Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34053
|
| Title: | The Impact of IEA Reports on Oil-Related Markets |
| Authors: | 陳俊源
Chen, Jiun-Yuan |
| Contributors: | 張元晨
Chang, Yuanchen
陳俊源
Chen, Jiun-Yuan |
| Keywords: | 石油
國際能源機構
石油供給與需求
事件研究法
oil
IEA
oil supply and demand
event study
Oil Market Report
Non-OPEC
Brent Crude |
| Date: | 2005 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 19:16:13 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 國際能源機構(IEA)每個月的石油報告已經變成預測世界石油供給與需求一個很重要的資源。因此，我們蒐集從1990年10月到2005年12月中國際能源機構所發佈的179次宣告，利用事件研究法來衡量國際能源機構對石油相關市場的影響性。
實證結果顯示，國際能源機構的石油報告的確對石油相關市場傳達重要的資訊；而國際能源機構報告的影響效果似乎會隨著國家的不同而有所不同；在當中，石油的生產和消費量多寡、石油的密集度和油價中稅占的比例都扮演重要的角色；此外，在國際能源機構的報告中，關於預測石油需求變化這方面似乎特別被大家所重視。
This study examines the impact of International Energy Agency`s Oil Market Reports on oil-related prices. The IEA reports, published monthly in Paris, have become the primary source of world oil supply and demand forecasts. We collect 179 announcements that released by IEA over the period October 1990 to December 2005. We analyze the effects of these reports on three oil-related markets, IPE Brent Crude futures, oil industry indices and stock prices of oil companies in six countries. Moreover, we separate the effects of IEA’s forecast changes on oil supply from non-OPEC countries and oil demand from North America and China in IEA’s report.
The results confirm that IEA’s reports carry important information source for oil-related markets because more than one half of our sample companies have abnormal returns around the announcement date of IEA’s reports, and we explore these prices respond negatively to the release of IEA’s reports. We also find that the actively traded IPE Brent Crude futures contracts are affected by IEA’s reports, particularly for the change of demand in North America. Forecast changes in IEA’s reports regarding supply in non-OPEC countries, demand in North America and China show that most countries are affected by the changes in these reports. The evidences also show that British and Norwegian oil stock markets react more strongly to the change of oil demand in North America and China. Moreover, we find that participants in the oil market put more emphasis on demand changes reported by IEA, especially for China demand. And we provides empirical evidence that these companies are concerned more about the related releases of decreased demand in North America and increased demand in China. Finally, cross-sectional analysis of cumulative abnormal returns suggests that the reaction of American and Norwegian companies to IEA’s announcements is stronger than other countries, and the change of demand in North America and China and the size variable for individual company contribute to the changes of abnormal returns around IEA’s reports. |
| Reference: | 1. Barrell R., and Pomerantz O., 2004, Oil prices and the world economy, NIESR discussion paper, 152-177.
2. Bentzen Jan, and Hans Linderoth, 2001, Has the accuracy of energy projections in OECD countries improved since the1970s? OPEC Review 25, 105-116.
3. Bjornland H., 2000, The dynamic effects of aggregate demand, supply and oil price shocks – a comparative study, The Manchester School 68, 578–607.
4. Bollerslev Tim, J. Cai, F. M. Song, 2000, Intraday periodicity, long memory volatility, and macroeconomic announcement effects in the US Treasury bond market, Journal of Empirical Finance 7, 37-55.
5. Boyer M. Martin, and Didier Filion, 2004, Common and fundamental factors in stock returns of Canadian oil and gas companies, CIRANO Working Papers No. 2004s-62.
6. BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. www.bp.com/statisticalreview.
7. Bromley Simon, 2005, The United States and the control of world oil, Government and Opposition 40, 225-255.
8. Brown S. J. and J. B. Warner, 1980, Measuring security price performance, Journal of Financial Economics 8, 205–258.
9. Brown S. J. and J. B. Warner, 1985, Using daily stock returns: the case of event studies, Journal of Financial Economics 14, 3–31.
10. Cai Jun, Yan-Leung Cheung, and Michael C. S. Wong, 2001, What moves the gold market? Journal of Futures Markets 21, 257-278.
11. Cooper M. J., O. Dimitrov, and P. R. Rau, 2001, A rose.com by any other name, Journal of Finance 6, 2371-2388.
12. Fortenbery T. R., and Sumner D. A., 1993, The effects of USDA reports in Futures and Options markets, The Journal of Futures Markets 13, 157–173.
13. Goodhart C.A. E., S. Hall, S. Henry, and B. Pesaran, 1993, News effects in a high frequency model of the sterling-dollar exchange rate, Journal of Applied Econometrics 8, 1–13.
14. Hammoudeh S., S. Dibooglu, and E. Aleisa, 2004, Relationships among U.S. oil prices and oil industry equity indices, International Review of Economics and Finance 13, 427-453.
15. Jimenez-Rodriguez R., and M. Sanchez, 2005, Oil price shocks and real GDP growth: empirical evidence for some OECD countries, Applied Economics 37, 201–228.
16. Jones C. M., and G. Kaul, 1996, Oil and the stock markets, Journal of Finance 51, 463-491.
17. Josev Thomas, Howard Chan, and Robert Faff, 2004, What`s in a name? evidence on corporate name changes from the Australian capital market, Pacific Accounting Review 16, 57-73.
18. Kato H., 2005, Effects of the oil price upsurge on the world economy, the institute of energy economics, Japan.
19. Linderoth H., 2002, Forecast errors in IEA-countries’ energy consumption, Energy Policy 30, 53–61.
20. McKinlay A. C., 1997, Event studies in economics and finance, Journal of Economic Literature 35, 13–39.
21. Milonas N. T., 1987, The effects of USDA crop announcements on commodity prices, Journal of Futures Markets 7, 571–589.
22. Mitchell M. L., and J. H. Mulherin, 1994, The impact of public information on the stock market, Journal of Finance 49, 923-950.
23. Moosa I., and M. Korczak, 1999, Is the price-volume relationship symmetric in the futures markets? Journal of Financial Studies 7, 1-15
24. Moosa I. et al, 2003, Testing for temporal asymmetry in the price-volume relationship, Bulletin of Economic Research 55, 373-389.
25. Mork, Knut Anton, Olsen, and Olstein, 1994, Macroeconomic responses to oil price increases and decreases in seven OECD countries, Energy Journal 15, 19-36.
26. O’Dell S., 1994, Long-term energy demand: projections of the International Energy Agency, Journal of Energy and Development 19, 179-195.
27. Okogu B. E., 2003, The Middle East and North Africa in a changing oil market, International Monetary Fund.
28. OPEC Secretariat, 2005, Energy indicators, OPEC Review 29, 295-313.
29. Ramcharran H., 2002, Oil production responses to price changes: an empirical application of the competitive model to OPEC and non-OPEC countries, Energy Economics 24, 97-106.
30. One M., 2004, Rising crude oil prices affect the Japanese Economy, Japan External Trade Organization.
31. Shihab-Eldin A.,Hamel M., and Brennand G., 2004, Oil outlook to 2025, OPEC Review 28, 155-205.
32. Unander F., 2005, Energy indicators and sustainable development: The International Energy Agency approach, Natural Resources Forum 29, 377-391. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
財務管理研究所
93357007
94 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093357007 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [財務管理學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
