政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33509

政大典藏 > College of Liberal Arts > Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies > Theses > Item 140.119/33509

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33509

Title:	引用文獻索引資料庫之比較研究 A Comparison Study of Citation Indexing Database
Authors:	陳薇竹 Chen, Wei-Chu
Contributors:	蔡明月陳薇竹 Chen, Wei-Chu
Keywords:	引文索引資料庫重複性學術出版開放存取 Citation Indexing Database Overlap Scholarly Publishing Open Access
Date:	2007
Issue Date:	2009-09-17 16:54:59 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	引用文獻索引資料庫在Institute for Scientific Information(ISI)建置了Science Citation Index(SCI)與Social Science Citation Index(SSCI)以後，逐漸為學術界所重視，也帶動了傳統商業公司發展引用文獻索引資料庫之風潮，其中又以Science Citation Index-Expanded(SCIE)及後起之Scopus最為人稱道。但由於傳統商業公司對學者及圖書館收費過於高昂，引起學者及圖書館的反動，興起一陣由計畫及少數商業公司所發展，開放存取引用文獻索引資料庫之風潮，其中又以Google公司製作的Google Scholar，及NEC公司隨著計畫建置的CiteSeer最受人注目。 <br>本研究採取實作法為研究方法，評比四個引用文獻索引資料庫的檢索介面及檢索細項之優劣。並以美國計算機械學會(ACM)頒發的杜林獎之50位得主為樣本，對SCIE、Scopus、CiteSeer及Google Scholar四個引用文獻索引資料庫進行作者檢索，逐一過濾檢索結果後，針對正確的檢索結果進行分析，比較四個引用文獻索引資料庫內部重複性與完整性，並交叉比對四個引用文獻索引資料庫兩兩比較之重複性、獨特性及完整性，並歸納造成此研究結果之原因。<br>研究結果發現SCIE與Scopus的檢索方式較容易，不會造成使用者太大的負擔，檢索方式也較為多元詳盡，其中又以Scopus的作者檢索使用最方便；而Google Scholar及CiteSeer皆主要利用一簡潔的檢索列，較難精準的檢索出所需資料。收錄資料完整度方面，Google Scholar收錄資料最多元，SCIE則涵蓋最完整之學術資源。交叉比對結果可得知，Google Scholar之資料獨特性最高；CiteSeer之收錄資料完整度最低。此外除了SCIE以外，其他三個引文索引資料庫皆收錄大量的網路資源。此外，美國計算機械學會的出版品則在四個引文索引資料庫中，皆扮演重要角色。<br>根據研究結果，對此四個引文索引資料庫提出建議，希望傳統商業引文索引資料庫能增加索引網路資源，並調整收費政策；開放存取引文索引資料庫應改正其書目著錄格式；希望圖書館能增加對引文索引資料庫使用之推廣，並教導使用者正確利用開放存取引文索引資料庫。<br>引文索引資料庫索引之文獻，已對學術評鑑造成很大的影響。圖書館應實地使用並引導使用者正確的利用引文索引資料庫，及使用網路資源的正確觀念。如此方可協助使用者不在浩瀚之網路資源中迷失。 After Institute for Scientific Information(ISI) made Science Citation Index(SCI) and Social Science Citation Index(SSCI), Scholars progressively took notice of citation indexing databases. Commercial Companies also had begun to expand citation indexing database like the famous products are Science Citation Index-Expanded(SCIE). However, the commercial companies charged too much for using the database. So it excited the development of open access(OA) citation indexing database, instant of Google Scholar and CiteSeer.<br>OA means that people can use these citation indexing database for free. This paper aims to adopt comparison as four databases’ retrieval interface, and unique and overlap of documents of the subjects of computing machinery and electrical engineering. The research subjects are composed of OA and traditional commercial citation indexing database in the follow: SCIE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and CiteSeer. Moreover, this research retrieved all documents of Turing award winners in the four citation indexing databases, in order to examine these four citation indexing databases’ unique and overlap.<br>As a consequence, this study provides the findings as follows : Firstly, traditional commercial citation indexing databases (SCIE and Scopus) have the easier retrieval interface and various searching forms. The Google Scholar collects more multiform resources of retrieval results, and SCIE completed collects scholarly literatures. We make a comparison to find that Google Scholar has much more unique data, but CiteSeer is completely less in four citation indexing databases. Besides SCIE, another three citation indexing databases conclude a large number of internet data. Finally, publications of The Association of Computing Machinery(ACM) play an important role in the four citation indexing databases.
Reference:	英文： Christine L. Borgman , “ Editor’s Introduction, ” in Scholarly Communication and Bibilometrics (Newbury Park: Sage,1990) Rob Kling and Lisa Spector, “Academic Rewards for Scholarly Research Communication via Electronic Publishinf,” <http://www.slis.indiana.edu/CSI/WP/WP02-13B.html > (17 Dec 2002) Accesses 2005/6/13 Citation Index,”< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation_index > Accessed 2005/10/30 Ann Okerson, “Of making many books there is no end: Report on serial prices for the association of research Libraries,” In Report of the ARL Serials Prices Project (1989), <http://library.yale.edu/~okerson/making > “About Create Change,” < http://www.createchange.org/librarians/intro/aboutcc.html > Accessed 2005/11/13 “ The ACRL Scholarly Communications Initiative: A progress report, ” < http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/crlnews/backissues2004/september04/scholarlycomminitiative.htm> Accessed 2005/12/1 “ Washington DC Principles for Free Access to Science, “(2004) < http://www.dcprinciples.org > Accessed 2005/12/1 OCLC, “ Open WorldCat program, ” < http://www.oclc.org/worldcat/open/default.htm > Accessed 2005/12/5 Norman Oder, “ Google Scholar Links with Libs, ” Library Journal (Apr 2005) < http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA516043.html?q=Google+Scholar+Links+with+Libs > CrossRef, “ Crossref Search Project , ” < http://www.crossref.org/crossrefsearch.html > Accessed 2005/12/5 Barbara Quint, “ Google Scholar Focus on Research-Quality Content, ” InformationToday, (Oct 2005) < http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb041122-1.shtml > Accessed 2005/11/20 Danny Sullivan, “ Google scholar offers access to academic information, “ SearchEngineWatch (Oct 2005), < http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3437471 > Accessed 2005/10/28 Péter Jacsoó, “ Google Scholar: The pros and cons, “Online information review 29(2) (2005) Greg R. Notess, “ Scholarly Web Searching: Google Scholar and Scirus ,” Online 29(4) (2005.8) Péter Jascó, ” Native Serching engine vs Google Scholar , ” < http://www2.hawaii.edu/~jacso/scholarly/side-by-side2.htm > Accessed 2005/12/10 Greg R. Notess, “ Scholarly Web Searching: Google Scholar and Scirus, ” Online 29(4) (2005.8) Mick O’Leary, “ Google Scholar: What’s in it for you, ” Information Today 22(7) (2005) Robin Peek, “ A googly New Year, ” (2005.1) < http://www.infotoday.com > Accessed 2005/2/10 Traffick.com, ” Google Scholar vs. Real Scholarship , ” < http://www.traffick.com/2004/11/google-scholar-vs-real-scholarship.asp > Accessed 2005/11/20 Alexandrin Popescul etc., “ Clustering and Identifying Temporal Trends in Document Database, ” IEEE Advances in Digital Libraries(2000) “ CiteSeer.IST, ” < http://citeseer.ifi.unizh.ch/citeseer.html > Accessed 2006/2/10 Steve Lawrence and C. Lee Giles, “ Searching the World Wide Web, ” Science 280(5360) (1998) Steve Lawrence and C. Lee Giles and Kurt Bollacker, “ Indexing and Retrieval of Scientific Literature, ” Eight International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Kansas City,1999) Kurt D. Bollacker etc., “ CiteSeer: An Autonomous Web Agent for Automatic Retrieval and Identification of Interesting Publications, ” 2nd International ACM Conference on Autonomous Agents (1998) “ Science Citation Index : A General Introduction, ” in Science Citation Index 1995, Guide and Lists of Source Publication (Philadelphia, PA : Institute for Scientific Information, 1995) “Science Citation Index Expanded : Journal List, “ < http://www.thomsonscientific.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=D > Accessed 2006/2/10 “ Science Citation Index®, ” < http://scientific.thomson.com/products/sci/ > Accessed 2006/2/10 Thomson , “ ISI Reasearch Service Group: Analytical Tools for Reasearch Evaluation, ” < http://scientific.thomson.com/knowledgelink/ > Accessed 2005/12/1 Susan Fingerman, ” Elsevier holds official launch events for scopus, ” Infotoday (15 Nov 2004), < http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb041115-2.shtml > “ Scopus in Detail: What does it cover?, ” < http://info.scopus.com/detail/what/ > Accessed 2005/12/10 “ Elsevier’s Scopus Introduces Citation Tracker: Challenge to Thomson ISI’s Web of Science?, ” < http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb060123-1.shtml > Accessed 2005/12/10 Howard M. Dess, “ Database Review and Report: Scopus, ” Science and Technology Librarianship(winter 2006), < http://www.istl.org/06-winter/databases4.html > Accessed 2005/3/11 Peter Jasco, “ Scopus ”, Peter’s Digital Reference Shelf (2004.11), < http://www.galegroup.com/reference/archive/200409/scopus.html > Accessed 2005/3/11 “ Elsevier’s Scopus Introduces Citation Tracker: Challenge to Thomson ISI’s Web of Science?, ” < http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb060123-1.shtml > Accessed 2006/1/3 “ Scopus in Detail: What does it cover?, ” < http://info.scopus.com/detail/what/ > Accessed 2006/1/3 George M. Weinstock, ” Citation index, ” in Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science vol.5 (N.Y.: Marcel Dekker,1971) Virgil Diodato, Dictionary of Bibliometrics (New York :Haworth Press, 1992) Linda.C.Smith, “ Citation analysis, ” Library Trends 30(1) (1981) Testing Labs, “ Google Web Search Engine Evaluation, ” < http://etestinglabs.com/main/reports/google.asp > Accessed 2005/12//30 Heting Chu, ” Search Engines for the World Wide Web: A Comparative Study and Evaluation Methodology, ” ASIS 1996 Annual Conference proceedings (1996) < http://www.asis.org/annual-96/ElectronicProceedings/chu.html > Barbara Quint, “ Google Scholar Focus on Research-Quality Content, ”, InformationToday (2005.8), < http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb041122-1.shtml > Danny Sullivan, “ google scholar offers access to academic information, ” SearchEngineWatch (2005.8), < http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3437471 > Steve Lawrence and C. Lee Giles and Kurt Bollacker, “ Indexing and Retrieval of Scientific Literature, ”in Eight International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management(1999) Steve Lawrence and C. Lee Giles and Kurt Bollacker, “ Digital Libraries and Autonomous Citation Indexing, ” IEEE Computer vol32(6) (1999) “ USING THE ISI IMPACT FACTOR, ” < http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/journalcitationreports/usingimpactfactor/ > Accessed 2006/4/9 Eugene Garfield, “ Citation indexes for science : A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas, “ Science 122(3159) (1955) Bobby Pickering, “ Scopus acquires citation tracker features, ” < http://www.iwr.co.uk/articles/print/2149115 > Access 2006/3/10 “ Scopus Empowers researchers with new Citation Tracter, ” < http://www.info.scopus.com/news/press/pr_060127.asp > Access 2006/3/10 “ Scopus Citation Tracker, ” < www.lib.pu.edu.tw/new/database-userguide/scopus/scopus-1.pdf > Access 2006/3/10 Samuel C. Bradford, “ The Extent to which scientific and technical literature is covered by present abstracting and indexing periodicals, ” Chemistry and Industry 23 (1937) Myke Gluck, “ A Review of Journal Coverage Overlap with an Extension to the Definition of Overlap, ” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(1) (1990) Neil Yerkey and Maryruth Glogowski, “ Scatter of library and information science topics among bibliographic data bases ”, Journal of American Society for Information Science 41(4) (1990) James Martyn , “ Tests on abstracts journals: Coverage overlap and indexing, ” Journal of Documentation 23 (1967) Charles P Bourne, ” Characteristics of Coverage by the Bibliography of agriculture of the literature relating to agricultural research and development, ” in Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, Springfield, Va. 22151 (1969) Charles P Bourne etc., “ Study and comparison of the indexing of the bibliography of agriculture in relation to the indexing of fifteen other secondary sources, ” U.S. Government Research and Development Report IGC-PA-69-40 (1969) James L. Wood and Carolyn Flanagan and H.E. Kennedy, ” Overlap in the List of Journals monitored by BIOSIS, CAS, Ei, ” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 23 (1972) James L. Wood and Carolyn Flanagan and H.E. Kennedy, ” Overlap among the Journal articles selected for coverage by BIOSIS, CAS, Ei, ” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24 (1973) Larson Julian R. etc., ” Comparison of printed bibliographic descriptions distributed by BIOSIS, CAS, and Ei, ” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27 (1976) Toni C Bearman and William A Kunberger, “ A Study of Coverage Overlap Among Fourteen Major Science and Technology Abstracting and Indexing Services, ” (Philadelphia: National Federation of Abstracting and Indexing Service, 1977) Tamas Doszkocs, ” Estimating citation overlap in a multi-file retrieval system, ” in Information Management in the 1980s: proceedings of 40th ASIS Annual Meeting Chicago, vol. 14 (White Plains, N.Y. : Knowledge Industry Publications for American Society for Information Science,1977) Donald T Hawkins and Betty Miller, “ On-line data base coverage of the on-line information-retrieval literature, ” Online Review 1 (1977) Robert K. Poyer, “ Journal Article Overlap Among Index Medicus, Science Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, and Chemical Abstracts, ” Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 72(4) (1984) Tim LaBorie etc., “ Library and information science abstracting and indexing services: coverage, overlap, and context, ” Library and Information Science Research 7(1) (1985) Pauls T. Nicholls, “ Bibliometrics of the laserdisc applications literature, ” Laserdisk Professional 2 (1989) Myke Gluck, “ A Review of Journal Coverage Overlap with an Extension to the Definition of Overlap, ” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(1) Alexander Y. Mychko-Megrin, “ A Comparison of biomedical databases, “ Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 79 (1991) Maryellen C. Sievert and Mark J. Andrew, ” Indexing consistency in Information Science Abstracts, ” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42 (1991) Linda G. Slater, “ Mapping the literature of speech-language pathology, ” Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 85 (1997) Frank Provost and Paul Nieuwenhuysen, “ Measuring overlap of data bases in water supply and sanitation using sampling and the binomial probability distribution, ” Scientometrics 25 (1992) Miranda L. Pao, ” Term and citation retrieval : A field study, ” Information Processing and Management 29 (1993) Krishna Bharat and Andrei Broder, “A Technique for Measuring the Relative Size and Overlap of the Public Web Search Engines, “ The 7th International World Wide Web Conference (1998.4) Kirsten A. GrØnbjerg, “ Evaluating Nonprofit Database, ” American Behavioral Scientist 45 (2002) Peter Jacsó, “ Analyzing the journal coverage of abstracting/indexing databases at variable aggregate and analytic levels, ” Library & Information Science Research 20 (1998) William W. Hood, ” An informetrics study of the distribution of bibliographic records in online database: A case study using the literature of Fuzzy Set Theory(1965-1993), ”( Sydney , Australia: Ph.D. dissertation, The University of New South Wales, 1998) William W. Hood and Concepci S. Wilson, “ The Relationship of Records in Multiple Database to Their Usage or Citeness, ” Journal of the American society for information science and technology 56(9) (2005) Eleanor Read and Craig Smith, “ Searching for library and information science literature: a comparison of coverage in three database, ” Library Computing 19 (2000) William H. Walters and Esther I. Wilder, ” Bibliographic Index Coverage of a Multidisciplinary Field, ” Journal of the American society for information science and technology 54(14) (2003) Garfield Eugene, “ Pioneer of Citation Index and analysis, celebrates 80th Birthday, “ < http://scientific.thomson.com/press/2005/8289850 > Accessed 2006/5/3 Science Citation Index Expanded™, < http://scientific.thomson.com/products/scie/ > Accessed 2007/6/30 Susan Fingerman, “ Elservier Holds Offical Launch Events for Scopus, ” Infotoday (2004) < http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb041115-2.shtml > Accessed 2006/5/1 “ Scopus in Detail: What does it cover ”, < http://www.info.scopus.com/detail/what/ > Accessed 2005/8/10 Turing Award , < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_award > Accessed 2006/1/30 Policies and Guide to Establishing an ACM Award, < http://www.acm.org/awards/policies.html > Accessed 2006/1/30 “ Ulrichsweb.com,” < http://www.csa.com/e_products/ulrichs.php > Accessed 2005/12/30 “How the Open WorldCat program works,” < http://www.oclc.org/worldcat/open/how/default.htm > Accessed 2006/1/4 “WorldCat, “ < http://www.oclc.org/worldcat/default.htm > Accessed 2006/1/4 “RefWorks, “ < http://service.refworks.com.tw/home.html > Accessed 2006/1/2 Steve Lawrence and Lee C. Giles and Kurt Bollacker, “ Indexing and Retrieval of Scientific Literature, ” Eight International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management”(Kansas City,1999) Kurt D. Bollacker and Steve Lawrence and C. Lee Giles, “ A System For Automatic Personalized Tracking of Scientific Literature on the Web, ” ACM Conference on Digital Libraries(1999) “The Biology Library’s Guide to Searching : Science Citation Index, “ < http://www.library.uiuc.edu/bix/SCIweb.htm > Accessed 2006/10/1 Nobuko Miyairi, “ Effective use of journal citation data: Journal Citation Reprots, “ 學術期刊與引用評鑑研討會(台北市：政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所，民國94年) 蔡明月，資訊計量學與文獻特性，國立編譯館(民92.2)；引用自 “ Science Citation Index : A General Introduction, ” in Science Citation Index 1995, Guide and Lists of Source Publication, Philadelphia, (PA : Institute for Science Information, 1995) 蔡明月，資訊計量學與文獻特性，國立編譯館(民92.2)；引用自Garfield Eugene, “ How to use the Science Citation Index (SCI), ” Current Contents 9 (1983.2 ) 中文：大學評鑑指標分級不分類，摘錄自聯合報2003年9月4日長庚竄起、政大暴跌，摘錄自中國時報92年10月20日AI版毛慶禎， ”開放近用學術文獻館藏”， < http://www.lins.fju.edu.tw/mao/works/oa2005.htm > Accessed 2005/10/30 2005年Open Access研討會；引自毛慶禎，開放近用學術文獻館藏<http://www.lins.fju.edu.tw/mao/works/oa2005.htm > 陳亞寧，開放式資訊取用之現況發展分析，圖書與資訊學刊 51(民93.11) 陳凱誌，網路搜尋引擎對取閱學術資訊的影響：以Google Scholar為例，淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系碩士論文(2005.6) 嵇麗，美國SCI的發展變化與應用研究，資訊傳播與圖書館學 9卷1期(2002.9) 張宏玲，從《SCI》的編輯特點看科技論文被收錄，鄭州工業大學學報(社會科學版) 19(4) (1991) 蔡明月，引用分析與學術研究投影片，引文分析研討會論文集(高雄第一科技大學、高雄市、2006.4) 蔡明月，科學引用文獻索引、期刊引用報告及期刊評估準則，資訊計量學與文獻特性第十一章(台北市，國立編譯館，民92) 方國珍，試析科學引文索引之不足，醫學情報工作19卷3期(民86) 蔡明月，引文索引與引文分析之探討，圖書館學與資訊科學31卷1期(民94.4) 蔡明月，資訊計量學與文獻特性(台北：國立編譯館，2003) 羅思嘉，引用文獻分析與學術傳播研究：中國圖書館學會會報 66 (民90.06) 丁學東，文獻計量基礎(北京：北京大學出版社，1993) 黃慕萱，引用文獻初探，當代圖書館事業論集:慶祝王振鵠教授七秩榮慶論文集(台北市：正中，民83) 陳光華，學術期刊引用文獻資料庫之現況與限制，大學圖書館5卷1期(民90年3月) 柏克萊大學圖書館教學網頁，< http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/SrchEngCriteria.pdf > 蔡明月，科學引用文獻索引、期刊引用報告及期刊評估準則，資訊計量學與文獻特性第十一章(台北市：國立編譯館，民國92年) 蔡明月，引文索引與引文分析之探討，圖書館學與資訊科學 31卷1期 (2005.4) 趙坤茂，計算機科學的諾貝爾獎-杜林獎，中國時報浮世繪版數位世界說法專欄(2000/5/26)，< http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~kmchao/life/rev4.htm > 全國圖書書目資訊網, < http://nbinet1.ncl.edu.tw/screens/opac_menu.html > Accessed 2006/1/4 CONCERT電子期刊聯合查詢系統, < http://ulej.stic.gov.tw/eIndex.asp > Accessed 2006/1/4
Description:	碩士國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所 93155008 96
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093155008
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
15500801.pdf	45Kb	Adobe PDF2	936	View/Open
15500802.pdf	89Kb	Adobe PDF2	973	View/Open
15500803.pdf	82Kb	Adobe PDF2	1779	View/Open
15500804.pdf	65Kb	Adobe PDF2	1034	View/Open
15500805.pdf	142Kb	Adobe PDF2	1270	View/Open
15500806.pdf	349Kb	Adobe PDF2	3726	View/Open
15500807.pdf	223Kb	Adobe PDF2	1354	View/Open
15500808.pdf	2904Kb	Adobe PDF2	2202	View/Open
15500809.pdf	143Kb	Adobe PDF2	1126	View/Open
15500810.pdf	486Kb	Adobe PDF2	1465	View/Open
15500811.pdf	130Kb	Adobe PDF2	1532	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...