Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33621
|
| Title: | 民族分離運動的比較研究--以俄羅斯聯邦之韃靼共和國與車臣共和國為例 |
| Authors: | 曾靖芳 |
| Contributors: | 吳玉山
Wu, Yu-shan
曾靖芳 |
| Keywords: | 民族分離運動
韃靼
車臣
俄羅斯聯邦
三角（邊）關係 |
| Date: | 2002 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 17:43:01 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本論文以隸屬於俄羅斯聯邦架構中的韃靼共和國和車臣共和國作為分離運動比較研究的兩個案例，進行民族分離運動相關問題的探討，包括民族分離意識興起的原因以及影響分離運動往不同路徑發展的因素。由於俄羅斯屬於前社會主義國家，國家體制曾經歷轉型的過程，因此除了具有一般民族問題的特質外，還必須將多重轉型的特殊性列入考量。
除了原生差異與政經利益考量的工具性訴求外，社會主義國家特有的聯邦制與本土化政策也促使民族意識興起，創造了潛在的民族分離團體。當中央的控制力有了鬆懈的跡象，分離意識便有了發揮的空間，分離運動隨之爆發。
韃靼共和國與車臣共和國分離運動的比較研究證明，作為動員基礎的原生性條件以及工具性訴求僅是影響分離運動發展的次要因素，由於領導人的動員可以決定分離運動發展的方向，因此領導人的策略抉擇才是影響分離運動發展的關鍵因素。而在蘇聯末期政治不穩定的局勢中，由誰來主導分離運動的發展相當程度受到莫斯科、原共和國執政者與民族主義力量三角關係的影響。
韃靼共和國的分離運動由立場溫和的夏米耶夫主導，在不斷的妥協談判後，最終以雙邊條約的方式界定與俄羅斯聯邦的關係，創造了「韃靼模式」，分離運動得到平息。相較之下，車臣共和國的分離運動在杜達耶夫激進的領導風格下一步步朝向完全獨立與脫離俄羅斯聯邦的方向發展。如此極端的立場當然不容於莫斯科。為了維護俄羅斯聯邦領土的完整性，莫斯科最後發動戰爭來解決車臣問題。在整個分離運動的發展過程中，領導者的策略決定了分離運動的發展，可見領導者的路線抉擇才是影響分離運動發展最關鍵的因素。
This thesis focuses on national separatism in former socialist countries and takes Tatarstan and Chechnya for a case study. My research seeks to answer several questions, such as where did the separatist group originate from? Why did nationalist movements explode? How to explain different attitudes towards secession?
I argue that primordial attachment and instrumental consideration about interests are the important causes shaping separatist groups. In the cases of former socialist countries, however, it is necessary to take the institutional factor into consideration, that is－ethnic federalism and korenizatsiya. All these elements combined to create the potential secessionist groups. Once the coercive controls formerly imposed by the central authority were removed, the previously repressed national groups inevitably reemerged and led the secessionist movement.
The comparative analysis of the secessionist movements in Tatarstan and Chechnya proves that primordial and instrumental factors can only explain the emergence of secessionist movements, however they are of little significance when it comes to explaining the divergent paths of the movements. What matters more is the leadership’s strategy. The crucial problem is who will lead the secessionist movements? In the chaotic years leading up to the collapse of the Soviet Union, it was the triangular relations among Moscow, republican leadership and secessionist movement that determined the exact leader of the secessionist movement.
In our cases, the moderate Shamiev led Tatarstan’s separatism by negotiation and was able to reach agreement with Moscow on a new Sovereignty Treaty. This pattern later came to be called the “Tatarstan Model”. After that, the secession in Tatarstan quieted down. In sharp contrast, Dudaev pursued a radical strategy and sought Chechnya’s complete independence from the Russian Federation. To defend his integrity of territory, Moscow dispatched Russian troops to quell this separatist republic. Leadership strategy thus determined the outcome of secessionist movements, and the choice of leaders proved crucial in the whole process. |
| Reference: | 《參考書目》
一、 中文資料
于蕙清，2002，《蘇聯的解體：民族主義因素之研究》，國立中山大學中山學術研究所博士論文。
王定士，1999，「車臣戰爭研究：車臣戰爭決策中的克里姆林宮政治因素」，《俄語學報》，2，頁232-256。
王雲怡，1993，《中共少數民族幹部政策之研究》，國立政治大學東亞研究所碩士論文。
江宜樺，1998，《自由主義、民族主義與國家認同》，台北：揚智文化。
吳玉山，1992，「蘇聯與南斯拉夫的解體及其對北約的影響」，《美國月刊》，77，頁4-18。
吳玉山，1997，《抗衡或扈從》，台北：正中書局。
吳玉山，1997，「書評：Nationalism and Rationality（民族主義與理性）」，《理論與政策》，11：2，頁173-176。
吳玉山，1998，《共產世界的變遷》，台北：東大。
吳斐竣，2002，《蘇後時期烏克蘭與俄羅斯關係－以烏克蘭國族認同的轉變為中心》，國立政治大學俄羅斯研究所碩士論文。
吳叡人譯，安德森（Benedict Anderson）著，1999，《想像的共同體》，臺北市：時報文化。
李信成，2001，《中共少數民族政策與整合》，國立政治大學東亞研究所博士論文。
李邁先，1969，《俄國史，上卷》，台北市：國立編譯館。
周陽山，1993，《民族與民主的當代詮釋》，台北：正中書局。
施正鋒，「台灣民族主義的意義」，台灣獨立建國網站資料：http://www.wufi.org.tw/natlism1.htm。
李金梅、黃俊龍等譯，葛爾納（Ernest Gellner）著， 2001，《國族與國族主義》，台北市：聯經出版社。
胡漢平，1989，《列寧主義民族問題之研究》，政治作戰學校政治研究所碩士論文。
張珍瑜，1993，《民族主義分離運動之比較研究─以南斯拉夫與捷克斯洛伐克為例》，國立台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
陳延琪、潘志平主編，2000，《泛突厥主義文化透視》，烏魯木齊：新疆人民出版社。
陳振華，1991，《蘇聯民族問題之研究》，政治作戰學校政治研究所碩士論文。
閔懿，1997，《蘇維埃聯邦制之研究》，淡江大學俄羅斯研究所碩士論文。
寧騷，1995，《民族與國家》，北京：北京大學出版社。
趙竹成，2002，《俄羅斯聯邦的憲政體制及其衝突》，台北：韋伯文化。
齊向，1992，《蘇聯解體內幕》，吉林市：吉林人民出版。
鄭羽，2002，《獨聯體十年，下卷》，北京：世界知識出版社。
羅彥傑，2001，《蘇聯末期公民社會萌芽之研究》，國立政治大學俄羅斯研究所碩士論文。
二、 外文資料
Bahry, Donna, and Brian Silver. 1987. “Intimidation and the Symbolic Uses of Terror in the USSR,” American Political Science Review, 81 (4), pp. 1065-1098.
Bartkus, Viva Ona. 1999. The Dynamic of Secession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Breslauer, George W.. 1995. “Yeltsin’s Political Leadership: Why Invade Chechenya? “ From: http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~bsp/caucasus/articles.html
Brubaker, R.. 1996. Nationalism Reframed –Nationhood and the national question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buchanan, Allen. 1991. Secession. Oxford: Westview Press.
Connor, Walker. 1984. The National Question in Marxist-Leninist Theory and Strategy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Conquest, R.. 1990. The Great Terror: A Reassessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dunlop, John B.. 1996. “ The ‘Party of War’ and Russian Imperial Nationalism, “ Problems of Post-Communism, 43(2), pp. 29 - 34.
Dunlop, John B.. 1998. Russia Confronts Chechnya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eriksen, T. . 1993. Ethnicity & Nationalism. London: Pluto Press.
Gammer, Moshe. 1955. “Unity, Diversity and Conflict in the Northern Caucasus,” in Yaacov Ro’I ed., Muslim Eurasia: Conflicting Legacies. London: Frank Cass.
Giuliano, Elise. 2000. “ Who Determines the Self in the Politics of Self-Determination? Identity and Preference formation in Tatarstan’s Nationalist Mobilization, “ Comparative Politics, 32(3), pp. 295-316.
Giuliano, Elise.2001. “Re-thinking Transitions from the Bottom-Up: Nationalism, Federalism, and Local Accountability in the Soviet Transitions.” University of Notre Dame: The Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies. From: www.cas.uchicago.edu/workshops/cpolit/elisegiuliano.doc
Gleason, Gregory. 1990. Federalism and Nationalism: The Struggle for Republican Rights in the USSR. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
Graney, Katherine. 2001. “Engaging Orientalism in the ‘Sovereign State of Tatarstan’: New Versions on a Very Old Them.” From: www.pro.harvard.edu/papers/013/013005GraneyKath.pdf
Gulnaz, Sharafutdinova. 2000. “Chechnya versus Tatarstan-Understanding Ethnopolitics in Post-Communist Russia,” Problems of Post-Communism, 47 (2), pp. 13-22.
Hannum, Hurst. 1990. Autonomy, Sovereignty, and Self-determination: the Accommodation of Conflicting rights. Philadelphia, [Pa.]: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hardin, Russell. 1995. “Self-interest, Group Identity.” In Albert Breton, ed., Nationalism and Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hechter, Michael. 1975. Internal Colonialism: the Celtic fringe in British national development, 1536-1966. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Heraclides, Alexis. 1990. The Self-Determination of Minorities in International Politics. Totowa, N.J.: F. Cass.
Kaiser, R. J.. 1994. The Geography of Nationalism in Russia and the USSR. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.
Karklins, Rasma. 1994. Ethnopolitics and Transition to Democracy. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kondrashov, Sergei. 2000. Nationalism and the Drive for Sovereignty in Tatarstan 1988-1992. New York: St. Martin`s Press.
Kovacs, Petra. 1998. “A Comparative Typology of Ethnic Relations in Central and Eastern Europe,” discussion papers, No. 5. Budapest: CEU/OSI Publications Office. From: www.ciaonet.org
Lapidus, G.W. 1989. “Gorbachev’s Nationality Problem," Foreign Affairs, 68(4), pp. 92-108.
Lapidus, Gail W.. 1992. “From Democratization to Disintegration: the Impact of Perestroika on the National question.” In Gail W. Lapidus, ed., From Union to Commonwealth-Nationalism and Separatism in the Soviet Republics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lapidus, Gail W.. 1999. “The Dynamics of Secession in the Russian Federation: Why Chechnya? ” In Mikhail A. Alexseev ed., Center-Periphery Conflict in Post-Soviet Russia. New York: St. Martin`s Press.
Leff, C. S. 1999. “ Democratization and Disintegration in Multinational States-The Breakup of the Communist Federations, “ World Politics, 51(2), pp. 205-235.
Lenin, V. I.. 1968. Collected Works. Moscow: Progress Publishers. From: http://marx2mao.phpwebhosting.com/Lenin/RCC13.html#s8
Mastyugina, Tatiana and Lev Perepelkin. 1996. An Ethnic History of Russia. London: Greenwood Press.
McAuley, Mary. 1997. Russia’s Politics of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mukharyamov, Nail’. 2000. Regiony Rossii Khoronika I Rukovoditeli Том 7: Respublika Tatarstan.
From: http://src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/publictn/tom7/contents.html
Nichols, Johanna. 1995. “Who are the Chechen? ” Linguist List, 6(22), 13 January.
Pain and Popov. 1995. “Rossiiskaya politika v Chechene, “ Izvestiya, 7 Feb. , pp. 1-4.
Paxton, John. 2001. Imperial Russia – A Reference Handbook. New York: PALGRAVE.
Peace in Chechnya? The Problem and Possibilities for Resolution by Strengthening Democratic Institution. From: www.ciaonet.org.
Premdas, Ralph R.. 1990. Secessionist Movements in Comparative Perspective. London: Pinter Publishers.
Rorlich, Azade-Ayse. 1986. The Volga Tatars: a Profile in National Resilience. Stanford, Calif: Hoover Institution Press.
Rutherford, R. L.. 1995. The Political Economy of Ethnonationalism: Eeparatism and Secession from the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms International Dissertation Services, A Bell & Howell Co..
Sakwa, Richard. 1993. Russian Politics and Society. London & New York: Routledge.
Sakwa, Richard. 2001. “Ethnic and Transitional Politics, “Working Paper, no. 4. London: London Centre of International Relations. From: http://www.ukc.ac.uk/politics/lcir/research/working-paper4.pdf.
Schamiloglu, Uli. 1992. “Whither Tatarstan?” Perspective on Change, 1 (3), pp. 14-21.
Seely, Robert. 2001. Russo-Chechen Conflict, 1800-2000. London: Frank Cass.
Shaw, Paul and Yuwa Wong. 1989. Genetic Seeds of Warfare-Evolution, Nationalism and Patriotism. London: Unwin Hyman.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg and John M. Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simon, Gerhard. 1991. Nationalism and Policy Toward the Nationalities in the Soviet Union. Boulder: Westview Press.
Slezkine, Yuri. 1994. “ The USSR as a Communal Apartment, or How a Socialist State Promoted Ethnic Particularism, “Slavic Review, 53(2), pp. 414-452.
Slocum, John W.. 1995. “Disintegration and Consolidation: National Separatism and the Evolution of Center-Periphery Relations in the Russian Federation, ” Cornell University Peace Studies Program occasional paper #19. From: www.ciaonet.org
Smith, Anthony D.. 1983. Theories of Nationalism. New York: Holmes and Meier.
Smith, Anthony D.. 1986. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Smith, Anthony D.. 1998. Nationalism and Modernism. London: Routledge.
Stalin, J. V.. 1953. Works,Vol. 5. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House. From: http://www.marx2mao.org/Stalin/CPNQ21.html
Starovoiteva, Galina. 1992. “Nationality policies in the period of perestroika: some comments from a political actor.” In Gail W. Lapidus, ed., From Union to Commonwealth-Nationalism and Separatism in the Soviet Republics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stepanov, Valery. 2000. “Ethnic Tensions and Separatism in Russia, ” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 26(2), pp. 305-332.
Suny, Ronald Grigor. 1992. “State, Civil Society, and ethnic cultural consolidation in the USSR-roots of the national question.” In Gail W. Lapidus, ed., From Union to Commonwealth-Nationalism and Separatism in the Soviet Republics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suny, Ronald Grigor. 1993. The revenge of the pass: nationalism, revolution, and the collapse of the Soviet Union. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
The Search for Peace in Chechnya: A Source book 1994-1996. From: www.ciaonet.org
Tishkov, Valery. 1997. Ethnicity, Nationalism and Conflict in and after the Soviet Union. London: UNRISD.
Tiwari, J.G.. 1984. Muslims Under the Czars and the Soviets. From: http://salam.muslimsonline.com/babri/tartars1.htm
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2001.“Indivisible Territory and Ethnic War, ” paper No. 01-08, pp. 1-46. Cambridge: WCFIA/Harvard University. From: www.ciaonet.org
Treisman, Daniel S.. 1997. “Russia’s ‘Ethnic Revival’: the Separatist Activism of Regional Leaders in a Post-communist Order, ” World Politics, 49 (2), pp. 212-249.
Usmanov, Lyoma. “The Fate of Democracy in Chechnya.“ From: www.islamicsupremecouncil.org/country_reports/Chechnya/fateofdemocracy.htm
Usmanov, Lyoma. 1997. Nepokoryonnaya Chechnya. Moskva: Parus.
White, Stephen and Alex Pravda, Zvi Gitelman eds.. 1997. Developments in Russian Politics 4. Durham: Duke University Press.
Zaslavsky, Victor. 1992. “The Evolution of Separatism in Soviet Society under Gorbachev.“ In Gail W. Lapidus, ed., From Union to Commonwealth-Nationalism and Separatism in the Soviet Republics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
三、 網站資料
（一） 官方網站
車臣共和國：www.chechnya.gov.ru
俄羅斯聯邦：www.gov.ru
俄羅斯聯邦中央選舉委員會：ww.fci.ru/
俄羅斯聯邦土地資源委員會：www.goscomzem.ru
獨立國協：www.cis.minsk.by
韃靼共和國：www.tatar.ru
（二） 資料庫、學術機構及其他
日本北海道大學斯拉夫研究中心：www.src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp
車臣共和國（非官方）：www.amina.com
車臣共和國－馬斯哈多夫：www.chechen.org
俄羅斯NNS新聞：www.nns.ru
俄羅斯世界地理：www.wgeo.ru
俄羅斯區域研究資料庫：www.isn.ethz.ch/researchpub/publihouse/rrr/
俄羅斯區域新聞：www.regions.ru
美國車臣和平委員會：www.peaceinchechnya.org
美國科學聯盟軍事分析網－車臣戰爭：http://fas.org/man/dod-101/ops/war/chechnya.htm
美國德州大學地圖資料庫：www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/
哥倫比亞國際事務研究線上資料庫：www.ciaonet.org
馬克斯、恩格斯、列寧、史達林、毛澤東研究：www.marx2mao.org
喀山大學：www.kcn.ru
斯拉夫歐亞研究資料庫：www.slavweb.com
線上「時代雜誌」－車臣戰爭追蹤報導：http://www.time.com/time/europe/chechnyatrail/trail2.html
蘇聯資料：cccp.narod.ru |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
俄羅斯研究所
89263002
91 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089263002 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [俄羅斯研究所] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
