English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51664173      Online Users : 570
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33437


    Title: 國中基測英文閱讀測驗分析與閱讀技巧及策略教學之研究
    Authors: 楊捷宇
    Contributors: 余明忠
    楊捷宇
    Keywords: 國中基測
    英文閱讀
    閱讀技巧與策略
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 16:35:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 論文提要內容:
    本論文旨在探討台灣國中基本學力測驗中英文閱讀測驗之題型,並且針對各題型相關之閱讀技巧及策略進行教學實驗,期望本論文的研究發現與建議能對國中英文閱讀教學有所貢獻。
    本研究實驗對象為六十名台北市景美地區一所國中九年級的學生,這些學生來自於二個不同的班級,一班為實驗組,另一班為控制組。本研究採用Mo (1987) 及 Johnson(2004) 的閱測題型分類,並參考國中基測委員會的建議,討論基測英文閱讀測驗題型與分配情形。實驗前測內容包含二○○二年至二○○四年所有國中基測英文閱讀測驗的考題,由受試者參加測驗。接下來進行本研究的教學實驗,實驗組中的受試者接受為期十三週,每週二節課,針對基則範例進行英文閱讀技巧及策略的教學,在另一方面,控制組在相同的條件下,針對相同的範例內容進行字彙、文法、句型及文意的講解與練習。實驗結束後,二組受試者均參加二○○六年所舉辦的兩次基測, 而受試者在英文閱讀測驗的表現,即代表他們的學習成效。
    本研究發現國中基測英文閱讀測驗有六種題型,分別為確認文章主旨、尋找細部資訊、猜測字詞意義、找出字詞指涉、導出暗示推論及引導正確結論,而在二○○六年的基測題目中,僅最後一個類型引導正確結論無相關考題,且各題型的次數分配顯示出相當不平均的考題分配情形,將近一半的題目都屬於尋找細部資訊的類型,且歸類於字面技巧 (literal skills) 的題型比重也遠超過屬於重要技巧 (critical skills) 的題型。此外,前測結果不僅顯示實驗組與控制組在教學實驗進行前並無顯著差異,也顯示受試者在字面技巧的表現優於重要技巧。本研究也發現閱讀技巧及策略教學在二○○六年的第一次基測是有顯著成效的,然而在第二次時,因受試者已畢業且缺乏有效練習,所以成效並不顯著。
    最後,本研究建議基測委員會與試題設計者能多考慮著重各種不同的閱讀題型,尤其是要增加對於學生整體閱讀能力提昇有很大幫助的題型比重,如找出文章主旨與結論等屬於重要技巧的題型。國中英文教師也能設計適合學生的閱讀教材,經由不同題型的練習與強化,幫助學生將這些閱讀技巧與策略內化為他們閱讀能力的一部份,本研究也建議國中英文教材與課本的編寫者能將這些技巧與策略安排在適當的單元與活動中。
    The present study aims to investigate the question types of the English reading comprehension tests in the BCT and to conduct an experiment on the effectiveness of related reading skills and strategies. The findings and suggestions of the present study may be helpful for the reading instruction in junior high school.
    A total of 60 ninth graders in a junior high school in Jing-mei, Taipei participated in this experiment. They are from two different classes; one is the control group and the other is the experimental group. According to the categorization of the reading skills from Mo (1987) and Johnson (2004), the present study examined the question types of the English reading comprehension tests in the BCT and the frequency distribution of different question types. The reading pretest included all the reading passages and items from 2002 to 2004, and the participants were asked to take the pretest as a formal exam. Then, the experiment of the present study lasted for 13 weeks, two class periods a week. The participants in the experimental group received the instruction of the reading skills and strategies while the participants in the control group were taught the vocabulary, the grammar, the structures and their meanings in the same reading passages. After the formal reading instruction, the participants took both of the BCT in 2006, and their performances may reflect the effectiveness of the formal reading instruction.
    There are several findings for the present research. First, six different question types are identified in the English reading comprehension tests of the BCT and they are identifying the main idea, finding the detailed information, determining the meaning out of context, finding the targets of the reference, drawing implications and inferences and drawing correct conclusions. But the last question type drawing correct conclusions was not identified in the BCT of 2006. Second, there existed an unbalanced distribution of these question types. Nearly half of the reading questions can be classified as the type finding the detailed information, and the proportion of the question types related to the literal skills was much larger than those of the question types concerning the critical skills. Moreover, the results of the reading pretest showed that there is no significant difference between the experimental and the control groups and that the participants performed better on the literal skills than on the critical ones. At last, the results of the participants’ performances in the first BCT of 2006 revealed that the formal reading instruction of the reading skills and strategies is effective. But the participants took the second BCT after they graduated, and the effectiveness of the instruction may reduce because of time and lack of practice.
    Finally,the researcher would like to suggest the BCT committee include more reading question types that may emphasize students’ overall reading abilities. Junior high school English teachers may design their own reading classes and help their students improve and internalize the reading skills and strategies they need. The designers of the English textbooks may include these useful reading skills and strategies in different tasks and activities.
    Reference: Alderson, J. C. & Urquhart, A. H. (1985). The effect of students’ academic discipline on their performance on ESP reading tests. Language Testing, 2, 192-204.
    Auerbach, E. R. & Paxton, D. (1997). Not the English thing? Bring reading research into the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 237-61.
    Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Bauman, J. (1982). Linguistic structure and the validity of reading comprehension test. Washington D.C. National Institute of Education.
    Bell, J. & Burnaby, B. (1984). A Handbook for ESL Literacy. Agincourt, Ontario: Dominie Press.
    Block, E. (1992). See how they read: comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 319-35.
    Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching By Principles. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.
    Carrell, P. L. (1988). Some causes of text-boundedness and schema interference in ESL reading. In P. L. Carrell et. al. (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (p.103-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Carrell, P. L.; Davine, J. & Eskey, D. (Eds). (1988). Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Carrell, P. L. & Eisterhold, J. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 553-73.
    Carroll, J. B. (1972). Defining language comprehension: some speculations. In Freedle, R. O. & Carroll, J. B. (Eds.) Language Comprehension and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Washington: Wiley.
    Wu, Y. J. (1997). A Comparison of English Reading Misuses Between Junior and Senior High School Students. Thesis. National Kaihsiung Normal University.
    Yang, P. Y. (1997). Exploring Chinese Students` Lexical Inferencing Behavior in English Reading. Thesis. Taichung: Providence University.
    You, H.L. (2004). Analysis of the Basic Competence English Test for Junior High School. Thesis. National Yunlin University of Science & Technology.
    Yu, G. K. (1995). New tendencies in reading proficiency tests: Implications from reading comprehension research. Paper presented at the Tenth English Conference on English Teaching and Learning in Taiwan.
    Caver, D. (1978). Reading Comprehension: Is there such a thing? English Language Teaching, 32(4), 291-97.
    Chan, Y. W. (2003). Junior High School English Teachers’ Ideas of Current English Textbooks in Tainan County. National Kaohsiung Normal University.
    Chang, L. S. (2001). 國中基本學力測驗之我思我見. 師說, 154, 14-16.
    Chao, Y. H. (2005). A Study of EFL Students’ Preference for Textbook Activities at a Junior High School in Taipei. Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University.
    Chapelle, C., Grabe, W. & Berns, M. (1997). Communicative language proficiency; Definition and Implication for TOEFL 2000. TOEFL Monograph Series, MS-10. Princeton, NJ: ETS.
    Chen, T. C. (2003). The Development of English Reading Diagnostic Test for Junior
    High School Students. Thesis. National Changhua University of Education.
    Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Clark, M. (1979). Reading in Spanish and English; evidence from adult ESL students.
    Language Learning, 29, 121-50.
    Clarke, M. & Silberstein, S. (1977). Toward a realization of psycholinguistic principles for the ESL reading class. Language Learning, 27, 135-54.
    Coady, J. (1979). A psycholinguistic model of the ESL reader. In R. Mackay, B. Barkman, & R. R. Jordan. (Eds.), Reading in a second language. (p.5-12). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies and process in test taking and SLA. In L. F. Bachman & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (p. 90-111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Cohen, A., Glasman, H., Phyllis, R., Rosenbaum-Cohen, R., Ferrara, J. & Fine, J. (1979). Reading English for specialized purposes: Discourse analysis and the use of students informants. TESOL Quarterly, 13(4), 551-64.
    Criper, C. & Davies, A. (1988). English Language Testing Service. Research Report 1 (i) ELTS Validation Project Report. The British Council and the University Examination Syndicate.
    Cummings, O. W. (1982). Differential measurement of reading comprehension skills for students with discrepant subskill profiles. Journal of Education Measurement, 19(1), 59-66.
    Devine, J. (1988). The relationship between general language competence and second language reading proficiency: implications for teaching In P. L. Carrell et. al. (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (260-77). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Dubin, F., Eskey, D. E.& Grabe, W. (1986). Teaching second language reading for academic purposes. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
    Entwhistle, N., Hanley, M. & Hounsell, D. (1979). Identifying distinctive approaches to studying. Higher Education, 8, 365-80.
    Eskey, D. E. (1988). Holding in the bottom: an interactive approach to the language problems of second language readers. In P. L. Carrell et. al. (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (p.93-100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Farr, R., Pritchard, R. & Smitten, B. (1990). A description of what happens when an examinee takes a multiple-choice reading comprehension test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(3), 209-26.
    Fillmore, C., & Kay, P. (1983). Text semantic analysis of reading comprehension. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
    Foote, T. A. (1976). The reading skills test. Chicago: Contemporary Books.
    Fries, C. C. (1963). Linguistics and Reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Geva, E. (1992). The role of conjunctions in L2 text comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 26(4), 731-47.
    Gillet, J. W., & Richards, H. C. (1979). Reading comprehension test performance and hierarchical classification. Paper presented to the Educational Resources Information Center. University of Virginia.
    Goodman, K. S. (1970). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. In H. Singer and R.B. Ruddell (Eds.) Theoretical models and processes of reading. (p.497-508). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
    Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In Kavanagh, F. J. & Mattingly, G. (Eds.) Language by Ear and by Eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.
    Grellet, F. (1981). Developing reading skills. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
    Haverson, Wayne, & Haynes, J. (1982). Literacy Training for ESL Adult Learners. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Heaton, J. B. (1990). Writing English Language Tests. New York; Longman.
    Henning, G. (1987). A guide to language testing: Development, evaluation, research. Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    Ho, W. C. (2001). 從基本學力測驗談起. 師友, 405, 34-36.
    Hoover, W. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (1993). The components of reading. In Thompson, J. B. et al., (Eds.) Reading Acquisition Processes. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    Hosenfeld, C. (1984). Case studies of ninth grade readers. In Alderson, J. C. & Urquhart, A. H. (Eds.) Reading in a Foreign Language. London: Longman.
    Hsieh, F. F. (2001). 既期待又怕受傷害的萬心交集— 第一次國中基本學力測驗後. 師說, 154, 16-18.
    Hsieh, M. C. (2003). A Case Study of English Reading Comprehension Strategies Used by Junior High Students. Thesis. National Chiayi University.
    Hsu, S. C. (2004). Reading Comprehension Difficulties and Reading Strategies of Junior High School EFL Students in Taiwan. Thesis. National Kaohsiung Normal University.
    Huang, S. C. (2004). Washback Effects of the Basic Competence English Test on EFL Teaching in Junior High School in Taiwan. Thesis. National Yunlin University of Science & Technology.
    Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    James, M. O. (1987). ESL reading pedagogy: Implication of schema- theoretical research. In J. Devine, O.L. Carrel, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Research in reading in English as as second language (p.177-88). Washington, D. C.: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Language.
    Johnson, B. E. (2004). The Reading Edge. Taipei: Bookman Books.
    Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of building background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 503-16.
    Kintsch, J., & Franzke, M. (1995). The role of background knowledge in the recall of a new story. In R. G. Lorch and E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (p. 321-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Kolers, P. A. (1969). Reading is only incidentally visual. In Goodman, K. S. & Fleming, J. T. (Eds.) Psycholinguistics and the Teaching of Reading. Newark, DE: IRA.
    Kuo, H. C. (2002). On Cloze Tests: Probing Reading Strategies and Language Proficiency of EFL Students. Thesis. National Chengchi University.
    Lee, J. W., & Schallert, D. L. (1997). The relative contribution of L2 language proficiency and L1 reading ability to L2 reading performance: A test of the Threshold Hypothesis in an EFL Context. TESOL Quarterly, 31(4), 713-39.
    Lei, W. (2001). 國中基本學力測驗問題總體檢. 師說, 154, 4-7.
    Liang, Y. F. (2002). The Effets of Metacognative Reading Strategy Training on Mildly Disabled Learners in Junior High School. Thesis. National Kaihsiung Normal University.
    Liao, C. C. (2003). The Study of Textbook and Teaching Methods Usage by Secondary School English Teachers. Unpublished MA Thesis. National Cheng Kung University.
    Liu, Y. C. (2001). 國中基本學力測驗之後— 高級中學多元入學方案的反思與檢視. 訓育研究, 40 (1), 63-67.
    Lo, W. L. (2004). The Effect of Lexical Inferencing in Vocabulary Learning and Reading Comprehension. Thesis. National Chengchi University.
    Lu, H. Y. (2003). A Study of the EEFTC English Cloze Procedure and Reading Comprehension Test. Thesis. National Yunlin University of Science & Technology.
    Lu, J. J. (2002). An Analysis of the Reading Comprehension Test Given in the English Subject Ability Test in Taiwan and Its Pedagogical Implication. Thesis. National Chengchi University.
    Lunzer, E., Waite, M., & Dolan, T. (1979). Comprehension and comprehension tests. In Luner, E. & Gardner, K. (Eds.) The Effective Use of Reading. London: Heinemann Educational.
    Lynch, B., & Hudson, T. (1991). EST Reading. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. New York: Newbury House.
    Macnamara, J. (1970). Comparative studies of reading and problem solving in two language. TESOL Quarterly, 4(2), 107-16.
    McCarthy, M. (2001). Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Meyer, B. F., & Freedle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 121-43.
    Milulecky, B. S. (1990). A short course in teaching reading skills. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
    Mo, C. C. (1987). A study of English reading comprehension and general guidelines for testing reading. Journal of National Chengchi University, 55, 173-206.
    Murphy, B. (1980). Second language Reading and Testing in Bilingual Education. TESOL Quarterly, 14(2), 189-197.
    Nevo, N. (1989). Test-taking strategies on a multiple-choice test of reading comprehension. Language Testing, 6, 199-215.
    Nicholson, T. (1993). The case against context. In Thompson, J. B. et al. (Eds.) Reading Acquisition Processes. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. London: Heinemann.
    Olshavsky, J. E. (1977). Reading as problem solving: an investigation of strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 12, 654-74.
    Perfetti, C. A. (1977). Language comprehension and fast decoding: some psycholinguistic prerequisites for skilled reading comprehension. In Guthrie, J. T (Ed.) Cognition, Curriculum, and Comprehension. Newark: International Reading Association.
    Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 273-95.
    Raygor, A. L., & Raygor, R. D. (1985). Effective reading: Improving reading rates and comprehension. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
    Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The Psychology of Reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Roller, C. M. (1990). The interaction between knowledge and structure variables in the processing of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(2), 79-89.
    Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text and the poem: the transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press.
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In Dornic, S. (Ed.) Attention and Performance VI. New York: Macmillan.
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension
    (p. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Sarig, G. (1987). High-level reading in the first and in the foreign language: some comparative process data. In Devine, J. et al. (Eds.) Research in reading in English as a Second Language. Washington; TESOL.
    Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
    Teale, W. H., & Rowley, G.. (1984). Standardized testing and the teaching of reading. San Antonio: The University of Texas.
    Traxler, A. E. (1970). Values and limitations of standardized reading tests. In R. Farr (Ed.), Measurement and evaluation of reading (p.220-36). New York: Harcourt.
    Vincent, D. (1985). Reading Tests in the Classroom: An Introduction. Windsor: NFER Nelson.
    Wang, Y. F. (1998). Facilitating EFL reading by teaching text cohesive ties. The proceedings of the seventh international symposium on English teaching. (p. 855-66). Taipei: Crane Publishing.
    Wang, Y. H. (2001). 基本學力測驗之實施: 問題與展望. 教育研究資訊, 9(1), 15-31.
    Weir, C. J. (1990). Communicative language testing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Weir, C. J. (1997). The testing of reading in a second language. In C. Clapham & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, 7. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Weir, C. J. & Urquhart, A. H. (1998). Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
    Williams, E., & Moran, C. (1989). Reading in a foreign language at intermediate and advanced levels with particular reference to English. Language Teaching, 22(4), 217-28.
    Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers: A Social Constructivist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
    93951011
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093951011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    95101101.pdf73KbAdobe PDF2938View/Open
    95101102.pdf11KbAdobe PDF2933View/Open
    95101103.pdf12KbAdobe PDF21045View/Open
    95101104.pdf73KbAdobe PDF21365View/Open
    95101105.pdf73KbAdobe PDF2981View/Open
    95101106.pdf12KbAdobe PDF2921View/Open
    95101107.pdf11KbAdobe PDF21026View/Open
    95101108.pdf11KbAdobe PDF2907View/Open
    95101109.pdf11KbAdobe PDF2900View/Open
    95101110.pdf43KbAdobe PDF22255View/Open
    95101111.pdf52KbAdobe PDF25519View/Open
    95101112.pdf57KbAdobe PDF21199View/Open
    95101113.pdf78KbAdobe PDF21012View/Open
    95101114.pdf31KbAdobe PDF21011View/Open
    95101115.pdf65KbAdobe PDF23285View/Open
    95101116.pdf385KbAdobe PDF28938View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback