政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/34291
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51665964      在线人数 : 586
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34291


    题名: 矽智財(SIP)交易之發展與制度規劃研究—以台灣IP Mall為例
    作者: 施傑峰
    Shih,Jey-Feng
    贡献者: 劉江彬
    Liu,Paul C.B.
    施傑峰
    Shih,Jey-Feng
    关键词: 交易成本
    統治結構
    設計重複使用
    矽智財
    系統單晶片
    矽導計畫
    智財匯集服務 (矽智財匯集平台/矽智財交易中心)
    transaction cost
    governance structure
    design reuse
    SIP (Silicon/Semiconductor Intellectual Property)
    SoC (System-on-Chip)
    Si-Soft project
    IP Mall
    日期: 2003
    上传时间: 2009-09-18 09:16:56 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 隨著半導體製程技術的快速演進，以及電子產品往系統單晶片（SoC）趨勢發展，晶片設計生產力與製程技術間的落差日益擴大。設計重複使用（design reuse）逐漸成為縮短兩者差距之重要方法；若能靈活應用公司內部的設計重複使用或大量引用外來矽智財（SIP）完成晶片設計，將有效加速產品設計時程、縮短上市時間、節省設計成本並降低風險。

    然而受限於資源、研發能力及SoC設計流程整合之複雜性，各公司無法自行開發所有需要的SIP，使得採用外部SIP並將其整合至設計專案中成為必要手段，並導致近幾年商品化SIP的交易市場開始蓬勃發展；但其中所牽涉之商業模式、授權方式與相關技術標準等議題卻相當複雜。

    SIP交易之一大障礙來自於缺乏交易過程中所有必須的基礎建設與相關服務。為解決此問題，目前已出現一些中介機構，提供SIP供應商、SoC設計者必要的法律契約、IP保護、交易媒合及結清等服務，使其在交易流通與應用上能更加便利。我國亦於2003年開始推動國家矽導計畫，希望透過其IP Mall子計畫，建立完善的SIP匯集交易與推廣服務機制。

    本研究從交易成本和統治結構觀點分析SIP的交易市場發展與衍生問題，並由交易流程中找出典型的商業模式與授權實務，繼而深入探討推廣SIP重複使用與促進交易流通之中介機構，為因應交易常見的問題與挑戰，在規劃交易運作制度、法律與整體交易體系之實際做法；就其擔任提供SIP交易相關活動支援的角色，提出實務上的制度規劃建議。

    研究對象為台灣國家矽導計畫中所建立的IP Mall，分別是由創意電子和智原科技兩家公司擔負基礎建設工作，並選擇國外VCX及SIPAC兩家機構做為對照。透過次級文獻蒐集、專家訪談等方法得到主要發現如下：
    1.極高的交易成本導致SIP交易困難。
    2.SIP交易需配合以三邊統治為基礎之中介機構方能有效執行。
    3.藉由建立SIP交易的機制及標準，將可大幅降低「交易成本以及資訊不對稱」所造成雙方損失。
    4.兩家IP Mall在功能服務說明、SIP匯集、品質驗證、履約保證與風險管理之制度規劃有待加強。
    5.台灣IP Mall的執行做法可朝Turnkey導向之營運模式發展。
    6.台灣IP Mall的規劃及運作缺乏整體規劃、使用誘因和成效評估。

    關鍵字：交易成本、統治結構、設計重複使用、矽智財、系統單晶片、矽導計畫、智財匯集服務（矽智財匯集平台／矽智財交易中心）
    The rapid advance of semiconductor fabrication technologies and the trend towards system-on-chip (SoC) based electronic devices development has caused the worsening gap between silicon capacity and design productivity. “Design reuse” becomes a key strategy for SoC design gap improvement. Combining a selection of reusable silicon IP (SIP) and new designs significantly shortens the time required to create complex SoC products and reduces costs & risks.

    However, due to constrained resources, the lack of experience with technologies and the complexity in SoC design flow integration, companies do need to source SIPs from outside suppliers instead of developing all kinds of functionalities internally. In recent years there has been a rapid development in the commercial SIP market. Nevertheless, the issues involved in the business model, licensing practices, and related technical standards are also quite complicated.

    A key barrier to trading SIP may be the lack of all necessary infrastructure and related services within the transaction flow. To overcome this, there are emerging intermediary organizations to facilitate SIP transactions and applications by providing necessary legal contracting, IP protection, trading matching, settlement and service for SIP providers and SoC Integrators. Taiwan also launched National Si-Soft Project from 2003 with an attempt to establish an appropriate SIP trading, promotion and service mechanism under its IP Mall sub-project.

    From the view of transaction costs and governance structure, this study analyzes the development and derivative problems of SIP trading market and generalizes common business models and licensing practices during the SIP transaction process. Moreover, according to the general problems and challenges from SIP trading, the study thoroughly discusses practices of intermediaries in the planning of transaction operating mechanism, legal matters and overall trading environment. Finally, this study offers some suggestions in practical system planning based on the role of providing SIP trading support.

    The study takes Taiwan’s IP Malls as subjects, which were implemented by Global Unichip Corporation and Faraday Corporation respectively. We also choose overseas organizations like VCX from Scotland and SIPAC from Korea as a comparison. Based on the literature review and individual interview, we found the following facts:
    1.Huge transaction costs result in SIP trading difficulties.
    2.Intermediary organizations based on trilateral governance are essential to implementing SIP trading effectively.
    3.Through the establishment of SIP trading systems and standards, the loss of both Buyers and Sellers results from transaction costs and information asymmetric can be reduced significantly.
    4.Both Taiwan’s IP Malls need to enhance their system planning in the service & function introduction, SIP collection, SIP quality assurance, verification, guaranty of contract and risk management.
    5.Taiwan’s IP Malls could take the turnkey-oriented business model based on their original design.
    6.The planning and operation of Taiwan’s IP Malls lacks a holistic view, attractions for usage and performance evaluations.

    Key words:
    transaction cost, governance structure, design reuse, SIP (Silicon Intellectual Property), SoC (System-on-Chip), Si-Soft project, IP Mall
    參考文獻: 一、中文文獻
    1.呂鴻德，「技術策略、功能互動與新產品績效關係之研究」，國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版博士論文，1992年。
    2.游雅祺，「技術知識特性、知識整合機制與知識移轉績效關係之研究」，國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文，2001年6月。
    3.花櫻芬，「高科技事業中技術知識特質與知識資源吸收之研究」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文，1996年6月。
    4.賴建男，「台灣IC設計業中技術知識特質與組織動態能耐之研究」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文，1997年6月。
    5.賴威龍，「組織知識流通之研究－以臺灣資訊硬體業為例」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文，1997年6月。
    6.江國誌，「廠商對於技術市場中介機構運用的相關因素之研究—以機械業為例」，文化大學國際企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文，1998年6月。
    7.洪堯勳，「從交易成本觀點探討價值鏈管理創新」，國立交通大學經營管理研究所未出版博士論文，2000年6月。
    8.曾瑜玉，「技術知識商品的交易市場研究—以SIP（矽智產）產業為例」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文，2001年6月。
    9.顏瑞全，「智慧財產權融資可行性之分析」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文，2002年6月。
    10.陳嘉慧，「台灣SIP Mall交易模式及經營策略之賽局分析與實證研究」，國立交通大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文，2003年6月。
    11.劉奕芳，「技術交易中介機構發展之研究」，國立交通大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文，2003年6月。
    12.王俊如，「多元交易關係之研究—以兩個交易關係的互相影響研究」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文，2003年6月。
    13.陳振祥、李吉人，「ODM的成因與策略運作—水平式產業下的策略聯盟型態」，中山管理評論，第五卷第三期，頁553-572，1997年。
    14.邱世寬，「高科技產業新產品開發之控制機制設計與績效關係之研究」，ITIS產業論壇，第五卷第三期，2003年9月。
    15.張俊彥、彭松村，「國家矽導計畫晶片系統國家型科技計畫總體規劃書」，2002年。
    16.「3C整合科技與產業白皮書」，財團法人NII產業發展協進會3C整合策劃推行小組，2003年1月。
    17.莊偉傑、范哲豪，「知識經濟在半導體產業的實現─SIP」，工業技術研究院產業經濟與資訊服務中心，2002年8月。
    18.徐美雯、曾瑜玉，「知識產權市場交易機制發展趨勢—以SIP為例」，資訊工業策進會資訊市場情報中心（MIC），2002年9月。
    19.吳欣怡、郭秋鈴、吳智伶等，「SoC趨勢下我國IC產業發展策略」，工業技術研究院產業經濟與資訊服務中心，2002年10月。
    20.范哲豪，「矽智產交易（SIP Mall）研究」，工業技術研究院產業經濟與資訊服務中心，2003年12月。
    21.徐敏思，「SIP產業的發展趨勢與挑戰」，半導體產業動態觀察，拓墣產業研究所，2002年12月。
    22.吳思華，「策略九說—策略思考的本質」，臉譜文化出版，1996年。
    23.蕭敏、陳明發、黃淑君，矽智財交易及其相關法律問題探討，政大智慧財產評論，第一卷第一期第四篇，2003年。
    24.吳豐祥、蔡政安，技術交易服務業的發展與政策初探，科技發展政策報導（SR9105），頁314-326，2002年。
    25.吳豐祥、許牧彥、蔡政安等，技術交易服務業願景規劃研究報告，經濟部工業局委託國立政治大學科技管理研究所專案計畫，2002年10月。
    26.巫黃鑑、陳明發、陳碧琳、吳明烈、楊佩文、余明長，產業協同合作，創造商業價值—以矽智財為例，經濟部技術處「培訊科技背景跨領域高級人才計畫」—九十一年海外培訓成果發表會論文集，2002年12月。
    27.黃逸平，IC設計的新趨勢—IP，電子時報，1998/07/14。
    28.黃逸平，SoC產業的尋夢者—蘇格蘭，電子時報，2000/01/18-20。
    29.柯心瀅，IP交易過程及各階段注意要領─評估階段、簽約階段、支援與服務階段，零組件雜誌第109期，遠播資訊股份有限公司，2000年11月。
    30.鄭斐方，架構健全的SIP產業環境—IP Mall的機會與挑戰，零組件雜誌第140期，頁52-56，遠播資訊股份有限公司，2002年6月。
    31.周銘、夏筑，SIP推動篳路藍縷，台灣IC設計產業腳步延後！？，IC設計月刊第41期，頁9-14，向網科技股份有限公司，2003年9月。
    二、英文文獻
    1.Akerloff, G. (1970), “The market for ‘Lemons’: Quality and the market mechanism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.84, August, pp.488-500.
    2.Ambrosio E.M. (1995), “Technological management and transfer of technology,” International Journal of Technology Management, 10 (7/8), pp.665-675.
    3.Arrow, K.J. (1962), “Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention,” in Arrow, K.J. (ed), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    4.Arrow, K.J. (1969), “The organization of economic activity: Issues pertinent to the choice of market versus nonmarket allocation,” in The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditure: The PPB System, Vol.1, U.S. Joint Economic Committee, 91st Cong., 1st session. Washington, DC; U.S. Government Printing Office, pp.59-63.
    5.Arrow, K.J., (1974), The Limits of Organization, New York: Norton.
    6.Auster, E.R. (1990), “The interorganizational environment: Network theory, tools, and applications,” in Williams, F. & Gibson, D. (eds), Technology Transfer: A Communication Perspective, CA: Sage Publication Inc. pp.63-89.
    7.Autio, E. & Laamanen, T. (1995), “Measurement and evaluation of technology transfer: review of technology transfer mechanism and indicators,” International Journal of Technology Management, 10(7/8), pp.643-664.
    8.Badaracco J. (1991), The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    9.Barney, J.B. & Ouchi, W.G. (1986), Organizational Economics —Toward a New Paradigm for Understanding and Studying Organizations, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    10.Bessant, J. & Rush, H. (1995), “Building bridges for innovation: The role of consultants in technology transfer,” Research Policy, 24(1), pp.97, 101-102.
    11.Bidault, F. & Fischer, W.A. (1994), “Technology transaction: networks over markets,” R&D Management, 24(4), pp.373-386.
    12.Bohn, R.E. (1994), “Measuring and managing technological knowledge”, Sloan Management Review, Fall, pp.61-73.
    13.Branson, J. (1966), “Transfer technology knowledge by international corporation to developing countries,” American Economics Review, May, pp.259-267.
    14.Bryant, T.A. & Reenstra-Bryant, R.A. (1998), “Technology brokers in the North American software industry: Getting most out of mismatched dyads,” International Journal of Technology Management, 16(1), pp.281&286.
    15.Carter, A.P. (1989), “Knowhow trading as economic change,” Research Policy, 18(2), pp.155-163.
    16.Caves, R.E., Crookel, H. & Killing, P.J. (1983), “The imperfect market for technology licenses,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 45(3), pp.223-248.
    17.Chi, T. (1994), “Trading in strategic resources: necessary conditions, transaction cost problems, and choice of transaction structure,” Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), pp.1-22.
    18.Coase, R.H. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, Vol.4, pp.386-405. Reprinted in Coase (1988), The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp.33-56.
    19.Dasgupta, P. & P.A. David (1994), “Toward a new economics of science,” Research Policy, 23(5) pp.487-521.
    20.Davenport, T.H. & Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge: How Organization Manage What They Know, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    21.Drucker, P.F. (1993), Post-Capitalist Society, New York: Harper Business.
    22.Farrel, J. & Saloner G. (1996), “Competition, Compatibility and Standards,” Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, pp.295-304, Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc.
    23.Ford, D. & Ryan, C. (1981), “Taking technology to market,” Harvard Business Review, March/April, pp.117-126.
    24.Gulati, R. & Singh, H. (1998), “The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliance,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), pp.781-814.
    25.Hedlund, G. (1994), “A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.15, pp.73-90.
    26.Hipple, E.V., “Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-know trading,” Research Policy, 16(2), pp.291-302, 1987.
    27.Howarth, C.S. (1994), “The role of strategic alliances in the development of technology,” Technovation, 14(4), pp.243-257.
    28.Katz, R., Rebentisch, E.S. & Allen, T.J. (1996), “A study of technology transfer in multinational cooperative joint venture,” IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 43(1), pp.97-105.
    29.Lacity, M.C. & R. Hirschheim (1993), Information System Outsourcing—Myths, Metaphors and Realities, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
    30.Leonard-Barton, Dorothy (1992), “Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, pp.111-125.
    31.Lesko, J. & Irish, M. (1995), Technology Exchange: A Guide to Successful Cooperative Research and Development Partnerships, Ohio: Battele Press, pp.188.
    32.Nonaka, I. (1994), “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation,” Organization Science, 5(1), pp.14-37.
    33.North, D.C. (1991), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
    34.Perlmutter, H.V., & T. Sagafinejad (1991), Technology Transfer, New York: Pergamo Press.
    35.Pisano, G. P. (1990), “The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical Analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp.153-176.
    36.Ratford, V., Popper, N., Caldwell D. & Katsioulas, T. (2003/06), Understanding the Semiconductor Intellectual Property (SIP) Business Process - Finding, Evaluating, and Licensing Commercial SIP (Ver 1.0), Industry Baseline Working Group (IBWG), Fabless Semiconductor Association (FSA).
    37.Roman, D.D. & Puett, J.F. Jr. (1983), International Business and Technological Innovation, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing, pp.157.
    38.Schon, D. (1967), “Champions for radical new inventions,” Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp.77-86.
    39.Shariff, M.N. (1988), “Basis for techno-economic policy analysis,” Science and Public Policy, 15(4), pp.217-229.
    40.Shohet, S. & Prevezer, M. (1996), “UK biotechnology: Institutional linkages, technology transfer and the role of intermediaries,” R&D Management, 26(3), pp.293-294.
    41.Souder, W. E. (1987), Managing New Product Innovation, Lexington Books, Candon Toronto, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
    42.Stantikarn, M. (1981), Technology Transfer: A Case Study, Singapore: Singapore University Press.
    43.Staudt, E., Bock, J. & Muhlemeyer, P. (1994), “Technology centres and sciences park: Agent or competence centres for small business,” International Journal of Technology Management, 9(2), pp.196.
    44.Tapon, F. (1989), “A transaction cost analysis of innovations in the organization of Pharmaceutical R&D,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12, pp.197-213.
    45.Teece, D.J. (1977), “Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technology know-how,” The Economic Journal, 87(2), pp.242-261.
    46.Teece, D.J. (1986), “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy,” Research Policy, 15(6), pp.285-305.
    47.Teece, D.J. (1992), “Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol.18, pp.1-25.
    48.Teece, D.J., (2000), Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions, New York, Oxford University Press.
    49.Thompson, J.D. (1967), Organizations in Action, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
    50.UNCATD (1970), Technology from Developed to Developing Countries, NY: United Nation, pp.47.
    51.Whinston, A.B., Stahl, D.O. & Choi, S.Y. (1997), The Economic of Electronic Commerce, Indiana: Macmillan Technical Publishing, pp.239.
    52.Williamson, O.E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, N.Y.: The Free Press.
    53.Williamson, O.E. (1979), “Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual relationship,” Journal of Law and Economics, 22(3), pp.233-262.
    54.Williamson, O.E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, N.Y.: The Free Press.
    55.Zaheer, A. & Venkatraman, V. (1995), “Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange,” Strategic Management Journal, 16, pp.373-392.
    三、參考網站
    1.國家矽導計畫，http://www.eic.nctu.edu.tw/SOC
    2.矽導計畫晶片系統國家型科技計畫，http://nsoc.eic.nctu.edu.tw
    3.創意電子公司，http://www.globalunichip.com
    4.創意電子TIPM，http://www.tipm.com
    5.智原科技公司，http://www.faraday-tech.com
    6.智原科技SIP Mall，http://www.sipmall.com
    7.VCX，http://www.thevcx.com
    8.SIPAC，http://www.sipac.org
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理研究所
    89359020
    92
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089359020
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[科技管理研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    35902001.pdf43KbAdobe PDF2895检视/开启
    35902002.pdf82KbAdobe PDF21019检视/开启
    35902003.pdf97KbAdobe PDF2970检视/开启
    35902004.pdf168KbAdobe PDF2852检视/开启
    35902005.pdf180KbAdobe PDF2869检视/开启
    35902006.pdf507KbAdobe PDF22266检视/开启
    35902007.pdf212KbAdobe PDF2978检视/开启
    35902008.pdf246KbAdobe PDF21673检视/开启
    35902009.pdf515KbAdobe PDF23007检视/开启
    35902010.pdf824KbAdobe PDF21691检视/开启
    35902011.pdf566KbAdobe PDF21499检视/开启
    35902012.pdf673KbAdobe PDF21400检视/开启
    35902013.pdf470KbAdobe PDF21210检视/开启
    35902014.pdf170KbAdobe PDF21061检视/开启
    35902015.pdf115KbAdobe PDF21169检视/开启
    35902016.pdf256KbAdobe PDF21257检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈