政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/34350
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51788007      線上人數 : 437
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34350


    題名: 間接引證資料於專利指標的運用─間接被引證次數對企業價值影響之研究
    Relevance of indirect citation in patent indicators – The influence of the number of indirect citations received on corporate market value
    作者: 陳穎重
    Chen, Geoffrey
    貢獻者: 劉江彬
    蘇瓜藤
    陳穎重
    Chen, Geoffrey
    關鍵詞: 專利
    專利指標
    專利價值
    專利品質
    間接引證
    patent
    patent indicator
    patent value
    patent quality
    indirect citation
    日期: 2008
    上傳時間: 2009-09-18 09:32:12 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 創新無論在經濟成長或是企業競爭中，都扮演非常重要的角色，其中專利權又是保護創新的重要關鍵，但基於專利價值分佈呈離散且偏態的特性，企業在從事研發活動時，必須重視專利品質，以避免專利與技術貿易收支之矛盾情形。過去在專利品質的研究上，被引證次數是最有效的衡量指標，但目前作法卻僅考慮直接被引證次數，而忽略間接被引證次數，此作法造成三個問題：忽略了間接引證資料的攸關性、未考慮各個被引證次數的品質差異、未考慮引證專利的品質差異。因此，本研究以實證研究方法，探討間接被引證次數對企業價值的影響，進而評估間接引證資料於專利品質評估的應用。
    本研究以在美積極從事專利活動的美國公開上市企業為樣本，期間為1980年至2002年，以二因子固定效果模型，觀察化學、電腦與通訊、電子與電機產業的創新活動對企業價值的影響。本研究有兩點重要發現：一、研發強度與專利產出效率與企業價值相關性低，甚至呈負向相關，而兼顧量與質的專利指標則與其呈現正向相關，表示研發必須值、量並重；二、間接被引證次數具有價值攸關性，且其影響力會逐層遞減，此結論不僅提供未來相關研究的重要基礎與新的研究方向，更表示在從事專利分析或專利指標設計時，需將間接引證資料納入考量。
    Innovation always plays an important role in both economic development and corporate competition, therefore patents that protect innovation are key. But because patent values are highly dispersed and skewed, corporations must focus on quality and not merely on quantity in R&D management to prevent a technology trade deficit while increasing the quantity of patents granted. Much literature has found that the number of citations received is a good proxy for patent quality. But most people only consider direct citations and ignore indirect citations in their research and practices. These people ignore three important facts: the value relevance of indirect citations, the weight difference of each citation count, and the quality dispersion of citing patents. As a result, this study utilizes empirical methods to discuss the influence of the number of indirect citations received on corporate market value and then assesses the relevance of indirect citation in patent indicators.
    The samples used in this study are 1,624 U.S. listed firms that have been active in applying for for patents in three areas: chemical, computer and communication, and electric and electronics between the years 1980 and 2002. This study uses two-way fixed effect model to evaluate the influence of innovation activities on corporate value. The first conclusion suggests that patent indicators based on quantity and quality has positive correlation with corporate value while R&D intensity and R&D efficiency based on patent quantity both have low correlation and sometimes even a negative correlation with corporate value. This implies that corporations must develop a R&D strategy that focus both on quantity and quality at the same time. The second conclusion confirms the value relevance of the number of indirect citations received and finds the progressively declining influence of ascending citation orders. This study not only offers an important basis and brings up new issues for future related research but also confirms that taking indirect citation data into consideration is necessary.
    參考文獻: 中文參考文獻
    大衛(民97年7月10日)。專利價值盤點雷達圖。民97年8月29日，取自科技政策研究與資訊中心之科技產業資訊室─專利情報網站：http://cdnet.stpi.org.tw/tec
    hroom/pclass/pclass023.htm
    中華經濟研究院(民91)。美、歐、日及韓等有關知識產權(智慧財產權)之鑑價機構、交易市場與融資機構之研究。台北：經濟部。
    方世杰(民85)。企業技術交易模式影響因素之探討。國立台灣大學商學研究所博士學位論文，台北。
    王世仁、王世堯(民92)。智慧財產權剖析─論生物科技專利策略與實務。台北：宏懋打字印刷。
    王俊傑、陳達仁、黃慕萱(民96)。從專利觀點比較台灣與南韓技術創新能力(1987-2006)。政大智慧財產評論，5:2，31-51。
    台一國際專利法律事務所(民95年6月1日)。淺談專利鑑價。民97年9月15日，取自台一國際專利法律事務所出版品網站：http://www.taie.com.tw/big5/publicati
    on.asp?ID=1029&page=6。
    台一國際專利法律事務所(民95年8月1日)。淺談專利技術評估指標。民97年9月15日，取自台一國際專利法律事務所出版品網站：http://www.taie.com.tw/big5/
    publication asp?ID=1051&page=5。
    吳豐祥(民91年9月24日)。技術鑑價的８大考量。工商時報，第35版。
    吳豐祥、蔡政安(民91年5月)。技術交易服務業的發展與政策初探。科技發展政策報導，SR9105002。
    李嘉孟、陳威霖(民91)。新世紀技術移轉的核心－選擇權專利計價理論與技術交易市集之探討。智慧財產，40，70-79。
    周延鵬(民95a)。虎與狐的智慧力－智慧資源規劃九把金鑰。台北：天下文化。
    周延鵬(民95b)。一堂課2000億。台北：時報文化。
    林亞偉(民96年11月5日)。關鍵一擊超越 對手20年！商業周刊，1041，126-156。
    林欣吾、林秀英(民94)。台灣創新系統之競爭力與成長挑戰研究計畫。新價值創造的年代。「2005產業科技創新：新價值創造的年代」國際研討會，台北。
    洪永杰(2005)。「新能源專利技術分析與創新設計平台之建立」計畫書。2008年9月10日，取自：http://0rz.tw/1e4Pf。
    張孟元(民90)。無形資產中技術價值「影響因素與評估模式」之研究─以「資訊科技相關技術」為例。國立政治大學資訊管理學研究所博士學位論文，台北。
    陳玉萍(民93)。專利權運用情境對專利價值因子之影響─以專利權融資、入股及訴訟情境為例。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士學位論文，台北。
    陳威霖、李嘉孟(民91)。專利技術之選擇權鑑價模式--以生物科技產業為例。會計研究月刊，197，77-84。
    陳湘錡(民93)。財務資本、智慧資本與企業價值之關聯性探討-以資訊電子產業為例。國立台灣科技大學企業管理所碩士學位論文，台北。
    陳達仁(民96)。專利檢索與分析。台北，經濟部智慧財產局。
    陳達仁、黃慕萱(民91)。專利資訊與專利檢索。台北：文華圖書館管理資訊。
    陳達仁、黃慕萱(民94年)。專利品質及公司技術強度之評估方法及其儲存媒體物。中華民國發明專利第9,4125,332號專利。
    馮震宇(民91年)。智慧資產鑑價之問題與挑戰。民國97年9月13日，取自財團法人亞太智慧財產權發展基金會智權情報網：http://www.apipa.org.tw/Article/Art
    icle-ViewADA.asp?intADA.asp?intADAArticleID=94&strSortTarget=adaCreateDate
    葉玉慧(民92)。專利權、創新投資與公司價值創造關係之研究─以研發投資宣告為例。國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士班，台南。
    詹炳耀(民96)。專利鑑價。台北：經濟部智慧財產局。
    廖和信(民92)。專利，就是科技競爭力。台北：天下遠見。
    劉江彬、張孟元(民94)。無形資產評估鑑價之理論與實務。台北，華泰。
    蔡明月(民86)。書目計量學、科學計量學與資訊計量學。教育資料與圖書館學，34:3，268-284。
    鄭中人(民90)。論我國發明專利要件之立法政策及其演變。智慧財產權月刊，32，3-40。
    謝明華(民85)。專利地圖及其策略性應用研究。科學發展月刊，24:11，923-931。
    謝寶煖(民87)。專利與專利資訊檢索。大學圖書館，2:4，111-127。
    簡兆良(民92)。專利資產評估方法研究。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士學位論文，台北。
    羅炳榮(民91)。智慧財產價格評估。智慧財產，42，66-75。
    蘇瓜藤(民95a)。無形資產之評價(上)--依目的精緻評價 助標的市場活絡。會計研究月刊，252，56-61。
    蘇瓜藤(民95b)。無形資產之評價(下)--方法論各迎所所需 一致性尚且努力。會計研究月刊，253，70-80。
    黨倩娜(2005)。專利分析方法和主要指標。2008年9月8日，取自上海情報服務平台網站：http://www.istis.cn/list/list.aspx?id=2402。
    姫野桂一(2003)。特許評価ビジネスの活性化に向けて。知的資産創造，2003年7月号。
    英文參考文獻
    Adam, B. J., Trajtenberg, M., & Fogarty, M. S. (2000). The Meaning of Patent Citations: Report on the NBER/Case-Western Reserve Survey of Patentees (NBER Working Paper W7631).
    Albert, M. B., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. (1991). Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy, 20(3), 251-259.
    Allison, J. R., Lemley, M. A., Moore, K. A., & Trunkey, R. D. (2004). Valuable Patents. Georgetown Law Journal, 92(3), 435-479.
    Atallah, G., & Rodríguez, G. (2006). Indirect patent citations. Scientometrics, 67(3), 437-465.
    Barney, J. (2002). A Study of Patent Mortality Rates: Using Statistical Analysis to Rate and Value Patent Assets. AIPLA Quarterly Journal, 30(3), 317-352.
    Barney, J., & Hesterly, W. (2006). Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    Bosworth, D. L. (2004). The Ancestral Tree of IPC C12S: A Preliminary Exploration Based on a Sample of Two. Paper to be presented to the Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre Seminar Series, 27th January 2004. Retrieved September 16, 2008, from The Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre Web site: http://www.oiprc.ox.ac.uk/EJWP0204.pdf
    Bowonder, B., Yadav, S., & Kumar, B. S. (2000). R&D spending patterns of global firms. Research Technology Management, 43(5), 40-56.
    Breitzman, & Narin, F. (2001). Method and apparatus for choosing a stock portfolio, based on patent indicators. United States Patent, 6175824.
    Carpenter, M. P., Narin, F., & Woolf, P. (1981). Citation rates to technologically important patents. World Patent Information, 3(4), 160-163.
    Chan, S. H., Martin, J. D., & Kensinger, J. W. (1990). Corporate research and development expenditures and share value. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 255-276.
    Chauhan, L. P. S. (2007). Modelling stock market performance of firms as a function of the quality and quantity of intellectual property owned (Master dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2007).
    Chauvin, K. W., & Hirschey, M. (1993). Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm. Financial Management, 22(4), 128-140.
    Cockburn, I., & Griliches, Z. (1988). Industry Effects and Appropriability Measures in the Stock Market`s Valuation of R&D and Patents. The American Economic Review, 78(2), 419-423.
    Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
    Dierickx, I., Cool, K., & Barney, J. B. (1989). Asset Stock Accumulation And Sustainability Of Competitive. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1513.
    Ernst, H. (2003). Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information, 25(3), 233-242.
    Ernst, H., & Omland, N. (2003). Patent management in German high tech firms - An exploratory empirical investigation (WHU Working Paper).
    Faulkner, T. W. (1996). Applying `options thinking` to R&D valuation. Research Technology Management, 39(3), 50-56.
    Franko, L. G. (1989). Global Corporate Competition: Who`s Winning, Who`s Losing, and the R&D Factor as One Reason Why. Strategic Management Journal, 10(5), 449-474.
    Gay, C., & Bas, C. L. (2005). Uses without too many abuses of patent citations or the simple economics of patent citations as a measure of value and flows of knowledge. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(5), 333-338.
    Gibbs, A. (2005). Application of Multiple Known Determinants to Evaluate Legal, Commercial, and Technical Value of a Patent Retrieved September 14, 2008, from PatentCafe web site: http://www.patentcafe.com/library/whitepapers/paten
    t_factor_whitepaper.pdf
    Greene, W. H. (2002). Econometric Analysis (5th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Griliches, Z. (1981). Market value, R&D, and patents. Economics Letters, 7(2), 183-187.
    Griliches , Z. (1987). R&D and Productivity: Measurement Issues and Econometric Results. Science, 237, 31-35.
    Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661-1707.
    Griliches, Z., Ariel, P., & Bronwyn, H. H. (1988). The Value of Patents as Indicators of Inventive Activity (NBER Working Paper W2083).
    Grindley, P. C., & Teece, D. J. (1997). Managing intellectual capital: Licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics. California Management Review, 39(2), 8.
    Hall, B. H., Adam, B. J., & Trajtenberg, M. (2000). Market value and patent citations: A First Look (NBER Working Paper W7741).
    Hall, B. H., Adam, B. J., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools (NBER Working Paper W8498).
    Hall, B. H., Adam, B. J., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. Rand Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16-38.
    Hall, B. H., Thoma, G., & Torris, S. (2006). The Market Value of Patents and R&D: Evidence from European Firms (CESPRI-Bocconi University Working Paper 186).
    Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 511-515.
    Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343-1363.
    Hirschey, M., & Richardson, V. J. (2001). Valuation effects of patent quality: A comparison for Japanese and U.S. firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9(1), 65-82.
    Hirschey, M., & Richardson, V. J. (2004). Are scientific indicators of patent quality useful to investors? Journal of Empirical Finance, 11(1), 91-107.
    Hirschey, M., Richardson, V. J., & Scholz, S. (2001). Value Relevance of Nonfinancial Information: The Case of Patent Data. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 17(3), 223-235.
    Hong, S. (2004). The Magic of Patent Information. Retrieved September 7, 2008, from WIPO Web site: http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/documents/patent_information.ht
    m
    Ignacio Palacios-Huerta, O. V. (2004). The Measurement of Intellectual Influence. Econometrica, 72(3), 963-977.
    Jaruzelski, B., Dehoff, K., & Bordia., R. (2006). Smart Spenders: The Global Innovation 1000. Retrieved September 2, 2008, from strategy+business managize Web site: http://www.strategy-business.com/press/article/06405?pg=a
    ll
    Joseph, E. C., & Paul, E. B., III (2006). Measuring technological capability and performance. R&D Management, 36(4), 421-438.
    Karki, M. M. S. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269-272.
    Kelley, D. J., & Rice, M. P. (2002). Advantage beyond founding: The strategic use of technologies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(1), 41-57.
    Khoury, S., Daniele, J., & Germeraad, P. (2001). Selection and Application of Intellectual Property Valuation Methods in Portfolio Management and Value Extraction. Journal of The Licensing Executives Society, 36(3), 77-86.
    Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
    Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (1999). The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators (NBER Working Paper W7345).
    Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators. Economic Journal, 114(495), 441-465.
    Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), 107-138.
    Louis, K. C. C. J. L., & Theodore, S. (2001). The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. The Journal of Finance, 56(6), 2431-2456.
    Michel, J., & Bettels, B. (2001). Patent citation analysis.A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports. Scientometrics, 51(1), 185-201.
    Morbey, G. K., & Reithner, R. M. (1990). How R&D Affects Sales Growth, Productivity And Profitabilit. Research Technology Management, 33(3), 11-14.
    Nagaoka, S. (2005). Patent quality, cumulative innovation and market value: Evidence from Japanese firm level panel data (Hitotsubashi University IIR Working Paper WP#05-06).
    Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity. Cherry Hill, NJ: Computer Horizons.
    Narin, F. (1994). Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147-155.
    Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317-330.
    Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16(2-4), 143-155.
    Neary, J. P., James, A. M., & Jean, T. (2003). Evaluating Economics Research in Europe: An Introduction. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1239-1249.
    Nelson, R. R. (1991). Why Do Firms Differ, and How Does it Matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12, 61-74.
    Nonaka, I., & Teece, D. J. (2001). Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    Ohlson, J. (1995). Earnings, Book Values and Dividends in Security Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661-687.
    Oldach, S., & Stabinsky, N. (2008). Why Use Patent Analytics? Retrieved September 8, 2008, from Intellectual Property Today web site: http://www.iptoday.com/articl
    es/2008-5-stabinsky.asp
    Parasuraman, A., & Zeren, L. M. (1983). R&D`s Relationship with Profits and Sales. Research Management, 26(1), 25-28.
    Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing & Management, 12(5), 297-312.
    Putnam, J. (1996). The Value of International Patent Rights (Doctoral dissertation, Yale University, 1996).
    Razgaitis, R. (1999). Early-Stage Technologies: Valuation and Pricing. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    Reitzi, M. (2004). What Do Patent Indicators Really Measure? - A Structural Test of ‘Novelty’ and ‘Inventive Step’ as Determinants of Patent Profitability. Paper presented at the meeting of DRUID Summer Conference 2004: Industrial Dynamics, Innovation and Development, Elsinore, Denmark.
    Reitzig, M. (2004). Improving patent valuations for management purposes--validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research Policy, 33(6-7), 939-957.
    Schankerman, M., & Pakes, A. (1986). Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During the Post-1950 Period. The Economic Journal, 96(384), 1052-1076.
    Scherer, F. M. (1965). Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions. The American Economic Review, 55(5), 1097-1125.
    Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press..
    Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
    Teece, D. J. (2000). Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions. NY: Oxford University Press, USA.
    Thomas, P. (1999). The Effect of Technological Impact upon Patent Renewal Decisions. Technology, Analysis and Strategic Management, 11, 181-197.
    Thomas, P. (2001). A relationship between technology indicators and stock market performance. Scientometrics, 51(1), 319-333.
    Thomas, P., & Narin, F. (2004). System and method for producing technology-based price targets for a company stock. United States Patent, 6832211.
    Thomson Scientific Solutions. DWPI Brochure. Retrieved September 10, 2008, from DWPI Web site: http://scientific.thomson.com/ts/media/pdfs/DWPI_brochure.p
    df
    Tong, X., & Frame, J. D. (1994). Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data. Research Policy, 23(2), 133-141.
    Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172-187.
    Trajtenberg, M., Adam, B. J., & Henderson, R. (1997). University versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5(1), 19-50.
    Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Trippe, A. J. (2003). Patinformatics: Tasks to tools. World Patent Information, 25(3), 211-221.
    United States Patent and Trademark Office (2007). United States Patent and Trademark Office Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2007. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from USPTO Web site: http://www.uspto.gov/we
    b/offices/com/annual/2007/2007annualreport.pdf
    von Wartburg, I., Teichert, T., & Rost, K. (2005). Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Research Policy, 34(10), 1591-1607.
    World Intellectual Property Organization (2008). WIPO Patent Report: A Statistical Review (2008 Edition) Retrieved Septembet 1, 2008, from WIPO web site: http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/patents/wipo_pub_931.html
    Zhen, D., Baruch, L., & Francis, N. (1999). Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 20-32.
    Zoltan, P. M., & Anne, W. (2003). Using patent-based metrics to understand the value of companies (Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia, Working Paper No. 09/03).
    Zoltan, P. M., & Anne, W. (2008). The Association between Technological Conditions and the Market Value of Equity. The Accounting Review, 83(2), 479-518.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理研究所
    95359007
    97
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095359007
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[科技管理研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    900701.pdf104KbAdobe PDF2929檢視/開啟
    900702.pdf235KbAdobe PDF21002檢視/開啟
    900703.pdf201KbAdobe PDF21114檢視/開啟
    900704.pdf234KbAdobe PDF21041檢視/開啟
    900705.pdf477KbAdobe PDF21338檢視/開啟
    900706.pdf1119KbAdobe PDF21788檢視/開啟
    900707.pdf534KbAdobe PDF21378檢視/開啟
    900708.pdf392KbAdobe PDF21499檢視/開啟
    900709.pdf615KbAdobe PDF21088檢視/開啟
    900710.pdf334KbAdobe PDF21359檢視/開啟
    900711.pdf1883KbAdobe PDF21460檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋