English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51726996      Online Users : 592
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33402


    Title: 漢語親子對話中打斷現象之研究
    A Study of Interruption Behavior in Mandarin Mother-child Conversation
    Authors: 呂佩君
    Contributors: 黃瓊之
    呂佩君
    Keywords: 語言習得
    母子互動
    打斷
    language acquisition
    mother-child interaction
    interruption
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 16:29:15 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究的目的為瞭解母子對話中的打斷現象,分析的語料來自於兩對以漢語為母語的母子對話,兩位小孩皆為三歲。首先,為瞭解母親與小孩打斷句之本質,我們採用Goldberg (1990:891)的分類來做判斷,結果顯示兩者在對談中皆大多使用rapport-oriented interruptions,代表在母子對話中,兩方傾向在打斷句中表達對對方話語的興趣與投入,並且藉由著打斷一同建立談話主題。再者,小孩的打斷句更進一步的用Dunn and Shatz’s (1989)的研究方法來分析其與對話言談的語意關連,結果發現小孩的打斷句多數都包含了與之前相關並且新的訊息,而這類的打斷句是最有可能得到母親的注意並且回應。
    The purpose of this study is to investigate the nature and function of mother-to-child and child-to-mother interruptions in conversation. The data analyzed are natural conversations from two Mandarin-speaking mother-child dyads. The children are about three years old. Goldberg’s (1990:891) categorization of interruptions is adopted to examine the nature of the mothers’ and children’s interruptions. The results show that both the mothers and the children use more rapport-oriented interruptions than other types of interruptions, which indicates that in mother-child interaction, both parties tend to use interruptions to signal their involvement and interest and to construct a shared topic cooperatively. In addition, the children’s interruptions are further examined based on Dunn and Shatz’s (1989) framework in order to investigate the semantic relations between the children’s interruptions and the conversational discourse. The findings show that most of the children’s interruptions contain relevant new information. Such interruptions are likely to succeed in getting the attention and response from the mothers.
    Reference: Beattie, G. W. (1981). Interruptions in conversational interaction, and its relation to the sex and status of the interactants. Linguistics, 19, 15-35.
    Bedrosian, Jan L. (1985). An approach to developing conversational competence. In D. N. Ripich & F. M. Spinelli (Eds.), School discourse problems (pp.231-255). San Diego: College-Hill Press.
    Bennett, A. (1981). Interruptions and the interpretation of conversation. Discourse Processes, 4:2.171-199.
    Bilous, R., & Krauss, M. (1988). Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behavior of same- and mixed-gender dyads. Language and Communication, 8, 183-194.
    Bonvillain, N. (2003). The acquisition of communicative competence. Language, Culture, and Communication: The meaning of messages (pp. 272-279). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Bresnahan, M., & Cai, D. (1996). Gender and aggression in the recognition of interruption. Discourse Processes, 21, 171-198.
    Brooks, V. (1982). Sex differences in student dominance behaviours in female and male professors’ classrooms. Sex Roles, 8, 683-690.
    Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. Walton Street, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Camaioni, L. (1979) Child-adult and child-child conversation: An Interactional Approach. In E. Ochs & B.B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental Pragmatics. New York: Academic press.
    Coates, J. (1989). Gossip revisited: Language in all-female group. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.), Women in their speech community (pp. 94-122). New York: Longman.
    Cook-Gumperz, J. (1977). Situated instructions: Language socialization of school age children. In S. Ervin-Tripp & C. Mitchell-Kernan (Eds.), Child Discourse (pp. 103-121). New-York: Academic Press.
    Coon, A., & Schwanenflugel, P. (1996). Evaluation of interruption behavior by naïve encoders. Discourse Processes, 22, 1-24.
    Dindia, Kathryn. (1987). The effects of sex of student and sex of partner on interruptions. Human Communication Research, 13, 345-371.
    Drass, Kriss A. (1986). The effect of gender identity on conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49,294-301.
    Drummond, Kent (1989). A backward glance at interruptions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 150-166.
    Dunn, J., & Shatz, M. (1989). Becoming a conversationalist despite (or because of) having an older sibling. Child Development, 60, 399-410.
    Ervin-Tripp, S. (1979). Children’s verbal turn-taking. In E. Ochs & B.B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental Pragmatics (pp. 391-414). New York: Academic Press.
    Esposito, A. (1979). Sex differences in children’s conversation. Language and Speech, 22, 213-220.
    Feldstein, S., & Welkowitz, J. (1987). A chronography of conversation: In defense of an objective approach. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Nonverbal Behavior and Communication (2nd ed., pp. 435-499). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Ferguson, N. (1977). Simultaneous speech, interruptions and dominance. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 295-302.
    Gleason, J. B., & Greif, E. B. (1983). Men’s speech to young children. In Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae, & Nancy Henley (Eds), Language, gender and society (pp. 140-150). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    Gleason, J. B. (1987). Sex difference in parent-child interaction. In S. Philip, S. Steele, & C. Tanz (Eds.), In language, Gender and Sex in Comparative Perspective (pp. 189-199). New York: Cambridge University.
    Goldberg, J. (1990) Interrupting the discourse on interruptions. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 883-903.
    Greenwood, A. (1989). Discourse variation and social comfort: A study of topic initiation and interruption patterns in the dinner conversation of preadolescent children. Ph.D. diss. City University of New York.
    Heath, S. (1982). What no bedtime story means. Language in Society, 11, 49-77.
    Hus, Joseph H. (2000). A study of the acquisition of communicative competence: Social appropriateness in interactional speech. National Science Council project report.
    Huang, Chiung-chih. (2004). Conversational contingency and topic management in Mandarin child language. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, Monograph Series No. 1.
    Hung, Brooke, M., & Dunne M. (1995). Interruption and influence in discussion groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14:4, 369-381.
    Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communication competence. In J.B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). Penguin.
    James, D., & Clarke, S. (1993). Women, men and interruptions: A critical review. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction (pp. 231-280). New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Jefferson, G.. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9, 47-96.
    Johnstone, B., Freedle, Roy O. & Kirk, A. (1994). Repetition in discourse: A dialogue. Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives. 47 & 48. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Kennedy, W., & Camden, C. (1983). A new look at interruptions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 45-58.
    McTear, M. (1985). Conversational processes: turn-taking and repairs. Children’s Conversation (pp. 159-200). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Murray, Stephen O. (1985). Toward a model of member’s method for recognizing interruptions. Language in Society, 13, 31-41.
    Murray, S., & Covelli, L. H. (1988). Women and men speaking at the same time. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 103-111.
    Ninio, A., & Snow, C. E. (1996). Children as conversationalist. Pragmatic Development (pp. 143-170). Boulder, Colorado: Westview.
    Nohara, M. (1992). Sex differences in interruption: An experimental reevaluation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21:2, 127-146.
    Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1984). Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories and their implications. In R. Shweder & R. Levine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays in mind, self and emotion (pp. 276-320). New-York: Cambridge University Press.
    Octigan, M., & Niederman, S. (1975). Male dominance in conversation. Frontiers, 4, 50-54.
    Piaget, J. (1926). The language and thought of the child. New York: Harcourt Brace.
    Roger, B. & Nesshoever, W. (1987). Individual differences in dyadic conversational strategies: A further study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 247-255.
    Roger, D. B., & Schumacher, A. (1983). Effects of individual differences in dyadic conversational strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 700-705.
    Rosenblum, K. E. (1986). Revelatory or purposive? Making sense of a ‘female register’. Semiotica, 59, 157-170.
    Sacks, Harvey, et al. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
    Smith-Lovin, L., & Brody, C. (1989). Interruption in group discussion: the effects of gender and group composition. American Sociology Review, 54, 424-453.
    Tannen, D (1983). When is an overlap not an interruption? One component of conversational style. In Robert J. DiPietro, William Frawley & Alfred Wedel (Eds.) The First Delaware Symposium on Language Studies (pp. 119-129). Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.
    Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voice: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    West, C., & Zimmerman, Don H. (1977). Women’s place in everyday talk: Reflection on parent-child interaction. Social Problems, 24, 521-528.
    West, C., & Zimmerman, Don H. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae, & Nancy Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 102-117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    Wiens, A. N., Thompson, S. M., Matarazzo, J. D., Matarazzo, R. G., & Saslow, G. (1965). Interview interaction behavior of supervisors, head nurses, and staff nurses. Nursing Research, 14, 322-329.
    Wu, Hsiu Chin. (2002). A Development Study of Chinese Children’s Conversational Overlapping. MA thesis: Fu Jen Catholic University.
    Zimmerman, D.H., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105-129). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    92555005
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0925550051
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    55005101.pdf59KbAdobe PDF2785View/Open
    55005102.pdf41KbAdobe PDF21217View/Open
    55005103.pdf17KbAdobe PDF2841View/Open
    55005104.pdf15KbAdobe PDF2700View/Open
    55005105.pdf15KbAdobe PDF2654View/Open
    55005106.pdf55KbAdobe PDF2751View/Open
    55005107.pdf16KbAdobe PDF2719View/Open
    55005108.pdf22KbAdobe PDF2906View/Open
    55005109.pdf55KbAdobe PDF26464View/Open
    55005110.pdf29KbAdobe PDF2824View/Open
    55005111.pdf165KbAdobe PDF2957View/Open
    55005112.pdf27KbAdobe PDF2896View/Open
    55005113.pdf16KbAdobe PDF2917View/Open
    55005114.pdf30KbAdobe PDF22462View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback