Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33408
|
| Title: | 國語閩南口音中的單元音化與擦音卸解
Monophthongization and Fricative Reconfiguration in the Taiwanese Accent of Mandarin |
| Authors: | 吳耿彰
Wu, Keng-Chang |
| Contributors: | 蕭宇超
Hsiao, E. Yuchau
吳耿彰
Wu, Keng-Chang |
| Keywords: | 國語
閩南語
口音
台灣國語
單元音化
擦音
卸解
語料庫
優選理論
音韻學
介音
方言變異
Mandarin, Chinese
Taiwanese, Southern Min
accent
Taiwanese Mandarin
monophthongization
fricative
reconfiguration
corpus
Optimality Theory
phonology
glide
dialectal variation |
| Date: | 2005 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 16:30:17 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本論文觀察台灣地區國語閩南口音，也就是俗稱的「台灣國語」中展現的單元音化以及擦音卸解現象，建立「台灣國語語料庫」作為本論文分析的基礎，並且從優選理論的觀點探討這些台灣國語音韻現象。
根據「台灣國語語料庫」的數據顯示，韻核後介音 /j/ 以及 /w/ 容易被語者刪除，韻核前介音 /j/ 以及 /w/ 則傾向被語者保留。輕擦音 /f/ 在台灣國語中常被卸解為 /hw/。
本文的分析認為，國語閩南口音是一種方言的變異，反映了閩南語以及國語的部份制約排序。當語者表現出明顯的閩南語口音時，反映出閩南語的部份制約排序；而語者的閩南語口音較不明顯時，則反映了國語的部份制約排序。
This thesis investigates monophthongization and fricative reconfiguration in the Taiwanese Accent of Mandarin (TM), and establishes the TM corpus as the base of phonological analysis. The Optimality Theory approach is adopted to account for the phonological phenomenon of TM.
As indicated by the TM corpus, the postnuclear glides /j/ and /w/ tend to be deleted in TM; the prenuclear glides /j/ and /w/ tend to be preserved in TM; and the fricative /f/ tend to reconfigurate as /hw/ in TM.
Our analysis considers that TM is a dialectal variation which reflects the subgrammars of Taiwanese and Mandarin. When the speaker shows a clear Taiwanese accent, the partially ordered ranking of Taiwanese is reflected; and when the speaker shows no obvious Taiwanese accent, the partially ordered ranking of Mandarin is reflected. |
| Reference: | Albright, Adam, Argelia Andrade & Bruce Hayes (2000). “Segmental environments of Spanish Diphthongization”. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics.
Anttila, Arto. (2000). “Derived environment effects in colloquial Helsinki Finnish.” ROA: 406.
Beckman, Jill. (1998). Positional faithfulness. Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Berg, M.E. van den. (2000). “Southern Min: Acquisition, proficiency, use and attitude formation in fujian and Taiwa.” In – (Ed.) Taiwan Yuyan ji qi Jiaoxue 2. [The languages of Taiwan & How to Teach them, vol. 2]
Boersma, Paul. (1998). Functional Phonology. Doctorial dissertation. University of Amsterdam.
Boersma, Paul & Bruce Hayes. (1999). “Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm.” ROA: 348.
Chao, Yuen Ren. (1930). “A system of tone letters.” Le Maître phonétique. 45:24-7.
Chen, Chin-Chuan. (1973). A synchronic phonology of Mandarin Chinese. Netherlands: Hague.
Chu, Chia-Ning. (2004). ShengYun Xue [Phonology]. Taipei: Wu-Nan Culture Enterprise.
Chung, Raung-fu. (1996). The segmental phonology of Southern Min in Taiwan. Taipei : the Crane Publishing co., Ltd.
Crowhurst, Megan & Mark Hewitt. (1997). “Boolean operations and constraint interactions in Optimality Theory.” Ms., University of North Carolina Chapel Hill & Brandeis University. ROA: 229.
Dell, François & Mohamed Elmedlaoui. (1985). “Syllabic consonants and syllabification in Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber.” Journal of African Languages and Linguistics. 7: 105-130.
Elliott, A. Raymond. (1995). “Field independence/dependence, hemispheric specialization, and attitude in relation to pronunciation accuracy in Spanish as a foreign language.” The Modern Language Journal. 79:356-371.
Flege, James. (1981). “The Phonological Basis of Foreign Accent: A Hypothesis.” TESOL Quartly. 15: 443-456.
Goldsmith, John. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT doctorial dissertation.
Hayes, Bruce. (1998). “Gradient well-formedness in Optimality Theory.” in J. Dekkers, F. Leeuw and J. Weijer, eds., Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition, Oxford University Press, pp. 88-120.
Itô, Junko & Armin Mester. (1998). “The phonological lexicon.” In Nat-suko Tsujimura (ed.), A Handbook of Japanese Linguistics. Oxford,Blackwell.
Kager, Rene. (1999). Optimality Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kenstowicz, Michael. (2001). “The role of perception in loanword phonology.” Linguistique Africaine. 20.
Kiparsky, Paul. (1993). “Variable rules.” Handout distributed at the Rutgers Optimality Workshop.
Krashen, Stephen. (1973). “Lateralization, language learning, and the critical period: Some new evidence.” Language Learning. 23:63-74.
Kubler, C. Cornelius. (1985). The development of Mandarin in Taiwan: a case study of language contact. Taiper: Taiwan Student Book Co., Ltd.
Leben, William. (1973). Suprasegmental phonology. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT doctorial dissertation.
Lenneberg, H. Eric. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
Lombardi, Linda. (2001). (ed.) Segmental phonology in Optimality Theory: Constraints and Representations. Cambridge University Press.
Łubowicz, Anna. (2005). “Locality of conjunction.” ROA: 764.
McCarthy, John. (1986). “OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination.” Linguistic Inquiry. 17:207-63.
McCarthy, John & Allen Prince. (1993a). Prosodic Morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction. ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA and Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
McCarthy, John & Allen Prince. (1993b). “Generalized Alignment.” In G.E. Booij & J. van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology, 1993. Dorderct: Kluwer. 79-153.
McCarthy, John & Allen Prince. (1994). “The emergence of unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology.” Proceedings of NELS. 24.
McCarthy, John & Allen Prince. (1995). “Faithfulness and reduplicative identity.” In J.N. Beckman, L.W. Dickey & S. Urbanczyk (eds.) University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers: Papers in Optimality Theory 18. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts. 249-384.
McCarthy, John & Allen Prince. (1999). “Faithfulness and identity in prosodic morphology.” In Rene Kagar, Harry van der Hulst & Wim Zonneveld (eds.) The prosody-morphology interface. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 218-209.
Moreton, Elliott and Paul Smolensky. 2002. “Typological Consequences of Local Constraint Conjunction.” WCCFL. 21. Cambridge, MA: Cascadilla Press. ROA: 525.
Morris, E. Richard. (1998). Stylistic Variation in Spanish Phonology. Doctorial dissertation. Ohio State University.
Ohala, John. (1990). “The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilation,” in John Kingston and Mary Beckman (eds.) Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 258-275
Paradis, Carole & Jean-François. Prunet. (2000). “Nasal vowels as two segments : evidence from Cantonese.” Language. 76: 324-57.
Prince, Allen & Paul Smolensky. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constrain Interaction in Generative Grammar. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science.
Reynolds, T. William. (1994). Variation and Optimality Theory. Doctorial dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.
Seliger, Herbert, Stephen Krashen & Peter Ladefoged. (1975). “Maturational constraints in the acquisition of second language accent.” Language Sciences. 36: 20-22.
Smolensky, Paul. (1993). “Harmony, Markedness, and Phonological Activity.” Handout of talk presented at RutgersOptimality Workshop-1, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. ROA: 87.
Smolensky, Paul. (1995). “On the Internal Structure of the Constraint Component of UG.” Colloquium presented at the University of California, Los Angeles. ROA: 86.
Steriade, Donca. (1987). “Locality conditions and feature geometry.” Proceedings of NELS. 17:595-618.
Steriade, Donca. (2000). “The phonology of perceptibility effects: the P-map and its consequences forconstraint organizations.” ms. UCLA.
Suter, Richard. (1976). “Predictors of pronunciation accuracy in second language learning.” Language Learning. 26: 233-253.
Thompson, Irene. (1991). “Foreign accents revisited: the English pronunciation of Russian immigrants.” Language Learning. 41: 177-204.
Tsao, Feng-fu. (2000). “Taiwanized Japanese and Taiwan Mandarin—two case studies of language contact during the past hundred years in Taiwa.” Hanxue yanjiu [Chinese Studies]. 18: 273-297.
Tse, Kwock-Ping. (1986). “Standardisation of Chinese in Taiwanese.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 59: 25-32.
Tung, Chung-ssu. (1991). in Bohui Zhan (ed.) Xiandai Hanyu Fangyan [Contemporary Chinese Dialects]. Taipei: Xinxueshi Wenjiao Chuban Zhongxin.
Williams, Lee. (1980). “Phonetic variation as a function of second-language learning.” In G. Yeni-Komshian, J. Kavanagh, and C. Ferguson (eds.), Child phonology. Volume 2: Perception. New York: Academic Press.
Wu, Keng-Chang. (2004). “On the Southern Min accent of Mandarin in Taiwan: An Optimality Theory Analysis.” Paper for ICSTLL-37. Lund University.
Wu, Keng-Chang & Yuchau E. Hsiao. (2005). “In Phonological Adaptation from the Perspective of Language Perception and Production.” Paper for the 9th International and 23rd National Conference on Chinese Phonology, Providence University.
Yin, Yuen-Mei. (1991). Some major issues in Mandarin tonal phonology. Taipei : the Crane Publishing co., Ltd.
Yuan, Jiahua. (1989). Hanyu fangyan gaiyao [Outline of Chinese Dialects], 2nd edn. Beijing: Wenzi Gaige Chubanshe.
Zuo, Yan. (2002). Classical Chinese verse grammar: Coexisting sub-grammars and formal grounding. Doctorial dissertation. Tilburg University, The Netherlands. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
92555018
94 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0925550181 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [語言學研究所] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
