Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33428
|
| Title: | 放聲思考法在國中生英文閱讀上字彙推論的效益 |
| Authors: | 楊純妹
Yang, Chun-mei |
| Contributors: | 林啟一
Lin, Chi-yee
楊純妹
Yang, Chun-mei |
| Keywords: | 放聲思考
字彙推論
英文閱讀
Thinking Aloud
Lexical Inferencing
English Reading Comprehension |
| Date: | 2004 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 16:34:09 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本文旨在探討台灣國中生在英語閱讀時, 運用「放聲思考配對練習法」結合「單字解讀策略」教學的成效及影響, 研究對象是依安置測驗所選出兩班具有高度同質性的國三學生, 隨機分派為一實驗組, 一控制組, 並依其安置測驗結果分為高、低兩組。 實驗組在老師教完單字解讀策略後, 由一高分組學生和一低分組學生隨機配對做為期八週的放聲思考閱讀訓練, 並且在訓練活動前後, 實驗組和控制組所有的學生皆施予單字解讀成就測驗, 閱讀理解成就測驗, 及英語閱讀學習態度量表, 實驗組更多加施予後設認知問卷及對此訓練活動的反應問卷, 同時在實驗組訓練過程中, 隨機抽取一組配對的學生將他們運用「放聲思考配對練習法」作答的過程錄音下來以便分析。
本研究結果顯示: (一)實驗組和控制組在單字解讀成就測驗有顯著差異。亦即, 運用「放聲思考配對練習法」結合「單字解讀策略」的教學有效地增進了學生字彙推測的成績表現, 對低程度的學生效果尤其明顯。(二)在四種單字解讀策略中, 「放聲思考配對練習法」最能增進學生在「往前線索策略」和「背景知識線索策略」的成績表現, 對不同程度的學生而言, 低程度學生的「往前線索策略」成績進步最多。(三)實驗組和控制組在閱讀理解成就測驗並沒有顯著差異。亦即, 此一訓練活動並不能改進學生在閱讀理解的成績表現。(四)實驗組和控制組的英語閱讀學習態度量表有顯著差異。即運用「放聲思考配對練習法」結合「單字解讀策略」的教學有效地增進了學生對英語閱讀的學習態度, 尤其對高程度的學生效果尤其明顯。在四種分項學習態度中, 學生的「免除對英語閱讀的恐懼」學習態度進步最多。(五)在後設認知方面, 實驗組的學生在接受此一閱讀訓練活動後, 對自己在文章大意、文章相關知識及猜字技巧的閱讀困難上有顯著的認知, 並且也認定猜字技巧是有效的英語閱讀策略。(六)從反應問卷中顯示, 接受此一閱讀訓練活動後, 大部分的學生認為運用「放聲思考配對練習法」結合「單字解讀策略」的教學對他們的字彙推測技巧是有幫助的, 且其幫助大於單獨運用「放聲思考配對練習法」或單獨運用「單字解讀策略」, 並且認為此一閱讀訓練活動有助於對自己和對他人閱讀過程的了解。但大多數的學生對運用此一閱讀訓練活動於未來英語課程中仍採保留態度。
根據上述的結果, 本研究建議國中英語教師可以運用「放聲思考配對練習法」結合「單字解讀策略」的教學來增進學生在英語閱讀時字彙推測的技巧和對英語閱讀的學習態度, 以及加強他們對自我閱讀過程的認知。同時, 為了能讓「放聲思考配對練習法」在學生身上發揮最大的學習效果, 教師應考慮學生在語言學習上的個別差異現象以及此一合作學習法時間掌握的問題, 以避免學生心理上的排斥作用和學習上的反效果。
This thesis explores EFL lexical inferencing abilities and reading behaviors of junior high school students in Taiwan. Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) and instruction of Word-solving Strategies were integrated to see whether they had effects on students’ lexical inferencing abilities, reading comprehension, learning attitude toward and metacognitive awareness of English reading. Two third-grade junior high school classes were selected as one experimental group and one control group, both with high-and low-proficiency levels.
Results were found from the statistical analysis of the experiment. First, TAPPS training in word-solving strategies proved quite beneficial in enhancing students’ lexical inferencing abilities, and the low-proficiency students benefited more than the high-proficiency students. Second, TAPPS training in word-solving strategies indeed facilitated students’ use of forward cues and background knowledge cues, and the low-proficiency students improved most in their use of forward cues. Third, TAPPS training in word-solving strategies did not benefit students in their general reading comprehension. Fourth, TAPPS training in word-solving strategies successfully helped the students change their learning attitude toward English reading, especially the high-proficiency students. As to the different learning attitudes, students’ learning attitude of “The freedom from fear of English reading” changed most. Fifth, after receiving this training activity, the students’ metacognitive awareness of English reading was significantly higher. Sixth, the response questionnaire revealed that most of the students considered TAPPS training in word-solving strategies helpful and gave positive responses to this training activity. However, most of the students were conservative about recommending this training activity to future English classes.
These aforementioned findings in this study suggested that junior high school English teachers could adopt TAPPS training in word-solving strategies to enhance students’ lexical inferencing abilities, change their learning attitude and reinforce their metacognitive awareness of English reading. However, it should be cautioned here that when teachers try to implement TAPPS training in English reading comprehension, they should consider students’ personal difference in language learning and the disruptive and time-consuming drawback of TAPPS to avoid students’ potential rejection and failure of the whole training activity. |
| Reference: | Afflerbach, P., & Johnston, P. (1984). Research methodology: On the use of verbal reports in reading research. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 307-322.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.). Handbook of reading research (pp. 252-295). New York: Longman.
Anderson, N. J., & Vandergrift, L. (1996). Increasing metacognitive awareness in the L2 classroom by using think-aloud protocols and other report formats. In R. L. Oxford (Ed). Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 3-18). National Foreign Language Resource Center. Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.
Artley, A. S. (1943). Teaching word meaning through context. Elementary English Review, 20, 68-74.
Baker, L. and Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognition skills in reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.). Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
Baumann, J. F. Jones, L. A., & Seifert-Kessell, N. (1993). Using thinking alouds to enhance children’s comprehension monitoring abilities. The Reading Teacher, 47 (3), 184-193.
Bereiter, C., & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2 (2), 131-156.
Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 463-493.
Block, E. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26 (2), 319-343.
Bright, J. A., & McGregor, G. P. (1970). Teaching English as a second language. London: Longman.
Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22 (1), 1-14.
Olshavsky, J. (1977). Reading as problem-solving: An investigation of strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 12, 654-657.
Olson, G. M., Duffy, S. A., & Mac, R. L. (1984). Thinking-out-loud as a method for studying real-time comprehension processes. In D. Kieras, & M. Just (Eds.). New methods in the study of immediate processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
Paribakht, S., & Wesche, M. (1999). “Incidental” vocabulary acquisition through reading: An introspective study. In M. Wesche, & S. Paribakht (Eds.). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Special Issues on “Incidental L2 Vocabulary Acquisition”: Theory, Current Research and Instructional Implications, 21 (2).
Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 7, 1239-1252.
Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.). Handbook of reading research (pp. 815-860). New York: Longman.
Pestel, B. C. (1993). Teaching problem solving without modeling through thinking aloud pair problem solving. Science Education, 77 (1), 83-94.
Phillips, J. K. (1984). Practical implications of recent research in reading. Foreign Language Annals, 17 (4), 309-312.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pressley, M., & Woloshyn, V. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Carrell, P. L. (1984). The effects of rhetorical organization on ESL readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 441-469.
Raphael, T. E. (1981). The effect of metacognitive awareness training on students’ question answering strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Illinois.
Robinson, R., & Good, T. L. (1987). Becoming an effective reading teacher. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
Roehler, L. R., & Duffy, G. G. (1984). Direct explanation of comprehension processes. In G. G. Duffy, L. R. Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.). Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 265-280). New York: Longman.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Berewer (Eds.). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Samels, S. J., & Kamil, M. L. (1988). Models of the reading process. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.). Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 22-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1985). Verbalization of comprehension strategies: Effects on children’s achievement outcomes. Human Learning, 4 (1), 1-10.
Silven, M., & Vaurus, M. (1992). Improving reading through thinking aloud. Learning and Instruction, 2, 69-88. Finland: University of Turku.
Smith, F. (1973). Psycholinguistics and reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Smith, F. (1996). Cooperative learning: Making groupwork work. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 67, 71-83.
Sprenger, A. (1975). The reading myth. Fu Jen Studies, 8, 77-92.
Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 727-752.
Sullivan, T. (1978). Comparing strategies of good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Reading, 21, 710-715.
Thorndike, E. L. (1917). Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 323-332.
Thurmond, V. B. (1986). Analytical reading: A course that stresses thinking aloud. Journal of Reading, 2, 729-732.
Tsao, F. F. (1991). Demerits of remedies for the current teaching on English reading. Proceedings of the English conference teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp. 291-304). Taipei: The Crane Publisher.
Twaddell, W. F. (1972). Linguistics and language teachers. In K. Croft (Ed.). Reading on English as a second language. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Thought and language. Papers presented to the annual conference of the Royal Institute of Philosophy, University of Reading.
Waern, Y. (1980). Thinking aloud during reading: A descriptive model and its application. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 123-132.
Wang, C. W. (1994). A study of NKNU majors’ ability to guess word meaning from context and its relationship to reading proficiency. Master thesis, NKNU.
Carrell, P. L. (1988). Some causes of text-boundness and schema-interference in ESL reading. In P. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.). Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 101-113). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Walker, L. J. A. (1981). Word-identification strategies of Spanish-speaking college students in reading English as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin.
Wei, C. L. (1997). Collaboration in English classroom: An investigation of DELL learners’ perceptions of jigsaw cooperative learning technique in freshman English classes. Proceedings of the fourteenth conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp. 223-238). Taipei: The Crane Publisher.
Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy: Planning and implementing learner training for language learners. New York: Prentice Hall.
Whimbey, A. (1975). Intelligence can be taught. New York: Dutton.
Whimbey, A. (1984). The key to higher order thinking is precise processing. Educational Learnership, 42 (1), 61-70.
Wilhelm, J. D. (2001). Improving comprehension with think-aloud strategies. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Wu, Y. J. (1997). A comparison of English reading miscues between junior and senior high school students. Master thesis, NKNU.
Yang, P. Y. (1997). Exploring Chinese students’ lexical inferencing behavior in English reading. Master thesis, Providence University.
Yorio, C. A. (1971). Some sources of reading problems for foreign language learners. Language Learning, 21, 107-115.
Young, D. J. (1993). Processing strategies of foreign language readers: Authentic and edited input. Foreign Language Annals-Winter 1993, 26 (4), 451-468.
Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1988). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.). Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 73-92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 73, 121-134.
Carton, A. (1971). Inferencing: A process in using and learning language. In P. Pimsleur, & T. Quinn (Eds.). The psychology of second language learning (pp. 45-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Casanave, C. P. (1998). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 73, 121-134.
Chamot, A. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. White plains, NY: Longman.
Chang, M. H. (1994). The role of context in vocabulary comprehension in reading. In S. Y. Huang, & C. L. Chern (Eds.). Papers from the twelfth conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China. Taipei: The Crane Publisher.
Chang, W. C. (1996). Introduction of the new English textbook. Paper presented at the meeting of the new textbook for junior high school, Pingtung, Taiwan.
Chen, L. T. (2003). Improving high school students’ performance on discourse structure tests through instruction of text structure and think-aloud modeling. Master thesis, NTNU.
Chern, C. L. (1986). Can reading be a guessing game for Chinese ESL students.
Papers from the third conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp. 295-303). Taipei: The Crane Publisher.
Chern, C. L., & Chi, F. M. (1988). The exploration on English reading teaching and learning in senior high. Papers from the sixth conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp. 95-109). Taipei: The Crane Publisher.
Chern, C. L. (1993). Chinese students’ word-solving strategies in reading in English. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.). Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 67-85). New Jersey: Alex Publishing.
Chern, C. L. (1993). Think-aloud: An ESL reading instructional tool. Tunghai Journal, 34, 179-198.
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self explanations. Cognitive Science, 18 (3), 439-477.
Chi, F. M. (1997). Investigating and comparing the reading processes between good and poor senior high school readers. Proceedings of the fourteenth conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp. 19-33). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
Clarke, M. A. (1979). Reading in Spanish and English: Evidence from adult ESL students. Language Learning, 29, 121-147.
Clarke, D. F. (1989). Materials adaptation: Why leave it all to the teacher. ELT Journal, 43 (2), 133-141.
Coady, J. (1979). A psycholinguistic model of the ESL reader. In R. Mackay, B. Barkman, & R. R. Jordan (Eds.). Reading in a second language (pp. 5-12). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
Cohen, A., Glasman, A., Rosenhaum-Cohem, P. R., Ferara, J., & Fine, J. (1979). Reading English for specialized purposes: Discourse analysis and the use of students’ informants. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 551-564.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Larkin, K. M. (1980). Inference in text understanding. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (pp. 385-407). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Collins, A., & Smith, E. E. (1982). Teaching the process of reading comprehension. In D. K. Detterman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). How and how much can intelligence be increased (pp. 173-185). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Cotharp, H. S. K. (1990). The effect on metacognitive strategies upon mathematical problem-solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Missouri.
Cziko, G. A. (1980). Language competence and reading strategies: A comparison of first and second language oral reading errors. Language Learning, 30, 101-116.
Davey, B. (1983). Thinking aloud: Modeling the cognitive processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Reading, 27, 44-47.
Devine, J. (1984). ESL reader’s internalized models of the reading process. In J. Handscombe, R. Orem, & B. Taylor (Eds.). On TESOL ’83 (pp. 95-108). Washington, DC: TESOL.
Devine, J. (1987). General language competence and adult second language reading. In J. Devine, P. L. Carrell, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.). Research on reading English as a second language. Washington, DC: TESOL.
Dowhower, S. (1999). Supporting a strategic stance in the classroom: A comprehension framework for helping students to be strategic. The Reading Teacher, 52 (7), 672-689.
Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Hermann, B. A. (1988). Modeling mental processes helps poor become strategic readers. The Reading Teacher, 41, 762-767.
Durkin, D. (1989). Teaching them to read. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1983)
Eskey, D. K. (1970). A new technique of the teaching of reading to advanced students. TESOL Quarterly, 4, 315-321.
Field, M. L. (1985). A psycholinguistic model of the Chinese ESL reader. In P. Larson, E. L. Judd, & D. S. Messerschmitt (Eds.). On TESOL ’84 (pp. 171-182). Washington, DC: TESOL.
Finocchiaro, M. (1989). English as a second/foreign language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.). Children’s oral communication skills (pp. 35-60). New York: Academic Press.
Floyd, P., & Carrell, P. (1987). Effects on ESL reading of teaching cultural content schemata. Language Learning, 37, 89-108.
Freedle, R. O., & Duran, R. P. (1987). Cognitive and linguistic analyses of test performance. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Co.
Garner, R., & Alexander, P. A. (1989). Metacognition: Answered and unanswered questions. Education Psychologist, 24 (2), 143-158.
Golinkoff, R. (1976). The development of a classification scheme of contextual aids. Reading Research Quarterly, 11, 623-659.
Goodman, K. S. (1970). Reading: A pshcholinguistic guessing game. In H. Singer, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.). Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 259-271). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Goodman, K. S., & Burke, C. L. (1987). Reading miscue inventory: Alternative procedure. New York: Richard C. Owen Publishers, Inc.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current development in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 375-406.
Haastrup, K. (1990). Developing learners’ procedural knowledge in comprehension. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, S. M. Sharwood, & M. Swain (Eds.). Foreign/second language pedagogy research (pp. 120-133). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Hafner, L. E. (1967). Using context to determine meanings in high school and college. Journal of Reading, 10, 491-498.
Haynes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg, & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.). Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hilldale, HJ: Erlbaum.
Haynes, J. R. (1981). The complete problem solver. Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press.
Haynes, M. (1984). Patterns and Perils of guessing in second language reading. In J. Handscombe, R. A. Orem, & B. P. Taylor (Eds.). On TESOL ’83. Washington, DC: TESOL.
Haynes, M., Huckin, T. N., & Coady, J. (1993). Second language reading and vocabulary learning. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Co.
Helfeldt, J. P., & Henk, W. A. (1990). Reciprocal question-answer relationships: An instructional technique for at-risk readers. Journal of Reading, 34, 509-514.
Honeyfield, J. (1977). Word frenquency and the importance of context in vocabulary learning. RELC Journal, 8 (2), 35-42.
Hosenfeld, C. (1977). A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and nonsuccessful second language learners. System, 5 (2), 110-123.
Hosenfeld, C., Arnold, V., & Wilson, L. (1981). Second language reading: A curricular sequence for teaching reading strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 14, 415-422.
House, E. R., Mathison, S., & McTaggart, R. (1989). Validity and teacher inference. Educational Researcher, 18 (7), 11-15.
Hsu, M. L. (2002). The effect of pair thinking aloud procedures on Taiwanese senior high school students’ EFL reading comprehension and metacognition awareness. Master thesis, NTNU.
Hudson, T. (1982). The effects of induced schemata on the “short-circuit” in L2 reading: Non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32, 1-31.
Hughes, G., & Chinn, C. (1986). Building reading vocabulary through inference: A better classification of context clues. Eric Reproductive Service. ED 267 634.
Irwin, J. W. (1991). Teaching reading comprehension processes (2ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Joe, S. G. (1996). Metacognitive awareness, reading strategies, and English teaching in the institutes of technology. In C. Y. Cheng, & D. A. Ho (Eds.). Proceedings of Monographic Studies in Linguistics, 6, 1-20. Taipei: Adademic Sinica and National Science Council.
Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of text. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 169-181.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991a). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC High Education Report N0. 4. Washing, DC: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991b). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Kern, R. G. (1989). Second language reading strategy instruction: Its effects on comprehension and word inference ability. Modern Language Journal, 73, 135-147.
Kruse, A. F. (1979). Vocabulary in context. English Language Teaching Journal, 33 (3), 207-213.
Lee, J. F. (1986). Background knowledge and L2 reading. Modern Language Journal, 71, 50-57.
Levine, A., & Reves, T. (1990). Does the method of vocabulary presentation make a difference. TESL Canada Journal, 8, 37-51.
Liaw, M. L. (1995, January). The use of think-aloud procedure for EFL instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the teachers of English to speakers of other languages, Long Beach, CA.
Lin, S. C. (1991). Strategies for developing English reading comprehension skills at college level. Taipei: The Crane Publisher.
Lochhead, J., & Whimbey, A. (1987a). Problem solving and comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
Lochhead, J., & Whimbey, A. (1987b). Teaching analytical reasoning through thinking aloud pair problem solving. New Direction for Teaching and Learning, 30, 73-93.
Loxterman, J. A., Beck, I. J., & McKeown, M. G. (1994). The effects of thinking aloud during reading on students’ comprehension of more or less coherent text. Reading Research Quarterly, 29 (4), 353-368.
Lynch, B. K., & Hudson, T. (1991). EST Reading. In Marianne Celce-Murcia (Ed.). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (p.216-232). Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
Maarten, W. S., Yvonne, F. B., & Jacobijn, A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modeling cognitive processes. San Diego: Academic press.
Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don’t understand: Elementary school children’s awareness of inconsistencies. Children Development, SO (3), 643-655.
Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York: W. H. Freeman.
McCombs, B. L. (1987). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J. Eimwerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 51-82). New York: Springer-Verlag.
McCullough, C. (1958). Context aids in reading. The Reading Teacher, 11, 225-229.
Meichenbaum, D., & Asarnow, J. (1979). Cognitive-behavioral modification and metacognitive development: Implications for the classroom. In P. C. Kendall, & S. D. Hollon (Eds.). Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Theory, research, and procedures (pp. 11-35). New York: Academic Press.
Meichenbaum, D. (1985). Teaching thinking: A cognitive-behavioral perspective. In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.). Thinking and learning skills: Research and open questions (pp. 407-426). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mikulecky, B. S. (1990). A short course in teaching reading skills. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Miller, G. E. (1985). The effects of general and specific self-instruction training on children’s comprehension monitoring performances during reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20 (5), 616-628.
Morrison, L. (1996). Talking about words: A study of French as a second language learners’ lexical inferencing procedures. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53 (1), 41-66.
Myers, M., & Paris, S. G. (1978). Children’s metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of Reading, 35 (2), 132-138.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. NY: Harper & Row Publishers.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Nist, S. L., & Kirby, K. (1986). Teaching comprehension and study strategies through modeling and thinking aloud. Reading Research and Instruction, 25 (4), 254-264.
Nuttall, C. (1989). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. London: Heinemann International.
Oller, J. W., Jr. (1972). Assessing competence in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 6 (4), 313-323. |
| Description: | 國立政治大學
英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
91951001
93 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091951001 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [英國語文學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
