政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33432
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 114205/145239 (79%)
造访人次 : 52591513      在线人数 : 692
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33432


    题名: 構思時間對英語學習者口語表達之影響
    THE EFFECTS OF PLANNING TIME OF EFL LEARNERS` ORAL PRODUCTION
    作者: 曾瓊樺
    Tseng,Chiung Hua
    贡献者: 余明忠
    Yu, Ming Chung
    曾瓊樺
    Tseng,Chiung Hua
    关键词: 構思時間
    planning time
    日期: 2006
    上传时间: 2009-09-17 16:34:44 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文旨在檢視口語活動時，構思時間對第二語言學習者口語表達之影響，進而探討學生如何運用構思時間，期許對學生構思時的認知過程有所了解，並對教師進行口語相關活動時有教學上的啟示。
    本研究以構思時間的不同將實驗學生分為四組：(1) 無構思、(2) 活動前構思、(3) 活動時構思、(4)活動前及活動時構思。探討四組學生語言表達流利度、複雜度、及正確度的差異。實驗結果顯示活動前構思有助於語言表達流利度，活動時構思則有損語言表達流利度。活動前構思傾向增加語言表達複雜度，但活動時構思一組則未顯現清楚影響。正確度方面，四組中只有活動前及活動時構思一組略有助益。由此推論學生首先利用構思時間構思口語表達之內容，語言正確度則需在學生認知處理時間及能力許可時，方能兼顧。此外，本研究發現口語活動困難度、學生語言能力及口語習慣均影響了構思時間對語言表達複雜度及正確度所造成的影響。
    Previous research on the impact of planning on L2 learners’ oral production has lent general support to the claim that pre-task planning facilitates the fluency and complexity aspects of oral production. However, due to lack of consistency in methodology, there has not been a conclusive result of the effects of planning. Besides, mixed results have been found for language accuracy. It remains uncertain whether pre-task planning or on-line planning enhances accuracy.
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of both pre-task planning and on-line planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy aspects of oral production. In this study, 40 participants were asked to narrate a picture story and were divided into groups under four conditions: (1) no-planning, (2) pre-task planning, (3) on-line planning, and (4) pre-task planning plus on-line planning. The results showed that pre-task planning improved fluency while on-line planning impeded fluency. Pre-task planning showed a tendency to facilitate complexity while on-line planning did not. It was also found that neither pre-task planning nor on-line planning evidently contributed to accurate language use. This finding contradicts with previous research which claimed that accuracy was more dependent on on-line planning. It appears that during on-line planning time, participants’ first priority remains the propositional content of the oral production.
    Most of the results in this study fail to reach statistical significance. It may be due to the task difficulty and participants’ proficiency level. The impacts of these two variables on the results of planning studies are in need of more future research.
    參考文獻: Anderson, J. R. (1995). Learning and memory. New York: John Wiley.
    Baddeley, A., and Hitch, G.. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The
    Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47-90. New York: Acdemic
    Press.
    Baddeley, A., and Loggie, R. (1999). The multiple component model. In A. Miyake
    and P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory (pp.28-61). New York:
    Cambridge University Press.
    Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. White Plains,
    NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
    Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second
    Language Learning Acquisition, 11, 367-383.
    Danielewicz, J.M. (1984). The interaction between text and context: A study of how
    adults and children use spoken and written language in four contexts. In A.D.
    Pellergrini & T.D. Yawkey (Eds.), The development of oral and written
    language in social contexts (pp. 243-260). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford
    University Press.
    Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style in the use of
    the past tense. Studies in Second Language Learning Acquisition, 9, 12-20.
    Foss, D. J., and Hakes, D. T. (1978). Psycholinguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
    Prentice-Hall.
    Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second
    language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-323.
    Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., and Wigglesworth, G.. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A
    unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21, 354-375.
    Hale, G. (1989). Confirmatory factor analysis of the test of English as a foreign language. TOEFL Research Reports 32.
    Hulstijn, J., & Hulstijn, W. (1984). Grammatical errors as a function of processing
    constraints and explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 34, 23-43.
    Hunt, K. (1966). Recent measures in syntactic development. Elementary English, 43, 732-739.
    Levelt, W. J. M., (1989). Speaking: from intension to articulation. Cambridge,
    MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
    Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second
    language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 52-83.
    Ochs, E. (1979). Planned and unplanned discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and
    semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and semantics (pp. 51-80). New York: Academic
    Press.
    O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., and Russo, R.
    (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second
    language. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 557-584.
    Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in
    Second Language Acquisition, 21, 108-148.
    Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied
    Linguistics, 11, 17-46.
    Schmidt, R., & Forta, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in second
    Language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. R. Day (Ed.),
    Talking to Learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-322).
    Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    Skehan, P. (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction.
    In J. Willis and D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 17-30). Oxford: Heinemann.
    Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford
    University Press.
    Skehan, P., and Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing
    conditions on narrative retelling. Language learning, 49:1, 93-120.
    Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics,
    4, 143-163.
    Van Patten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in
    consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
    Wigglesworth, G. (1997). An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on
    oral test discourse. Language Testing,14, 85-106.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
    93951004
    95
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093951004
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    95100401.pdf61KbAdobe PDF2796检视/开启
    95100402.pdf12KbAdobe PDF21102检视/开启
    95100403.pdf61KbAdobe PDF2817检视/开启
    95100404.pdf13KbAdobe PDF2705检视/开启
    95100405.pdf22KbAdobe PDF25569检视/开启
    95100406.pdf41KbAdobe PDF21576检视/开启
    95100407.pdf33KbAdobe PDF2898检视/开启
    95100408.pdf24KbAdobe PDF2867检视/开启
    95100409.pdf56KbAdobe PDF2827检视/开启
    95100410.pdf57KbAdobe PDF2940检视/开启
    95100411.pdf17KbAdobe PDF22599检视/开启
    95100412.pdf126KbAdobe PDF21080检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈