Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33517
|
| Title: | 資訊檢索文獻老化現象之研究-兼論同時法與歷時法之特質
Obsolescence of Information Retrieval Literature:Synchronous and Diachronous Approaches |
| Authors: | 許雅婷 |
| Contributors: | 蔡明月
許雅婷 |
| Keywords: | 文獻老化
資訊檢索
同時法研究
歷時法研究
引用年齡中數
半衰期
obsolescence
information retrieval
synchronous approach
diachrinous approach
median citation age
half-life |
| Date: | 2006 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 16:56:03 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究採用同時法與歷時法二種文獻老化研究方法，進行資訊檢索領域下系統研究及使用者研究二種主題文獻之老化研究，主要研究重點有二，一是資訊檢索領域下，系統研究及使用者研究二種不同主題文獻老化現象之差異性；二是同一主題文獻下，同時法與歷時法二種不同老化研究方法之文獻衰退情形是否一致。
同時法研究是針對現時某一特定文獻之引用參考文獻進行分析，並測得其引用年齡中數。本研究自LISA資料庫取得2006年資訊檢索領域下系統研究及使用者研究二種主題之相關文獻，作為同時法研究樣本，並利用T檢定檢測系統研究及使用者研究二種主題文獻老化現象之差異。在同時法研究結果方面，系統研究及使用者研究二種主題文獻之引用年齡中數分別為7.25歲與7.98歲，系統研究主題文獻同時法老化速度快於使用者研究主題文獻，但差異不大，T檢定結果亦顯示同時法系統研究及使用者研究二種主題文獻之老化速度無顯著差異。
歷時法研究是分析過去某特定期間所發表之文獻，其逐年被引用情形，並計算其被引用半衰期。本研究利用LISA資料庫取得1996年資訊檢索領域下系統研究及使用者研究二種主題之相關文獻，作為歷時法研究樣本，並利用WOS資料庫，取得其自1996年至2006年間逐年被引用情形。在歷時法研究結果方面，系統研究及使用者研究二種主題文獻之被引用半衰期分別為5.12歲與4.99歲，系統研究主題文獻之歷時法老化速度較使用者研究主題文獻稍慢，二者差異不大，T檢定結果亦顯示歷時法系統研究及使用者研究二種主題文獻之老化速度無顯著差異。
在同時法與歷時法二種研究方法比較部份，就文獻老化速度而言，同時法之引用參考文獻數量於高峰期後，呈現顯著文獻衰退現象；而歷時法達到被引用次數最高峰後，則未呈現明顯文獻衰退現象，可知同時法文獻老化速度較歷時法文獻老化速度快。在柯史（K-S）檢測方面，檢測結果發現，不論系統研究主題文獻或使用者研究主題文獻，同時法與歷時法之文獻老化現象皆不一致。
因此，本研究重要研究結論有二：一是資訊檢索領域下，不會因主題不同而有顯著差異；二是資訊檢索領域下，同時法所測得之文獻老化現象與歷時法所測得之文獻老化現象不一致。
This obsolescence study uses two kinds of aging research methods - synchronous approach and diachrinous approach. Analyze two subjects of systems-centered and users-centered in the information retrieval field. The main emphasis of the research is two. First, under information retrieval field, the differences between systems-centered and user-centered in obsolescence study. Second, the difference between synchronous approach and diachrinous approach’s aging phenomenon in the same subject.
Synchronous approach is targeted at the present of a particular literature references and calculated median citation age. This study acquired the information retrieval field of systems-centered and user-centered’s sample in 2006 from LISA database, and tested the difference between systems-centered and user-centered literature aging with using t-test. The result of synchronous approach, median citation age of systems-centered literature is 7.25 years and median citation age of user-centered literature is 7.98 years. So systems-centered literature aging is faster than user-centered literature. But the difference is small. T test results also revealed that difference between systems-centered and user-centered of literature aging has not significantly.
Diachrinous approach was to analyze a particular during the past published literature and observed the cited times each year, and finally calculated its half-life. This study acquired the information retrieval field of systems-centered and user-centered’s sample in 1996 from LISA database, and acquired the cited times each year during 1996 to 2006 from WOS database.The result of diachrinous approach, cited half-life of system-centered literatures is 5.12 and cited half-life of user-centered literatures is 4.99 years. So user-centered literature aging was faster than system-centered literatures. But the difference was small. T test results also revealed that difference between the system-centered and user-centered of literature aging has not significantly
Synchronous approach and diachrinous approach methods of comparison. By the literature on the aging speed, cited reference numbers of synchronous approach reached peak period, and the literature curve showed significant recession; cited times of diachrinous approach reached a peak, and literature curve were not significantly recession. It revealed that aging speed of synchronous approach was faster than aging speed of diachrinous approach. In the K-S test, the results showed that synchronous approach and diachrinous approach were inconsistent, whether systems-centered literatures or users-centered literatures.
Therefore, the important conclusion of this study are two : First, in the information retrieval field, even different subject there will be no significant differences on literature aging phenomenon; Second, under the information retrieval field, synchronous approach and diachrinous approach which measured the aging phenomenon of literature are inconsistent. |
| Reference: | 一、中文書目
丁學東（1993）。文獻計量學基礎。北京：北京大學出版社。
王宏鑫（2003）。文獻老化研究現狀的分析。情報理論與實踐，26(3)，232-234。
王淑儀（1998）。電腦科學文獻老化研究—兼論同時法與歷時法的特質。未出版之碩士論文，私立淡江大學資訊與圖書館學研究所，台北縣。
王傳、俞培果（1998）。地質學文獻的歷時和同步半衰期測定比較。情報雜誌，17(2)，79-80。
吳明德（1987）。我國公立大學圖書館支援研究所學術研究之探討（行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，NSC 76-0301-H002-13）。台北市：台灣大學圖書館系暨研究所。
林娟娟（1997）。學術期刊之同儕評鑑。大學圖書館，1(3)，127-140。
金珊資訊有限公司（2006，1月11日）。Web of Science中文使用手冊。上網日期：2006年11月19日，檢自：http://www.stpi.org.tw/fdb/wos/WOS_7_2_050916.pdf
周曉雯（1994）。我國台灣地區化學期刊引用文獻老化之研究。台北市：漢美。
俞培果（1997）。文獻老化現象研究的歷史評說。中國圖書館學報，4，44-49。
俞培果（1998）。關於文獻老化研究中若干問題的思考。情報理論與實踐，21(3)，144-147。
陳光華（2006）。引文索引之建置與應用。台北市：文華。
陳旭耀（1996）。臺灣地區圖書資訊學碩士論文及其引用文獻之研究。私立輔仁大學圖書資訊學研究所，台北縣。
陳徹工作室（2003）。SPSS統計分析：基礎篇。台北市：碁峰資訊。
國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心（2006，11月20日）。Web of Science簡介。上網日期：2006年11月20日，檢自：http://www.stpi.org.tw/fdb/wos/index.html
傅雅秀（1990）。以文獻引用分析評估海洋學期刊。教育資料與圖書館學，27，318-319。
資訊應用研究室（2002）。Excel 2002學習範本。台北縣：台科大圖書。
蔡明月（2003）。資訊計量學與文獻特性。台北市：編譯館。
二、西文書目
Abelson, P. (1990). Mechanisms for evaluating scientific information and the role of peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 216-222.
Alvarez, P., Escalona, I., ＆ Pulgarín, A. (2000).What is wrong with obsolescence？Journal of the American Society for Information Science,51(9),812-815.
Bernal, J. D. (1959).The Transmission of scientific information: A user’s agenda, Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information (pp.85-95). Washington: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
Biradar, B. S., ＆ Sampath Kumar, B. T. (2003).Chemical technology literature: An obsolescence study. Annals of Library and Information Studies,50(4),156-162.
Bottle, R. T., ＆ Gong, Y. T. (1987). A Bibliometric study on the ageing and content typology relationship of the biochemical literature. Journal of Information Science ,13,59-63.
Buttlar, L. (1999). Information sources in library and information science doctoral research. Library＆Information Science Research,21(2),227-245.
Burton, R. E., ＆ Kebler, R. W. (1960). Half-life of some scientific and technical literature. American Documentation,11,18-22.
Brookes, B. C. (1970). The Growth, utility and obsolescence of scientific periodical literature. Journal of Documentation,26(4),283-294.
Brookes, B. C. (1981). The Foundation of information science, part iv: Information science: The changing paradigm. Journal of Information Science,3(1):3-12.
CSA, Inc. (2006). LISA: library and information science abstracts database guide. Retrieved October 26, 2006, from: http://140.119.115.253/Eserv/csa_LISA_intro.pdf
Culnan, M. J. (1978). Analysis of the information usage patterns of academics and practitioners in the computer field: A citation analysis of a national conference proceedings. Information Processing and Management,14(6),395-404.
Cunninggham, Sally jo ＆ Bocock, D. (1995). Obsolescence of computing literature. Scientometrics,34(2),255-262.
Ding, Y. (1998). Visualisation of intellectual structure in information retrieval: Author co-citation analysis. International Forum on Information and Documentation, 23(1),25-36.
Ding, Y., Chrowdhury, G. G., ＆ Foo, S. (1999). Mapping the development in information retrieval speciality: A bibliometric analysis via journals. MACIAS-CHAPULA, C.A., (Eds.), Seventh Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics-Processings (pp. 139-149). Mexico.
Ding, Y., Chrowdhury, G. G., ＆ Foo, S. (1999a). Mapping intellectual structure of information retrieval: An author co-citation analysis, 1987-1997. Journal of Information Science,25(1),67-78.
Ding, Y., Chrowdhury, G. G., ＆ Foo, S. (2000). Journal as markers of intellectual space: Journal co-citation analysis of information retrieval. Scientometrics, 47(1), 55-73.
Ding、Chowdhury, G. G., ＆ Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometrics cartography of information retrieval search by using co-word analysis. Information Processing and Management,37,817-842.
Diodato, V., & Smith, F. (1993). Obsolescence of music literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,44(2),101-112.
Egghe, L. (2004). Solution of a problem of Buckland on the influence of obsolescence on scattering. Scientometrics,59(2),225-232.
Egghe, L., ＆ Rousseau, R. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization：Definitions and relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,51(11),1004-1017.
Eldredge, J. D. (1998). The Vital few meet the trivial many: Unexpected use patterns in a monographs collection. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86(4), 496-503.
Gapen, D. K., ＆ Milner, S. P. (1981). Obsolescence. Library Trend,30(11),107-124.
Glanzel, W. (2004). Toward a model for diachronous and synchronous citation analyses. Scientometrics,60(3),511-522.
Gosnell, C. F. (1943). The Rate of obsolescence in college library book collection by an analysis of three select lists of books for college libraries. Doctoral dissertation, New York University.
Griffith, B. C., Servi, P. N., Anker, A. L.,＆ Drott, M. C. (1979). The Aging of scientific literature: A citation analysis. Journal of Documentation,35,179-197.
Griscom, R. (1983). Periodical use in a university music library: A citation study of theses and dissertations submitted to the Indian university school of music from 1975-1980. The Serials Librarian,7(3),35-52.
Gupta, B. M. (1998). Growth and obsolescence of literature in theoretical population genetics. Scientometrics,42(3),335-347.
Gupta, U. (1990). Obsolescence of physics literature: Exponential decrease of the density of citations to physical review articles with age. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(4), 282-287.
Kent, A. et al. (1979). Use of library material: The university of Pittsburgh study. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Lawani, S. W. (1975). Obsolescence of american and french agronomic literature. Journal of Librarianship,7,12-30.
Line, M. B. (1993). Obsolescence and change in the use of literature with time : Obsolescence revisited. Library Trend,41(4),665-683.
Line, M. B., ＆ Sandison, A. (1974). Obsolescence and change in the use of literature with time. Journal of Documentation,30(3),283-350.
Mooers, C. N. (1951). Zatocoding applied to mechanical organization of knowledge. American Documentation,2(1),20-32.
Motylev, V. M. (1989). The Main problems of studying literature aging. Scientometrics, 15, 97-109.
Musib, S. K. (1988). Age of literature Studies in psychology, IASLIC Bulletin, 33, 15-18.
Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Dobrowolski, T., Rowlands, I., Jamali M., Hamid R., Polydoratou, P. (2005). Revisiting “obsolescence” and journal article “decay” through usage data: An analysis of digital journal use by year of publication. Information Processing and Management,41,1441-1461.
Persson, O. (1994). The Intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American society for information science.45(1),31-38.
Pertiz, B. C. ＆ Sor, D. (1990). The Use of library by graduate students in phychology as indicated by citations. Collection Management,12(3/4),12-15.
Price, Derek de Solla (1970). Citation measure of hard science, soft science, technology and non-science. In C.E. Nelson ＆ D.K. Pollock,(Eds.), Communication Among Scientists and Engineers (pp.3-22). Lexington, MA: Health.
Pulgarín, A., ＆ Gil-Levia, I. (2004). Bibliometric analysis of the automatic indexing literature: 1956-2000. Information Processing and Management,40(2),365-377.
Redmond-Neal, A., ＆ Hlava, M. M. K. (2005). ASIS&T thesaurus of information science, technology, and librarianship. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
Rouse, S. H. ＆ Rouse, W. B. (1979). Analysis of monograph obsolescence at two levels of interlibrary loan network. Information Processing and Managemen,15,219-225.
Sangam, S. L. (1999). Obsolescence of literature in the field of psychology. Scientometrics,44(1),33-46.
Saracevic, T. (1999). Information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,50(12),1051-1063.
Sennyey, p., Ellern, G. D. ＆ Newsome, N. (2002). Collection development and a long-term periodical use study: Methodology and implications. Serials Review,28(1), 38-44.
Stinson, E. R. (1981). Diachronous VS synchronous study of obsolescence. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Stinson, E. R., & Lancaster, F. W. (1987). Synchronous versus diachronous methods in the measurement of obsolescence by citation studies. Journal of Information Science,13(2),65.
Száva-Kováts, E. (2002). Unfound attribution of the “half-life” index-number of literature obsolescence to Burton and Kebler：A literature science study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,53(13),1098-1105.
Tahai, A., ＆ Rigsby, J. T. (1998). Information processing using citations to investigate journal influence in accounting. Information Processing＆ Management,34(2/3),341-359.
Tonta, Y., ＆ Al, U. (2006). Scatter and obsolescence of journal cited in theses and dissertations of librarianship. Library and Information Science Research,28,281-296.
Tonta, Y., ＆ Ünal, Y. (2005). Scatter of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in document delivery requests. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology,56(1),84-94.
Tsay, M. Y. (2006). Journal self-citation study for semiconductor literature: Synchronous and diachronous approach. Information Processing and Management,42(6),1567–1577.
Wallace, D. P. (1986). The Relationship between journal productivity and obsolescence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,37(3),136. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
94155006
95 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094155006 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
