English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51871285      Online Users : 297
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/34234
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34234


    Title: 智慧資本衡量指標在績效評估之運用-以科學工業園區管理局為例
    Authors: 顏志哲
    Contributors: 吳安妮
    劉正田

    顏志哲
    Keywords: 科學園區
    績效評估
    智慧資本衡量指標
    Science Park
    Performance evaluation
    Intellectual capital measurement
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 09:05:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本研究目的在探討智慧資本衡量指標如何運用於績效評估上,透過文獻探討以及專家學者之意見,建立適當之智慧資本衡量指標,以作為本研究之績效評估指標,並以在科學園區內設廠之廠商為問卷發放對象,探討園區內廠商對於科學園區管理局所提供服務之評估。本文將科學園區提供之服務依照智慧資本構成要素分類為知識資本、組織資本與顧客資本深入探討,期望能瞭解廠商對於科學園區管理局提供服務之重要性、期望程度以及達成水準之看法。最後探討不同特性之廠商(產業別、所在園區、經營績效、規模、未來展望、依賴程度、是否在園區外另行設廠),是否影響其對於科學園區提供服務之重要性、期望程度與達成水準之看法。
      研究結論發現,目前我國科學園區內的廠商普遍依然認為與組織資本相關之服務最為重要,例如園區能提供穩定的能源,其次為知識資本相關之服務,最後為顧客資本相關之服務。另外,本研究亦發現不同特性的廠商會影響其對於園區提供服務之重要性、期望程度與達成水準之看法。故,政府應深入探討不同特性廠商之需要,以提供一個良好的高科技產業發展之環境。
    The purpose of this research was to explore how to use the measurement indicators of intellectual capital to assess performance provided to firms by Science Park Administration. In addition, explored how the different characteristics of firms (industries, location, operation performance, size, future prospects and dependence) influenced the performance provided by Science Park Administration. Performance measurement indicators divided into three catergories including knowledge capital, organizational capital and customer capital. And the performance was assessed by three evaluation criteria: importance, expectations and achievement.
    Conclusion of the research found that firms considered the the most important services provided by Science Park Administration was organizational capital-related sevices, followed by the knowledge capital-related services, and the last important is customer capital-related services. In addition, the research also found that different characteristics of firms will affect their views on sevices provided by Science Park Administration. Therefore, in order to provide a good high-tech industry development environment, the government should thoroughly investigate different firms’ needs with different characteristics.
    Reference: 中文部份
    于宗先,1998,台灣經濟發展的困境與出路,台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    于宗先、王金利,2003,一隻看得見的手-政府在經濟發展過程中的角色,台北,聯經出版公司。
    王文英、張清福,2004,智慧資本影響績效模式之探討:我國半導體業之實證研究,會計評論,第39期:88-117。
    李國鼎、陳木在,1987,我國經濟發展策略總論(上、下冊),台北:聯經出版社。
    李允傑、丘昌泰,1999,政策執行與評估。台北:國立空中大學。
    李昱慧,2005,智慧資本衡量之研究─以製藥產業為例,私立大同大學資訊經營研究所碩士論文。
    吳安妮,2003,智慧資本的類別與評價機制之探討,智慧資本的創造與管理研討會,台北市。
    吳思華、黃宛華、賴鈺晶,2000,智慧資本衡量因素之研究-以我國軟體業為例,發表於中華民國科技管理研討會,台北:國立政治大學。
    吳統熊,1995,態度與行為研究的信度與效度:理論、反應、反省,民意學術專刊,夏季號。
    吳淑鈴,2004,生物科技產業智慧資本衡量指標之建立,國立彰化師範大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
    吳明瑜,2004,非營利組織智慧資本與績效評估之關聯性研究,私立中國文化大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    呂清松,1997,科學園區對地方發展之論爭與臺灣實證:新竹科學園區個案研究,國立中興大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
    胡太山,1991,台灣地區科技園區區域發展策略研究,國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
    高誓男、蔡保言、李麗霞、吳治忠,2004,工業區暨科學園區設廠申辦流程與作業之分析與檢討摘要報告。
    孫克難,1998,發展台灣成為「科技島」之策略與作為,經濟情勢暨評論第三卷,第四期:107-140。
    張璠、張吉宏,1997,設置「科學園區」與「科技工業區」之競合問題探討,經濟情勢暨評論,第三卷,第三期:87-94。
    陳文隆,2001,匯聚智慧資本開創企業利基,品質月刊(8月):34-37。
    陳毓晴,2002,從群聚論台灣高科技產業與大學的互動,國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
    陳志明,2002,研發導向機構智慧資本衡量指標建立之研究-以我國某航太公司為例,國立國防管理學院碩士論文。
    郭家蓉,2003,智慧資本衡量模式探討,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    莊弘鈺,2006,創新活動下之智慧資本衡量系統-以IC設計公司為例,國立政治大學智慧財產硏究所碩士論文。
    莊子雯,2002,智慧資本衡量指標之研究-以我國IC設計產業為例,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    黃俊英,1996,多變量分析,台北:華泰書局。
    游正田,2004,兩岸科學園區發展策略之比較研究,私立淡江大學中國大陸研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    經濟部技術處,2004,經濟部推動成立RFID研發及產業應用聯盟。
    經濟部投資業務處編印,2004a,《韓國投資環境簡介》。
    ____________________,2004b,《新加坡投資環境簡介》。
    ____________________,2004c,《馬來西亞投資環境簡介》。
    ____________________,2004d,《香港投資環境簡介》。
    詹文男,2002,資訊科技產業智慧資本衡量之研究-系統理論之觀點,國立中央大學資訊管理學系博士論文。
    蔡建年,2003,台灣地區產業投資誘因彙整與分析,工業區產業環境推動策略計畫,台北,經濟部工業 局主辦,資訊工業策進會受託,2003年12月:4-23-4-51。
    蔡長山,2002,台南科技工業區再發展與轉型之研究,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
    英文部份
    Agor, W. 1997. The measurement, use and development of intellectual capital to increase public sector productivity. Public Personnel Management 27 (2): 175-186.
    Bird, A., and S. Beechler. 1995. Links between business strategy and human resource management strategy in U.S.-based Japanese subsidiaries: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies 26 (1): 23-46.
    Berger, P., and E. Ofek. 1995. Diversification‘s Effect on Firm Value. Journal of Financial Economics 37: 39-65.
    Booth, R. 1998. The measurement of intellectual capital. Management Accounting 76 (10): 26-28.
    Brooking, A., P. Board, and S. Jones. 1998. The predictive potential of intellectual capital. International Journal of Technology Management 16 (1): 115-125.
    Bell, C. 1997. Intellectual Capital. Executive Excellence 14 (1): 15.
    Bozzo, U. 1998. Technology Park: An enterprise model. Progress in Planning Quarterly 49 (9): 215-225.
    Buren, M. 1999. A yardstick for knowledge management. Training & Development 53 (5): 71-78.
    Bontis, N. 1998. Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory Study that Develops Measures and Models. Management Decision 36 (2): 63-72.
    Brooking, A. 1996. Intellectual Capital: Core Asset for the Third Millennium Enterprise. London New York: International Thomson Business Press.
    Campa, J., and S. Kedia. 2002. Explaining the Diversification Discount. The Journal of Financial 57 (4): 1731-1762.
    Chiang, L. 1993. From Industry Targeting to Technology Targeting: A Policy Paradigm Shift in the 1980s. Technology in Society 15: 341-357.
    Chorda, I. 1996. Towards the maturity stage: An insight into the performance of French technopoles. Technovation 16 (3): 143-152
    Dzinkowski, R. 2000. The measurement and management of intellectual capital: An introduction. Management Accounting 78 (2): 32-36
    Edvinsson, L. 1997. Developing Intellectual Capital at Skandia. Long Range Planning 30 (3): 366-373.
    Edvinsson, L., and M. Malone. 1997. Intellectual Capital. New York: Harper Collins.
    Galbraith, J. 1969. The New Industrial State. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Guthrie, J. 2001. High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal 44 (1): 180-190.
    Gibbons, J. 1993a. Nonparametric Statistics: An Introduction. Newbury Park: Sage.
    _________. 1993b. Nonparametric Measures of Association. Newbury Park: Sage.
    Hirschman, A. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Knight, D. 1999. Performance measure for increasing intellectual capital. Strategy & Leadership 27 (2): 22-25.
    Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 1992. The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review (1-2): 71-79.
    _________, and ________. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    _________, and ________. 2001. Strategy Focused Organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    _________, and ________. 2003. Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
    Kaplan, R. 1993. Implementing the Balanced Scorecard at FMC Corporation: An Interview with Larry D. Brady. Harvard Business Review (9-10): 143-149.
    Kerlinger, F., and H. Lee. 2000. Foundations of Behavioral Research. Harcourt, Inc.
    Lins, K., and H. Servaes. 2002. Is Corporate Diversification Beneficial in Emerging Markets? Financial Management 31 (2): 5-31.
    McElroy, W. 2002. Social Innovation Capital. Journal of Intel lectual Capital 3 (1): 30-39.
    Monck, C., R. Porter, P. Quintas, and P. Wynarczyk .1988. Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms. London: Croom Helm.
    Osborne, A. 1998. Measuring Intellectual Capital: The Real Value of Companies. The Ohio CPA Journal 57 (10-12): 37-38.
    Petrash, G. 1996. Dow’s journey to a knowledge value management culture. European Management Journal 14 (4): 365-373.
    Petrash, G., and W. Bukowitz. 1997. Visualizing, measuring, and managing knowledge. Chemtech 27 (10): 6-10.
    Perroux, F. 1950. Le pool du charbon et de l`acier et le plan Schuman-Illusions et réalités. Économie appliquée XL (2): 351-366.
    Piatier, A. 1984. Barriers to Innovation. London: Frances Pinter. Quoted in: Malecki, E. 1991. Technology and Economic Development. Longman, Harlow: 341.
    Ross, J. 1998. Exploring the concept of intellectual capital (IC). Long Range Planning 31 (1): 150-153.
    Roos, J., R. Roos, L. Edvinsson, and Dragonetti. 1998. Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape. New York: New York University Press.
    Stewart, T. 1997. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organization. New York: Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.
    Siegel, S., and N. Castellan. 1989. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Sullivan, P. 2000. Value-driven intellectual capital: How to convert intangible corporate assets into market value. New York: Wiley.
    Sveiby, K. 1997. The new organizational wealth-managing and measuring knowledge-based assets. New York: Berrett-Koehler Publishing.
    Ulrich, D. 1998. Intellectual Capital = Competence * Commitment. Sloan Management Review 39 (2): 15-26.
    Vedovello, C. 1997. Science parks and university-industry interaction: Geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force. Technovation 17 (9): 491-502.
    Venkatraman, N., and V. Ramanujam. 1986. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review 11 (4): 801-814.
    Weiss, L. 1995. Governed interdependence: Rethinking the government-business relationship in East Asia. The Pacific Review 8 (4): 589-616.
    Weber, M., and J. Friendrich. 1929. A Theory of the Location of Industries. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    94353004
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094353004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    300401.pdf45KbAdobe PDF2756View/Open
    300402.pdf76KbAdobe PDF2740View/Open
    300403.pdf63KbAdobe PDF2690View/Open
    300404.pdf116KbAdobe PDF2745View/Open
    300405.pdf103KbAdobe PDF2918View/Open
    300406.pdf300KbAdobe PDF21575View/Open
    300407.pdf338KbAdobe PDF24408View/Open
    300408.pdf147KbAdobe PDF2828View/Open
    300409.pdf353KbAdobe PDF21396View/Open
    300410.pdf113KbAdobe PDF2846View/Open
    300411.pdf103KbAdobe PDF2917View/Open
    300412.pdf153KbAdobe PDF21358View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback