English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51769859      Online Users : 549
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33673


    Title: 美加雙方關係之魁北克因素
    The Impact of the Quebec Factor in the Canada-U.S. Bilateral Relations
    Authors: 李祿思
    Laprise,Louis Sebastien
    Contributors: 劉德海
    Liou,To-hai
    李祿思
    Laprise,Louis Sebastien
    Keywords: 魁北克
    加拿大
    美國
    加美關係
    Quebec
    Canada
    Bilateral Relations
    United States
    Quebec Factor
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 17:50:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: The Quiet Revolution, and the unceasing changes that characterize the Québec of the 60’s marked an enormous step forward for Québec studies. From the end of the 60’s, and beginning of the 70’s, a series of research on Québec started to see the light. With the October Crisis of 1970, the emergence of the “Parti Québecois” and the province’s first lost of referendum; hundreds of articles, books, and researches have been written. Québec’s economic relationship with the United States, the quest for Québec’s identity and its place within the Canadian federation, the tensions within Canada, its relations with other Canadian provinces, as well as the whole cultural aspects, i.e. French language, politic, well almost everything has been studied over and over, everything but the implication of Québec, or “The Québec Factor ” in the Canada-U.S. bilateral relations. A few texts have been written about, the sovereignty movement and the Canada-U.S. relations, still not so numerous amounts of data related to the strength of the Québec factor and its role in the Canadian decision-makings toward the U.S. This is where the motive emerges, the fact that this subject has rarely been touched is not only extremely attractive, it is also a once in a lifetime opportunity to contribute considerably not only to Taiwan’s Canadian studies, but also to the field of Québec studies.

    The main objective of the present thesis will be to demonstrate that the Québec factor influences not only relations with the rest of Canada, but as well, from time to time, Canadian bilateral relations with its southern neighbor: the United States. The extent to which Québec is implicated in the Canadian decision-making toward the United States will be explored. Furthermore, Québec’s distinct cultural background, its cultural insecurity generated by domestic tensions with Canada, and the role played by those tensions in the Québec government’s decision to slightly detach with the rest of Canada and get closer to the United States will be addressed. The study will put its emphasis not on the fact that Quebec is extremely powerful, because it would be a lie, but more on the fact that Quebec, which is only a province, as well can greatly influence Canada and its neighbor. The study will be structured as follow; the second chapter will define what really is the “Quebec factor”, and will emphasize on the definition of Quebec’s potential influence on Canada, as well as its origin i.e. the domestic tensions present in the federation that led to the two referendums for independence. The third chapter will introduce the Canada-U.S. bilateral relation in order to further comprehend the considerable importance of both actors for each other. The fourth chapter will put its focus on the actual economic power of the province, taking as example the signature of the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement and the role played by the province in the Canadian decision-making toward this issue, which we will see was much more desired in the U.S. as it was in Canada. Moreover, as well in this chapter, the actual strength of the province’s economy, prior and post CUFTA, will be assessed. The fifth chapter will exhibit the influence of the Quebec public opinion on political issues i.e. the Iraq incursion and the first refusal of Canada to participate to the building of the Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD). Finally, the last chapter will conclude on what really represents the province for the triangular Quebec-Canada-U.S. relation.
    Reference: Books
    Burgess, Michael, Canadian Federalism: Past, Present, and Future, Leicester University Press London & N.Y., 1990, 206 pages.
    Carr, Graham, Culture, Canada Under Free Trade, Ed. Duncan Cameron and Mel Watkins. Toronto: Lorimer, 1993. 203-13, 310-12.
    Dion, Stephane, Straight Talk: Speeches and writing on Canadian Unity, McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1999, 254 pages.
    Doran, Charles F. & Sigler, John H., Canada and The United States: Enduring Friendship, Persistent Stress, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1985, 369 pages.
    Fox, William T.R., A Continent Apart: The United States and Canada in world Politics, University of Toronto Press, 1985, 188 pages.
    Grady, Patrick, The Economic Consequences of Québec Sovereignty, The Fraser Institute, 1991, 168p.
    Holmes, John W., Life With Uncle: The Canadian American Relationship, University of Toronto Press, 1981, 144p.
    Kirton, John, Canada and the United states: A More Distant Relationship, Current History (1980), p.117-120.
    Lachapelle, Guy and Gagne, Gilbert, "L`americanite du Québec ou le developpement d`une identite nord-americaine", Francophonies d`Amerique 10 (2000): 87-99.
    Lamonde, Yvan, "American Cultural Influence in Québec: A One-Way Mirror." Problems and Opportunities in U.S.-Québec Relations, Ed. Alfred O. Hero Jr. and Marcel Daneau. Boulder, CO and London: Westview, 1984. 106-126.
    Lemco, Jonathan, Turmoil in the Peaceable Kingdom: The Québec Sovereignty Movement and its Implications For Canada and the United States, University of Toronto Press, 1994, 266 pgs.
    McBride, Stephen, Paradigm Shift: Globalization and the Canadian State, Fernwood Publishing, Halifax, 2005, 243 pgs.
    Neville, Neil & Fieldman, Eliott J., The future of North America: Canada, the United States, and Québec Nationalism, Harvard Studies in International affairs, no.42, University Press of America, 1985, 369 pages.
    Seidle, Leslie F., A la Recherche d’un Nouveau Contrat Politique pour le Canada: Option Asymetriques et Options Confederales, IRPP, 1994, 230p.
    Smiley, Donald V., Canada in Question: Federalism in the Seventies, McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1976, 248 p.
    Stevenson, Brian J.R., Canada, Latin America, and the New Internationalism: A Foreign Analysis, 1968-1990, McGill-Queen`s Press–MQUP, 2000, 289 pgs.
    Theriault, Joseph Yvon, Critique de L’Americaneite: Memoire et Democratie au Québec, Québec Amerique, 2005, 386 pgs.
    Young, Robert A., (1995), The Secession of Quebec and the Future of Canada, Kingston, McGill-Queen`s University Press.
    Weaver, R. Kent, The Collapse of Canada?, The Brookings Institution, 1992, 178 pages.
    Welsh, Jennifer, At Home in the World: Canada’s Global Vision for the 21st Century, Harper, 2004, 282 pgs.
    Jean, Crête, Comportement électoral au Québec, Chicoutimi, Gætan Morin 1984.
    Periodicals
    Aubin, Benoit, More Hurt Than Angry, Maclean’s, Vol.116, Issue 16, 2003.
    Aubin, Benoit, In Sync Against War, Maclean’s, Vol.116, Issue 13, p.60, 1p.2003.
    Balthazar, Louis, Une Relation Primordiale Entre Deux Peuples Frontaliers, Journal Le Devoir, CAHIER SPÉCIAL, Wednesday March 9 2005, p. c4.
    Bashevkin, Silvia, In the Shadow of Free Trade: Nationalism, Feminism and Identity Politics in Contemporary English Canada, Journal of Canadian Studies 35:2 (Summer 2000), 109-27.
    Bélanger, Yves & Quéau, Yannick & Roussel, Stéphane, « La société québécoise face aux enjeux du périmètre de sécurité nord-américain », La Chronique des Amériques 34 (novembre 2004).
    Blank, Stephen, « The North American Economic System: Dangers Ahead », Conférence, Center for International Business Studies, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington, 28 février 2005.
    Black, Conrad, Canada’s Continuing Identity Crisis, Foreign Affairs, New York: March 1995, Vol.74, Issue 2, pg.99, 17p.
    Black, Conrad, Sometimes a Great Nation, Canadian Business, Toronto, February 1993, Vol.66, Issue 2; pg.48, 4pgs.
    Blais, Blais, & Nevitte, Language and Cultural Security, Chapter prepared for Alain-G. Gagnon (ed.), Québec: State and Society, 3rd edition.
    Bouchard, Gerard, Charest, Jean, Separatists in Quebec enjoy new lease of life, FT.com, London, July 12 2005, p.1
    Brisson, Daniel, « Bouclier antimissile. Le Canada a-t-il évité le pire ? », Les Chroniques du GERSI, Vol. 1, No 1, mars 2005.
    Brunelle, Dorval, Deblock, Christian, Free trade related issues in Québec: the challenge of continental integration, The Association for Canadian Studies in the United States, Washington, Feb.21,1997.
    Bush, George W., Mckenna, Frank, Missile Rejection Decision Applauded, 中國時報, New York, N.Y., Mar13 2005, pg.4.
    Came, Barry, Separatist Kickoff, Maclean’s, Toronto, August 28, 1995, Vol.108, Issue 35, pg.14.
    Chrétien, Raymond, Fortmann, Michel, Roussel, Stéphane, Brisson, Daniel, « Une réalité incontournable : La question n’est plus de savoir si oui ou non un système antimissile sera déployé, mais plutôt quelle forme il prendra », La Presse (27 octobre 2004), p. A21.
    Chrétien, Raymond, Fortmann, Michel, Roussel, Stéphane, Brisson, Daniel, « Oui mais... Le Canada doit s’impliquer dans le projet de bouclier antimissile américain, mais pas à n’importe quel prix », La Presse (28 octobre 2004), p. A21.
    Chrétien, Raymond, Fortmann, Michel, Roussel, Stéphane, Brisson, Daniel, We can’t beat it, so let’s join it, The Globe and Mail (28 octobre 2004), p. A17.
    Courchene, Thomas J., The Changing Nature of Quebec-Canada Relations: From the 1980 Referendum to the Summit of the Canadas, Institute for Research on Public Policy, Montreal, p. 3.
    Doshi, Sameer, Québec’s Lesson: A Path of Peaceful Separation, Harvard International Review, Cambridge, Summer 1999, Vol.21, Issue 3; pg.18, 4pgs.
    Dostie, Pierre, and Rioux, Bernard, Why Québec Says No to War, Canadian Dimension, Vol.39, Issue 3.
    Dufour, Christian, Appeal to Sovereignists and to Federalists loyal to Québec, Inroads, Montreal, 2001, Issue 10, pg.187, 6pgs.
    Edward, Bob, Canada Remains Whole by One Percent of the Vote, Morning Edition, NPR, Washington D.C., October 31, 1995.
    Fidler, Richard, The 2004 Election and the Left: Some Lessons From Québec, UFP: Union de forces progressists, tribune libre, August 2004.
    Fry, Earl H., Québec’s Relations with the United states, American Review of Canadian Studies, Summer 2002, Vol.32, 323 pages, p.20
    Fry, Earl H., The Role of Sub-National Governments in North American Integration, No.3 of Thinking North America, edited by Thomas J. Courchene, The Art of The State, Vol. 2. Montreal: Institute for research on Public Policy.
    Foote, John A., "Cultural Diversity, Globalization and Canada/United States Relations." Paper presented at the conference "Rethinking the Line: The Canada-U.S. Border," Waterfront Centre Hotel, Vancouver, 22-25 October 2000.
    Fortmann, Michel , « Le bouclier antimissile sera bientôt prêt », Émission « Découverte », Télévision de Radio-Canada, 28 novembre 2004.
    Fotheringham, Allan, Losing the Language Battle, Maclean’s, October 2000, Vol.113, Issue 15.
    Francis, David, In US, Québec’s Top Separatist Wants to Talk Trade, Christian Science Monitor, Christian science Publishing, Vol.90 Issue 131, p19.
    Gagne, Gilbert, Cultural Sovereignty, identity, and the North American Integration on the relevance of the U.S.-Canada-Québec border, Québec Studies, American Council for Québec Studies, Sept 2003, vol.36, 29p.
    Gagnon, Lysiane, The October Crisis: Singular Anomalie, Beaver; Oct/Nov2000, Vol. 80 Issue 5, p6, 2p.
    Gelinas, Jaques B., Le Reveil Brutal de Parizeau: Sept Ans Pour se Rendre Compte, L’Aut’Journal, No.208, April 2002.
    Gotlieb, Allan, Chrétien Doctrine, Maclean’s, Vol.116, issue 13, March 2003.
    Handler, Richard, Nationalism And The Politics Of Culture In Québec, The University of Wisconsin Press, 1988, 217p.
    Hayward, D.J. and R.A. Erickson. 1995. “The North American Trade of U.S. States: A Comparative Analysis of Industrial Shipments, 1983-91”. International Regional Science Review, 18: 1-31.
    Helliwell, J. 1996, Do National Borders Matter for Quebec’s Trade?, Canadian Journal of Economics, 29: 507-522.
    Hufbauer, Gary C., and Schott, Jeffrey J., Canada in the 21st Century, North America Economic Integration: 25years Backward and Forward, Institute for International Economics, Washington D.C., Industry Canada Research Publications Program.
    Kurlantzick, Joshua, Separation Anxiety: Quebec versus Canada, Again, Current History. Philadelphia: Feb 2006.Vol.105, Iss. 688; pg. 90, 5 pgs
    Lachapelle, Guy, & Gagne, Gilbert, L`americanite du Québec ou le developpement d`une identite nord-americaine, Francophonies d`Amerique 10 (2000): 87-99
    Leger, Jean-Mark, L’attitude des Canadiens a la suite du conflit en Irak, Sondage Leger Marketing, May 15 2003.
    Lejtenyi, Patrick, "Yankee Go ’ome. Americans have replaced the English as the number one villain in Québec. What happened ?", Montreal Mirror, April 14 2005.
    "Libre-echange, souverainete et americanite: une nouvelle Trinite pour le Québec." Politique et Societes 18.1 (1999b): 99-107.
    Lisee, Jean-Francois, Invest in Québec’s Uniqueness, Inroads, Montreal, 2001, Issue 10, pg.167, 20 pgs.
    Lisee, Jean-Francois, Is Québec a North American Region-State?, Option Politiques, December 2001, 8 pgs, pg. 225-32.
    Martin, Pierre, All Québec’s Fault, Again? Québec Public Opinion And Canada’s Rejection of Missile Defense, Opinions Politiques/Policy Opinion, May 2005.
    Martin, Pierre, American Border Security Measures: Potential Economic Impact and Policy Responses From a Québec Perspective, Research Report, December 1st 2005.
    Martin, Pierre, Quel impact ?, La Presse / Cyberpresse.ca, 11 novembre 2005, p. A18.
    Martin, Pierre, Ce que le resserrement de la sécurité aux frontières américaines coûte au Québec, Le Devoir, 12-13 novembre 2005, p. B5.
    Martin, Pierre, Amerique du Nord: Partenariat sur le commerce et la prosperite (Bush-Martin), Sans Frontiere, March 23 2003.
    Merolla, Jennifer, Paper Presented for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 29-September 2 2001, San Francisco Ca.
    Ministère des Relations Internationales (MRI) / Ministry of International Relations, Rapport annuel 1998-1999 (Annual Report 1998-99), Government of Quebec, p. 53 and 55.
    Missile Rejection Decision Applauded, China Daily (中國時報 North American Ed.), New York, N.Y., Mar13 2005, pg
    Morici, Peter, U.S.-Canadian Trade Relations in the 1980s, American Review of Canadian Studies (summer 1987), pp. 163-167.
    Mouterde, Pierre, Le PQ et le Reniement Social-Democrate, Interview With Jaques B. Gelinas.
    Nossal, Kim Richard. "Economic Nationalism and Continental Integration: Assumptions, Arguments, and Advocacies." The Politics of Canada`s Economic Relationship with the United States. Ed. Denis Stairs and Gilbert R. Winham. Toronto: U Toronto P, 1985: 55-94.
    Pasquero, Jean, Business Ethics and National Identity in Québec: Distinctiveness and directions, Journal of Business Ethics, Apr.1997, Vol.16, Iss.6, pg.621, 13pgs.
    Pelltier, Rejean, Tremblay, Manon, Le parlementarism Canadian, Presses de L’Universite Laval, 2005, 541 pgs.
    Proulx, Pierre Paul, Commission Meeting: The North American Free Trade Agreement, Universite de Montreal, Speech given at the Hotle Mont Royal on the 6th of October 2003.
    Proulx, Pierre Paul, Les Effets de L’ALE et de L’ALENA sur Les Economies du Canada et du Québec: Examen des Etudes Recentes, ASDEQ, 1999, Chapter 1, p.16, Chapter 5.
    Ratte, Sylvie, Ten Years of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement: Assessing Its Impact on Québec SMEs, Canadian Fedderation Of Independent Business, Legislative Québec Action, Montreal, 1998.
    Ritchie, Gordon, Wrestling With the Elephant: The Inside Story of Canada-US Trade Wars, Toronto: Macfarlane, Walter & Ross, 1997.
    Robitaille, Antoine, Quebecers: A Pacifist People, Inroads, Montreal: Winter 2004., Issue 14, pg.62, 14 pgs.
    Roussel, Stephane. "Canadian-American Relations: Time for Cassandra?" American Review of Canadian Studies 30.2 (2000): 135-57.
    Roussel, Stéphane, « Le gouvernement de Paul Martin serait sur le point d’annoncer le rejet du bouclier anti-missiles », « C’est bien meilleur le matin » Première chaîne de Radio-Canada, 23 février 2005.
    Roussel, Stéphane, Bouclier antimissile : De mauvaises et d’excellentes raisons d’accepter l’invitation des Américains, Le Devoir, 25 septembre 2004, p. b5.
    Rudd, David, Muddling Through on missile Defence: The Politics of Indecision, Option Politiques May 2005, p.1-5.
    Salee, Daniel, Québec Forty Years Later, Canadian Dimension, September/October 2003, Vol.37, Issue 5, p.29-31, 2pgs.
    Schwartzwald, Robert, Another Canada? Other Canadas, Massachusetts Review, Spring/Summer, 1990, Vol.31, Issue ½.
    Simpson, Jeffrey, The Two Canadas, Foreign Policy, Winter 1990, Issue81, p.71, 16pgs.
    Stark, Andrew, Adieu, Liberal Nationalism, New York Times, N.Y., November 2, 1995, pg.27.
    Thomas, Tim, George Grant The Free Trade Agreement and Contemporary Québec, Journal of Canadian Studies, Peterborough, Winter 1992, Vol.27 Issue 4, pg 180.
    Thomas, David, Introduction." Canada and the United States: Differences that Count, Ed. David Thomas. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 1993.1-21.
    Thompson, John Herd, Canada`s Quest for Cultural Sovereignty: Protection, Promotion, and Popular Culture" NAFTA in transition. Ed. Stephen J. Randall and Herman W. Konrad. Calgary: UP Calgary , 1996. 393-410.
    Vaillancourt, Francois, The Impact of CUFTA/NAFTA on Canadian Federal Arrangements, Is There Any?, ASDEQ, June 2002.
    Vaillancourt, François and M. Bird, Richard, Changing with the Times: Success, Failure and Inertia in Canadian Federal Arrangements, 1945-2001Center For Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, August 2002, Stanford University, 57 pages, p. 38-41.
    Websites
    Delegation Generale New York: Ministere des Relations Inernationales.
    http://www.mri.gouv.qc.ca/usa/en/new_york/economie/marche.asp
    Institut de la Statistique Québec
    http://www.bdso.gouv.qc.ca/pls/ken/Ken263_Gestn_Tri.Ken_P_Maj_Rechr
    The Québec Act
    http://www.plpsd.mb.ca/amhs/history/Québec.html
    Il y a 20 ans: La nuit des longs couteaux
    http://www.uni.ca/mythepequiste.html
    Duff-Brown, Beth, Canadian Parliament recognizes Quebec, Washington Post,Tuesday November 29th 2006.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com
    FLQ’s historical website
    http://www.independance-Québec.com/flq/recherche_echec.php
    Statistic Canada, Demography Division
    www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/donstat/econm_finnc/conjn_econm/TSC/pdf/chap1.pdf
    Souverainete Quebec
    http://www.souverainete-qc.net/annexe/biographie_pierre_eliot_trudeau.htm
    A La Prochaine Fois- The 1980 Referendum, Politics and Economy- CBC Archives
    http://archives.cbc.ca/IDD-1-73-1938/politics_economy/1980_referendum/
    The CBC Archives
    http://archives.cbc.ca
    Peter Morici, Assessing the Canada - U.S. Free Trade Agreement,SICE foreign trade information system. 1998.
    http://www.sice.oas.org/geograph/north/pmor1.asp
    Ottawa Citizen: Senator: We Canadians Need to Defend Ourselves.
    http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/index.html
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    外交研究所
    93253036
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093253036
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[外交學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    25303601.pdf22KbAdobe PDF2822View/Open
    25303602.pdf27KbAdobe PDF2764View/Open
    25303603.pdf127KbAdobe PDF21005View/Open
    25303604.pdf211KbAdobe PDF21121View/Open
    25303605.pdf47KbAdobe PDF2935View/Open
    25303606.pdf242KbAdobe PDF21122View/Open
    25303607.pdf215KbAdobe PDF2966View/Open
    25303608.pdf47KbAdobe PDF2806View/Open
    25303609.pdf127KbAdobe PDF2904View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback