Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34212
|
| Title: | 非審計公費及審計公費與財務報表品質關聯性之研究 |
| Authors: | 許淑琇 |
| Contributors: | 戚務君
許淑琇 |
| Keywords: | 盈餘管理
非審計公費
審計公費
裁量性應計
earnings management
non-audit fee
audit fee
discretionary accrual |
| Date: | 2003 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 09:01:12 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 美國在2001年10月爆發了安達信(Anderson)-安隆（Enron）案，對整個企業界造成極大的衝擊，提供非審計服務究竟是否會影響財務報表品質引起廣泛討論。
因證期會於民國九十二年一月三十日新修正「證券發行人財務報告編製準則」第二十二條，使得資訊相對過往較易取得，雖因研究限制使得樣本不具良好代表性，但在某種程度上仍能提供一定的參考價值，故本研究擬仿效Frankel et al. (2002)之研究，探討在台灣會計師提供非審計服務及審計服務是否會對財務報表品質造成影響；本研究以Threshold（公司實際每股盈餘-分析師預測每股盈餘）及裁量性應計(discretionary accrual)做為財務報表品質之代理變數。
本研究發現上市公司並未因審計公費及非審計公費較高而有進行盈餘管理，但上櫃公司卻會因審計公費及非審計公費較高而進行盈餘管理。
The collapse of Enron and the conflict of interest surrounding their auditors Arthur Anderson, particularly the effect non-audit fees on the quality of the audited financial statements, have resulted in numerous changes to the regulations effectively limiting the level of non-audit service accounting firms can offer to their clients.
The Taiwan SEC enacted new regulations forcing public companies that meet certain criteria, to disclose the level of audit and non-audit fees paid to accounting firms. This resulted in the availability of information that was previously unobtainable. However, concerns still remain, as research is restricted because the number of companies reporting represents a small percentage of the companies in Taiwan. Nonetheless, this research hopes to use the data from the reporting companies to examine the relationship between the quality of the financial statement and the level of fees paid to accounting firms.
We intent to use an adaptation of the Frankel et al. (2002) model to study the companies in Taiwan. Using data provided by the companies we intend to demonstrate a causal relationship between the level of non-audit fees and the quality of the accounting statement. We used Threshold and discretionary accrual to represent the quality of the financial statement.
We found that for the companies listed on the TAIEX there was no relationship between the quality of the financial statements and the level of audit and non-audit fees; however for companies trading on the OTC market we found there was a causal relationship. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
沈維民，1997，企業之盈餘管理：以「會計方法選用」和「應計項目認列」為例，管理評論，第十六卷第一期，11-38頁。
金成隆、林修葳及張永芳，1999，強制性財務預測與盈餘管理關係：20%門檻限制之研究，中國財務學刊，第七卷第一期，59-96頁。
林嬋娟、洪櫻芬及薛敏正，1997，財務困難公司之盈餘管理實證研究，管理學報，第十四卷第一期，15-38頁。
張文靜、周玲臺與林修葳，2001，審計品質對維持前期盈餘績效公司盈餘管理行為影響之研究，證券市場發展季刊、第十三卷第二期， 31-70頁。
李建然，許書偉，陳政芳，2002，非審計服務對審計獨立性之影響：從非審計服務與異常應計數之關係探討，發表於2002會計理論與實務研討會，台北：國立台北大學。
陳育成，2002，臺灣金融業的壞帳管理及相關研究，管理評論，第二十一卷第四期，1-17頁
黃馨儀，1997。會計師提供非審計服務之研究，國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文，。
蔡慧玲，1998。企業對會計師事務所非審計服務需求研究，台灣大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
翁文課，1999。非審計服務、事務所規模與審計公費之關聯性研究，國立中正大學會計學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
林松樹，2001。大陸台商對非審計服務需求之研究，國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
胡靜妮，2002，非審計服務與會計師獨立性關係之實證研究，國立台北大學會計學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
王秋梅，2002，會計師事務所管理顧問服務之研究，私立靜宜大學未出版碩士論文。
王兼善，2003，非審計服務業務與會計師獨立性—對會計師出具繼續經營疑慮意見之影響，國立台北大學會計學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
馬瑜霙，2003，我國獨立董事與獨立監察人之屬性與盈餘管理之關聯性研究，國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
二、英文部分
Abdel-khalik, A. R. (1990). The jointness of audit fees and demand for MAS: a self-selection analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research 6 : 295-322.
Arruňada, B. (1999). The economics of audit quality: Private incen-tives and the regulation of audit and non-audit services. Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ashbaugh, H. and Lafond, R., & Mayhew, B. (2003) Do Nonaudit Services Compromise Auditor Independence? Further Evidence. Working paper, University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Accounting and Information Systems.
Bartov, E., (1993). The timing of asset sales and earnings manipulation. The Accounting Review (October): 840-855.
Bartov, E., Gul, F., & Tsui, J. (2001). Discretionary accruals model and audit qualification. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 421-452.
Beck, B., Frecka, T., & Somomon, I. (1988a). A model of the market for MAS : Knowledge spillovers and auditor-auditee bonding. Journal of Accounting Literature, 7(1), 50-64.
Beck, B., Frecka, T., & Somomon, I. (1988b). An empirical analysis of the relationship between MAS involvement and auditor ten-ure: Implications for auditor independence. Journal of Account-ing Literature, 7(1), 65-84.
Becker, C. L., M.L. Defond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management, Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring): 1-24.
Beeler, J. D., and J. E. Hunton. 2001. Contingent economic rents: Precursors to predecisional distortion of client information. Working paper, University of South Carolina.
Brown, L. D. 2001. A temporal analysis of earnings surprise: Profit versus losses. Journal of Accounting Research 39: 221-241.
Davis, R., Ricchiute, N., & Trompeter, G. (1993). Audit effort, audit fees, and the provision of nonaudit services to audit clients. The Accounting Review, 68(1), 135-150.
DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor Independence, Low-Balling, and Disclosure Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 113-127.
DeAngelo, L.E. 1986. Accounting numbers as market valuation substitute: a study of management buyouts of public stockholders. The Accounting Review 61: 400-420.
Dechow, P., and R. Sloan. 1991, Executive incentives and horizon problem. Journal of Accounting and Economics 14(1): 51-89.
Dechow, P., Sloan, R., & Sweeney, A. (1995). Detecting earning management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193-225.
Dee, C.C. Lulseged, A.A., Nowlin, T.S. (2002). Earnings Quality and Auditor Independence: An Examination Using Non-audit Fee Data. Working paper, Florida State University - Department of Accounting.
Defond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1991. Incidence and circumstances of accounting errors. The Accounting Review 66: 643-655.
Defond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1993. Factors related to auditor-clientdisagreements over income-increasing accounting methods. Contemporary Accounting Research 9: 411-431.
Defond, M. L. and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics17: 14-176.
Defond, M., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyam, K. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Re-search, 40(4), 1247-1274.
Dhaliwal, G., L. Salamon, and E. D. Smith, 1990. The Effect of Owner Versus Management Control on the Choice of Accounting Methods. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25:36-67.
Firth, M. (1997). The provision of nonaudit services by accounting firms to their audit clients. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14 (2), 1-21.
Francis, J. R., E. L. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. 1999. The role of big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice &Theory 18:17-34.
Frankel, R., Marilyn, J., & Nelson, K. (2002). The relations between auditors’ fee for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77(1), 71-105.
Friedlan, J. (1994). “Accounting choices of issuers of initial public offerings.” Contemporary Accounting Research. 1-31.
Gilson, S.C.1989. Management turnover and financial distress. Journal of Financial (December): 241-262.
Glezen, G. W., and J. A. Millar. 1985. An empirical investigation of stockholder reaction to disclosures required by ASR No. 250. Journal of Accounting Research 23: 859-870.
Gul, F.A., Chen, C.J.P., Tsui, J.S.L. (2003). Discretionary Accounting Accruals, Managers` Incentives and Audit Fees. Working paper, City University of Hong Kong - Department of Accountancy.
Hand J. R., 1989. Did firms undertake debt-equity swaps for an accounting paperprofit or true financial gain? The Accounting Review (October): 587-623.
Healy, P. M., (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting deci-sions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1), 85-107.
Jensen ,Michael, and William Meckling,1976, Theory of the firm：Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics 38:29-58.
Jones, J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investiga-tions. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193-228.
Lees, F. 1981, “Public disclosure of corporate earnings forecasts, ” New York, NY : the conference Board.
Lys, T., and R. L. Watts. 1994. Lawsuits against auditors. Journal of Accounting Research 32: 65-93.
Magee, R., and M. Tesng. 1990. Audit pricing and independence. The Accounting Review 65: 315-336.
Matsumoto, D. 2002. Management’s incentives to avoid negativeearnings surprise. The Accounting Review 77 (3): 483-514.
Palmrose, Z. 1986. Audit Fees and Auditor Size: Further Evidence. Journalof Accounting Research 24:97-110
Palmrose, Z. (1988). An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review, 63(1), 55-73.
Parkash, M., and C. F. Venable. 1993. Auditee incentives for auditee independence: The case of nonaudit services. The Accounting Review (Supplement): 175-202.
Reckers, P.M.J. and A.J. Stagliano. “The CPA’s Non-Audit Services.” The CPA Journal (February 1980): 25-28
Reynolds, K., & Francis, J. (2001). Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decision. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 375-400.
Rangan, S. 1998. Earnings management and the performanceof seasoned equity offering. Journal of Financial Economics 50: 101-122.
Scheiner, J. H. and J. E. Kiger. 1982. An empirical investigation ofauditor involvement in non-audit services. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn)： 482-496.
Scheiner, J. H. 1984. The impact of SEC nonaudit service disclosure requirements on independent auditors and their clients: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting Research22: 789-797.
Schipper, Katherine, 1989, Commentary on earnings management, Accounting Horizons 3, 91-102.
Simunic, D. (1984). Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(2), 679-702.
Teoh, S.H., I. Welch, and T.J. Wong, 1998. Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 50, 63-99.
Wines, G.“Auditor Independence, Audit Qualifications and the Provision of Non-Audit services：A Note.”, Accounting & Finance, May 1994, pp.75-86.
Zmijewski, M. E. and R. L. Hagerman. 1981. An income strategy approach to the positive theory of accounting standard setting/ choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3: 129-150. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
91353030
92 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091353030 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
