: 蔡政安
    Tsai, Cheng-An
    Contributors: 溫肇東
    蔡政安
    Tsai, Cheng-An
    Keywords: 關係鑲嵌性
    創業精神
    公司興業精神
    社會網絡
    多國企業子公司
    relational embeddedness
    entrepreneurship
    cioporate entrepreneurship
    social netwok
    multinational enterprise subsidiary
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 09:34:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 創業精神的研究對象概可分為新創企業及已奠基廠商，本研究是關注已奠基廠商的創業行為研究，稱為公司興業精神研究。此研究的主軸是興業精神行為模式，此模式是以興業導向衡量公司興業精神，主要在探討公司興業精神與廠商績效的關聯，過去二十多年來在許多學者的努力下已有豐碩的理論發展與實證成果。然此類研究也遇到發展瓶頸，因而學者建議此類研究應往國際化活動或是結合社會網絡觀點發展。
    本研究是以興業精神行為模式為基礎，結合社會網絡觀點中的關係鑲嵌性概念，經由文獻回顧歸納出影響多國企業子公司興業精神的關係鑲嵌性包括母子公司間公司鑲嵌性、顧客關係鑲嵌性、供應商關係鑲嵌性及政府單位關係鑲嵌性，探討不同關係鑲嵌性與多國企業子公司興業導向的關聯。
    經由個案訪談及問卷調查方法，對台灣企業在大陸子公司的230位經理人進行調查，以統計方法檢定各項假說，並再對未符合預期的假說進行較深入探索性分析，研究結果發現：（1）多國企業子公司興業導向與顧客關係鑲嵌性有導U字型關聯，（2）多國企業子公司興業導向與供應商關係鑲嵌性有導U字型關聯，（3）多國企業子公司興業導向與政府單位關係鑲嵌性無關聯，（4）多國企業子公司興業導向與母子公司間關係鑲嵌性有正向關聯。此結果顯示在社會網絡理論中的重要觀點：「平衡網絡」或是「過度鑲嵌」，會在多國企業子公司的興業精神中發生，換言之，本研究證實與顧客或供應商過度鑲嵌時，會不利於子公司興業精神行為。
    本研究同時也探討環境中的政策不確定性、產業不確定性及競爭不確定性與子公司興業導向的關聯，研究結果顯示：（5）多國企業子公司興業導向與政策不確定性有正向關聯，（6）多國企業子公司興業導向與產業不確定性無關聯，（7）多國企業子公司興業導向與競爭不確定性有正向關聯。研究結果顯示：在面對政策上的不確定或是競爭上的不確定時，多國企業子公司會發揮更高的興業精神來因應此環境下的變動。
    最後，本研究依理論架構與實證發現，提出研究的理論貢獻、實務意涵及後續研究的建議，使未來研究能彌補理論發展或是實證研究的不足。
    Research on corporate entrepreneurship(CE) has grown rapidly over the past decades. Both scholars and practitioners remain interested in studying and better understanding CE(Ireland, Kuratko & Covins, 2002).CE has bees viewed as the driver of new business and economic growth within on-going enterprises as achieved through innovativeness, proactiveness, risk-taking(Miller, 1983; Covin & Slevin, 1989e), new business venturing (Burgelman, 1983b, Guth & Ginsberg, 1990; Zahra, 1995), self-renewal(Guth & Ginsberg, 1990; Zahra, 1995; Shama & Chrisma, 1999), opportunity pursuit(Stevenson & Jarillo, 1990; Shane & Vankataraman, 2000), etc. CE can be important not only for small and medium size enterprises but also for large corporation(Antocic & Hisrich, 2001).
    The previous research mainly focused on the relationship between CE and firm performance and generated an study axial of entrepreneurship behavior model that used measures as the firm entrepreneurial orientation(Covin & Slevin, 1989, 1991; Zahra, 1996,1996; Lumpkin & Dess, 1996). Although this kind of research has come out with valuable theoretical concepts and rich empirical results, it till encounters the bottleneck of research. Some scholars suggested that CE research should be extended to international business activities or include the social network perspective(Zehra et. al. , 2003).
    Approximately 15 years ago, research on networks emerged as an important new era of inquiring within the field of entrepreneurship, but published papers on journals were relatively few and mainly focused on the development and consequences of networks in the new venture creation process, or focused on small medium-sized firms(Hoang & Antocic, 2003). There was lack of the network perspective research on the established firm in the field of entrepreneurship.
    This research extended entrepreneurship into international activities and conducted an empirical study on multinational enterprise’s subsidiaries with relational embeddedness of social network perspective. Through the literature review and case study, we generated a research framework and a set of hypothesis which described the relationships between relational embeddedness and subsidiary’s entrepreneurial orientation. We collected data and used statistical tool to verify the hypothesis. Besides, we conducted an exploratory analysis on some field of what hypotheses were not supported to further understand how relational embeddedness influence the entrepreneurial behavior in the subsidiaries of multinational enterprises.
    This research finds that (1)there exists the inverse U shape relationship between the customer relational embeddedness and subsidiary’s entrepreneurial orientation, (2)there exists the inverse U shape relationship between the supplier relational embeddedness and subsidiary’s entrepreneurial orientation, (3)there exists no relationship between government relational embeddedness and subsidiary’s entrepreneurial orientation, (4)there exists the positive association between the mother-subsidiary relational embeddedness and subsidiary’s entrepreneurial orientation. This results imply that the important phenomenon of balance network or over embeddedness be exactly happen in the filed of subsidiary’s entrepreneurial behavior. Our study verified that over embeddedness will negatively influence the entrepreneurship of subsidiary, especially over embeddedness with customers or suppliers.
    This research also searched the relationship between the environmental uncertainties and subsidiary’s entrepreneurial orientation. This result finds that (5) there exists positive association between the policy uncertainty and subsidiary’s entrepreneurial orientation, (6) there exists non-association between the industry uncertainty and subsidiary’s entrepreneurial orientation,(7) there exists positive association between the competitive uncertainty and subsidiary’s entrepreneurial orientation. This imply the subsidiary will advance his entrepreneurial behavior to overcome the environmental uncertainty or pursuit the business opportunities in the dynamic change.
    Finally this research proposed the theoretical contribution, practitioner implications and further research suggestions
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    1. 工商時報，2005，大陸台商1000大，台北：工商時報出版。
    2. 王存國與王凱，2001，「影響電子資料交換使用效益因素之研究─由社會關係與組織因素探討」，管理學報，第18卷第1期，頁99-134。
    3. 王克陸、劉亮君（1997），「我國創業投資公司投資活動之個案分析」，科技管理學刊，第4卷第1期，頁1-15。
    4. 方世杰，2001，「以網絡個體分析法探討我國中小企業之國際化與績效─中衛體系電子訊業廠商之實證研究」，管理學報，第18卷第1期，頁49-74。
    5. 司徒達賢、于卓民與曾紀幸，1997，「環境特性與公司特性隊多國籍企業網絡關係之影響─在台外商子公司之實證研究」，管理學報，第14卷第2期，頁155-176。
    6. 林志宏、賴其勛、蔡翠旭、簡倍祥（2001），「台灣創業投資事業之控制策略及其先行因子之研究」，科技管理學刊，第6卷第1期，頁71-102。
    7. 林家五、黃國隆、鄭伯壎（2004），「從認同到開創：創業家的動態釋意歷程」，中山管理評論，第12卷第2期，頁337-397。
    8. 邱正仁、陳文進、高蘭芬（2001），「影響創業投資事業報酬因素之研究」，中山管理評論，第9卷第1期，頁11-35。
    9. 吳思華，1996，策略九說，台北：麥田出版社。
    10. 吳豐祥（1997），「高科技公司內部創新事業的機制之實證研究」，科技管理學刊，第2卷第2期，頁87-108。
    11. 洪廣朋、史習安、廖珮如（2001），「公司內部創業統治機制選擇之實證研究 ─ 交易成本之觀點」，中山管理評論，第9卷第2期，頁271-291。
    12. 徐守德、陳宗民、王毓敏（2001），「投資創投事業對高科技產業上市上櫃之影響」，中山管理評論，第9卷第4期，頁655-690。
    13. 莊立民，2002，組織創新模式建構與時證之研究──以台灣資訊電子業為例，國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    14. 溫肇東，2005，創業家精神的典範學習，2005/08/10工商時報經營知識版。
    15. 張世佳與林能白，2001，「環境因素不確定性對製造彈性能力之影響關係研究─以台灣資訊產業為例」，中山管理評論，第9卷第1期，頁111-133。
    16. 曾志弘，2001，多國籍企業子公司自主性與主導行為影響因素之研究─以多國及企業在台子公司為例，國立中山大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。
    17. 曾紀幸，1996，多國籍企業在台子公司網絡組織型態及其母公司管理機制選擇之關係，國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。
    18. 陳禹辰，1999，創新負擔與新興資訊科技的採用及實施--電子銀行的實證研究，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所博士論文。
    19. 趙必孝，1994，國際企業子公司的人力資源管理：策略、控制與績效，國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。
    20. 劉世南、袁建中、羅達賢、高宜君（2003），「創業行為之模式建立」，科技管理學刊，第8卷第1期，頁61-78。
    21. 盧瑞陽（2005），「創投公司對投資公司的增資決定之研究」，中山管理評論，第13卷第2期，頁589-616。
    22. 賴宏誌，2003，網絡關係對新創企業發展影養之研究─以台灣高科技廠商為例，國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。
    23. 經濟部，2005，「上市櫃公司赴中國大陸投資名錄(歷年至93年)」，中華民國行政院經濟部投資審議委員會出版。
    24. 廖明坤，2003，台商大陸子公司決策自主性影響因素之研究，國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。
    25. 羅達賢、劉世南、袁建中（2002），「從科技人到創業家 ─ 由台灣積體電路引進團隊的發展分析」，管理與系統，第9卷第1期，頁1-10。

    二、英文部分
    1. Aldrich, H.E.& Reese, P.R. 1993. Does networking pay off ? A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle. In Churchill N.S. et al.. (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 325-339
    2. Aldrich, H.E.& Zimmer, C. 1986. Entrepreneurship through social network. In Sexton D.L. & Smilor R.W. (Eds.) The Art of Science of Entrepreneurship, 2-23, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA
    3. Amabile, T.M. 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organization. In Barry M. Staw &. Cummings L. L (Eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    4. Andersson, U. & Forsgren, M. 1996. Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation. International Business Review, 5(5): 487-508.
    5. Andersson, U. & Forsgren, M. 2000. In search of centre of excellence: network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 40(4): 329-350
    6. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. & Holm, U. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 979-996.
    7. Ang, S.H. & Leong, S.M. 2000. Out of mouth of babes: Business ethics and younths in Asia. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(2): 129-144
    8. Antoncic, B. & Hisrich, R.D. 2004. Corporate entrepreneurship contingencies and organizational wealth creation. The Journal of Management Developemnt, 23(5/6): 518-550
    9. Armstrong, J.S. & Overton, T.S. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 11: 396-402
    10. Arogon-Correa, J.A. 1998. Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 556-567
    11. Bantel, K.A. 1998. Technology-based adolescent firm configurations: strategy identification, context and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 13: 205-230
    12. Bantel, K. A. & Jackson, S. E. 1989. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of top management team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, Summer: 107-124
    13. Barret, H., Balloon, J.L. & Weinstein, A. 2000. Marketing mix factors as moderators of the corporate entrepreneurship-business performance relationship – a multistage, multivariable analysis. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 8(2): 50-62
    14. Barringer, B.R. & Bluedorn, A.C. 1999. The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 421-444
    15. Bartlett, C.A. & Ghoshal, S. 1986.Tap your subsidiaries for global reach. Harvard Business Review, 64(4): 87-94
    16. Bartlett, C.A. & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, Boston, MA.
    17. Bartlett, C.A. & Ghoshal, S. 1991. Global strategic management: Impact on the new frontiers of strategy research. Strategic Management Journal,12: 5-16.
    18. Batjargal, B. 2003. Social capital and entrepreneurual performance in Russia: A longitudinal study. Organozation Study: 24(4): 535-556
    19. Beacherer, R.C. & Maurer, J.G. 1997. The moderating effect of environmental variables on the entrepreneurial & marketing orientation of entrepreneur-led firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 22(1): 47-58
    20. Bell, G.G. 2005. Clusters, networks and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 287-295
    21. Birkinshaw, J. 1995. Entreprenrurship in multinational corporations: The Initative Pprocesses in Canadian Subsidiaries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Business School, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
    22. Birkinshaw, J. 1996.How multinational subsidiary m&ates are gained & lost. Journal of International Business Studies: 467-495.
    23. Birkinshaw, J. 1997. Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3): 207-229.
    24. Birkinshaw, J. 1998. Corporate entrepreneurship in network organizations: How subsidiary initiative drives internal market efficiency. European Management Journal, 16(3): 355-365.
    25. Birkinshaw, J. 1999.The determinants and consequences of subsidiary initiative in multinational corporations. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 24(1): 9-36
    26. Birkinshaw, J. & Hood, N. 1998a. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773-795.
    27. Birkinshaw, J. & Hood, N. 1998b. Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development. MacMillan Press Inc.: London.
    28. Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N. & Jonsson, S. 1998. Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3): 221-241.
    29. Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N. & Young, S. 2005. Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review,14: 227-248
    30. Birkinshaw, J. & Ridderstrale, J. 1999. Fighting the corporate immune system：A process study of subsidiary initiatives in multinational corporations. International Business Review, 8: 149-180.
    31. Blalock, H.M. 1982. Conceptualization and Measurement in the Social Science. Sage: Berverly Hill, CA
    32. Brown, T.E., Davisson, P. & Wiklund, J. 2001. An operationalization of Stevenson’s conceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10): 953-968
    33. Buckley, P. J. & Casson, M. 1976. The Future of the Multinational Enterprises, Macmillan: London.
    34. Burgelman, R.A. 1983a. Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Inside from a process study. Management Science, 29: 1349-1364.
    35. Burgelman, R.A. 1983b. A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context and the concept of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 8: 61-70.
    36. Burgelman, R.A. 1984. Design for corporate entrepreneurship. California Management Review, 26(2): 154-166
    37. Burt, R.S. 1992. The social structure of competition. In Nohria N.& Eccles R.G. (Eds.) Networks and Organizations, 57-91
    38. Christensen, C. M. & Rayor, M.E., 2003, The Innovator’s Solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.（李芳齡、李田樹譯，2004，創新者的解答，台北：天下出版）
    39. Cooper, A.C. 1986. Entrepreneurship and high technology. In Sexton D. & Smilor R (Eds.). The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship. Ballinger: Cambigde, MA
    40. Covin, J.G. & Slevin, D. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1): 75-87
    41. Covin, J.G. & Slevin, D. 1991. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 16(1): 7-25
    42. Covin, J.G. , Slevin, D. & Heeley, M.B. 1999. Pioneers and followers: Competitive atctics, environment & firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 15: 175-210
    43. Daft, R.L. 1978. A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2): 193-210.
    44. Daily, C. M. & Dalton, D. R. 1992. The relationship between goverance structure and corporate performance in entrepreurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 7: 375-386
    45. Damanpour, F. 1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 555-590.
    46. Damanpour, F. 1996. Organizational complexity & innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5): 693-716.
    47. Damanpour, F. & Evan, W. M. 1984. Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of “organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3): 392-409.
    48. Danneels, E. 2002. The dynamics of product innovation & firm competences. Srtaegic Management Journal, 23(12): 1095-1211
    49. Danneels, E. 2003. Tight-loose coupling with customers: The enactment of customer orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 559-576
    50. Daneels, E. 2004. Disruptive technology reconsidered: a critique and research agenda. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21: 246-258
    51. Deeds, D.L. & Hill, C.W. 1996. Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1): 41-55
    52. Dess, G..G.. Ireland, R.D., Zahra, S.A., Floyd, S.W., Janney, J.J. & Lane, P.J. E. 2003. Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3): 351-378
    53. Dess, G..G.., Lumpkin, G.T. & Covin, J.G. 1997. Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: test of contingency & configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9): 677-695
    54. DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell, W.W. 1983. The iron cage revisted: Institutional isomorphisim and collective rationality in orgznizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160
    55. Dimitratos, P., Lioukas, S. & Carter, S. 2004. The relationship between entrepreneurship and international performance: the importance of domestic environment. International Business Review, 13: 19-41
    56. Dougherty, D. & Bowman, E.H. 1995. The effects of organizational downsizing of product innovation. California Management Review, 37(4): 28-44
    57. Downey, H.K., Hellriegel, D. & Slocum, J.W. 1975. Environment uncertainty: The construct and its application. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(4): 562-577
    58. Duncan, R.B. 1972. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environment uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3): 313-327
    59. Dunning, J.H. 1981. International Production and the Multinational Enterprise, Allen and Unwin: London.
    60. Dunning, J.H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19:1-31.
    61. Dunning, J. H. 1995. Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in an age of alliance capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, third quarter: 461-491.
    62. Dyer, J.H. & Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 660-679
    63. Farh, J.L. abd Behling, O. 1998. Doing business in China: The what, the why & - most important - the how of guanxi. Working Paper . Hong Kong University ofScience of Technology
    64. Farh, J.L., Tsui, A.S., Xin, K.R. & Cheng, B.S. 1998. The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4): 471-488
    65. Fowler, F.J. 1988. Survey Research Methods. Beverly Hills, Sage Publications.
    66. Frankfort-Nachmias, C. & Nachmias, D. 1996. Research Method in the Social Science. Martin’s College Publishing Group INC.（潘明宏與陳志瑋譯，2001，社會科學研究方法，韋伯文化: 台北）
    67. Freeman, C. 1991. Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, 20(5): 499-514
    68. Frosgrent, M. 1990. Managing the international multi-centre firms: Case studies from Sweden. European Management Journal, 8: 261-267
    69. Frost, T.S., Birkinshaw, J.M., & Ensign, P.C. 2002. Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 997-1018
    70. Gartner, W.B. 1985. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomanon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4): 696-706
    71. Gartner, W.B. 1990. What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 5: 15-28
    72. Ghoshal, S. 1987. Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 8(5): 425-440.
    73. Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett, C. 1988. Creation, adoption and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 365-387.
    74. Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett,C. 1990. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15(4):603-625.
    75. Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett, C. 1994. Linking organizational context anf managirail action: the dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal, 15(Summer special): 91-112.
    76. Ghoshal, S. & Nohria, N. 1989. Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 10(4): 323-337.
    77. Ghoshal, S. & Westney, D.E. 1991. Introduction and overview. In Ghoshal S. & Westney (Eds.). Organization Theory and the Multinational Cooperation, St. Martin’s Press: New York.
    78. Grabher, G. 1993. The Embedded Firm: On the Socieconomics of Industrial Networks. London, England: Routledge
    79. Granovettor, M.S. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481-510
    80. Granovettor, M.S. 1992. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In Nohria N. & Eccles R. (Eds.), Networks and Organizations, 25-56. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
    81. Gulati, R. 1998. Alliance & networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4): 293-317
    82. Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on allliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5): 397-420
    83. Gulati, R., Nohria, N. & Zaheer, A. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 203-215
    84. Gupta, A.K. & Govindarajan, V. 1994. Organizing for knowledge flows within MNCs. International Business Reviews, 3（4）：443-457.
    85. Guth, W.D. & Ginsberg, A. 1990. Guest editors’ introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11(summer): 5-15
    86. Hakansson, H. 1989. Corporate Technological Behavior: Cooperations and Networks. Routledge: London.
    87. Hannan, M.T. & Freeman, J. 1989. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    88. Hansen, E.L. 1995. Entrepreurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreurship Theory & Practice, 19(4): 7-19
    89. Hayton, J.C. 2005. Competing in the new economy: the effect of intellectual capital on corporate entrepreneurship in high-technology new venture. R&D Management, 35(2): 137-155
    90. Hedlund, G. 1986. The hypermodern MNC—a heterarchy? Human Resource management, 25: 9-26.
    91. Hennart, J.F. 1982. A Theory of Multinational Enterprise. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
    92. Hite, J.M. 2003. Patterns of multidimentionalality among embedded networl ties: A typology of relational embeddedness in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Organization, 1(1): 9-49
    93. Hite, J.M. 2005. Evolutionary processes and paths of relational embeddednetwork ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice,29(1): 113-144
    94. Hoang, H. & Antoncic B. 2003. Network-based research in entreprenurshp: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18: 165-187
    95. Hoetker, G. 2005. How much you know versus how well I know you: Selecting a supplier for a technically innovative componet. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 75-96
    96. Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D.F. & Zahra, S.A. 2002. Middle manager’s perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17: 253-273
    97. Hymer, S.H. 1976. The International Operations of National Firms：A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.
    98. Jarillo, J.C.1988. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1): 31-41
    99. Jarillo, J.C. & Martinez, J.I. 1990. Different roles for subsidiaries: The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Strategic Management Journal, 11(7): 501-512
    100. Jennings, D.F. & Lumpkin, J.R. 1989. Funtioning modeling corporate entrepreneurship: an empirical integrative analysis. Journal of Management, 15(3): 485-502
    101. Johannisson, B. 1996. The dynamics of entrepreneurial networks. In Reynolds P. et al.(Eds.) Frontier of Entrepreneurship Research, 253-267
    102. Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J.E. 1977. Internationalisation process of the firm: a model of knowledge development & increasing foreign commitment. Journal of International Business Studies, 8: 23-32
    103. Johanson, J. & Mattsson, L-G. 1987. Internationalization in industrial systems: A network approach. The International Executive, 29(2): 19-21
    104. Jones, M. V. & Coviello, N. E. 2005. Internationalisation: conceptualizing an entrepreneurial process of behavior in time. Journal of International Business Studies, 36: 284-303.
    105. Kanter, R.M. 1983. The Change Masters. Simon & Schuster: New York
    106. Katz, R. 1982. The effects of group longity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(1): 81-104
    107. Kelloway, K.E. 1995. Structural equation modeling in perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16: 215-224
    108. Kirzner, I.M. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL
    109. Knickererbocker, F.T. 1973. Oligopolistic Reaction and the Multinational Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
    110. Knight, G.A.1997. Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Busisness Venturing, 12(3): 213-225
    111. Kotter, J.P. 1995. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail.Harvard Business Review, 71(11): 3-11
    112. Kogut, B. 1985. Designing global strategies: Profiting from operational flexibility. Sloan Management Review, 27(1): 27-38
    113. Kogut, B. & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383-397
    114. Kohli, A. K. & Jaworski, B. 1990. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implication. Journal of Marketing, 54(April): 1-18
    115. Krackhardt, D. 1990. Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition and power in networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 342-369
    116. Krackhardt, D. 1992. The strength of stong ties: The importance of Philios in organization. In Nohria, N. & Eccles, G.. （eds.）, Networks and Organizations: structure, form and action: p216-239. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    117. Kuratko, D.F., Ireland, R. D. & Hornsby, J.S. 2001. Improving firm performance through entrepreneurial action: Acordia’s corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4): 60-71
    118. Kuratko, D.F., Montagno, R.V. & Hornsby, J.S. 1990. Developing an irapreneurial assessment instrument. Strategic Management Journal, 11(Summer): 49-58
    119. Lant, T. K. & Mezias, S. J. 1990. Managing discontinuous change: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51: 123-140
    120. Larson, A.1992. Networks dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1): 76-104
    121. Lee, J. & Chen, J. 2003. Internationalization, local adaption & subsidiary’s entrepreneurship: an exploratory study on Taiwanese manufacturing firms in Indonesia and Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20(1): 51-72
    122. Lee, C., Lee, K. & Pennings, J.M. 2001. Internal capabilities, enternal networks and performance: A study of on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7): 615-640
    123. LiLi,. 2005. The effects of trust and shared visin on inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries’ intra- and inter-organizational relationship. International Business Review, 14: 77-95
    124. Lorenzoni, G. & Lipparini, A. 1999. The leveraging of inter-firm relationships as distinctive organizational capabilities: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4): 317-338
    125. Low, M.B. 2001. The adolescence of entrepreneurship research: specification of purpose. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 25(4): 17-25
    126. Lumpkin, G..T. & Dess, G..G..1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(3): 135-172
    127. Lumpkin, G..T. & Dess, G..G.. 2001. Linking two dimension of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16: 429-451
    128. Lyon, D.W., Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, G.G.. 2000. Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: Operationalizing & measuring a key strategic decision process. Journal of Management, 26(5): 1055-1085
    129. Madhok, A. 1997. Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: The transaction and the firm. Strategic Mmanagement Journal, 18: 39-61.
    130. Malnight, T.W. 1995. Globalization of an ethnocentric firm: An evolutionary perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 16( ): 119-141.
    131. March, J.G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71-87
    132. Marsden, P.V. & Friedkin, N.E. 1993. Network studies of social influence. Sociological Methods& Research, 22: 127-18-51
    133. Matsuno, K., Mentzer, J.T. & Ozsomer, A. 2002. The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business performance. Journal of Marketing, 66(3): 18-32
    134. McEvily, B. & Marcus, A. 2005. Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 1033-1055
    135. Mckern, B. 1993. An evolutionary approach to strategic management in the international firm. In Lorange, Chakravarthy, Roos & Van de Ven（Eds.）, Implementing Strategic Processes: Change, Learning and Co-operation. Blackwell.
    136. Miles, R.E. & Snow, C.C. 1978. Organization Strategy, Structure and Process. McGrawHill, New York
    137. Miller, D. 1983. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29: 770-791
    138. Miller, K.D. 1992. A framework for integrated risk management in international business, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(2): 311-331
    139. Miller, K.D. 1993. Industry and country effects on managers’ perception of environmental uncertainties. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 693-714
    140. Morris, M.H. 1998. Entrepreneurial intensity: Sustainable advantages for individuals, organizations and societies. West-port, CT: Ouorum Books.
    141. Naman, J.L. & Slevin, D.P. 1993. Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model of empirical tests. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2): 137-153
    142. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Socila capital, intellectual capital and organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2):242-266
    143. Nobel, R. & Birkinshaw, J. 1998. Innovation in multinational corporations: Control and communication patterns in international R&D operations. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5): 479-496
    144. Nohria, N. & Ghoshal, S. 1994. Differentiated fit and shared values. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6): 491-502
    145. North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press（制度、制度變遷與經濟成就，1994，劉瑞華譯，台北：時報出版）
    146. Oliver, C.1990. Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Intergratiom and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2): 241-265
    147. Park, S. H. & Luo, Y. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese. Strstegic Management Journal, 22(5): 455-477
    148. Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organization：A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row: New York
    149. Pinchott, G. III. 1985. Intrapreneuring. Harper & Row: New York
    150. Podolny, J.M. 1994. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic change. Aderministrative Science Quarterly, 39: 458-483
    151. Porter, M.E. 1985. Competitive Advantage. Free Press: New York.
    152. Powell, W.W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In Cumming L.L. & Staw B.M. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 10-20
    153. Powell, W.W., Koput ,K.W. & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quasrterly, 41: 116-145
    154. Rodan, S. & Galunic, C. 2004. More than network structure : How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 541-562
    155. Roger, E. 1983. Diffusion of Innovation. 3th Eds., Free Press:.New York
    156. Roger, E. M. & Shoemaker, F.F. 1971. Communication of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
    157. Roth, K. & Morrison, A. J. 1992. Implementing global strategy: Characteristics of global subsidiary mandate. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 715-735
    158. Sapienza, H.J. & Grimm, C.M. 1997. Founder characteristics, start-up process and strategy/structure variables as predictors of shortline railroad performance. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 22(1):5-24
    159. Saxenian, A. 1991. The origin and dynamics of productionnetworks in sillicon valley. Research Policy, 20(5): 423-437
    160. Schollhammer, H. 1982. Internal corporate entrepreneurship. In Kent C.A. Sexton D. L. & Vesper K. H.(Eds) Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. 202-229. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Printice Hall
    161. Schumpeter, J.A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Transaction Publishers: New Brunswick, NJ
    162. Shame, S. & Vakatraraman, S. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 217-226
    163. Sharma, P. & Chrisman, J.J. 1999. Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 23(3): 11-27
    164. Simon, H. A. 1960. The New Science of Management Decision, New York: Harper & Row
    165. Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M.H. & Floyd, S.W. 2003. Inter-firm networks and entrepreneurual behavior: A structural embeddedness perspective. Journal of Management, 29(3): 427-442
    166. Smith-Doerr, L., Owen-Smith, J., Koput, K.W. & Powell, W.W., 1999. Networks and Knowledge production: Collaborating and patenting in biotechnology. In Leenders R etal. (Eds.) Corporate Social Capital and Liability. 390-408. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Boston
    167. Steams, T.M. 1996. Strategic alliances and performance of high technology new firms. In Reynolds P. et al.(Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 268-281
    168. Stevenson, H.H. & Jarillo, J.C. 1990. A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(summer): 17-27
    169. Stopford, J.M. & Baden-Fuller, C.W.F. 1994. Creating corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11(summer): 521-536
    170. Stuart, T.E., Hoang, H. & Hybels, R. 1999. Interorganizational endosements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative ScienceQuarterly, 44(2): 315-349
    171. Sutcliffe, K.M. & Zaheer, A. 1998. Uncertainty in the transaction environment: An empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 19(1): 1-23
    172. Taggart, J.M. 1998. Strategy shifts in MNC subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal, 19(7): 663-681.
    173. Teece, D. 1986. Transaction cost economics and the multinational enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, l.7: 21-45.
    174. Thorelli, H.B. 1986. Networks: Between markets and hierachies, Strategic Management Journal, 7(1): 37-51.
    175. Tosi, H., Aldag, R. & Storey, R. 1973. On the measurement of environment: An assessment of the Lawrence and lorsch environmental uncertainty subscale. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(1): 27-36
    176. Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4): 464-476
    177. Tsang, W.K. 1998. Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in Chana? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2): 64-73
    178. Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4): 674-698
    179. Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Scince Quarterly, 42: 35-67
    180. Van de Ven, A. H. & Poole, M.S. 1995. Explaining development and change in organization. Academy of Management Review, 20: 510-540.
    181. Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product life cycle. Quality Journal of economics, 80: 190-207.
    182. Vesper, K.H. 1984. Three faces of corporate entrepreneurship: A pilot study. In Horaday ,J.A. Tarpley, F. Timmons J.A. & Vsper, K.H (Eds.) Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Babson College, Wellesley, MA
    183. von Hippel, E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Pres, New York
    184. Wiklund ,J. & Shpherd D. 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20: 71-91
    185. Williamson, O.E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational contracts. Free Press, New York
    186. Yamin, M. 2002. Subsidiary entrepreneurship and advantage of multinationality. In Havila, V., Forsgren, M. & Hakosson, H. （Eds.）Critical perspectives on Internationalisation. Pergamon Press: Oxford
    187. Zahra, S. A. 1991. Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6: 259-286
    188. Zahra, S. A. 1993a. Conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior: a critique and extension. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 14(4): 5-21
    189. Zahra, S. A. 1993b. Environment, corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: a taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8: 319-340
    190. Zahra, S. A. 1995. Corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance: the case of management leverage buyouts. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(3): 225-247
    191. Zahra, S. A. 1996a. Goverance, ownership and corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1713-1735
    192. Zahra, S. A. 1996b. Technology strategy and performance: a study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4): 289-321
    193. Zahra, S. A. & Covin J. 1995. Contextual influences on the corporate financial performance-company performance relationship in established firms: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10: 43-58
    194. Zahra, S. A. & Garvis, S. 2000. International corporate entrepreneurship and company performance. The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15: 469-492
    195. Zahra, S. A. & George, C. 2002. International entrepreneurship: the current status of the field & the future research agenda. In Hitt, M., Ireland, D., Sexton, D. & Camp, M. （Eds.）Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating an integrated mindset. Strategic Management series. Blackwell Publishers: Oxford
    196. Zahra, S. A., Jennings, D.F. & Kuratko, D. 1999. Guest Editors’ introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship in a global economy. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 24(1): 5-8
    197. Zahra, S. A., Nielsen, A.P. & Bogner, W.C. 1999. Corporate entrepreneurship, knowledge, competence development. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Spring: 169-189
    198. Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D.O. & Huse, M. 2000. Entrepreneurship in medium size companies: exploring the effects of ownership and governance system. Journal of Management, 26(5): 947-976
    199. Zenger, T.R. & Lawrence, B.S. 1989. Organization demography: The difference effects of age and tenure distributins on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2): 353-376
    200. Zhao, L. & Aram, J.D. 1995. Networking and growth of young technology-intensive ventures in China. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(5): 349-370
    201. Zmud, R.W. 1984. An examination of “pull-push” theory applied to process innovation in knowledge work. Management Science, 30(6): 727-738
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理研究所
    89359501
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0893595011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    59501101.pdf43KbAdobe PDF21025View/Open
    59501102.pdf142KbAdobe PDF22577View/Open
    59501103.pdf76KbAdobe PDF2984View/Open
    59501104.pdf84KbAdobe PDF2964View/Open
    59501105.pdf200KbAdobe PDF21682View/Open
    59501106.pdf317KbAdobe PDF21763View/Open
    59501107.pdf319KbAdobe PDF21363View/Open
    59501108.pdf282KbAdobe PDF21275View/Open
    59501109.pdf290KbAdobe PDF21252View/Open
    59501110.pdf160KbAdobe PDF21002View/Open
    59501111.pdf195KbAdobe PDF21550View/Open
    59501112.pdf240KbAdobe PDF21026View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback