政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/34285
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51733904      Online Users : 594
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34285


    Title: 從創新觀點檢視創作共享機制與著作權保護及知識分享擴散之關係
    Creative Commons and Its Relationship with Copyright Protection and Knowledge Sharing Distribution ~from an Innovation Perspective~
    Authors: 盧文祥
    Lu,Wen-Hsiang
    Contributors: 劉江彬
    Liu,Paul C.B.
    盧文祥
    Lu,Wen-Hsiang
    Keywords: 創作共享
    授權契約
    CC授權條款
    著作權保護
    知識分享
    知識擴散
    制度創新
    Creative Commons
    Licensing Agreement
    CC Licensing Terms
    Copyrights Protection
    Knowledge Sharing
    Knowledge Proliferation
    System Innovation
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 09:15:42 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 著作肩負著人類對文化傳承、藝術發揚及知識分享的重責大任，影響深遠，自應創造因誘因加以鼓勵並給予適當的法律保障；惟現代著作權法保護創作人的思維均藉由「創作完成自動保護」的途徑，賦予創作人各種著作人格權及著作財產權，一改往昔仍須藉由註冊審查或登記列冊方能享有著作權的傳統作法。然而,任何偉大的著作,其價值乃貴在廣為利用方能源遠流傳，前述各類創作人是否分享或放棄著作權之意願，由法律自動保留全部權利（all rights reserved）的預設（default）立場，使得利用人在利用著作或接續創作的平台受到重重的限制，除了能符合較抽象的「合理使用」範疇以外，利用著作前均須依法取得權利人之同意或授權方能免除因此所生侵權責任。
    對於一向主張著作應視為公共財的自由派學者，前述加諸廣大利用人動輒得咎的法律限制，顯然會認為對於知識分享擴散造成阻礙的結果無法忍受，於是美國史丹福大學Lawrence Lessig教授即於2002年間號召有識之士，倡導「Creative Commons」（本研究稱為「創作共享」）之運動，藉由「保留部分著作權」（some rights reserved）的理念，設計鬆綁著作權法以釋出著作權的機制，現正積極在世界各國間推廣中。
    本研究即針對上述理念之興起，思考此一創新機制與知識分享擴散及著作權保護間有無相關，並試圖找出可能直接影響機制之關鍵因素提供建言。在第一章部分，除敍明研究動機、目的、範圍、限制外，更直指本研究之問題所在及預期之貢獻；第二章即針對研究主題，包括過去對著作權保護、創作共享機制、知識分享擴散及制度創新的研究進行文獻探討，第三章則對研究核心創作共享機制具體實踐之契約條款予以法律剖析檢驗，並釋疑部分易為外界混淆或誤解之觀念；第四章則詳細闡明研究方法後，設定各個命題及假設，並各賦予操作化定義，落實為問卷調查之問題及選項，第五章則以立意取向調查方式發放及回收共547份有效問卷，並以11.0版SPSS軟體執行問卷數據分析並進而出各項判讀，印證前述命題及假設相關程度，另從管理意涵賦予各項解讀之詮釋；第六章則藉由坊間已先後運行的四個類似創作共享機制的個案，將前述檢驗的內外因素、體質因素、驅動因素等研究構面逐一比較，第七章即就研究成果列出結論並提出後續研究之建議以供來者繼續接棒發揚。
    Creative work carries the responsibilities of cultural inheritance, artistic manifestation, and knowledge sharing; its influences are far reaching and the work ought to be encouraged and properly protected by law. In contrast to traditional copyright laws, whereby protection was given only after registration or examination, current copyright laws give protection to creative work upon its completion, and provide the creator with all kinds of moral integrity rights and copyrights. However, the value of a masterpiece lies in its widespread use, and the current legal system gives the creator, by default, all rights to reserve their intention to share or forfeit their copyrights. From the user’s standpoint, this protective system means limitations and restrictions in using creative work or in continuing creative platform—requiring the user to obtain agreement or license from the rights owner for any use of the work outside the scope of “fair use.”
    Liberal scholars who believe creative work ought to be public property find these legal restrictions on users and limitations on the proliferation of knowledge sharing intolerable. In 2002, under the appeal of Stanford’s Professor Lawrence Lessig, the movement for Creative Commons was begun. Under this model, relaxation of copyrights with some rights reserved is called for, and this idea is being widely promoted throughout the world.
    This study focuses on the development of this new ideology and examines its relationship with the proliferation of knowledge sharing and copyrights protection, and further inspects the key factors that may directly influence this new mechanism as well as provides necessary suggestions. Chapter One explains the motivation, purpose, scope, and limitation of this study as well as pointing out the problems and expectations of this study. Chapter Two focuses on the main theme of this study, including empirical studies on past copyright protections, creative commons mechanism, proliferation of knowledge sharing and innovation of its system. Chapter Three examines the legal aspects of the creative commons licensing agreement and clarifies the parts that are confusing or can be easily misunderstood. Chapter Four explains the research approach and sets up theories for each topic, and defines the procedures for selecting questions for the survey. Chapter Five analyzes the 547 valid surveys, which were distributed using the conceptual approach, using v.11.0 of SPSS against the topic and theories set forth in the previous chapter, and interpret each item in the survey via management connotation. Chapter Six compares four existing mechanisms similar to the creative commons model in terms internal and external factors, physical factors, and driving factors. Chapter Seven discusses the results of this study and states suggestions for subsequent research.
    Reference: 1. 方世榮、方世杰(2000)，「知識管理觀念架構的建立」，商管科技季刊，Vol. 1 (3)，頁355-374。
    2. 王美音 譯(1998)，知識創新之泉：智價企業的經營，台北：遠流。原著：雷納德巴頓(Dorothy Leonard-Barton)。
    3. 伍忠賢（2000），「知識管理策略-知識取得方式的抉擇」，能力雜誌，Vol.537，頁110-112。
    4. 伍忠賢(2001)，知識管理：策略與實務，台北：華泰。
    5. 伍忠賢(2004)，知識經濟，台北：全華。
    6. 吳思華(2000)，策略九說，台北：城邦文化。
    7. 吳書榆 譯(2001)，知識的戰爭，台北：聯經出版。原著：舒爾曼(Seth Shulman)。
    8. 吳凱琳 譯(2000)，創新的兩難：企業面對新科技的掙扎與抉擇，台北：商周出版。原著：克里斯坦森(Christensen, Clayton M.)。
    9. 李芳齡、李田樹 譯(2004)，創新者的解答，台北：天下出版。原著：克里斯坦森(Christensen, Clayton M.)。
    10. 李科逸(2005)，「自由軟體國際間智財權重要爭訟及趨勢之淺析」，智慧財產權，Vol.76, 頁5。
    11. 李素華(2004)，「智財權人拒絕授權構成優勢地位濫用--歐洲法院確立判斷標準」，科技法律透析，Vol.16 (7)，頁11-16。
    12. 李婉萍(2005)，「加拿大、日本關於著作權人不明或失聯時之法定授權制度介紹」，科技法律透析，Vol.17 (3)，頁12-15。
    13. 林柳君 譯(2000)，閣樓上的林布蘭，台北：經典傳訊。原著：李飛特(Kevin G. Rivette)、克萊因(Kline, David)。
    14. 益思科技法律事務所(2002)，數位科技對著作權授權契約及合理使用範圍之影響之研究，經濟部智慧財產局委託研究。
    15. 益思科技法律事務所(2004)，著作物重製設備補償金收取制度之研究，經濟部智慧財產局委託研究。
    16. 張玉文 譯(2000)，知識管理─哈佛商業評論，台北：天下文化。原著：杜拉克(Drucker, Peter F.)。
    17. 許牧彥(2001)，「從知識的經濟特質談台灣專利制度的演進」，知識資本在台灣，台北：遠流，頁297-352，。
    18. 陳宜君 譯(2003)，著作權保護了誰？，台北：商周出版。原著：維迪亞那桑 (Vaidhyanathan, Siva)。
    19. 陳淑美(2005)，「我國著作權業務之現況與願景」，智慧財產權，Vol.73，頁92-114。
    20. 章忠信(2003)，「著作權保護、科技發展與合理使用」，2003全國科技法律研討會論文集，頁。
    21. 章忠信(2004)，著作權法的第一堂課，台北：書泉。
    22. 傅振焜 譯(2003)，杜拉克談未來企業，台北：時報文化。原著：杜拉克 (Drucker, Peter F.)。
    23. 賀德芬(1986)，著作權法論文集，台北：自刊。
    24. 黃怡騰(2001)，著作之合理使用案例介紹，經濟部智慧財產局委託。
    25. 黃俊英、劉江彬(1998)，智慧財產的法律與管理：美日智慧財產權管理制度與技術移轉模式之研究，台北：華泰出版。
    26. 黃銘傑(2005)，日本著作權法現況與相關修正之研究-期中報告，經濟部智慧財產局委託研究。
    27. 楊子江、王美音(1997)，創新求勝：智價企業論，台北：源流。原著：野中郁次郎 (Nonaka, Ikujiro)、竹內弘高 (Takeuchi, Hirotaka)。
    28. 廖月娟 譯(1996)，旁觀者：管理大師杜拉克回憶錄，台北：麥格羅希爾。原著：杜拉克 (Drucker, Peter F.)。
    29. 廖月娟、陳琇玲、李芳齡 譯(2001)，第五項修練. III, 變革之舞 : 持續「學習型組織」動力的挑戰與策略，台北：天下文化。原著：孫吉(Senge,Peter M.)
    30. 齊思賢 譯(2000)，知識經濟時代，台北：時報文化。原著：梭羅(Thurow, Lester C.)。
    31. 劉孔中、宿希成(2000)，電腦程式相關發明之專利保護：法律與技術之分析，台北：自刊。
    32. 劉江彬(2002)，「知識經濟時代下企業的智慧財產權管理」，會計研究月刊，Vol.204，pp.67-73。
    33. 劉偉京 譯(2000)，知識管理的第一本書，台北：商周文化。原著：勤業顧問公司(Arthur Andersen Business Consulting)。
    34. 劉毓玲 譯(2000)，21世紀的管理挑戰，台北：天下遠見。原著：杜拉克 (Drucker, Peter F.)。
    35. 劉靜怡 譯(2002)，網路自由與法律，台北：商周出版。原著：雷席格 (Lessig, Lawrence)。
    36. 蔡文橐(2004)，BLOG架設我的部落格，台北：城邦文化。
    37. 盧文祥(1988)，司法革新與電腦科技互動關係之研究，台北：自刊。
    38. 謝育容 譯(2006)，創新者的思考：看見生意與創意的源頭，台北：商周出版。原著：大前研一。
    39. 羅明通(2005)，著作權法論，第六版，台北：群彥圖書。
    40. 蘇育琪、鄭新嘉、陳景蔚 譯(2003)，勇者致富－全球化：在拒絕與接受之間，台北：天下雜誌。原著：梭羅(Thurow, Lester C.)。
    英文資料
    1. Amabile, T.M.(1994), "The Delicate Balance in Managing for Creativity.", R&D Innovator, Vol. 3, pp.1-9.
    2. Amabile, T.M.(1997), "Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do.", California Management Review, Vol. 40 (1), pp.39-58.
    3. Anand B.N., Khanna T., (2000),"Intellectual Property Rights and Contract Structure", Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. XLVIII, 103-135.
    4. Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.(1998), Working knowledge : how organizations manage what they know, Boston, Mass : Harvard Business School Press.
    5. Davenport, Thomas H. & Prusak, Laurence(1998), Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press.
    6. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination on human behavior. New York: Academic.
    7. Eriksson, Inger V., Dickson, G. W (2000), "Reflections on designing field research for emerging IS topics: the case of knowledge management", Communications of the AIS, Vol.3 (2), pp.
    8. Everett M. Rogers (1962) , Diffusion of Innovations, 1st Ed. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
    9. Grossman, Gene M., Helpman, E.(1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy,, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    10. Herbert, T. T. (1976). Dimensions of Organizational Behavior, New York: Collier Macmillan.
    11. Hidding, G. & Shireen, M. C.(1998), "Anatomy of a learning organization: Turning knowledge into capital at Andersen Consulting", Knowledge and Process Management, Vol.5 (1), pp.3-13
    12. Holtshouse D. (1998), "Knowledge Research Issues", California Management Review Vol. 40 (3), pp.277-280.
    13. Kim, W.C. and Mauborgne, R.A. (1997), "Fair Process: Managing in the Knowledge Economy", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75(4), pp. 65-75.
    14. Leaffer, Marshall A.(1999),Understanding copyright law, 3rd ed, New York: M. Bender.
    15. Leigh Weiss (1999),"Collection and Connection：The Anatomy of Knowledge Sharing in Professional Service Firms", Organizational Development Journal, pp.66
    16. Lessig, Lawrence(1999), Code : and other laws of cyberspace, New York: Basic Books.
    17. Lessig, Lawrence(2005), Free culture : the nature and future of creativity, London: Penguin Books.
    18. McEvily Susan, Chakravarthy Bala(2002),"The Persistence of Knowledge-based Advantage: An Empirical Test for Product Performance and Technological Knowledge", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, pp.285-305.
    19. Nijssen, J., Lieshout, K.M. (1995), "Awareness, use and effectiveness of models and methods for new product development." , European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 29 (10), pp.27-44.
    20. Nonaka, I., M. Konno. (1998), "The Concept of Ba: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation", California Management Review, Vol.3 (40), pp. 40-54.
    21. Owens, R.G. (1991). Organizational Behavior in Education, Boston: Allyn and
    22. Patry, William F. (1994), "Fair use is an affirmative defense. As such, it is a privilege, not a right, and is relevant only after a prima facie shoeing of infringement has been established.", Copyright Law and Practice, pp.725-726.
    23. Polanyi, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
    24. Polanyi, M.(1966), The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge & Kegan paul.
    25. Poter, L. W., Steers, R.M., Mowday, R.T. & Boulian, P.V. (1974), "Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.59 (5), pp.603-609.
    26. Quinn, J.B., Anderson, P. & Finkelstein, S.(1996),"Managing professional intellect : making the most of the best", Harvard Business Review,Vo1.74, pp.71-80.
    27. Robbin, S.P. (1992). Organizational Behavior. Prentice Hall In.
    28. Rogers, E.M., Shoemaker, F.F. (1971), Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach, New York: The Free Press.
    29. Romer, P. M. (1986),"Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth." Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, pp.1002-1037.
    30. Saviotti, Paolo(1996),Technological evolution, variety, and the economy, Cheltenham, UK ; Brookfield.
    31. Schumpeter, J.A. (1948), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy 5th, London: George Allen and Unwin.
    32. Stewart, Thomas A.(1997), Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations, New York: Doubleday.
    33. Stott, K., Walker, A. (1995), Teams: teamwork & teambuilding: the manager`s complete guide to teams in organizations, New York : Prentice Hall.
    34. Tampoe, M(1993), "Motivating Knowledge Workers - The Challenge for The 1990s", Long Range Planning, Vol, 26 (3), pp49-55.
    35. Tampoe, M. (1994), "Exploiting the core competences of your organization", Long Range Planning, 21(4), pp.66-77.
    36. von Krogh , G. (1998), "Care in knowledge creation", California Management Review, Vol. Vol. 40(3), pp.133-153.
    37. Wesley M. Cohen, Daniel A. Levinthal (1990), "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation", Journal article by; Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. .
    38. Williamson O.E.(1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New-York: The Free Press.
    39. Williamson, Oliver E, Winter, Sidney G, Coase, R. H.(1991), The Nature of the firm : origins, evolution, and development, New York: Oxford University Press.
    40. Zack, Michael H (1999), "Developing a knowledge strategy", California Management Review, Vol.41 (3), pp.125-145.
    網路資料
    1. GNU計畫網站，http://www.gnu.org/
    2. Open Access網站，http://www.centerpd.org
    3. Stallman教授網站，http://www.stallman.org/
    4. 加拿大維多利亞大學網站，http://ise.uvic.ca/
    5. 自由軟體基金會網站，http://www.fsf.org/
    6. 自由軟體鑄造場網站，http://www.openfoundry.org/
    7. 李仁芳教授網站，http://tim.nccu.edu.tw/croci/group/leerenfang.htm
    8. 奇摩「知識+」網站，http://tw.knowledge.yahoo.com/
    9. 奇摩部落格網站，http://tw.blog.yahoo.com/
    10. 紐約時報專欄網站，http://www.petitiononline.com/
    11. 創用CC中文網站，http://www.creativecommons.org.tw
    12. 創用CC英文網站，http://creativecommons.org/
    13. 無名小站部落格網站，http://www.wretch.cc/blog/
    14. 著作權筆記網站，http://www.copyrightnote.org/
    15. 開放原始碼基金會網站，http://www.opensource.org/
    16. 經濟部工業局數位學習產業推動與發展計畫網站，http//www.elearn.org.tw/
    17. 經濟部智慧財產局網站，http://www.tipo.gov.tw/
    18. 維基線上百科網站，http://www.wikipedia.org/
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理研究所
    88359505
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088359505
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Technology and Innovation Management] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35950501.pdf71KbAdobe PDF2927View/Open
    35950502.pdf181KbAdobe PDF21077View/Open
    35950503.pdf178KbAdobe PDF2968View/Open
    35950504.pdf473KbAdobe PDF21025View/Open
    35950505.pdf258KbAdobe PDF21221View/Open
    35950506.pdf794KbAdobe PDF21806View/Open
    35950507.pdf387KbAdobe PDF21591View/Open
    35950508.pdf199KbAdobe PDF2953View/Open
    35950509.pdf627KbAdobe PDF21355View/Open
    35950510.pdf351KbAdobe PDF21187View/Open
    35950511.pdf236KbAdobe PDF21092View/Open
    35950512.pdf443KbAdobe PDF21207View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback